"the ICO issued the company an enforcement notice ordering it to stop the illegal marketing within 35 days."
So they can keep breaking the law up until then. Can I get a similar deal please.
170 posts • joined 29 Sep 2009
"the ICO issued the company an enforcement notice ordering it to stop the illegal marketing within 35 days."
So they can keep breaking the law up until then. Can I get a similar deal please.
I'm pretty sure Zen are using them, that's what it said on my account last time I logged into the Zen portal. This was a few months ago and I've not had any issues. Only had one issue with Zen in 5+ years and it was sorted quickly.
I would mock people on talk talk, but I logged into my Zen account page for the first time in years and it says I'm on talk talk business. I've always had great service from Zen, but this worries me.
I for one am glad Google are putting the needs of facebook before my security, it's the only sane choice.
"The whole concept of a browser has already slid into irrelevance, then: it’s just that Microsoft seems to be the first to realise it. "
Any one else think of Bill Gates when reading this part?
"Hey, fridge, am i running out of milk"?
"Yes and cheese, can i suggest this lovely cheshire from xxxxx supplier" You might also like this meat from xxxxx as well".
Ahh my silly little friend, your view of how joyus this awesome functionality will work is laughably far from the truth. This is what will happen.
"Hey fridge, am I running out of milk"
"Hello, people who bought milk also bought <insert random unrelated crap here>"
*fridge see's you've just bought some new milk*
"Hello, may we suggest the following products... Milk"
All perfectly wonderful and making our lives easier.
That's £10 credit, so in real terms about 50p
But everything has to be down to Brexit, even when they're not related in any way. Removes the need to do a proper job and all news sites are guilty unfortunately. I'm pretty sure if we looked hard enough we'd find an article stating Eve ate the forbidden fruit because she was for/against Brexit.
As this is much worse than hsbc laundering money for the big drug cartels.
Actually we vote for a single person to represent our area, but people forget that and vote for people who will stop the party the really hate getting in, rather than for someone with similar values as them. They then bitch about how crap our system is because whoever they wanted to win didn't and forget that they didn't actually vote for them in the first place.
According to Obama, they managed to 'hack' the US election without the NSA finding out about it. They must be the best of the best, otherwise it means they didn't do anything bad and people are just spouting bullshit, or the NSA have all this monitoring power, but can't do anything with it. Surely the last two can't be true can they?
"and is leading some customers and pundits to wonder if the new policy in Cupertino is to sweep complaints under the rug rather than address them head-on."
Hardly a new policy, this is the same company the told iphone4 users they were holding their phones incorrectly.
Couldn't have put it better myself. If the democrats had put Bernie forward, we wouldn't be having this discussion as he'd have romped home. The democrats went with Hillary as she'd do very little about all the problems in the US and make sure the money kept flowing up.
I also like the way the democrats harped on about the sanctity of the election and how Trump should honour the outcome of the vote and his comments are dividing the country. Then they lose and they're saying exactly the same things as Trump, showing themselves to be just as shitty as Trump. The difference being Trump has never tried to hide it and that's why he won, people decided they'd rather have a corrupt businessman who has never tried to hide it, over a corrupt politician who pretends she's a saint. No matter who won, they were all fucked.
"YES, I DO want to live in a world where the government will be held to account if it chooses to ignore the law."
And this is the crux of the argument, by fining a country, does it achieve anything? If it does, then good, but as Britain has been fined numerous times, it seems it will do nothing but take money from the population. All the while, the company responsible for polluting the air gets off scot free.
So to return to the parking analogy, the EU is fining me because VW are parking their cars illegally. At the moment they're dealing with a symptom ineffectively and leaving the cause alone.
"If you got a parking-fine, should it matter where YOU get the money from? Could you get out of paying the fine if you said "Oh, I'm going to have to mug a couple of old ladies to pay for this. Is that REALLY what you want?"
Is living in a world where you get fined because someone else parked their car illegally REALLY what you want?
It may be the law but we shouldn't be happy. A company operating under EU law has committed a crime, but the EU are fining the population of the member countries. The people can vote out the politicians responsible, but they then go and work within the EU and can't be voted out; see Peter Mandelson.
This is not a system to be happy with. The fines will do nothing but take money from where it's needed and the company responsible is unaffected.
Errm, you do realise that the EU is effectively fining the population of these countries because VW cheated the EU emissions tests? The politicians don't pay the fine out of their own pocket. So VW pay jacks shit, and tax payers suffer. I'm not sure how anyone can be happy with that.
"One of the key priorities of law enforcement should be to engage with these young people to prevent them from pursuing a criminal path, helping them understand how they can use their skills for a more constructive purpose.“
What skills? They're only paying to access the software.
If we live in a world where corporations are hacked and their IP stolen, the answer is simple. Don't keep it online.
as far as America goes, he can just claim he was keeping the documents on his own private web server for convenience and he'll get off scot free?
