I've no sympathy for people who click okay without looking what they're clicking okay to.
149 posts • joined 4 Sep 2009
It's a touch screen tablet, are we saying because Apple has a successful touchscreen tablet nobody else can use the most obvious form factor?
Should Samsung have a superfluous keyboard just to be different, or make it round to clearly separate it from Apples offering?
Given the purpose of these things they have to be as thin and light as possible and the shape of a widescreen LCD of whatever size.
Should Samsung sue Apple should they ever dare release a 7" tablet? Cause you know, 7" is Samsung's thing, their copyrighted dimension.
I'd quite like to see one device with both an lcd screen and e-ink screen (either side if they can't think of a more ergonomic way of doing it).
I like e-ink for reading long passages but for quickly flipping through a book or for flipping around managing collections (or accessing other material - like a website) an lcd would be nice.
Looking squarely at security for the common home or small business user this is a good idea - just make it so you can turn it off in the bios.
If you know how to install Linux, you'll know how to turn it off.
Making it impossible to turn off is overkill and I don't think it would happen unless there was a commercial imperative (i.e. subsidised hardware or software purchased as a bundle).
I don't think so, it's just simply not that cheap to make these things and Apple has huge volume on it's side.
If Dell could put a tablet out there for £100 they would have, it's not impossible to do it but slow 7" tablets with poor screens aren't what people want. They want a 10" tablet that looks great and is fast - like an iPad.
Sadly they cost, well, as much as an iPad. Given the choice most people prefer the ubiquity of iTunes and Apples app store.
A reply needs a title?
I imagine governments want to read the hotmail / yahoo emails of people they are interested in too, I also doubt that these other services are impossible to intercept (especially given the nature of this attack).
It seems more likely that the other services either don't wish to disclose attacks or just willingly give up information when asked.
Nah, not the same
Tablets can hold more than one document at a time.
Did you never notice when they wanted to show someone was really busy they'd have a stack of these little tablet devices? Like, look at me, I've got 20 reports to read, so I've got 20 tablets!
Actually I've just thought, how are we going to look busy in the future?
Must be privately owned
It's good for the steel workers, it's good to hold a long term view about their industry and market place.
But it sounds pretty obvious that they could make more money selling the iron and coal than using it to make steel in Australia.
A public company would take the short term view, sell off the loss making steel foundries and profiteer on the coal and iron.
Not a lot I'd hope
Contractors are very cost efficient if used right.
Why bother training somebody up for a year, paying their wages as well as expensive training courses, when you can get somebody in for 2 weeks and have the job done?
Of course this relies on several assumptions:
1) It is indeed just 2 weeks and not an ongoing requirement
2) the contractor is competent
3) there is work for the contractor to do immediately (and then leave)
Of course if the requirement is urgent and ongoing, you do both, but I'm sure a lot of lazy managers spending other peoples money don't bother and just leave the contractor on it.
Conclusions seem flimsy
You work your fingers to the bone doing the house work so don't have time to exercise - wait, house work IS exercise, do it in a spandex jump suit if it makes you feel better.
Simply fact is men and women look after themselves to get laid / married, as soon as a woman gets married she stops trying. The man still wants to get laid.
After a divorce a woman jumps straight back into 'get a man' mode (must be in their dna) while the man breaths a huge sigh of relief and falls back into a comfortable batchelor-hood for a period of time before the 'must get laid' instinct over--powers the horrors of marriage and divorce.
The lake district isn't remote NZ though :)
I don't use it any differently to a paper map, there's plenty of features around to work out where you are and the GPS bit just helps you if you've managed to take a wrong turn (tbh looking at the compass and a map would tell you that quickly enough but it may save you walking 10 minutes in the wrong direction).
Roadtour app with all parks at 50k and in-app purchase for lakes at 25k was £80 total.
Already have a waterproof case for it, battery is plenty for the walks I do but you could buy a booster pack that takes AA batteries.
Of course that means owning an iPhone first but the maps seem a lot cheaper.
Girls bullied on nerd forum?
That would run contrary to experience, perhaps wiki editors are unlike any of the nerds on every other internet forum but I doubt it.
Could be the women don't want to argue, hide the fact they are women if they have any sense and aren't used to being corrected when wrong (it is the ones without sense who own up to being a woman remember).
Then the clincher, women just don't want to edit a wiki.
