Re: People stil falling for the fake email.
"What can they possibly be thinking?" I would suggest your question could be improved by removing the first word. :)
249 posts • joined 26 Sep 2009
" It understands my (US) Southern accent, and co-workers with strong Welsh, Scottish, Australian, or Indian accents, even in a loud bar."
Yep - one of the things that quite frankly stunned me when I upgraded from 13 to 15 a couple of years ago was how quickly my DNS learned to recognise Panjbi names and Hindi words *in my Kiwi accent*. It really is the only game in town.
I have no problem with paying for DNS - none at all. Because I use it for work, I can even claim it against my tax :)
My initial reply was simply in reaction to the almost Pavlovian "Windows? AVOID!" comment. For Mac users like Colin who need DNS, such advice is even more pointless than trying to help a sinner accept the superiority of the Emacsulate conception :)
He did say that, but he also said, as I quoted originally " I don't care HOW good DNS on Windows claims to be, it'll never hold a candle to the level of productivity you enjoy on a Mac" - that claim could only be made by someone with no experience of how outstandingly good DNS is, and how it makes productivity possible when one's hands simply don't work. My productivity on Windows with DNS would be far greater than on an OS without i, such as the MacOS is apparently becoming.
I am no fan of MS but I'm a pragmatist, and their OS is (now) the only one that supports a tool which people in my (and Colin's) situation need. So ranting about how how awful it is serves no purpose.
"Good FLOSS solutions for accessibility lag behind commercial offerings by quite a bit,"
If I could have upvoted your comment more than once I would have. When I was playing around with Mandrake 6/7 and learning to take the right side in the vim/emacs war (emacs OFC), I fell in love with FLOSS and would have ditched Windows in a heartbeat. Then my CP started to make itself more noticeable and I started to need using DNS (then around v7 iirc) more. It wasn't bad then, but was also far from great, especially with my thick Kiwi accent. But, it was the only game in town. FLOSS solutions didn't "lag behind" they didn't exist. I reluctantly gave up my dualboot setups and kept an eye on the situation over the years, as DNS kept getting better and better and better. For those who need it, there really is NOTHING else, sadly. I wish there were, but, afaik, there still isn't
That's why the (ironic) lack of empathy in the original post irked me so. When one's hands don't work well enough (or at all, as for Colin), being smug about the awfulness of a non-FLOSS os is not a luxury one can afford. I just discovered yesterday that my version of DNS (15 Professional) is "out of warranty" which means Nuance won't help me if stuff goes wrong. That made me very irate, but the reality is, I will have to suck it up, and save up for a newer version to get the support I will need. Because for some of us, DNS is still not simply the best solution, it's the only solution.
As a user of DNS on Windows for more than 10 years, and one who depends on it more and more, I can really empathise with his story. DNS is the reason I gave up trying to migrate to Linux, there was simply nothing that came close. And each release of DNS has got better and better. The reflexive "ditch Windows, it sucks" attitude of the initial comment here is to be expected from the El Reg crowd, but it betrays utter ignorance of how good DNS is, and how important is BECAUSE it's so good.
I've had Win10 installed for more than 2 years now and have not ONCE needed "to repair their systems themselves or pay constantly to have someone fix it. The constant updates *will* break something that is mission critical for you" Not for me it hasn't, And my PC is "mission critical" because I work from home and would be stuck without a working PC.
"I don't care HOW good DNS on Windows claims to be, it'll never hold a candle to the level of productivity you enjoy on a Mac" is, quite frankly, a STUPID thing to say to anyone who actually DEPENDS on DNS. If you need DNS, as Colin does, and as I increasingly do, your "level of productivity" will dive without it - whatever your OS. When you need it, you need it, and that's what makes Nuance's decision so devastating to its Apple user base, regardless of whose fault it is.
I know that "Windows is 100% crap" is the orthodoxy here, as so ably preached by the first poster, and so I know that all disciples of that cult will downvote me for daring to be so heretical as to offer a contrary POV - even though it is one solidly based on actual real world experience and deep familiarity with the very software being discussed. So be it - "what say they? Let them say!"
Hooray! I was beginning to wonder if I was the only person left who was avoiding the "smart home" hoopla. Ours is a small flat and when I want to to turn anything on or off I have a portable digital control centre right in the palm of my hands. Actually, it IS the palm of my hands, and it does a splendid job of controlling my digits as I tackle such ferociously complex tasks as turning lights on, putting the kettle on, adjusting the thermostat on the AC. THey can force an IoT hub into my cold, dead hands.
I haven't read any of the other comments yet, I just wanted to say that one of the many reasons I love El Reg is that I know a very significant proportion of the readership would instantly have though of lemon-soaked paper napkins when they read this:
"Stuck on the ground awaiting a load sheet?"
" I of course meant duckduckgo, not Bing. But still get better results in Google!" As do I.
