@Dan 55 "Force Quit Safari. Then remove it from the dock and/or desktop."
Then bury it at a crossroads with a head of garlic in its mouth and a stake through its heart - you cannot be too sure.
2652 posts • joined 6 Nov 2009
Then bury it at a crossroads with a head of garlic in its mouth and a stake through its heart - you cannot be too sure.
Indeed. Available on Linux, Windows and MacOS (or however one is supposed to italicise Cupertino's offering these days). Unless you are so deep into i-Tunes that you cannot get out there is no excuse for installing that shit regardless of your choice of OS.
I imagine that Donkey Molestor X is currently closeted with his paramour and is unable to reply.
Were you by any chance being a touch satirical old chap? See icon.
............there is no chance in hell that I am giving my phone access to my bank. Regardless of the protestations of the usual suspects that secure systems are in place. It is just yet another attack vector for the various toss-bags out there who want to part us from out hard-earned. I am not suggesting that our banking should revolve around storing banknotes under our mattresses but there are limits. At least for this example of the Canidae.
Your Galaxy S6 has a conventional micro USB 2 port the techonology of which reputable producers thoroughly understand and have considerable experience with in the area of rapid charging. I wrote "I also wonder (my added emphasis ed.) whether a lack of/limited experience with correct implementation of the USB type C standard..." I was scarcely being didactic old chap and my comment was specific to the context of USB type C.
I entirely agree with the points you have made. I also wonder whether a lack of/limited experience with correct implementation of the USB type C standard (currently true of all producers) may also have exacerbated the situation. The behaviour of that port has to be very precisely regulated or the device will end up in trouble - particularly when when we are of course by definitition talking about rapid charging which can under certain circumstances lead to battery damage (if incorrectly regulated) with, potentially, the kind of problems we have seen with the Note 7.
A very good point, exactly what I was about to post. How on earth does a twelve year old know his mum and dad's banking details?
In addition we also see that the smartphone market has been showing signs that it too is flattening out prior to serious slowdown (the first indications that mobes were affected as well as tablets and pcs started to appear about a year ago). Quite what is killing what I do not know other than it is quite obvious that refresh cycles for all these three types of shiny are getting longer and longer. I note that a certain section of our little congregation here at El Reg post regularly claiming that Win 10 is destroying the pc-market. I wonder what their explanation is for condition of the tablet and smartmobe markets? Given that the Demon Lords of Redmond have a low percentage market presense in both those areas. Something is definitely going on and whilst one can speculate about market saturation, commoditization and so on and so forth it is still somewhat of a puzzle.
It is a matter of scale. Whilst I do not disagree with your characterisation of Cupertino's store the sheer all-pervasiveness of the Android OS means that it in effect has a market dominant position as far as its percentage of the total smarphone market is concerned. That, IMO, is why the EU are prioritising going after Google.
The best description of SlapTwat that I have read to date.
I have noticed on a number of previous threads connected to articles where the Kardashians are mentioned that there appears to be a certain confusion between that family and the Cardassians from Deep Space 9. As a public service I offer the following clarification. A Cardassian would be deeply offended if you asked him to "walk with the Prophets" whilst a Kardashian would always be delighted if you asked them to "walk with the profits".
..............Paper. Always. Works."
I hear you brother. Been there, done that, bought the T-shirt, read the book. Bringing some chalk with you in case they have something so impossibly old fashioned as a blackboard is not to be despised either.*
*Not so unlikely as you might think in the university sector where I work.
He may very well think that he is a bit of a nob (as in a cut above the rest of us mere mortals) whilst we think that he is a bit of a knob.
"..............their market was based on fleecing the customer."
Entirely correct. I do not for one moment defend the privacy issues that curently bedevil Win 10 but when it comes to the "slurping" of personal data Google could give everyone, Redmond included, master classes.
I entirely agree that fines they can simply regard as a business cost are indeed useless. Perhaps the answer is to make the board of directors personally liable and make it a criminal offence to in any way compensate them for the fines they would have to pay.
I would agree that this world wide high speed echo-chamber we call the web with its proliferation of debate-fora is (ref your comment about FarceBook) having all sorts of unexpected socio-political effects (also some very antisocial effects i.e. the nastier type of trolling and flaming). However, I also think that retail goods go from being new and innovative to being commoditized in ever shorter periods of time with the result that manufacturers are in an increasingly desperate race to come up with the next new thing. The consequence is that the proportion of goods that are being designed as solutions in search of an application becomes ever greater (and ever more foolish!). I will of course not be buying a smart fridge regardless of which OS it is running on. :)
Is that a reference to the taxes that Apple hand over to the British tax authorities as a consequence of the PAYE system? If it is then it is Apple's employees who are paying their own tax, Apple is paying bugger all. In fact it is a serious comment on what BigCorp can get away with when their employees pay vastly more tax than a company as rich as Apple does.
