Re: @James 51 .... WRONG!
> "Trump could have chosen to fly commercial when he was a candidate. Instead he flew on his own plane and pocketed the money."
No. He used it (indirectly) to pay a whole bunch of his employees who keep that plane ready for duty. Do you suppose large planes just grow on bushes?
> "He is chosing to spend a huge amount of his time at his own golf courses instead of other peoples golf courses or goverement owned places like camp david where other presidents have gone."
That cad! How DARE he not frequent golf courses he doesn't own! Isn't there a law or something? Christ, what a country!
> "His family is living in trump tower instead of moving to the white house or at least a more defensable location nearby so the secert service must pay rent to trump to have the space they need to operate."
Has it ever occurred to you that Trump is a high-risk assassination target? Maybe he prefers to have his family away from where he is, and not in some 'defensible' bunker like you suggest.
> "There are all the security upgrades and things like helicopter pads that have added value to his commercial property that he has not had to pay for."
Okay, I can't knock this one down off the cuff, but even if completely true, it doesn't really amount to more than peanuts by Trump's standards, and in no way is it a funds transfer to him, correct? So where I come from this particular charge would be called "candy ass." My advice is to save your charges so that they don't devalue so much.
> "Stuff like this has brought down presidents of other countries."
Yes, trumped up charges have destroyed many honest men. And so far that's all you have shown me.
> "The secert service has to buy this stuff."
So because Trump is not altering his lifestyle to save the taxpayers a few million, that's unethical? Dude, every president creates such costs in many different ways. Obama was no different. What is different is that I won't obsess over minutiae like you and sadly, some on my own side too.
> "All you have done is be unpleasent and told me to back down."
If I've upset you I'm sorry for that. What I'd like to see are reasoned arguments instead of regurgitated leftist talking points for the masses. The funny thing is, Trump has real weaknesses, but you go haring off after ethics charges because if they ever stick they are very damaging, and yet none seem to be very substantial.
If Trump really were gouging the SS, do you suppose NBC would just do an occasional bit about it? No, they would hammer him into his political grave with it! And rightly so. Any president who did that to the ones charged with taking a bullet for him would be a monster, but primarily a fool.
So your charges are very serious indeed, but they rest on weakness and wishful thinking. THAT is why I ridicule you, to get you to wake up a little.