Lets face it, most guys have better things to be doing than editing a wiki, what kind of swamp monster must the women on their be?
the PC is at a desk
Things you don't want to sit at a desk for use other devices (phones, tablets, game consoles).
There's plenty of things you want to do at a desk though, fps gaming, strategy games, any non trivial word processing / spreadsheets / cad / graphics.
The difference is things we don't need a desk for, we no longer need to do at a desk. That doesn't stop a desk being useful, and no matter what you want to call it, that computing device you use at your desk is a PC.
It could be your tablet plugged into a dock, or it could be a great big biege box, it's still being a PC.
this is a technical issue, not legal or moral
RIM are happy to provide anything they can to facilitate lawful intercept (lawful in the relevant jurisdiction).
The problem is people with their own enterprise servers who have their own encryption keys - RIM can't decrypt that.
If they could, they already would have, this has nothing to do with standing up to tyrants.
It's such a shame
But popular science is a religion, this article, anything that gets into the popular press and especially these comments - all based on belief more than the scientific method.
Personally I like my gods to have some some theatre and a bit of hope for an afterlife, all the pop science cultists can offer me is mung beans and milk floats - no thanks, I'm out!
did every new product have to be revolutionary and magical?
It's a netbook, use it for sending email and browsing on the move. It doesn't need higher specs for that.
An SSD would be nice but realistically you aren't going to get anything bigger than 20GB and the big spinny HD lets you dump quite a few episodes of something on it for travelling.
Too soft on the infected users
the ISPs should have pulled the plug on the zombies until the client paid for a technician to go out and clean their PC(s), they should also have to provide proof they are running up-to-date AV software for a period of 3 years after being identified as a zombie.
ISPs that have identified zombie clients and do not follow the above rules should be cut off upstream.
I don't see why we're still tip toeing around with what is a serious threat to both the commercial and free speech future of the internet.
What are cloud drives made from - clouds?
I see it as a big plus for the fixed disk manufacturers, demand for enterprise storage is rising faster than in decades and we still need a desktop or laptop for most of what we do with computers.
It may end up being a smaller SSD, but that's got nothing to do with the cloud and everything to do with new tech. WD et al should get into making SSDs if they don't want their consumer market (and even high end enterprise market) walking away from them.
"Customer details should have been no more accesible than internal corporate data."
Because requiring customers to be in your building or signed in with a securid authenticated VPN connection is a great business model.
Things that expose themselves to the world get hacked more often than things that are hidden behind firewalls. Shocker.
I am guessing
There is limited supply of the curved screens and Apple has *big* launches (much bigger than the other phones that have used a curved screen).
Apple could risk supply problems at launch, sign big long term contracts to some firms (which would allow them to commit to the investment needed) or they could give them the machines, I expect with a proviso that Apple owns the machines and they are only to be used for Apple contracts.
It's a way of controlling the market, ensuring exclusivity and guaranteeing (their own) supply. The normal approach would be to sign commited contracts with suppliers which would ensure they could invest in the machines needed. But whats to stop them selling similar screens to someone else ocne they've satisfied Apple's order?
This bit does concern me
His employers have no process in place to ensure passwords are kept in the company, and changed when a senior employee leaves.
So they sack him, then realise he was the only one who knew the passwords, that nobody thought to get them from him before he left, and (obviously) they haven't been changed.
So because of his human instinct to tell the guys who are ultimately responsible for not maintaining the passwords (his management) and who just sacked him to go do one he is jailed for 4 years and a $1.5m fine.
I surely hope there's more to this than meets the eye because in my eyes he's left, he has no further responsibility to that company. What if some server just failed without good backups, would he be expected to go in and fix it after being sacked too - whats the fine for not going in when you don't work there anymore?
Not for tracking habits
But for identifying where your machine is when the guy renting it disappears.
It's not unreasonable but should 1) be up front about it and 2) strictly controlled and only used when the rental agreement is breached.
To be legal the agreement would need to be explicit and that might well tip off the user (i.e. if they decide to nick it, the'll wipe the HD before doing anything else - soldered to the motherboard my arse).
It's a legal problem not a technical one - the law needs to sort it out.
Make the ISPs responsible for traffic leaving their network.
If Youtube host infringing material they are required to take it down but if an ISP is spewing malware and spam it's nothing to do with them?
The law isn't perfect but I can't imagine youtube bothering with take down requests if there wasn't a legal framework backing them up.