I think that part of the problem (only a part) is public expectations. Quite apart from examples of incompetance amongst the producers these same producers know that the average punter will be very resistant to paying much more for a USB type C cable than they pay for your common-or-garden USB 2 cables. The fact that USB C cables have to be produced to a much higher standard and will in the nature of things cost more is not something the average member of the Great Techno-Ignorant Unwashed wants to hear.
"Why would that be, it is supported until 2019?"
Possibly because we have another three years of this to go?
"As Adam Smith said, capitalism leads directly to monopoly unless the government steps in to enforce a fairer playing field."
The quote is of course: “People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices”
Smith's point of course was that intervention was needed to ensure that the market actually was free. The practical reality that he understood 400 or so years ago was that maintaining a free market without government intervention was in reality (regardless of what the barking wing of the neo-liberal school of economic thinking might opine) a non sequitur.
A cogent point that the writer appears to have missed entirely. The whole point about Microsoft's "bad old ways" was that they were bad because the were abusing a "market dominant position" - which is why the DoJ (quite rightly) went after them. In all of these new areas of competition MS is nowhere near in any kind of dominant position (and given that there are in many areas strong established players, eg Amazon, Apple and Google, they are most unlikely to end up with power that they could abuse). They are moreover often competing on other people's platforms and are not able to leverage the dominance that their own OS gave them in the past. They are having, in increasing degree, to fight their corner in an effective market over which they have no improper control - which is after all what we as punters want to happen.
"Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance" old chap? Published in 1974 - I was nineteen at the time. God that makes me feel old!
I agree that the temptation is enormous. However, the take-home message is, IMO, very straight forward. We all have our opinions about which OS is the best but there is one huge problem with all these discussions about which system is the most secure and so on and so forth. Those arguments do not take into account one simple fact. The biggest vulnerability regardless of which system one chooses (Windows, MacOS or whichever flavour of Linux you prefer) is the person using it. Everything else pales in comparison with that issue. The average computer user would fuck it up regardless of which system one chose. Hmm, maybe summary execution is the only way forward!
It is one thing that they cannot be told regarding their own pcs/tablets/phones but when even the possibility of the sack if they eff up at work does not seem to make any difference then we really have a huge problem. When it all comes down to it the choice of OS or the security measures taken are of little use if the life-form on the other side of the keyboard simply ignores what they are told. Frankly I am at a loss to suggest any measures short of electric shock treatment that would get the average punter/employee to show a modicum of common sense.
A very acute post. I must admit that the potential consequences for the insurance companies had not occurred to me. With essentially only "one driver" to insure for the whole fleet, insurance costs would indeed drop dramatically and the auto-manufacturers could very well afford to supply insurance as part of the deal. See icon.
"Or have I missed a step, and Apple have some low-cost answer to empower the peasantry ?"
Pardon? This is Apple we are talking about! :)
The only problem with that is that India in terms of market share is almost entirely Android as far as smartphones go.*
We saw the pc market mature and begin to "adjust" downwards about 3 years or so ago. Thereafter we saw the tablet market (iPads included) do the same. The first indications that the smartphone market was heading the same way started to crop up about a year or more ago. No one is immune - not even Cupertino. Markets mature, they saturate and refresh rates begin to slow down. I repeat a point that I have made before. Where once the tech that the average member of the domestic retail market owned and used consisted of the "dumbphone" they carried with them and the pc they had at home, there are now three pieces of tech that are competing for the punter's spons - the phone, the pad and the pc.** It is scarcely amazing that the turnover in all of these markets is slowing. No company's bottom line can defy gravity for ever - about time that the markets had a more mature attitude to such issues. The hysterical volte-face from "buy, buy, buy I tell you" to " for God's sake sell, sell, sell" is, frankly speaking, no way to run an economy.
*No, this is not a "Fandroid" speaking - these are facts. At Arctic Fox towers I run a L950XL as my primary and a L950 as my backup. Madam runs a Sony Xperia as her primary and a midrange HTC as her backup - we are an ecumenical household.
** Currently, AFAIK, the only growth in "shinies" of any kind in the retail market is in the area of "all-in-ones" and "hybrids". How long that will last is anybody's guess.
Please Mr Dabbs, stop doing that. The image of your Fitbit Charge having a total nervous breakdown as you approach your climactic moment is too much to bear. I am billing you for a new keyboard.
"but there's good reasons nobody else has succeeded with them"
Where in the article is there any reference to these reasons? Apart, of course, from the obligatory reference to the R101 disaster, in the 1930s. Might it not be imagined that the necessary technology has improved a touch in the last eighty-five years?
