Re: Police are investigating?
"Because they're Canadians, the most polite and friendly nation on the Western Hemisphere."
Based on my experience Japan has that title for the Eastern Hemisphere :)
473 posts • joined 6 Jul 2009
Afghanistan was, and parts of still are, a "Developed" country before the USSR invaded in 1979, then the Taliban, then the USA. Contrary to what people seem to think it is not a huge area filled with nothing but goat herders.
Never underestimate the effectiveness of localized guerilla forces against a large trained military group, even in "developed" countries.
I don't own a gun because I want to overthrow a corrupt government. I own a gun so I can protect my family and myself when someone else tries to overthrow the government, or any other time the rule of law fails.
I live in an area that gets the occasional BIG natural disaster, the sort that takes out utilities for extended periods of time. I have supplies set aside for such times so my family and I are OK for a up to 2 weeks in a worst case scenario. Those supplies also include a gun and ammo, so that when, not if, someone else who could not/did not set aside supplies comes looking for my supplies, and anything else of value that catches their eye, I will be able to ensure that my family is safe. I know from experience that most of the time looters will simply move on to easier pickings when they see that you are armed, even if they are armed themselves.
"It never pays to carry a gun."
I have to disagree.
Over the years I have been in two situations where carrying a gun saved my life, or at least kept me from being seriously injured. In both cases I did not have to draw my weapon, once it became known I was armed the threat to my safety ended.
Guns are tools, just like a car, if you are careless or don't know how to use them properly they will end up injuring or killing someone.
What does need to be addressed however is the sub culture that considers the use of deadly force to be an acceptable first response to any disagreement or conflict. Social programs that reduce poverty, improve education and provide job opportunities do more to reduce violent crime overall than gun control laws.
GPU's good enough for gaming but not so great at bitcoin and other non gaming applications will bring the price on high end gaming graphics cards back down to something more reasonable.
The bit miners can create a niche market for dedicated "BmPU" (Bitmining Processor Units) that I'm sure someone will seek to corner.
You should be able to get up on a soap box on any street corner and start speaking your views, even if you say that Gay's should be stoned, Jews should be gassed, US President Trump should be impeached and local zoning laws should be changed to allow a brothel next to the church. The only restrictions on public speech should be in regard to interference with local business/private dwellings, bothering people in their homes or other non-public spaces, disturbing people late night, etc. (personally I would also like a noise ordinance to keep Public parks reasonably quite, you could still stand there in a sandwich board and speak at a normal volume). If I don't agree with the person speaking I can ignore them and walk away, or ask them to move from in front of my business/home.
"Free speech" should be about expressing you views without fear of censorship, no mater what you want to say. Putting limits and restrictions on what can be said, no mater how repugnant those opinions may be, goes against the entire concept of "Freedom of Speech".
I think it was US's "Founding Father" John Adams who said that when defending freedoms you will often have to defend those who are repugnant, because that is where the erosion of freedoms will begin. The restrictions will first be targeted at those on the fringes that no one will object to, and then it will grow. If you say nothing when they come for the Neo-Nazis eventually there won't be anyone left to speak out when they come for you.
I'm fully aware that my view on this is more than a little simplistic, idealistic, and naive to the point that it will beggar some peoples minds but it is how I see the topic. I would rather have someone venting their hate for X publicly and being ignored than them keeping silent and letting the hate fester and build until it actually harms someone.
I will now step down from my soap box. Thank you for your time and have a good day.
17.46kps really isn't that fast when compared to light speed at 300,000kps, so any time dilation can safely be ignored. The dilation only becomes meaningful when you get up to higher fractions of light speed.
According to Relativity time will slow down even when you just walk to the corner store. Its all about how fast your moving relative to another point of reference.
Because they were cheap ass consultants who didn't want to spend the money on fully licensed MS software but were also to lazy to get Libre/Open Office.
I've encountered that in many small businesses I've done IT work for over the years. One time there where 4 of 5 machines running hacked Solidworks CAD software and ALL the machine (23 total) were running hacked installs of MS Office 2003. I brought this to the owners attention and he told be "I've already given MS enough more money, they aren't getting anymore from me" and my favorite line was "It's too expensive" when I brought up the Solidworks (each license was something like US$40K at the time). About a month later he had me spec out and purchase a new US$ 3500 desktop system, and he asked me if I could download a 64 bit version of Windows instead of paying for it. I was laid off fairly soon afterwards because "the network is running so well we don't think we need a full time IT guy anymore". I thought about tipping off the BSA but the boss wasn't worth it.
