Re: The only remaining question is ..
Pointing the laser at the bell from four different directions?
48 posts • joined 14 Jul 2009
Pointing the laser at the bell from four different directions?
@Lars: the day the French armed forces swear allegiance to the Eiffel Tower, I may be more inclined to accept your analogy.
I'm pretty sure I remember ICL George 3 MOP sessions being held up waiting for a file restore back in the 1970s.
Jet engines have armoured burst protection casings. They aren't there to retain bits of goose, but to retain bits of high speed nickel alloy compressor blades which are a much tougher proposition. What breaks the first blade is probably irrelevant to the outcome.
Warrant canaries, like the real ones, don't sing when triggered - they fall off their perch and die.
For versions of Android prior to 5 (at least 4.3 and 4.4), there are apps like Permission Manager available on PlayStore. I unchecked "microphone" for FB, though the app tells me that permission has never been used.
It will not be by monarchy that the totalitarian dystopian future will be imposed.
@MaxNZ: Except for Swahili, which a one time was written in Arabic script. Indeed, the very name of the language is Arabic.
I'd like to think you mean "peu à peu".
@NumptyScrub: "So remind me again, how many ounces to a pound, how many pounds to a stone, how many stone to a hundredweight, and how many hundredweight to a ton?"
I'll tell you a funny thing. There are still lots of us about who learned how to deal with this system at school. It didn't kill us, and we still remember the numbers (16, 14, 8 and 20, since you ask).
I too find the description objectionable. I have in the past acted as an ORG volunteer on election issues: this is not something I would ever be likely to undertake for a "freetard collective". A withdrawal of the description would be welcome.
Doesn't have to go abroad, bring it to the Museum of Computing in Swindon if they have space (it's almost abroad, I guess, from a Cambridge perspective). It may not be truly a museum piece yet, but it's undeniably a brilliant educational tool.
We have good beer, too.
Because they operate - at least in an ideal world - as a single economic unit.
My wife is long-term sick, and cannot work. Why should she be forced to waste the unused part of her tax allowance, when I am supporting her?
Perhaps you're too young to remember the days when couples actually had a choice, to have their allowances treated separately or jointly. This was done away with on the excuse (I guess) of encouraging women to be financially independent of their husbands. As usual, the law of unintended consequences applies.
This appears to be a fake name used as a tongue-twister in Polish - see http://translate.google.co.uk/translate?hl=en&sl=pl&u=http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grzegorz_Brz%25C4%2599czyszczykiewicz&prev=search for a translation of a wikipedia.pl page.
Since this name seems to be fake, I find myself wondering about the veracity of the whole story.
Best leave spouses and children out of this.
As I understand it, the species name is Homo Sapiens, of which we are the sub-species Homo Sapiens Sapiens. The neanderthals were the sub-species Homo Sapiens Neanderthalis. Nothing problematic about different sub-species interbreeding - was probably good fun for those concerned :-)
I would find a public statement from e.g. the Culham laboratory in the UK to be considerably more significant.
@Cynic_999: Do you know what the terms of the order (or rather, National Security Letter) might be? Nor do I. It seems not impossible that it might forbid the authors recommending previous versions of Truecrypt, or in some other way make it impossible for them to do so without breaching the terms of the order. By offering the ridiculous advice that they have offered, they not only avoid that possibility, but make it clear that they are acting under duress.
@Don Jefe: You haven't lived until you've had your English corrected by a Dutchman.
"Unlike certain other penguin flavoured OSs...e.g. having to use SUDO which must run as root UID0. Major security fail."
Errr... "sudo su - <username>". I use this daily.
Microsoft are now reaping the results of the decision they made back in the 90s to eschew the traditional software upgrade model of major and minor version releases in favour of presenting the world with a brand new (apparently) product every few years, and thus forcing users to shell out for a complete new product, rather than a more moderate price for a version upgrade. If they had taken a staged approach with the WInNT development stream, we might have seen:
Windows 5.0 - 5.4 (aka Win2000)
Windows 6.0 - 6.x (aka WinXP)
Skip Vista entirely
Windows 7.0 (Win7) - Windows 7.5 (perhaps) (Win8).
What we know as XP would by now be only one major version behind, and open to additional development and/or maintenance, rather than three products behind, and politically embarrassing to develop further.
