* Posts by Some Beggar

882 publicly visible posts • joined 14 Jul 2009

Moore's Law has ten years to run, predicts physicist

Some Beggar

What ... AGAIN??

Wind farms create local warming

Some Beggar

Re: Of course it does

Do you have any citations for that ground source claim?

There's a convenient "experiment" been built close to us (in southern France) that appears to completely contradict it. A row of essentially identical villas (in terms of area/volume) running along a gently sloping road all built with identical ground source heating systems. As far as I am aware, they are all running as efficiently as expected. If cooled ground water was a real problem, shouldn't the chap at the bottom of the hill have lost some benefit?

Some Beggar

Re: taking this theory further...

Most of that 15C is because urban areas are made of brick, concrete and asphalt and act as massive solar ovens storing up the sun's heat and blocking any cooling winds. Pompeii is effing hot in the summer and I don't think there are many Roman aircon units still running.

Some Beggar

Re: Constant input

Quite. But that's the same constant input as is received by any other area at the same latitude. They are trying to explain why there would be local differences.

Some Beggar

Re: Humidity?

Built-in aircon drips the humidity into the drains. The units that are bolted to the side of existing buildings don't. You can steam clean your clothes outside half the residential buildings in Kowloon.

Some Beggar

Re: taking this theory further...

Not quite as daft as it sounds. Ever stood by the exterior vent of an air conditioning unit? In built-up areas, air conditioning contributes a non-negligible amount to the heat and humidity of the immediate surrounding area.

Some Beggar
WTF?

Re: Earth's Rotation?

You forgot the "joke alert" icon.

At least I really really hope you forgot the "joke alert" icon.

Some Beggar

Re: But cooling elsewhere

Removing energy from the flow means that the flow can't reach as far as it once did, so 'where ever' doesn't get the cooling breezes it used to.Consequently, 'where ever' gets warmer.

First Law of Thermodynamics again. How does removing energy from the system cause another part of the system to gain energy in the form of heat?

Some Beggar
Headmaster

Re: sure

@Anonymous Coward

I suggest you swot up on the First Law of Thermodynamics. They are removing energy from the local system. If they are creating electrical energy and creating heat energy then somebody somewhere is losing energy.

Arcam rPac

Some Beggar
FAIL

Re: It is not intended to be a panacea

And are you going to explain why you think double blind testing is a waste of time? Or offer any alternatives? Because otherwise this is a pretty feeble response.

Some Beggar

Re: Would you like to buy a bridge?

That's not what I asked.

Some Beggar

Re: jitter-free analogue signal

(that should be "Arcam sales bumph")

Some Beggar
Meh

Re: jitter-free analogue signal

Apologies. You're quite right. The datasheets I was looking at were packages with both the DAC and a TI USB controller. The PCM5102 itself doesn't have on-board USB.

It's interesting that your main post mentions your abundance of gear (or 'ear') to test this on and yet neither the TI sales bumph nor this review contains any objective testing.

No offence, but until somebody actually posts something material rather than these empty assertions then I'm sticking firmly with my original audiophile voodoo assessment.

Some Beggar

Re: It is not intended to be a panacea

I'm putting them up my bum.

Some Beggar
Meh

Re: jitter-free analogue signal

"Arcam is one of the few companies to implement it in all its USB DACs right down to this inexpensive one."

The USB stack is built into the TI DAC. The only other digital i/f into the DAC is s/pdif. How are Arcam implementing anything novel in the USB connection in this product?

Some Beggar

Re: Don't be too harsh

"If you can get a £10 box of bits and sell it for £150, welcome to capitalism"

Absolutely. But when somebody does sell a £10 box of bits for £150 it is the responsibility of people who know better to point that out. And a reviewer on a techie website should be one of the people who knows better. Writing a fluff piece that gives that £10 box of bits a score of 90% is weak.

Some Beggar

Re: Would you like to buy a bridge?

Rather than spamming a blog, perhaps you could simply explain what else you believe is inside that pretty box that would bring the necessary BoM and design costs into double figures, let alone up to £75 or £150.

I just poked around and the same (or essentially the same) DAC is used in several of those cheapo USB-driven (rather than USB-powered) PC speakers. So that's the entire useful contents of that box plus two (or four) drivers, power/volume control, caseworks, headphone output and cable to connect the satellite speaker ... all for between £25 and £50 retail.