The moral? Even when someone can afford it they will cheat because they want to save a buck or two and don't care how they do it.
If the story had been
"80-year-old cyclist killed in prang with Lamborghini Huracán"
would anyone care?
Any car, with auto-pilot or not, can hit and kill someone if the driver isn't paying attention. Even if the Tesla's autopilot was engaged and working perfectly the driver was not paying attention to the road and thus is to blame, not the car. I believe Tesla makes it quite clear that the driver should not take their attention off the road even with the AP engaged.
As a driving instructor once said "There are no 'accidents', its always because someone wasn't paying attention"
"When will women have better rights?
1 day after the country runs out of oil."
Uh, no. No they won't. The lack of women's rights is related to the religions and culture of the area, not the amount of oil there. Even before Islam took hold in the area women were treated as property and that will not change until there is a fundamental change in the cultures that consider women to be property.
Back around the time "Hunt for Red October" came out I had co-worker who had done some contracting work for the US Navy, the sort where he couldn't say more than "I did some work for the Navy awhile back". After seeing "Red October" asked him what he thought about MHD engines and he told me that while they might find a use in civilian ships eventually they would NEVER be used in a military sub because using a HDM engine would always reveal a subs location.
A MHD engine may be silent but they have large and easy to detect magnetic signature that would reveal the location of a ship from a surprisingly large distance away. Since both "Hunter" and "Boomer" class subs rely on not being detected using something like a MHD propulsion unit would be avoided at all costs.
I can understand your viewpoint but remember that whatever freedoms you have now where more than likely secured for you by the use, of or threat of, a weapon at some point in the past.
That said the American obsession with guns is a bit disturbing, but it is not the guns at fault. One of the core issues is the culture that glorifies and promotes violence as an acceptable first response to any disagreement.
funny thing about free speech is your going to hear stuff you don't like.
As soon as you say it is alright to censor someone because you don't like the intolerant racist shit they spout then you become just like the many tyrants of history and today who would silence any speech they disagree with.
If you don't like what someone is saying don't do business or associate with them, but don't try to shut them up. Let them speak loudly and widely so everyone will know exactly what sort of person they are.
I for one would rather have the racists and other intolerant extremists saying exactly what they feel like saying. Makes it easier to know who the bigots are.
As the old saying goes, “I wholly disapprove of what you say—and will defend to the death your right to say it.”
"They are not very smart,"
Never underestimate the intelligence of your opponent. The reason the TLA's keep doing this kind of BS is because they believe everyone else is too stupid to care or powerless to do anything about it.
And sadly, they are for the most part correct.
"When they start putting these in newborns, I'll be very afraid!"
I'll be afraid when the they start requiring them for anything, right now they just worry me.
"Then again, chipping convicted felons might not be a bad idea."
Once a person has completed their sentence they should not continue to be punished for their crime.
While I can think of a lot of things I would do with 7 million there are also some things that I wouldn't sell for anything.
Glad to hear there are others who don't value money above everything else.
Sadly those who do value money will do whatever it takes to get it from those who have it. I wouldn't be surprised if some new city regulation or ordinance gets passed that will either force the land to be sold, or simply seized, shortly after some "contributions" to the local city government.
A very scary film because it really happened. 36 innocent people people convicted and sentenced in one of California's biggest child abuse/pedophile cases. 20+ years later 34 of them had been released, the last two died in prison after serving 14+ years of their sentences.
An "assault rifle" as legally defined is full auto and used by military and LEOs.
An "assault weapon", which is what the gunman had and has no standard legal definition, is a semi-auto civilian version of a military assault rifle.
Just being pedantic but this always ruffles me off when people mix up the two.
Building a rocket is not new. Its just doing the math, drawing some blueprints and building it.
What is impressive as all Hells to me is the programming needed to pull this off.
I used to teach real time embedded programming and from a RTOS programmers standpoint this is just Freaking incredible.
Serious Kudos to the SpaceX team that wrote and tested the code.
What if the chicken wing theft was just a false flag operation to get a stingray activated in an area that contained a "person of interest" (terrorist, civil rights lawyer, environmental activist, etc.).
Sure, they could have just used a Stingray without a warrant, and risked getting anything they collected thrown out later as tainted. BUT by getting the warrant to use the device they can say the data collected against the "person of interest" was not illegally acquired since it was the result of a legal search using the Stingray device that just "happened" to pickup some other data. Sort of like a cop using a warrant to search a house for a stolen coffee maker and finding a few lines of cocaine that belong to a visiting friend on the kitchen table, sure its outside the scope of the original warrant but still admissible.
