Nerds throw toys out of pram.
Film at 11.
4790 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Nov 2009
I think you're being downvoted because somebody's a cretin who hates Microsoft (presumably based on a throwaway comment 13 years ago which was actually about the GPL or about IE which was happened 21 years ago and was fined 15 years ago) so much that any information they're given which does not cast MS in a negative is automagically "bad" and the giver must be a "shill" rather than somebody who, y'know, checks their fucking facts.
All that stuff was probably before your downvoter could be sure they would wake up in a dry bed, if they can now. Which is uncertain.
I believe it's absolutely the position of civil servants and police to explain what they've done, why they've done it and how it will save us money.
Also, I don't recall insulting you. "dogging" is soooooo hilarious, isn't it? What a clever fellow you are! And so mature!
One more and I shall be forced to retaliate in kind (and probably get banned for a week again but what the hell).
As for Fukushima, dismissing the worst nuclear disaster in a generation (and it's still ongoing) as just "background radiation" is IMO slightly deranged.
Oh fucking really.
Fukushima scaremongers becoming increasingly desperate
Quake + tsunami = 1 minor radiation dose so far
Oh noes! New 'CRISIS DISASTER' at Fukushima! Oh wait, it's nothing. Again.
Of course, if you prefer the BBC or Sky ambulance chasing viewing figures by running around screaming and waving their hands and interviewing Jonathan "Big Fat Vested Interest" Porritt, that's up to you. But don't try to pretend that telling us the sky is falling means that it actually is.
If that's the worst disaster in a generation, nuclear power is astonishingly safe compared to absolutely everything, including getting out of bed in the morning.
I'm posting this as an AC because I know it will be massively voted down, but the fact is (and this is not green wash), in some Reg Reader's lifetimes sea level will be 3 or 4 metres higher than it is now
[reliable citation needed]
As for Fukushima, it proved that a reactor built in the 70's that was never intended to withstand more than a third of the force of the damage which hit it can actually withstand three times that with no more than background-level radiation as an effect.
You can shout names of nuclear plants at the ignorant but this is the Reg. We know a little better.
1) Sell off the resevoirs so houses can be built on them.
2) Sell off prime agricultural land so houses can be built on them.
Will never happen. Housing supply is kept artificially low to keep house prices high (and thus, the buy-to-let 25% of Members of Parliament and the rental sector chums, not to mention the Daily Heil happy) and buy votes come election time as well as contributions from the "credit" industry.
Agricultural land is sold off for golf courses instead.
Trebles all round!
Go crash both into a wall or telegraph pole (or cow) at 40mph and see which one you walk away from.
Then try that again at 70mph and see which one you *still* walk away from, and which one requires several refuse sacks to collect you.
Or, y'know, don't crash into things.
Looks oddly familiar....
> How long has Linux been around...is it bug free?
It's worse than that, Jim...
This is Windows and Office so for a valid comparison you need to be looking at linux-distro-of-choice plus office-productivity-suite-of-choice which, for the record, had better include translators, a macro language, a database (this can suck, don't panic), a note-taking tool, a best-of-breed spreadsheet, a word processor, a desktop publisher, and HTML editor, an equation editor, a graph maker, billions of templates, a presentation application that everyone hates (this should be easy because all presentation software is hateful), hundreds of thousands of file converters, a form maker and fuckload of crap nobody understands.
If your office suite of choice does not include all these, feel free to supplement it with other utilities.
And then add up the bugs. How many will you find, I wonder?
If we work along the (fairly well substantiated) theory that the vast majority of consumers either buy an iPhone or a Samsung phone but that almost none of them go out and deliberately buy an Android, the consequences of Samsung phones no longer being Android phones should be fairly self-evident in terms of Android sales.
Consider an imaginary parallel - Apple decide that their Macbook Air line will no longer run OSX but will now run (for the sake of argument) Ubuntu. The effect on sales of Airs would be negligible (this is almost wholly a consumer product, after all) but the effect on new installs of OSX would be dramatic in the extreme.