So ... can you persuade me that this device is anything other than audiophile homeopathy?

Some Beggar
FAIL

Would you like to buy a bridge?

Those DACs cost under $3 in volume, they have on-board USB and sp/dif, and they can drive headphones directly. You need about another $1 of discrete components to make something that goes all the way from the USB in to the headphone socket out. You can get away with cheapo components since the whole point of that DAC is that it does the full job and is robust against interference and jitter.

Let's be generous and say $5 for the electronics. Care to explain where the rest of that £150 comes from? Pure voodoo.

Shock sales surge sends Amazon shares soaring

Some Beggar

Calm down, petal. It's what we humans call a "joke".

Some Beggar

I've never had any trouble with them. They must really hate you.

Some Beggar
Childcatcher

The disturbing part of this is that the volatility of trading in high tech whizz bang interweb businesses suggests that few of the stripey shirts on the stock exchanges have attended that 101 class.

Study finds water cycle accelerating with warming

Some Beggar
Facepalm

Re: @Silly Beggar

@amanfromearth

Which bit of "water vapor" are you struggling with?

Some Beggar

Re: So ?

They're not.

HTH.

Some Beggar
FAIL

Water vapor is a greenhouse gas. It is a positive feedback, not a negative one.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_gas#Role_of_water_vapor

Panasonic touts monster 8k by 4k 'flickerless' plasma

Some Beggar
WTF?

Re: Premature

Ummm ... which bit of this rant is aimed at me? It doesn't appear to have much or anything to do with what I wrote

Some Beggar

Re: Premature

Many of these [insert your superlative] products are about as 'real' as the concept cars you see at motor shows. There's no rush to ever get them to market. They get attention at trade shows and free advertising in the papers.

I mean ... not The Register obviously. They wouldn't be gullible enough to splash the word PANASONIC onto their interweb just because somebody at PANASONIC released the sniff of a hint of a rumour that a big and shiny PANASONIC product might possibly go on sale at some vague point in the future. Maybe. Perhaps.

Gaia scientist Lovelock: 'I was wrong and alarmist on climate'

Some Beggar
FAIL

Re: @ ArmanX

(I'd avoid the weak attempts at condescension if I were you. I'm a scientist. I'm perfectly comfortable with the concept of a scientific model and its place within the broader scientific process. I even know some long words.)

One model that was suggested many years ago said that, among other things, the polar ice caps would melt completely by the year 2010.

Citation please.

I am attacking, for lack of a better word, the Cult of Climate Change

No. What you are attacking is a straw man.

Some Beggar
FAIL

Re: @ ArmanX

"My point is that the current model ceased being science when it was disproved, but not abandoned."

Then your point is empty since nobody has "disproved" the science. The overwhelming scientific consensus is still very much in favour of the model of man-made climate change:

http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/06/04/1003187107.abstract

Some Beggar
Unhappy

Re: He's obviously a heretic of some sort

I can't believe people have downvoted the idea of me dancing naked. How incredibly rude.

Some Beggar
Stop

Re: Predictions...

"Somehow I believe that this "climate change" stuff fits into this type of model, but I have no evidence, just a belief."

Why rely on belief for something that is straightforward to empirically test? These predictions are published in journals. They're not buried in concrete tombs. You simply need to collect them, evaluate their accuracy against some metric, and compare the distribution against what you would expect from pure chance.

(or you could just use google scholar and read the papers that have already this ... unfortunately it completely contradicts your belief so you might not want to)

Some Beggar
Headmaster

Re: SCIENCE

"The test case for climate science is just so big, you need a spare planet"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observational_science

There are some fundamental differences between observational and experimental science, but that doesn't automatically mean the former is invalid or based on 'faith'.

And if you take the argument too far then it starts to sound disturbingly similar to the arguments used by creationists to undermine our theories on the age of the planet and the universe.

Some Beggar

Re: Eh?

He's presumably talking about impulse rather than force. The basic arithmetic and underlying point remain: you would need to drop a truly massive hat to cause a ripple on the Richter scale.

(and if you're going to attempt pedantry then force is written as an upper case F)

Some Beggar

Re: Weak.

"What's so crazy about the idea of multi-cellular life forms being part of a higher level multi-cellular life form?"

There is no mechanism proposed by this could work and no test proposed to verify whether it is false. That might make it "interesting" to some people, but it disqualifies it from being a scientific hypothesis.