"The South Koreans doth protest too much, methinks".
One South Korean doth protest too much, whilst two or more South Koreans do protest too much.
So true and so profound, a subset of Murpy's Law I believe?
Pleasure old chap. I have however to confess myself somewhat puzzled. We have both been downvoted and I do not have the first clue about why this should be the case. :)
"Oh! I have slipped the surly bonds of Earth
And danced the skies on laughter-silvered wings;
Sunward I've climbed, and joined the tumbling mirth
Of sun-split clouds, — and done a hundred things
You have not dreamed of — wheeled and soared and swung
High in the sunlit silence. Hov'ring there,
I've chased the shouting wind along, and flung
My eager craft through footless halls of air. . . .
Up, up the long, delirious burning blue
I've topped the wind-swept heights with easy grace
Where never lark, or ever eagle flew —
And, while with silent, lifting mind I've trod
The high untrespassed sanctity of space,
Put out my hand, and touched the face of God."
(The author, a pilot in the RAF, died in a training accident in on Dec 11th 1941)
Have you guys considered counselling? *
*That really was a joke, honest!
I think that if you had thought through the business case a little you might have realised the following. Far more people run an iPhone and/or an iPad in combination with a Windows pc at home than run them in conjunction with a Mac (this is a statement of fact - not puerile tribalist points scoring). That being the case there is possibly a market amongst retail punters who would like to have a version of their iOS app running on their Windows box. How well this would do is anybody's guess but some devs might feel that it was worth (from the purely business point of view) giving it a go if MS makes the time investment case worthwhile.
Oh dear J.J. It seems as if the anti-Redmond hatebois are so po-faced that they are not capable of recognising when someone is winding them up.
...............should be grateful that we cannot install Pokemon Go on our phones!
You owe me a new keyboard - see icon.
Known from here on in as the iDie award.
My immediate thought when I read the sub-heading: "Klan K not doing much to help women. Or anyone really" lead at once to my choice of icon.
Spanish subtitles for Donald Trump? Well done Alistair, hilarious - see icon.
Entirely possible which is one reason why I wrote "One possible interpretation is that....". I always have reservations if hard and fast conclusions are drawn when the evidence is in fact ambiguous. My point is simply that they have not made their case if it is possible to argue, based on the same general evidence, an alternative explanation.
"That Chinese paid and patriot hacking groups were already in decline led iSight security intelligence wonks to rob the agreement of its watershed title of "cybercrime killer"."
Hmm. It must be obvious even to this think-tank that such agreements as the one in this instance between the leaders of the US and China do not happen overnight. There is usually a long process via diplomatic back-channels and at relatively low (and therefore deniable) levels. One possible interpretation is that there were "confidence building measures" undertaken to ensure that both sides could feel confident that neither leader would subjected to "surprises" and end up covered in political ooh-nasty. It would therefore be entirely logical that (looking back) signs of a reduction of such activity would occur for a significant period of time before the leaders of both nations gave their official blessing to it in the form of a signed agreement.
"Although the energy released from both pairs of colliding black holes was greater than all the energy radiated by every star in the observable universe, it would have remained invisible if it wasn't for LIGO."
It is events on that inconvievable scale that really cause my mind to boggle. We can calculate something like that. We can now observe it even. However, imagine it? Quite impossible!
I am Arctic Fox
I fear that the El Reg subbies are being their usual mischevious selves with that subheading. The writing was very clearly on the wall for the PC market before Win 10 was even in beta and the first signs that the tablet market was slowing down had also been spotted (we are of course now seeing the same thing in the phone market ). Indeed that is entirely unsurprising. All markets reach maturity sooner or later and that is what we are seeing now. The refresh cycle in the private retail market is probably nearer 5 years than 3 and that is no surprise. Before the advent of the smartphone and the tablet the tech that the average person owned consisted of their home pc and the dumb-phone they carried with them. The situation you have now is that three major pieces of tech purchase are competing for the customers money - hardly surprising that the profile in these markets has changed.
Entirely agree. A most cogent point. I have added to your laurels, see icon.
I see that someone of very limited memory has down-voted me for stating a fact about Sammy borking Linux installs on some of their kit. Let me refer to an article published here at El Reg with the wonderful title:
"How to destroy a brand-new Samsung laptop: Boot Linux on it"
Sammy does not want you installing anything that they are not happy with. They certainly do not want you installing the latest Windows iteration on a older device of theirs when they want to sell you a shiny new one. A tactic that they use across the whole range of their devices. I have in fact a considerable respect for a good deal of their engineering. I do not, however, have any time for their "customer support" policies.