. I use Google's result count feature a lot when trying to ascertain how common a particular word is in a given language. It lets me compare dictionary listings with real world usage, or a reasonable facsimile thereof, and saves me choosing a dictionary entry which was last used 200 years ago in some arcane treatise.
I really like what duckduckgo is trying to do, but because it lacks a feature I find VERY useful I stick with Google. I'm sure many others feel similarly.
Steve, that was exactly why I suggested it. Māori and Hawaiian are closely related, and I've been told that fluent speakers of either can converse with each other, albeit with some difficulty due to consonantal differences like this one. Māori has more consonants than most of its Polynesian siblings, so we're very used to seeing the glottal stop ' here, though more often in Samoan than Hawaiian
"perched it awkwardly on the rear of its Galaxy S and Note models."
I don't know about the Samsung placement, but on both my V10 and V20, the rear placement of the fnigerprint sensor is perfect. MUCH more user friendly than the front placement of the fingerprint sensor on my Huawei M3 tablet. So much so that learning the Mate 10 has a front fingerprint sensor went into the "cons" column for me when weighing up the pros and cons of getting one.
"Computer speech recognition has come a long way"
It really, really has. I've been using Dragon for 10+ years now, and each new release gets better and better. As the effects of my CP become more noticeable, it's great that I can finally rely on my computer to understand 99% of what my thick Kiwi accent says. However, that's not my experience with the built in speech recognition in Windows 10. It's not awful, but it's not a patch on Dragon 15 for sure. If MS's new AI speech recognition i as good as claimed, I hope it does filter down to Win 10 sooner rather than later
When I bought my LG V10 a few months ago, I was pleased to see that not only did it come with Marshmallow, but LG seems to be one of the better manufacturers when it comes to patching. As of now, my phone has Android patches up to June installed - by no means perfect, of course, but much, much better than many handset manufacturers, I think. Based on the number of updates I've had since getting the phone, I',m hoping this next batch won't be too far away.
Yes, I have used pgp on windows and linux, and yes I agree it's not optimal in terms of ease of use. Which is why I said "or something of similar strength".I was just checking that I'd understood the article correctly - that IF something as secure as pgp were to become widely used, then the sheer volume of metadata would dilute the value of that metadata.
Yes, as I made my initial comment I did consider the possibility of USB malware, but I figure that since I never share the sticks I use, the risk is as low as it can possibly be. At the very least, the article suggests I have one fewer infection vector to worry about. Which might be about as good as it gets.
Thank you all very much for taking the time to reply with suggestions. I apologise for my tardiness in checking the thread I started!
I did have the licence, for both the Win 7 and Win 8 PCs, and despite the assistance of an MS staffer on another forum, in the end I had to format both and do clean install of their original OSes to enable the Windows 10 upgrade.
I wanted to download Windows 10 directly, to give myself the option of doing a clean install. I went to this page
and downloaded the Media Creation tool, but when I try to run it, on either my Win 7 64Pro PC or my 8.1 Home laptop, nothing at all happenes. That is, the UAC dialog comes up, I click "Yes", and then, nada. Checking Task Manager shows now new applications or processes running after clicking "Yes" on the UAC dialog. I have tried turning it off then on again, that didn't help either. I'm assuming this is a pebkac issue, but what sort, exactly? Any suggestions will be received with profound gratitude.
"Final total was 2 failures from 135 launches (98.5%)
Falcon9 is currently 1 failure from 19 launches (95% success)"
THANK YOU for this clear comparison. Simple and straightforward, it makes me wonder why there is so much antagonistic hyperbole in this thread. Many posts read as if Space X's record were more like 1 success from 19 launches, so this counterpoint is appreciated. Sufficiently appreciated for me to sacrifice my high upvote ratio to the flood of down votes I know this post will generate.
How many launch failures has Space X had? Obviously the attempted landings are irrelevant to a discussion of their launch safety record, but am I correct in thinking that the one catastrophic failure El Reg chose to dwell on at length, via the headline image and commentary, was a rare exception for Musk's company?
This fight looks like lasting long enough to keep all the lawyers involved happily on the gravy train for at least as many generations as it took Lunkwill and Fook to become Loonquawl and Phouchg, with billable hours exceeding the age of the Universe, by the application of legal mathematics (that highly specialised subdiscipline of irrational & imaginary numbers).
New Zealand was first in the world to get it, but despite having registered early, still no sign of it being available for either my Win 7 64 Pro PC or my wife's 8.1 laptop. Which fits with my plan to wait until the eager beavers (lemmings?) have done the worst of the bugfinding for me.
Yes, my original comment was stuck in moderation. Made just minutes after the article went live, it would've been the first had it not received the special treatment. A comment I made in reply to Cristoph about that did not survive moderation, sadly, and will be honoured in a private service later today. :)
There is another way to parse that sentence. "the expansive globe of gas stretches about a million light-years from (Andromeda), the nearest significant galaxy to Earth." The galaxy was already mentioned by name earlier, so omitting its name from this sentence did not compromise clarity.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019