New satellite will blow your socks off - and spot them from spaaaace

Some Beggar

Re: 80's Tech

I worked on some <censored> technology in the early '90s and the <censored> still struggled to distinguish between a <censored> and a transit van.

Nokia's fontastic Pure wins 'design Oscar'

Some Beggar

Re: Quite partial to...

I write perl in wingdings. I'm font hardcore, me.

Some Beggar
WTF?

Re: You can read it then

Are nokia so desperate they are trying to claim copyright on the alphabet now?

Ummm. Fonts have been commercial licensed products for ever and ever. Nokia didn't invent that.

Quantum cruncher beats today's computers by 1080

Some Beggar
Facepalm

Re: They haven't built a "computer" by any ordinary definition.

@Mike 16

Ah yes. Sorry. I dun a stoopid. What I meant to compare was a piston engine and a jet engine. I'll go and sit in the herp derp corner along with whichever Reg editor wrote the title of this article.

Some Beggar

Re: They haven't built a "computer" by any ordinary definition.

Comparing performance is not really the same as calling it a computer.

It's like bragging about the power of a jet engine by comparing it to "the most powerful internal combustion engine".

Bill Hicks was right about marketing.

Some Beggar

Re: Here I am..

a reproductive tract the size of the universe

George Osborne?

Some Beggar

Re: This sentence should be taken out and shot!

It makes more sense if you read it in the voice of Borat.

Some Beggar
WTF?

They haven't built a "computer" by any ordinary definition.

What they've built is an analogue simulator. It uses quantum behaviour on a small and manageable scale - the disc of beryllium - to model the quantum behaviour of much more intractable systems. It's like modelling tsunamis in the kitchen and calling your sink a "computer".

I'm not sure at what point between the Nature paper and the Reg article this became so completely befuddled. It's not rocket science.

Well ... ok ... it is slightly rocket science. But somebody with a background in physics and an ability to read even just the abstract of the Nature paper could have grasped the vague idea of what they've done.

Indiana cops arrest violent 6-year-old

Some Beggar
Facepalm

Re: It never ceases to amaze me

"the lefties"?

You're probably amazed by your own reflection.

Tablets are the future of the PC, says researcher

Some Beggar

Re: @Some Beggar

Macbooks have a proprietary port you can use.

Some Beggar

Re: portable?

You seem somewhat confused about what "portable" means. Is your name Humpty Dumpty?

And tablets are already available with 3G. It'll be standard in all but the bottom rung in the next generation.

Some Beggar

Re: What's it called?

@Neil Lewis

Are you sure you're not confusing 'work' with another word that starts with 'w' and ends with 'k'?

Some Beggar
Thumb Down

Re: Convenient?

Not everybody has a job that can be done while sitting in one place. Or wants one. I'm hardly a skittish youth but if I had to sit in one place all day I'd quit and become a landscape gardener or a plasterer. Or whatever you call those people who build paths on mountains. Or a spaceman.

Some Beggar
Thumb Down

Re: What's it called?

I don't know anybody who uses a laptop on their lap. It's a horrible way to work. The screen is far too low and the keyboard is far too close. You might as well try to work while throwing yourself down a staircase.

Some Beggar
Facepalm

Re: Yawn.

Absolutely. Life would be far more interesting if nobody had opinions.

DERP.

Some Beggar
Meh

On the one hand, I'm buying his predictions because I like tablets and I like his smiley beardy face.

On the other hand, he's done the standard market analyst trick of publishing a colourful graph with no error bars and pointlessly specific predictions. And if you browse the old papers on the Forrester website there are some ... "interesting"... predictions even amongst the papers that they haven't pulled because they turned out to be bollocks.

(no offence to any market anaylysts ... I'm sure you're not all charlatans with nice shirts and trustworthy faces)

Amazon Kindle Touch touches down early

Some Beggar
WTF?

Re: Here's a question

@The BigYin

You seem peculiarly determined to persuade me that I've made a foolish purchasing decision. Is this genuine concern for my welfare or are you just tickling your own bollocks to make yourself feel good?

Here's what I originally wrote:

"I wouldn't rely on DRM'd media for anything that I wanted to keep. E-books are a handy paperback replacement if you read and/or travel a lot. For stuff that I might actually want to dip into in the future I'd rather own a hardback or an "open" digital copy."

Is there anything in there that you actually disagree with?