"He said free Wi-fi should be available on 100 per cent of trains by 2020"
Someone should tell him it's not free, the cost will be added to the price of the ticket. Given how shonky the wifi is on a train, I'd rather have a cheaper ticket and pay for the wifi if I need it.
I don't know, but please sign me up for the study to find out.
Don't forget the body is made from one piece of material, with no doors or windows as they're so 20th century.
If a shoe factory buys new machines that get the work done in half the time, the factory lays off half the shoe making workforce. Unless they can't keep up with demand.
I must admit I gave up reading the article after that example as it was so bad.
Someone being scammed over the internet, fair enough. Scammers teaching people the best techniques for committing suicide is much harder to swallow. Once they have the money they don't hang around to give after care to their victims.
So let's look at another universe, one where the remain vote won. All the remainers are happy for about a year before France, Denmark, Austria, Greece all vote in far right parties just to take them out of the Union. Hooray we're officially Scotland. Decided to take the soft way out and keep things as they are, just to find themselves fucked by another countries decision.
Also, who in their right mind is going to vote for any major political party after this. Brexit has proved one thing, the people in power know nothing about running the country. The politicians that are in fighting at a time we need people looking at the new opportunities and then the head of the Bank of England's plan to stop a shrinking economy is to lower interest rates, even though the economy didn't shrink through lack of money.
Frankly we could have all voted in a local independent candidate at the last election, helpd the referendum and still be in a better position than we are now. So instead of looking at a life outside the EU with a tory government, look at one with a holding govt. of independents that will allow people who can run the country to come through the ranks. It can happen if we just stop putting an x next to corrupt tw*ts
Yep Brexit killed Rackspace, not their shit service. Oh and why are you surprised politicions lied, they've done it for years. Sensible poeple ignore them.
'Can't say I'm surprised to see a brexiter blaming "the killings" on the EU.'
While I agree the killings in Europe lately are down to nut jobs using IS as a convenient way to remove any guilt about their actions, you can't ignore the fact the EU is a horrendously poisonous institution that has split Europe as a whole.
People are making jokes about the name United Kingdom at the moment, but the idea Europe is united is a complete joke. Austria may well have it's first right wing president soon because the Austrians want out of the EU, everyone’s petrified that the elections in France and Denmark next year will see the far right gain power; again due to people wanting out of the EU. Greece democratically voted a person in on the sole basis that he'd take them out of the EU. Rather than honour a democratic decision, the EU gave him a sh*t ton of cash, imposed no restrictions on expenses and told him to introduce austerity measures against the people to pay for it. Very democratic.
The fact is the EU is a failed system and the Euro is a failed currency. It's just a matter of time until it falls and I'd rather be in a country that's ahead of the game when it does crumble, then a Scotland who voted to remain in the UK mainly because lots of people were afraid of the change and now have change forced upon them.
"Could someone please explain this BREXIT argument to me? German car manufacturer sell more cars in a day to India/China than they do in a year in the UK"
Ok it's not the Brexit argument, just one of the many reason people voted leave.
The German car industry makes a nice chunk of money from the UK market, it doesn't matter that it makes more elsewhere, the important bit is the UK is a profitable market. If the EU and Britain failed to come to an agreement and imports were introduced on their cars, it would mean they either have to reduce the cost, or add it on to their already premium prices. Adding the cost on would almost definitely lose significant sales, as car prices have risen rapidly due to people switching to PCP deals and not realising how expensive the car is.
Meanwhile the UK government is free to cut deals with other countries and their car manufacturing business. If we look at Korea and China, they're already in the UK market with cheap but dull cars. While the snobs of the automobile world will likely stay second hand because they love the badge and people that want an enjoyable car experience will ignore them, the rest of the purchasing population will switch their PCP deals to this new market; especially if the UK removes import duty in return for building some cars in the UK.
Over time the increase in money will allow the Asian competitors to create cheap, reliable and enjoyable cars that the British public are loving. They then move into Europe, India etc and take big holes out of the German car market. VW will not allow this.
Also, this is an article saying companies that aren't employing British workers are looking to move from the UK so they can continue not hiring British workers. I don't see much reason to be sad here.
Yep, just like they all f*cked off when we didn't join the euro, oh wait. Business goes where it's cheapest and if Britain get a good deal, they'll stay. If they do go, that means there's a lot of talented people and cheap premises for non EU car manufacturers to take advantage of.
Remember the EU is run by companies and they're not going to allow the EU to give Britain a shit deal, as that allows non eu companies the chance to come in and take over the market. Right now Korea are producing cheap dull cars that are fine if you have no love of driving. Give them a large chunk of the UK car market and it won't be long before those dull cars are quite good, cheap and moving into the European market.
"I suppose the Brexiteers felt they needed more flexibility in labour laws so that they can push the same conditions onto those supposedly employed full-time."
You're complaining that workers are getting shafted while we're under EU rule and then bitching that people voted out of such a system.
Is what he actually said.