After all, they didn't catch the wing thief did they?
Super conspiracy mode : OFF
mines the grey trench coat with the graphene/kevlar/tin foil composite lining and matching hat..
Fun fact about the USA. The original Constitution only authorized the Navy/Marines, it forbid a standing Army and of course the Air Force wasn't even imagined.
A Civil war, some amendments and technological advancements later and the USA now has everything their Founding Fathers didn't think a good country should have.
Most of the "issues" were caused by bad design choices. The Hindenburg was covered in a paint that was effectively thermit and had thousands of gallons of diesel fuel on board. All the hydrogen was burned up with in the first 90 seconds, and the hydrogen fire burned UP, it was the burning diesel fuel that fell down.
Watch the video of the Hindenburg again sometime, and remember that Hydrogen flames are nearly invisible.
They could always switch to Hydrogen.
These are unmanned units so loss of life is not an issue, except possibly when taking off and landing. What made the Hindenburg so deadly was not the gas it used but the highly flammable paint it was coated with and all the diesel fuel it was carrying. With a properly designed gas envelope and equipment pod there is no reason it couldn't be at least as safe as what they currently use.
Most people reactions to using hydrogen are just like their reaction to nuclear energy. Hydrogen==Hindenburg!! nuclear==Fukushima!!, both cases the problem was caused by poor design choices, not the core technology itself.
Something else I just thought of. It might be possible to use condensed water from the air and some of the solar energy to keep the gas envelop topped up so the "on station time" might be extended. This is just an off the top of my head idea, I don't know what the rate of gas escape is and all the other factors that need to be accounted for but it might be something to look into.
small correction. Nothing was "stolen". The woman provided the phone to the police and consented to its contents being copied. However, the police had no fucking business copying and keeping more than the video the victim had made. And they sure as Hells should not have provided it to the lawyer until charges had actually been brought against the accused as part of discovery.
Given the number of times I've heard about police doing more to protect each other than to protect the public I can't help but think there was malicious intent by individuals in the police department.
One of the things they teach you in law school and the training academy of every LEO in the USA, is what kind of judge is needed for what level of search.
The Feds screwed up. They should have gotten another warrant before they went outside the boundaries of the warrant they had. And if they didn't know the difference they shouldn't be in law enforcement.
If a good cop knows that another officer is bad and doesn't do anything, doesn't that make the "good" cop worse than the bad cop since they are not only NOT doing anything to stop the bad cop (so an accessory after the fact) but are also protecting the bad cop (obstruction) by not reporting them.
So by this its easy to arrive at the conclusion that all the police are dirty, not just one or two.
The greatest evil is when the good to nothing.
probably the older cops that where hired before the departments started going for lower barrel recruits are biasing the average up by a large amount. Give it a little more time, when the older cops retire we'll see the more accurate, and lower, average emerge among the remaining street thugs^wcops.
The article mentions that "Planet 9" would not be able to directly affect Cassini but could affect Saturn's orbit which WOULD affect Cassini's position relative to the Earth since Cassini is within Saturn's gravity well.
But they didn't find anything that showed an effect on Saturn during Cassini's time there. This lack of detection could mean;
The current positions of Saturn and Planet 9 are so far apart that any deviance in Saturn's orbit is so small it is below the detection threshold of the instruments. This could be the case if "9" is currently near the outer end of it's orbit. So effort must continue using other methods.
There is no "Planet 9" and the evidence so far is just random orbital noise that looks like a pattern
I'm hoping its the former, it would be really cool if a new, big, planet was found during my lifetime. Sadly there would not be a mission to it within whats left of my lifetime. A planet so far out would likely be so cold, and has stayed that way, as to have preserved information about the dust/gas cloud that formed the solar system.
Side note; Pluto comes in close enough to the sun that it gets enough heat at times to maintain a gaseous atmosphere for a time, so some of the Hydrogen and other lite gasses would have had a chance to boil off a little since Pluto formed. Planet 9 might be far enough out and big enough to have held onto more of its original gasses.
In 2019 it will be the 50th anniversary of the first moon landing.
And in that 50 years there have only been 12 humans who have walked on the moon.
I grew with the Apollo missions and I remember how there was all this talk of permanent bases on the moon and missions to Mars by the year 2000.
Then America stumbled somewhere along the way and never got it's stride back, and now its not really even in the race anymore.
What the Hells went wrong?
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019