Re: Preeminent domain
> Google's ethical principles
can't. stop. laughing.
4992 posts • joined 16 Nov 2009
> Google's ethical principles
can't. stop. laughing.
> ..yet the majority of CM users first action is installing the Google software that so offends you!
It doesn't offend me, it is what it is. But Cyanogen have stated that they want to build a wholly open source Android distro that doesn't rely on Google which makes some sense because it's no longer possible to build a wholly open source Android distro that does rely on Google.
Always remember to thumb down information with cites if that information is not what you wish it was.
No, they weren't participating in this funding round.
While Microsoft and Cyanogen failed to strike an investment deal, talks between the two illustrate how Microsoft is trying to get its applications and services on rival operating systems, a key goal embraced by Chief Executive Officer Satya Nadella. Microsoft has in the past complained that Google Inc., which manages Android, has blocked its programs from the operating system.
> why distance itself from core android?
Because core Android is being left to die by Google, who continually shift more and more functionality into the wholly proprietary and closed-source Google Play.
Short version, Android isn't open any more (or rather, what's open is barely functional).
Does PlusNet (for example) count as "BT Broadband" for the definition of who's a customer?
Pretty much, yeah :)
Adobe Web Platform Team are among the largest UI/UX contributors to Chrome and about a third of the way down the list on Firefox.
Just don't let them anywhere near scripting.
feasible, given asm.js but nightmarishly difficult. I wouldn't want to try it.
Another danger is inappropriate speed limits.
For example, three years ago a car full of teenagers doing about 90mph on a blind bend smashed through the trees and killed all occupants just outside Devizes. The council, in their "wisdom" have responded by making the whole 3 mile stretch a 30mph zone (previously it was National Limit).
Any experienced driver using this clear, wide country A road with only one bend will find themselves doing at least 40 (especially those massive arseholes who do 40 all the time in every zone, but I digress) and those who actually stick to the limit get overtaken and that is going to lead to accidents.
The council naturally see it as a way to plant speed traps and gain revenue but it's making an accident into a tragedy.
> Anyone spotted any dino-tech on the moon?
Iron Sky 2, anyone?
Add up 25 telegraph poles and it's going to look pretty similar.
Well, I don't like them one little bit but it seems that actually, they have a point.
If cell towers make less money than the land rental (set by HMG) they cost to site, there's a problem. Especially if a similar footprint such as a telephone pole costs BT effectively fuck all.
One thing that does rather add to the confusion is tax. Not jumping on the "Vodafone owes me a gazillion pounds" bandwagon here - simply pointing out that equipment site rental is a wholly tax-deductible expense for everyone else. Is it not deductible for MNOs? If not, why not? If so, why aren't they deducting it?
BizTalk is awful.
Almost as awful as all of its competition.
> Have you also given HoloLens a go? No? Could that be because all we've had a chance to find out about HoloLens are hardware mock-ups (they wouldn't let anyone show the *actual* hardware used) and the gushing of carefully selected tech media types (well known for their ethics and objectivity)?
except that those journalists actually tried it. Even the Verge tried it and they're basically a marketing wing of Apple. Even the Register tried it and the Reg is where you come for your daily hate-chant, right?
Piss off back to Slashdot, you troll.
> For Industrial and medical uses (eg. use during surgery), however, Glass has no equivalent AFAIK.
You might be right - although the hololens "plumbing" demonstration indicates not - but how are those sectors useful to Google? There's no real data to slurp and sell on.
It's not dead until they have some other means of sucking up all information from billions of people all the time including where they go, what they see, what interests them about what they see, who they meet, what they say, what they don't know and what they buy when they're not even using the interwebs.
They were never Glassholes. They were tiny eyes of Sauron.
That makes no sense whatsoever, AC. The compiler is installed sure but it's not been a part of any VS install I've used in years. And the runtime only deals with intermediate language.
> JScript.NET has existed since .NET 1.0 was released in 2002. However, it hasn't been tracking ECMAScript releases, being approximately based on ES3.
I don't think I've even seen JScript.NET installed since about 2003. I honestly thought it was dead.
Are war crimes worse than aiding and abetting the sale of fake and potentially lethal pharmaceuticals?
> Goddam, what absolute bastards!
I mostly agree but when the adverts are basically blood money - and those illegal pharmaceuticals fall right into that category - then it becomes less a case of business as usual and more a case of organized crime.
I used to think that too, and then I followed the reporting on Ars Technica.
It turns out that yes, the MPAA did donate to Jim Hood's election campaign but only about $3000 - less than one hundredth of the total funds he raised. He's not owned by them and they don't do him any favours - his opponent, however, was a big "let's make copyright illegal!" guy so they weren't without motive.
Basically though, your conspiracy theory is a dud.
Seems to be very popular though. You'd almost think that it turned up every time someone searched for "Jim Hood" on a popular search engine...
> Linux grew as a direct response to Microsoft's monopolist actions and snuffing software rivals but now Google is effectively "killing" *information*.
Really? And here was me thinking it grew because a lot of people - including me - had a desire to run UNIX-like environment on hardware that didn't cost ten years' salary.
I like Maplins. I agree some of the stock is crappy and they're edging into turf already held by Halfords on quite a lot of the motoring gear (although Maplins are much cheaper and Halfords are bastards).
