Re: Why does a river need its own TLD?
(it's in North Carolina, might not be important enough for its own TLD, but with a name like that...)
3689 posts • joined 20 Dec 2009
"Can you name a single porn site in .sex"
I would be disappointed if great.sex didn't exist.
"Can you name a single furniture store in .homefurnishings"
Jesus, what a mouthful. Given a choice between that and something like dfs.co.uk, I know which I'd rather type.
Perhaps I ought to see if I can register the .goddamndifficultandoverlylong TLD?
Not only does this not make sense with the article (as mentioned above), but if we take it on face value - do those three countries really have the most, or do they have people more willing to make a complaint because they know their regulator is more likely to actually do something?
I'm a Brit living and working in France. The locals (and even the beaurocrats) have made me feel a lot more welcome than the government and people of my country of origin.
Post referendum, the overwhelming sentiment from many Brits (both online and in person) has been a mixture of "bugger off, it has nothing to do with you" (oh really?) and "don't worry, nothing will change" (delusional!).
Over here? Sympathy, offers to help if I need complicated stuff translated, and the French government has created a site explaining the residency card process in English.
I can read/speak French, but appreciate that they at least appear to give a shit, which is a lot more than I can say for anybody in Westminster.
"Like I said, do we REALLY need this?"
Yes. Not because it is any good but because it is cheap and powerful and the vast majority simply don't care.
Want an example? Look what happened to TalkTalk and they still have NEW subscribers.
A few geeky types saying "hell no" won't change anything any more than those of us using NoScript (etc).
That's *before* we get to the whole "we're not on the web, you need a special program" hurdle.
That ship has already sailed, look how many popular sites want you to install their app, and notice that some of them are breaking their sites to make simple things difficult because they really REALLY want you to install the app.
"superiority which is critical in any major conflict"
I think as time goes by, the conflicts between countries will be less and less (one doesn't pick a fight with a heavily militarised nuclear power and expect to win) and instead will be conflicts of ideology.
What good is a missile and an aircraft carrier when you're fighting thoughts, propaganda, and brainwashing rather than actual countries?
"the media as "the enemy" and has stymied FOI requests from journalists"
You mean, just like that lot down south?
(and quite a few more)
"but I've seen nothing that indicates any change to the device"
Except the article itself, which says: In some other cases, such as with Android devices, it tries to temporarily root the handset.
If they try that with some of the later Samsung models, they'd better be prepared to pay for a replacement. Rooting the device will trip KNOX which will blow an efuse to indicate that the device can no longer be considered "secure". It's hardware. It's permanent. Unrooting doesn't restore things.
So, yes, there is a very real risk of changes to the device, and as the better phones take security more seriously, more devious methods will need to be used to try to get in. But deviousness has consequences.
I don't think Google is in any position to comment on this sort of thing.
Have you tried Google Docs? The web version is astonishing, like a proper mini word processor running in the browser. You can define styles, set up character sequences to be replaced with others (like (c) becoming ©), and you can sort out headers and footers with sections for per-chapter content, blah blah blah.
The native app, that you would expect to blow the browser version out of the water...is decidedly inferior. Indeed it took numerous updates over last summer to fix the problem where copy-pasting content with a section break would crash it!
So, what was this about browser vs native app?
"if you're GOOD at it, your financial reward should be HUGE"
Small correction: if you're GOOD at it, your boss's financial reward will be HUGE
People at the top make money off the labour of people at the bottom. Topical case in point Jeff Bezos has ooooodles of cash. And the
robot person working in the fulfillment centre that helps make the entire operation work...she gets paid what?
Yeah, YOU can assert whatever weird terms you like in a licence (some of mine require the user to be nice to kittens, but nobody has ever said anything, likely because nobody reads that stuff), because one can take it or leave it (or get it legally smacked down for reaching into contexts that are irrelevant to that which is being licenced).
A bona fide "open source" licence should not. It should concern itself with exactly that which is necessary for the use of the software and/or source and no more.
Don't get me wrong, it's a good idea to fight back against the stupidity of the anti vaccine people, but it's not something that belongs in a software licence. I mean, let's start with an obvious question - how the hell do you plan on enforcing that?
Exactly. The software licence should concern itself with the software, period.
While it might sound laudable to interfere in people's personal lives and require that they get themselves vaccinated like any sane person should...
...would you feel the same way if the licence requested that the user be a member of the NRA (or a registered gun owner for international users)? It's really no different. This sort of thing has no place in an implicit agreement about how to use software and/or its source.
Depending upon where you are, one could say the same for the GPL...namely because the not terribly well defined linkage issue [*] meaning that the GPL only plays with itself so you can't bring in code from other sources (bsd, CDDL, etc) and use it alongside while respecting the freedoms of the licence that code was originally released under.
* - makes sense for Linux, not so much for other systems and ways of doing things.
Surely the word "cyber" is redundant and should no longer be used by anybody who wants to be taken seriously?
Secondly, perhaps they don't consider it to be a security issue because the LSE hasn't reported any security issues and/or they are aware of a borked update or the like?
Not everything is the Russians (alternative bad guys available).
Upgraded from a Livebox 2 to a Livebox Play. Got an extra half megabit on a long run of twisted pair that is older than I am and my hair is grey (I live very rural).
Randomly, my phone (S9) is unable to talk to any of the machines on the LAN using IP address. No idea why. But since the printer has WiFi Direct (which is usually faster) I've not bothered looking into it.
