Re: Free to get locked in?
No,
Grangemouth.
1862 publicly visible posts • joined 17 Sep 2009
As someone who has worked in IT at an oil refinery, a steel works and at a financial services call centre amongst other places, the thought of someone else having control of the servers at any of these places leaves me cold.
The point is who do you trust? The people on the ground or some faceless entity located miles away? If the oil refinery was to blow up, and at the site I worked it had happened. Not all of it of course but part of the cat-cracker landed in the chemical site's canteen about half a mile down the road. If it had been caused by a cloud based IT failure who would be to blame? The same goes for the steel works. Remember these are potentially dangerous places.
As for sites handling peoples financial details I don't think that regulators would look too kindly on anyone outsourcing their IT, conceivably to another legal jurisdiction.
There are good reasons for keeping IT in-house and the issue of trust is one of the main ones.
As someone who is never going to get a "smart" phone the question I would like to ask is: Can all this stuff be removed from the car and it still works?
At the risk of being thought a Luddite, stuck in my ways and hopelessly old-fashioned what I require from a car is that it gets me from A to B reliably and cheaply, What I don' t want is some smart-arsed computer telling me where to go and how to drive, I'm quite capable of figuring that out for myself.
Added to which is the potential of a greatly expanded attack surface for all manner of ills. Would you trust the likes of Ford or Toyota to scrupulously keep all the software and firmware updated? Or would that involve some sort of paid subscription?
No, as a firm believer in the Unix philosophy of doing one thing and doing it well they can keep their mobile computers. I'll keep mine on my desk where it belongs.
"Until now SIMS was very much the anomaly."
If all their competitors have three year contracts they could have sold the year long contracts as a unique selling point, but instead they have gone for the short term fix, presumably in order to recoup the cost of the purchase.
Having read a lot of the comments on edugeek it looks as if SIMS was falling behind the others and the new management has seen this and decided to sweat the asset before it slides into irrelevance.
It seems standard practice for these private equity types.
To quote Capt. Jack Sparrow; "Take all you can, give nothing back."
Well users might be gnashing their teeth in frustration but spare a thought for Google.
Think of all the data they could have been slurping from all those emails and messages.
Money doesn't grow on trees you know and they have a duty to turn all that data into bonuses for the C suite.
"...they all comply to international standards, right? So you get the same result on all of them?"
Not in my experience. I use Pale Moon and I have lost count of the sites that are mangled. Boxes overwriting the text, weird formatting of pictures and text, white on white text and so on. I suspect that we are going back to the old days when we had that "This site is best viewed with IE6." nonsense.
I suspect that Chrome is the culprit here and that site are veering away from the standards and optimising for Chrome and its relations. I can't confirm this is you would have to put a gun against my head to make me even think of using the data gulping monster that Google has foisted on us.
“Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.” Sir Winston Churchill.
Looks like he got that one right.
Oh, and yes, I did get the joke but this is something that needs to be sorted out asap or we will be back in the "good old days" of Microsoft's pomp.
"technology work is better than diggin' a ditch"
Having done both in my time I would have to agree with the proposition. Not only is tech work better paid in my somewhat dated experience you also have the considerable advantage of performing most of it indoors.
Being a former archaeologist I can tell you stories of digging on sites where the work only stopped because it was snowing harder than we could trowel it away or the time when a site was exposed during building work and we were asked to dig out some footings on a gravel terrace by hand in the middle of a summer heat wave.
On the other hand being dragged out of bed at two o'clock in the morning to troubleshoot a misbehaving server did take the glamour out of being a sysadmin but the overtime and the fact that the server room was nice and cosy did make up for some of the inconvenience.
Personally I appreciated being in the background and more or less invisible when doing my IT stuff. Any difficulties with the users were either handled face-to-face there and then or were punted up to my team leaders for them to sort out.
If I had to chose which to do now I would unhesitatingly chose IT work every time.
"...you're basically stuck with plain or, for some reason, paprika."
Good lord, the thought of paprika flavoured crisps brings back a few memories.
During my time in the Army in the late '60s I was posted to Germany and paprika was the only flavour we could get. If my memory serves me correctly, we didn't even have the luxury of ready salted ones.
Mind you, given the fact that the booze was duty free most of the time we were not in a fit state to know what flavour the crisps were.
Yes, indeed.
The thing that puzzles me is where is the "Take back control" bit of the Brexit pie?
By storming off and proceeding to sulk in a corner Britain has got exactly what it voted for. Cutting ties with an organisation with more money and influence was bound to turn out badly. Now we have the likes of Bill Cash moaning that the UK has been excluded from all the juicy contracts and funding that are available to members is sheer hypocrisy.
The old saying: "Be careful what you wish for, you might get it." is in this case, only too true.
"...who simply don't understand what's good for them and keep refusing to spend money on DAB."
" ...do not fully understand the choice of free-to-access services" while asserting that stubborn analogue oldies are simply happy with what they've got and don't see the need to buy a DAB set."
Some of us "oldies" have no bloody choice but to stick with FM.
Where I live we have no DAB signal, so why would I fork out for something that is of absolutely no use to me?