> Though I have to admit to wanting an electronic slave, the question is do people really want a mechanical. Copy of a human or simply a home environment that makes life easier?
It most cases, the latter. However, some things - like the ironing and putting your stuff away - are simply better suited to a mechanical human.
Robots that carry bales of hay through mud down to the feeders in pissing rain.
Robots that can attach a cow to a milking machine without frightening her so badly she gives yogurt.
Robots that can mend a sheep-proof fence in the snow.
Robots that can lay a hedge.
Robots that can catch and crush for a TT test.
Robots that can birth a calf.
Yeah. Good luck with that.
> The government have made it plain that in their view not only foreign powers (ie probably Russia and others) have full access to the Snowden leaks, but quite possibly "non state actors" also.
Presumably everyone who routinely reads Glen Greenwald's email knows so that's China, Russia, France and probably Syria for starters. ECHELON nations already presumably already knew, barring bureaucratic buggerups.
Thanks, El Reg, for being brave enough to actually inform (some of) the public about what is done with our money, in our name.
The kid above is probably fourteen and still thinks Britain can do no wrong - don't mind him. Without a Fourth Estate that actually reports and provides accountability, the politicians will abuse power, the bureaucracies that feed them will seize ever more and we shall continue to be expected to shut up and obey our masters.
Well, fuck 'em.
And BT.
> (you failed to provide sources for those figures btw)
Apologies. They're from googling 2013 financial statements. They were all PDFs but luckily all the increases were on the second page of each PDF.
I'd re-search (re-research?) but I have a meeting in 4 minutes.
Alright, you don't wear a watch. Nobody you know wears a watch. Nobody you have ever seen in your life wears a watch. Nobody in your entire country wears a watch! Nobody wears watches!
But based on 2013 figures -
Timex sales of wristwatches increased by 9.1%
Casio sales of wristwatches increased by 14.2%
Swatch sales of wristwatches increased by 12.7%
So somebody's buying watches. Perhaps, in your world, they wear them while locked away in darkened rooms with the blinds drawn for fear that somebody will see them.
Or maybe you're just wrong.
Roslyn Compiler project and source code
No, it's a compiler-as-a-service project plus added transparency.
Well...
> Who wants a watch with a 2 day battery life?
A watch that wirelessly charges is no biggie. I take my watch off every night anyway.
> How will you use it as a phone?
You won't? I'm guessing MS are (like everyone sane) seeing this as a notification device (if it's not just bullshit). A watch is notification device, after all. Currently only for time and date (and in some cases, pressure) but you look at your watch to get information very quickly. Expanding that information doesn't seem like a terrible idea.
Making a 1.5cm thick watch in order to cram all the electronics in sounds like a shitty idea though; I wouldn't wear anything over about 8mm thick. Or that didn't have an always-on analogue face.
> If it needs to be paired to a smartphone then what is in fact the point of it?
What about driving? I get a call, I'm driving, I can ignore the phone, use Bluetooth handsfree or answer the phone and get arrested and fined. Or I can press the button on my watch that I've got programmed to send an "I'm driving, call me back in {x} minutes" text and hang up the phone. They can't do you for checking your watch.
Or an interview? I forgot to set my phone to airplane mode - oops. I can fumble for it, curse under my breath, switch it off and apologize to the interviewer or just tap a button on my wrist to make it go away.
Or a phablet? Say I've got a phablet and I keep it in my laptop bag and I answer calls with a Bluetooth headset - I get no caller ID but I can look at my watch. Or read a text. Without delving into the bag and producing an unwieldy and highly nickable slab. That's worth a few quid.
Are you one of those people who don't wear a watch and can't imagine why anyone else would? Because that might show a serious lack of imagination on your part. Just sayin'.
Ah. I see that you are. Okay.
Er, what difference does it make?
Except that if you prefer one of the third-party versions, you can use that instead which is one of those things that people like about - for example - Android.
Good luck writing a file manager for iOS and even better luck getting it in the Apple store.