I also agree with a poster above who stated that the way to success would be to do electronics clubs, make your own drone weekends, ATX Case modding (Dremel 101!)...
All these places used to be great because they had public support. Now, thanks to Amazon, Scan and (in the US) Newegg, that support has gone and the retailers need to build it back up.
what worries me is the assumption that CIOs need a "non-techies guide". If they need a non-technical guide, they should not be CIOs.
the worst thing about energy-saving lightbulbs is how long it takes to have an idea.
Those companies didn't exist in 1912 or 1985, you bell end.
We're talking about market valuations, not astrology. The difference is that market valuations sometimes reflect reality.
If there's no long-term investment, what's a mortgage?
I thought being warm wasn't going to be the problem?
Welcome to everywhere. There is literally nowhere this kind of thing doesn't happen. You just don't see it because either a) you're not paying attention b) you're lucky enough to have a different lifestyle and/or c) you don't watch Channel 4 documentaries
> A payment backlog of six months was considered good.
when it comes to agricultural payments, 6 months is amazingly good. You tend to think in terms of 18 months to two years or three if Margaret Beckett is in charge. Unless you're not a farmer but an "agribusiness" - then you get your money pretty quickly. The UK Government loves giving money to rich people.
Are you absolutely certain about that, Tim?
Given a decent implementation of WPF on OSX or $preferred_shell along with MSBuild and .NET Core, I really can't see why not.
It's not a money thing - VS Community is already free.
The shamrock isn't really a symbol of anything (except possibly the Trinity if you happen to be Sister Robbie Coltrane). The symbol for Ireland is the harp.
That being, the upgrade from Win7 is free regardless if whether the Win7 install is legit or pirated.
That's news. That means a billion or so Universal App customers.
> A sign of a electorate happy with their life is one where many don't bother to vote as they don't see the need to get new policiticans in to change the system.
No, I'd say what we're currently looking at is a society where all the choices are the same and there is no way to make a meaningful choice so people don't even dignify the process by turning up to it.
Who can blame them?
Do you want rain or rain?
I was with you up until the House of Lords thing.
I quite liked the old hereditary peers. They weren't elected so weren't beholden to Paul Dacre or Rupert Murdoch, a lot of them were far too rich to be worried about bribes and cash-for-questions/access and they were, by and large interested tinkerers. Angus Hamilton used to build off-road cars and hardware encryption , for example. An awful lot of the Lords used to be in one business or another, usually at the "cottage industry" level.
On legislation affecting normal rights they were great. "Should we allow Government to spy on everyone? No. Should we make it illegal to own a dog that somebody might be frightened of? No. Is it right that people who don't buy a TV license go to jail? No". All good decisions by the _old_ Lords, all overturned by the Commons and the _new_ Lords, the unelected financial contributors to political parties that Tony Blair decided should be doing that job and rubber-stamping his every whim.
There really wasn't much wrong with the old system except if you're a Class Warfare type. There's a lot wrong with the new one.
No, I won't be able to retire until I'm at least 70. My retirement was spent on bailing out banks, remember?
Except we have an ageing population and old people already own all the property and get all
electoral bribesbenefits and they all go out and vote for whoever's promising them more free shit. Young people are outnumbered. The Baby Boomers rule the world.
I'm 45. I've already seen this happen to my generation - the absolute worst bit being people saying "oh, we must be nice to them, they fought in the war!" when actually they just got wankered at Woodstock or the Isle of Wight - and it will happen to every following generation until those selfish old pricks finally die.
MEPs go on expenses-paid junket. Taxpayers pick up bill.
Film at 11.
yes because spoofing a certificate could easily allow the viking pirates to steal all of MS's money.
In your wet dreams.
"M$", wow, that's hilarious, is it 1994 again?
I followed the W7 links - am at work - got to the Standalone Updater, ran it, discovered the update wasd already installed. Checked update history and... it was installed on Sunday night.
So this is probably just the Reg's usual "hot off the presses but allowed to cool in order to comply with Health & Safety legislation" policy.
frankly, most malware is less intrusive than Chrome.
what's the cut-off point?
If it's not 22 installs (not users, most workplaces have more installs than users because of servers (however limited, a fileserver is still a server as is a backup server), laptops, other mobile stuff..
Is it 10? What about 10 users? Should you be MacGuyvering your own patch solution for ten users? How about five? A lot of households have more than five..
There are a lot of companies out there with a fileserver, a backup server and potentially a print server and < 25 users. 25 being the "Essentials" seat limitation so it seemed appropriate.
I read your title wrong.
Considering that P2P code was first pushed in Win7 as Direct Cache, I suspect they've had plenty of time to refine it.
And even if they haven't, the fact that is not BitTorrent is actually a bonus. Not in a security-thorugh-obscurity sense but rather simply because it is not as familiar as a BT clone would be. For example, suppose it can only host files cleared by by the main MS servers and which conform to SHA checksum? Would that be hard? No. Would it involve lots of throwing data around? Not really.
In such a case, both client AND server are running security checks. Hard to corrupt, a system like that. Not impossible but very, very improbable.
> a fair indication that Microsoft want everyone to be on some sort of 'Software Assurance' plan with an annual, or monthly, fee. What else would 'WAAS' be?
An attempt to reduce their support base by having run _one_ version of Windows.
And your Secure Boot FUD is littered everywhere and provably false. You keep posting it though.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017