Microsoft has sown the seeds of its own decline with its grasping business practices, of which this is only one example. Similar comments apply to the Office range of products.
"You're mistaken. Dell offers Ubuntu preloaded."
Do they? They probably ought to advertise it on their website then. Admittedly I've only looked at the Inspiron range on the UK website, but there is nothing there about Ubuntu.
Cable & Wireless Worldwide became part of Vodafone in April this year.
I'm baffled by the idea that WW1 and WWII might have been responsible for a reduction in economic activity. The participating nations (notably the USA) ramped up their economic activity tremendously, to produce the military hardware required, and to support the activity of millions of fighting men and women. Not to mention the polluting effect of millions of things going bang...
I try to keep an open mind on the whole subject, but sometimes, when confronted by obvious bollox, it's difficult.
@Peter2: It's not *them* getting *younger*, you know...
Printing a safety razor out of plastic? You don't want to even *buy* one with any plastic in the handle - after a few weeks use it starts to deform slightly - suddenly the blade can't be clamped in place as hard as it was, and there's blood all over the shop (got the T-shirt, but had to bin it cos of all the blood).
Sometimes there's no substitute for stainless steel.
So ends (hopefully) one of the biggest cons in computing history, namely the pretence that each new version of Windows was a brand new product rather than a version change over the previous product - thus enabling Microsoft to charge more for the "new product" than they could have if it were seen solely as a new version.
Same goes for Office. I'd be glad to see that go the same way.
This is very odd. Kubuntu (that's Ubuntu withe KDE4 front end) 12.04 runs fine on my Acer AO725 - dual-core 1GHz C60 processor, 2GB memory. Flash video is a bit choppy, but that's a whole separate issue.
So the RPi is a base model Android phone? Hmm, let's see.
As you say, no touchscreen, no cell interface, no battery.
On the other hand, LAN interface, 2 x USB Type "A" i/fs, micro SD card I/f, analogue video, 5V power socket in non-obvious location for a phone, GPIO pins, HDMI...
I would think there comes a point where you don't mod a phone card to make it into an RPi, you design from scratch. And I think that's what happened.
I suggest you read this - http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-115535 - and then lecture us on the existence or otherwise of extradition agreements between Sweden and the US.
Perhaps I'm being stupid, but I don't understand the reason for the "VC" reference.
They may be one day...
Surely the price is $35 for a Model B, $25 for a Model A. It's the Model B which is selling in the UK for £29, which includes (I think) VAT and delivery.
I'm a bit confused that we should share only 5% of our DNA with this delightful young lady. I thought we shared 95% with chimps!
I'll tell you a funny thing. NSA have for years published advice on their website on how to secure various types of system, most importantly elements of an Enterprise Windows/AD environment. They do this to help US entities, Government or otherwise, protect themselves, but they have no problem with foreigners making use of this advice as well. It seems to me that their SELinux efforts should be looked at in that light.
And I won't even tell you how polite they were when I rang them about one of their documents at around 0900 Eastern Time on Sept 11th, 2001...
Sorry, is it fed with a reel of punch cards or a pack of paper tape?
Works for me.
There is the odd difficulty with unmanned aircraft in some conflict environments. See
You obviously missed out on Granada and the Alpujarra...
Splendid - I do miss the days of having my Sinclair Spectrum plugged into the telly! Not sure my wife does, though...
It seems to me basic that you should not use a security mechanism provided by supplier X to address security vulnerabilities originating from the same supplier. Microsoft do not seem to have understood this.
Microsoft's first anti-virus product, MSAV, was rubbish. I can't speak to the quality of this one, but however technically good it may be at detection, it has now, I believe, been utterly compromised by this extremely bad advice. The only way out, I feel, is for Microsoft to improve the performance to the point where thay can publicly rescind that advice.
Paris, because her performance is never in doubt. Can't speak about vulnerability to infection though...
PKC, I think you mean
You may be interested to know that according to Wikipedia the USA does not have an official language.
Your headline raises the question of whether the GPL is or is not a license; but your article text does not address that point at all, which makes the headline a trifle misleading.
See http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20031214210634851 for a treatment of that question (written in pre-GPLv3 days).
The simplest workaround is to install the "NoScript" add-on, and only allow scripts on sites known to be trusted.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017