Give me a viable alternative and I *might* consider changing but from anecdotal evidence DAB is no real advance on what I already have.
In actual fact I do a lot of my listening via my PC, mostly TMS, but it is nice to just switch on the radio and not have to log in and scratch around looking for the BBC Sounds website.
It's not only the presence of unlicensed guns in Ireland that could be a problem, it's the fact that there are a lot of people trained in their use and with an inclination to use them.
When I was lucky enough to live there each time the bank down the road got a delivery of cash the place was swamped with soldiers with guns. Don't tell me that that was done for show. Someone, somewhere,was aware that illegal arms were a problem and were taking steps to counter any threat.
"It's easy to be reassured by a big brand, but virtual networks have to work harder for your money, and do so by offering extremely competitive alternatives,"
Yes, probably true but if, like us, you have no choice but to use EE as they are the only one providing a signal, what can you do?
If only there was some way of overriding the laws of physics.
Yes, scrabbling about at the back of a tower is both a pain in the arse and in the back.
That's why I was so pleased to see when I got my last case that it had USB ports at the front.
At my age I am no longer suited for the gymnastics need to fiddle with ports at the back once they are set up.
...he will be fair and impartial in his dealings with tech companies despite once describing Facebook as "morally bankrupt pathological liars."
What's wrong with that?
It's the truth and if he is embarrassed about it how can he be "fair and impartial" if he is changing his tune before he even starts the job in a way that looks like he is taking Facebook's side already?
Rupert,
Thank you for a thoughtful and thought provoking piece on a subject that had slipped under my mental radar.
Uses of AI to recreate a person who we have lost is as you say an almost irresistible temptation and like many things, like fire, can be two-edged.
Both good and bad will come of this and I feel that not only the AI community should get a grip on the potential problems but the whole of society. One way would be through legislation but I have doubts if politicians are properly equipped to deal with it. Maybe some sort of commission or inquiry would help, that way we could gather the thoughts of everyone. All of us will be affected by this and it is only right that everyone is consulted and it is not left to vested interests to twist any controls on the technique to their private advantage.
Speaking for myself I would love to have been in a position to re-connect, however ephemerally, with people I have lost and I can see that handled in the right way and with sensitivity may well prove to be of great help to many people
"I expect Facebook to be brutally slapped down on this one."
I'm not sure that they will, though I sincerely hope they are.
No, there will be some cosy stitch-up and Facebook will go on its merry way.
"Too big to fail?" More like "Too big to prosecute." After all they have more money to spend on lawyers than most governments.
"...a very profitable wheel run by the usual chummy suspects and their overseas partners."
I couldn't agree more.
When the NHS Digital people told the minister and friends about data mining of the users of the NHS, it was the "mining" bit that caught their eye. All these characters could see was a gigantic profit opportunity and sod the privacy and ethical considerations.
All this private and very sensitive data is to them is a resource to be squeezed for as much money as they can get out of it.
I'll bet you that the term "gold mine" cropped up in some of the discussions about this scheme.
"Tax elusion ought to be fought against ..."
Eh?
I'm not sure what you mean by "tax elusion" but if you mean "tax evasion" then that is a criminal offence.
On the other hand what these companies are so fond of is "tax avoidance" which is legal but unethical.
The OECD proposal, which has these people so exercised is designed to put an end to tax avoidance and by the looks of things is not going down to well in certain quarters. Governments should ignore this special pleading and put the measures into effect as quickly as possible. No one likes paying taxes but the benefits of civil society have to be paid for somehow, and unless these companies decide to stop using the roads, schools, police, fire services and so on then they should stop being a parasite and start paying their way.
It's this bit:
...aiming to give universal access to a large universe of documents.
The original web was envisioned as a too for granting access to information. Then the suits saw an opportunity to make money and things went downhill from there. Now it's turned into a marketing machine trying to part you from your money as quickly as possible.
The CEOs of a lot of big corporations regard their customers as children with the attention span of a goldfish and all the aesthetic sense of a magpie.
Forget "Faster, higher, stronger" all these people have in mind is "Shinier, glitzier, slower".
"...precisely so that an application that was obsolete a quarter of a century ago can still run."
Well, if it does the job it was meant to do and will run on the platform you have, is it obsolete?
Or just a well debugged, reliable tool to do the job that you originally bought it for?
""The traditional on-prem, highly customised ERP solution, absolutely, positively has to give way to a more SaaS-based ERP solution," he said." ... "That's not how the cloud works,"
Which makes me think "Who is the master here?"
If I buy something from you I would expect it to fit in with my requirements not the other way round. Unless that is you are doing it for free. Then I might think about changing the way my business has developed to fit in with your agenda.
Are SAP offering something here without cost? Or can they convince you that by forcing your business processes into their straight-jacket they are doing you a favour?
Because if they are not then "Caveat emptor"
"Free Software isn't free for enterprise, it still needs supporting. And that costs way more than the Licensing."
Well things may have changed since I hung up my mouse but where I worked we already had an in-house teams supporting the system, me being one of them, so the cost was already factored in. Then on top there were the afford said licensing costs courtesy of Microsoft, Apple, Oracle and on and on.