So it's not always DNS. Sometimes it's just shitty firmware.
(so no IT angle)
Anyway, the evening of 31st December I was working on enhanced pay as an agency at a nursing home near Camberley.
My job, since I am a guy, was to carry an ungodly amount of bottled water, tinned tomatoes, and toothpaste (!) from the back of a minibus and up into the loft. When I pointed out to the activities girl (who was dealing with all of this for about a fiver an hour) that it might be hard to do anything useful with the tomatoes if there's no power, she actually peed. Like, right there.
She scurried off, I thought to go change, but she came back half an hour later with boxes of tea, UHT milk, and several large bottles of butane gas. I had no idea what the gas was going to connect to, but since the poor girl was on the verge of a heart attack, I said nothing.
I don't know what the hell she'd been listening to, but she basically passed out in the recreation room at about eleven PM, absolutely convinced that the world was going to end.
And I wouldn't be at all surprised if all that stuff wasn't still up on the loft under a twenty year (my god, has it been that long!?) layer of dust.
"to make it look it's "live""
Isn't it a bit of a giveaway when they have sound bites from the various people at the end... when they're supposed to be on the dance floor hugging and crying?
I don't watch it, just happens to be what was on before His Dark Materials.
Also useful for following dialogue in too many "trendy" programmes where the characters mumble incoherently over backing music that is a little too loud.
A person with hearing shouldn't have to read on screen words to understand what's going on in their own language. Great production values...
Missed? Not at my school they didn't. It was a private boarding school, so different rules which included throwing whiteboard erasers and aiming to hit, corporal punishment (slipper, gym shoe, cane, in increasing order of severity) and other nice punishments like spend all night in the changing room standing only on one leg (and hope to whoever you believe in that you don't need to pee).
Buy a local knock-off cola, one of them will have a sticker getting the winner free tickets to a football match.
Sounds better when you look in the machine and realise it can only hold five bottles, so spend a fiver and buy all the bottles (because we all know the sticker will be on the last bottle) and gain the tickets.
I suggested this logic to a friend (as I don't care for football). All bottles bought, and predictably the sticker was on the last bottle.
Well, nothing said (or could justifiably prevent) somebody buying all the bottles a few minutes after the machine had been refilled. The company running the promotion just didn't think it through...
"These days, crashing less seems to be all we can hope for from most applications."
While it may be sad-but-true, do remember that an entire word processor from yesteryear would fit in a single floppy with plenty of space for examples, files, printer drivers, etc and run happily in under half a meg of memory (often much less).
Nowadays? A DVD and hundreds of megabytes of memory...
"When the lecturers found out"
I got promoted to managing the network because the competent CS teacher was replaced by an IT teacher who was so useless he spent half a lesson trying to explain what a database was, unaware that we'd all written one the term before.
As part of my expected bollocking for hacking the network, it became clear that the main reason that I did so was so the thing would keep on working (because Chuckie Egg) because the IT teacher did NOT have a clue and managed to often screw up user accounts, lose data, lose discs, and my personal favourite - end a lesson by flipping the switch on the fusebox on the wall above the door. Yup, he just forcibly power cycled everything between lessons. Granted, it reset the stations, but the server wasn't too happy. Especially if it was in the process of saving something to disc.
I only thank God that back then harddiscs were so expensive that we never had one...
" was identified as having a station number of 0"
Wasn't station zero a broadcast address, not a valid station?
Older versions of NETFS had the idea that certain stations (something like 230 to 254?) were always to be considered privileged, so *PROT would not work against them. Thankfully Acorn saw sense and fixed that, but that was of little comfort on a network with older NETFS and a bunch of students that tweaked the links in certain stations to make them nicely powerful.
Don't get me started on the FileStore. It was dead easy to get SYST privs on that. Just take out the floppies, insert one of your own, open the flap, start it up, and then go into maintenance mode and format a disc with you as SYST...
"Try getting by without it? Can't be that difficult."
The only times I've ever had a Facebook app is when it came preinstalled, and even then it was never used. WhatsApp? That's some sort of Skype-like thing isn't it? As you can guess, never used it. Never plan to. I get by. Just as people did long before this stuff even existed.
Half of them are worse than that. They set cookies and then give you some boilerplate bull about using the site consents to you accepting cookies.
It's a good thing the cookie monster lives in my browser. They can do what they want, the moment that tab is closed, pooof! The cookies are stomped upon with extreme prejudice.
I used to have something to wipe Flash cookies too, but I found it less bothersome to just wipe Flash.
I have Prime. Get to watch films when I'm bored, listen to a fair bit of music, and free quick delivery for a lot of stuff. For the latter, I've probably saved more money than the subs cost.
Prime itself isn't inherently evil. The sales push is.
"cretinous online chats that don't leave a paper trail so good luck if they stiff you"
Strange, most of my communications with Amazon are by email, except the things like "why was my panier order delivered somewhere else yesterday?" which got a phone call literally 45 seconds later.
I got the idiotic online chat when asking Skype why my account was locked out when I'd just created it. So I just took periodic screenshots. Where there's a will, there's a way...
"Deals that change between you clicking on them and trying to pay" - how is that even legal?
"don't try to use PayPal with a VPN" - I use a virtual credit card with PayPal, where literally every purchase is a different card number. That gets the machine a bit stressy. They haven't, at least, done anything dumb like freezing my account for fraud...yet. And, no, there's NO way in hell I'm giving PayPal access to a real bank account.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2020