480?
I work in game development and we capture our animation data with three web cams. We record whole body movement down to individual fingers. We don't use markers or those funny suits - just process the video feed.
576 publicly visible posts • joined 6 Jul 2009
"Am I the only one that just wants to punch that thing it its stupid smug face? (I'm pretty sure that when I'm an old fart I am going to be spending a lot of time yelling at robots and demanding to speak to a human being.)"
More likely you'll be like the rest of us nerds, desperately yearning for a bit of the robot's attention, but continually spurned.
"On the stand, Freecale apps manager Graham Troy suggested other implications for engine management where car owners could switch ECU (Engine Control Unit) profiles and pay a few quid extra for a download to have their sedentary saloon souped up to a sportster for the weekend."
I'm not convinced that would be very popular with motorists, to be frank. Many might take the view that they already bought the car, so should be able to access it's capabilities at will and without further charge.
It feels really strange that the Internet has shrunk the world for so many people, making us feel more like a global society and then people want domain names tied down to cities.
Look at the popularity of .com compared to country specific TLDs. It seems odd to me that anyone's that fussed about .london, beyond tourism and companies scared of the domain being squatted.
Xenon 2 was absolutely outstanding both graphically and in terms of audio, but Xenon really did have the more interesting gameplay.
When I was about 14, me and a friend would play Xenon in co-op mode... one person did the space bar to swap between air and ground and the other did everything else. We played it so much that we could clock the game without dying.
Those were the days.
Why do they need to have these two words as a single entry? I don't understand the need when, presumably, they also have each word as an individual entry.
All the other stuff is just meh, whatever. Who cares if cur's in the dictionary or not. It's clearly part of the language either way.
The worst excuse I've been given for keeping us on low spec PCs is "We don't want you developing on better PCs than our average customers have because you won't realise how badly your code performs in the real world."
Oddly, we don't ship the debug build of our product, although we often have to run it when debugging.
I did a degree in AI in the 90s and my professor shared a cute story with us about Marvin Minski going to view his colleagues table tennis playing robot. The claim is that when Minski walked into the lab, the robot immediately started doing it's best to smack him on his shiny, bald noggin.
I have no idea if there's any truth in it, but it still makes me happy.
I hope that they'll look more closely than just at the name. Otherwise when I come to release my 1920s themed, point and click adventure following a young woman as she explores the fashion and dances of the speakeasies it may turn out I've wasted a whole morning and most of an afternoon developing Flapper Bird. :(
It's worse than that. He's come in and kicked all this off now, but in a couple of years he'll either be in opposition or he'll have been moved into health or sport or something else he's shit at instead.
While schools are trying to train up teachers to be good at teaching programming to five year olds, he'll be off being an arse biscuit somewhere else and he won't have to deal with any of the difficulties everyone in education is having with the whole scheme.
It seems that it is more profitable for them to plug them in and use them themselves, but only for a period of time. After that period, they start to be too slow to be profitable, so then they're sitting there with piles of stock that's making them no money and for which there is no demand.
That means they need to sell stock on while it's still considered fast enough that other people can see profit in buying it for mining. The people making them must find the right time where they can give up any future profits from mining and balance that by selling the device.
Anyone buying from them must therefore automatically be looking at a thinner profit margin than the people making them, but then I guess that's just how life works.
At least when everyone was doing this with graphics cards, there was still some inherent value in the kit once it was no longer profitable to mine with it. Well, I hope so anyway. I wouldn't mind picking up a bargain graphics card just for gaming.
Question: Is there any use at all for these ASICs once they're retire from mining?
It sounds like some of the hardware manufacturers are quietly or openly developing and using their own chips to mine for themselves and only selling the hardware on when it becomes more profitable to sell it than to use it. I suppose there's a small window where there's still demand for the hardware - that being where the public can run it profitably before it comes obsolete.
My question is whether this will ever be attractive to the big chip development companies, like Intel. Being as they have the facilities to fabricate large quantities of chips quickly, is there any point in them making themselves a large number fo mining chips, even if it's still only a small percentage of their chip output. Another way of phrasing it may be to ask if the economies of scale available to them mean there's be profit in using some of their capacity purely to speculate on bitcoin mining at the cost of reduced output of chips that they normally sell.
The whole thing's fascinating, but it feels like we're well past the stage where it's worth getting involved in buying hardware - as a hobbyist anyway. Just buying some kit that's a month too old could completely kill any chance of profit, by the sound of it.
As pointed out in the article, now there are over a million apps in these stores, it's really hard for anyone to find anything worth bothering with.
I think the best solution would be for the store managers to drop apps that are unpopular after a while. No downloads in a month? Delist the app. It sounds harsh, but it would be easy for any developer who cared to make sure they downloaded the app now and then to keep it listed and you'd probably find many don't bother to do that for apps that aren't performing at all anyway.
Maybe peopel would react better to this kind of thing if Google didn't turn it on by default, but instead made it available and then tried to explain to people why they might want to turn it on.
That or they'd realise they couldn't persuade anyone to turn it on because it's so obviously going to be far more trouble than it's worth.
"Smartwatches and wearable devices have proved the key theme of the show, with lots of folk jumping on the bandwagon to try and get a piece of the action early, now well-known birds like Fitbit and Pebble have been enjoying."
"Smartwatches and wearable devices have proved the key theme of the show, with lots of folk jumping on the bandwagon to try and get a piece of the action [that] early, now well-known birds like Fitbit and Pebble have been enjoying."
Better? :)