True, but they're focusing on self drive as it's in its infancy and the best time to get people thinking about consequences while they're developing they're automated driving system. Bringing up the Jeep hack is just a very good example of how cars today are being hacked, so sweeping the issue under the carpet shouldn't be an option.
Right now if you owned a Jeep that was hacked and caused you to crash, you'd probably find yourself fighting with your insurance provider who are refusing to pay as the car was hacked and in their language modified so your insurance is null and void. Fighting with the manufacturer who will say claim from the insurance company/it must be your fault our cars are great and can't be hacked. As well as anyone you may have had the misfortune to hit. If they get nowhere with your insurance they'll mount a private prosecution and it's goodbye money/house/car/family.
The people in the article are saying sort this scenario out before automated cars are available, rather than automated cars have problems current cars don't.
"and that the British Public has "had enough of experts".
Err if the last few months have shown anything, it's that the so called experts aren't experts at all. Everyone was just spouting crap to further their own agenda and I'm all for being through with that.
"90% of the people who voted had no clue what they are voting for and what are the consequences so they looked them up the day AFTER they voted."
Which makes absolutely no sense so is most likely complete bullshit. It's much more likely people who voted in because they have little concept of the EU and just what to keep things as is; which is fine, looking up what they've just been voted out of. There's also lots of kids that would want to lookup what they've been voted out of for their tumbler posts.
But why let common sense get in the way of whinging.
Well said. Perusing the european press sites shows a union falling apart, hence the noises of a Germany - France super state. Pushing ahead for closer intergration right now, will just force the hands of the countries that are dealing with unrest over an out vote.
Personally I'm not that bothered about the negotiations with the EU as it won't be around much longer. We should start talking to South Korea and it's car makers, that would certainly get VW leaning on the German govt to allow a deal through.
"If we're really lucky, this brouhaha may even kill the British exceptionalism in the UE and help reform the UE and make it more democratic. A win-win in my opinion."
Eu reform itself. Before we left what reason did it have to do that? Peter Mandelson doesn't join an institution to help reform it, he joins because it's looting time.
"Microsoft had endorsed the remain cause and blasted Brexiters but contacted by The Reg, refused to provide statment on Friday morning's vote outcome."
Oi reg, have you forgotten while MS said stay in the eu they were outsourcing jobs to the EU state of India? There's no one left in their EU offices now so you need to call another office if you want a reply.
So Corbyn was checking the site was working until the end and we can probably presume others were doing the same. Sooooo did the site crash because so many people were checking it was up and had nothing to do with the amount of people trying to register?
Over Salisbury Plain yesterday. MIght just have to contact them.
What a great pro-exit post and pretty much sums up my feelings. I want out as the current system is basically an abusive relationship; see Camerons completely pointless 'guarantees' for proof, and the reason it's so bad is because the main party is dyeing and knows if we leave it's done for.
I'd rather leave now, let it die and see what comes out of the remains. As far as I can tell most pro who aren't living in the EU, are afraid of the change, but big things generally start with a big change and I want to see where it goes.
As for our corrupt politicians, we vote them in, stop and the problem goes away. A fair chunk of the UK electorate is pretty dumb in this respect.
If I had any say in a tech firm, I would definitely be arguing for a move to Malta. A nice spot near a beach I think and to hell with practicalities like Internet connections.
With their strong economy, lax attitude to privacy and a business plan of "please come here and we promise not to tax you or hold you to that horrible data protection act".
As for why people are considering an exit, might have something to do with the current US - EU trade agreement going on behind closed doors. I'm so glad I'm in the EU so we get a say about what goes into this agreement... Oh hold on.
The only person who's spoken sense on the whole in/out thing is Martin Lewis who summed it up beautifully. If we stay, things will stay pretty much the same short term with minimal risk. If we leave, there's more risk but we may do better or we could do worse. No one will now until we do it.
Business doesn't like risk, fair enough, but as most businesses would sell out their employees at a moments notice I couldn't give a **** about their thoughts.
The companies that want in are after cheap foreign labour, those who want out are fed up with the secretive way Europe is run. That pretty much sums up the arguments for both sides, so no need for any crappy politicion to harp on about how good/bad being in/out will be, because neither side has a clue.
and ironic given this article is above it: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/04/04/undeclared_advertorials_clampdown/
Errrmmm so your point is basically "Britain shoud stay so I won't have to fill out a few extra forms"?
Well you've convinced me
Ahh insulting people who don't agree with you, always the calling card of a solid argument.
The problem with the "Company X employee people who pay tax" is these people use servivces paid for by the tax they pay, so it's cancelled out. What's left is a corporation that happily uses the country infrustructure to earn revenue, but pays nothing for it and that's wrong.
I don't think someone who made their fortune through illegal business practices can really be called a 'Humanitarian'. He's only giving away some money in the hope History remembers him in a positive way, rather than a true representation as someone who ruined lives while amassing a fortune.
There's not a person on the planet who wouldn't accept ten billion pounds with the understanding they give nine billion away to good causes. Would they be classed as Humanitarian?
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2018