If a company can reduce the reliance of proprietary software and effectively switch to FOSS then there must be a saving. Both in terms of reduced licensing costs plus if they were using Linux greater stabilty.
"I enjoy the novelty of learning a new system."
Ah! more of a hobbyist than a worker then.
See the thing is for most people a PC is a tool. One that they need to use to get things done and not as an object of interest in itself. If the OS puts up obstacles in the way of getting your job done then something's wrong.
Sure, most people here are interested in the ins and outs of operating system, GUIs, networking, application programming and so on, but they are not representative of the general population of users. So saying that rearranging the GUI is of no consequence and that people should enjoy what may be a jarring experience is short-sighted and wrong.
The outcome was the discovery that people want to access their document, website or streaming content and then for Windows "to get out of the way."
Well, I'll be blowed.
How long has Windows been around? Thirty years or so if my memory serves me correctly, and they have just "discovered" that people want to do work with their PCs and want the OS to get out of the way!
What the bloody hell have they been thinking the OS was for? It's a tool, a means to an end and not the be all and end all.
Still better late than never, I suppose.
Luke 15:7
"BS Standards used to be cheap, useful and informative."
Well, I'll go along with you in that certain BSI publications are useful and informative but I disagree with you on the cheap part.
I wanted a copy of BS381C for my modelling hobby. If you take a look at the BSI shop you will be amazed at the prices asked. Yes I know that making a standard colour chart is expensive but to charge £246 for a booklet with 16 pages is taking the mickey.
I have other colour standards for other air forces and they didn't cost a third as much to buy so it can be done although without the authority of an official standard. Which is probably one of the reasons these organisation feel free to charge as much as they do.
Oh, I did in the end buy BS381C, as I needed it for a particular colour reference and very nicely presented it is. But so it should be at that price.
If memory serves me correctly Therium Litigation Funding IC were the people who funded the Justice for Sub-Postmasters Alliance in their titanic struggle against The Post Office.
The JSPA won, as is well known, but a lot of the £57 million award went to Therium and its lawyers.
Having said that if Therium had not stumped up the money in the first place the Post Office might have got away with the cover-up and a huge miscarriage of justice would not now be in the process of being put right after twenty years.
So, there are good and bad things about legal "guns-for-hire. "But to my mind, if nothing else comes out of it and those affected get little or no recompense, at least the bad behaviour and outright illegality of these big corporations would never be exposed.
"... not what is left of the NHS as a whole."
I think that two entities are being conflated here when people talk about the NHS being untrusted.
The bit that is doing this is NHSDigital. They seem to be the sweepings of the corporatist data-grabbing bit of the IT industry whose only real interest is making as much money as possible from other peoples data.
The real NHS are the doctors and nurses, support staff and volunteers struggling to keep a lid on this pandemic we are suffering.
Personally I trust the real NHS to look after my well-being and keep my intimate and private data secure..
I trust NHSDigital about as far as I could spit them.
"In a statement, a spokesperson for Cellnex insisted that the deal would improve mobile coverage across the UK."
To quote Mandy Rice Davies, "Well he would, wouldn't he."
Does anyone really think that putting out an obvious self-serving statement like that is going to have any impact whatsoever?
Let's wait and see what the CMA come up with before rushing to judgement.
"you could pin a blue rosette on a shit around here and it would get elected",
Sounds to me as if that is exactly what happened.
I get e-mails asking me to contact my MP from various organisations, I never do as I have had dealings with him in before and he is well aware of my different attitudes to events in the recent past. Brexit being one of the main ones. So I never bother to e-mail him and if I do have to contact him I write. By the rules of Parliament he is obliged to reply. Though I have never had a satisfactory answer from him yet.
Oh, he is a Tory and I, most definitely, am not.
"Kleber said: "The W3C doesn't get to be the boss of anyone..."
There speaks someone who knows that whatever Google wants, Google gets.
The arrogance is breathtaking and to actually come out and say, "The goal isn't to have one winner and everyone else losing..." Of course it is, and shows that with over 60% of the browser market Google has made sure that it alone is to be the beneficiary of any changes that it manages to ram through.
Google is likely to win if things go on as they are and the internet will be a poorer and more impoverished place for it.
And to think that I have always regarded Microsoft as the unacceptable face of the IT world. Google's hubris and disdain makes MS look positively cuddly.
I'd like to know who the genius is who decided that it was a good idea to start digging up the roads in the busiest resort town on the Isle of Wight in the middle of the season.
The queues and disruption are horrendous and like others here where the roads have been dug up half the time there is no-one there and if there is anyone on site most of their time seems to be spent having a brew-up.
When finally the roads and pavements had been reinstated things got back to normal, for about a week, and then the gas network people moved in and dug up all the roads, again! And like their fibre laying brethren the holes are still not filled in and an eerie silence reigns.
I am surprised that valuable plant and equipment can be so easily left just waiting to be stolen.
I agree and gave you an up-vote but you must realise that it is very difficult to defend the indefensible.
God knows, I despise PR people in general, but you have to feel sorry for the poor bastards having to go around polishing a turd like Johnson and his utterances, as well as the shambles masquerading as a government.