* Posts by ChrisC

1291 publicly visible posts • joined 2 Jul 2009

Is Microsoft going back to the future on release cadences?

ChrisC Silver badge

The backward compatibility issue

"attempts to deal with all that cruft (most recently via the doomed Windows 10X) have tended to flounder on the requirement to make that one weird app work."

I do wonder just how many of these old and weird apps are written in a way which requires direct access to the underlying hardware (*), and how many of them would merely fail to run on a "clean/current-API-only" version of Windows due to things like changes in the API calls, differences in where user files are stored etc, and from there how many of these "worthy of continued support despite the headaches it causes" apps could then be catered for simply by providing a set of VMs for different versions of Windows - i.e. re-introduce the XP Mode functionality MS offered back in the early days of Windows 7, but extend it to cover enough different versions of Windows (even back to 3.1 etc if needed) that pretty much every legacy app anyone might still want to run on a modern PC could be accommodated without the need to continue compromising the core OS with legacy support cruft.

Wouldn't necessarily even need MS to build this functionality into Windows themselves, all they need to do is provide a set of licence-free/pre-activated OS images for use with VirtualBox etc. so that anyone who needs this level of backward compatibility can set it up for themselves without the need to either still have their own copies of the installation media (assuming they still have access to the necessary reader hardware, and that it's all still in working condition), or to obtain a copy via means which may be not entirely legitimate.

(*) and which haven't already been rendered useless/unable to be run on a newer PC due to changes in the hardware itself - e.g. anything using a dedicated ISA/VLB/MCA (any other legacy formats I've forgotten?) card which can't be connected to anything built in the last couple of decades...

Improve Linux performance with this one weird trick

ChrisC Silver badge

Before or after the decimal point?

Is the $10 billion James Webb Space Telescope worth the price tag?

ChrisC Silver badge

Re: Yes, it is

ISTR his articles here had a sometimes "interesting" take on the subject matter, and if the above summary is in any way truly representative of what the article actually says then this could well be another example of this.

As general comments:

Of all the navies around the world which operate carriers capable of handling fixed wing aircraft, the ONLY navy which cuirrently operates catapult-equipped carriers is the US, so declaring cats to be the obvious choice is only necessarily true for a specific set of criteria, otherwise everyone would be using them without a second thought as to what the alternative options might be...

Whilst the STOVL design features of the F35B make it less efficient than either the A or C variants when deployed to bases where STOVL isn't required (i.e. normal airfields with nice long runways), there's nothing about the B which prevents it being based at such locations, so there's no "could be used from ground bases" argument to be made here.

Whilst looking at the Telegraph front page, I noticed another familiar name from days of Register yore - Andrew Orlowski...

FYI: BMW puts heated seats, other features behind paywall

ChrisC Silver badge

Re: More subscriptions

"Brave New World."

Or even Brave Modern World, if you want to keep the BMW theme going...

ChrisC Silver badge

Re: Weight and Waste?

"So I get a car with a bunch of features built in that I don't want - but that's a waste of resources to build and install and it's extra weight the car is dragging around?"

Chances are you're already driving a car like that, only without the ability to then easily enable the extra features if you later think they might actually be of use to you...

ChrisC Silver badge

Re: I don't really see the problem

This sort of thing (fitting parts that aren't ever used) ALREADY occurs in the car industry - chances are most cars built in the last decade or so will have at least one extra bit of hardware fitted which serves no purpose for the given spec level of that particular car.

Even if it's just a single extra wire in a wiring loom that, on the highest spec level version of tha car, enables a feature that isn't present on any of the lower spec models, that's still a waste of materials. But manufacturers will do it, and take the hit on the additional cost of including that extra wire in every loom they fit, because overall it works out better for them to only need to source/stock one version of the loom - if you're buying a million looms all of the same spec with one extra wire, chances are the additional material cost will pale into insignificance compared with the additional tooling costs of getting your loom provider to build you 999,000 versions of the standard loom and then 1000 versions with just that one extra wire added.

Car manufacturers aren't stupid, they'll know exactly how much it'll cost them to include a part in every car they build vs the cost of including it only in those cars where the buyer has specced it. And if they calculate that it's cheaper to just chuck that part into every car, even if 99% of the time it's never then used, then so be it. If, as BMW are now proposing, they can potentially then earn even more profit by allowing anyone (not just the original buyer) who owns that car in future to opt into having that part enabled for use just with a simple tap of a button, then even more reason to standardise on the hardware build spec and use soft-switches to control what the actual spec is at any given instant within the lifespan of that car.

ChrisC Silver badge

I guess the question here is whether or not you have actually paid for the part of the car covered by the subscription model, or if BMW are just using this as a way to essentially reduce their lineup to a single build-spec per model, with the spec features normally offered only on the higher-spec models or as optional extras on lower-spec models being physically present in ALL cars, but only enabled either at the factory when someone opts to purchase a "higher spec" model from the outset, or post-purchase by the owner as and when they think to themselves "damnit, I really wish I'd opted for feature X now"...

I can see this being a potentially very smart move for BMW if it means they can rationalise how many different versions of the same component - reduced inventory costs/greater economies of scale - and also reduce how many different options the production line workers need to deal with when building each individual car - potentially reducing the time taken to build each car, or increasing the build quality by giving workers fewer different build procedures they need to be trained for.

It'd also bring benefits to anyone looking to buy a used BMW, because every such car that hits the second hand market then has the capability of being reinitialised to whichever spec level the next buyer wants - the only things they'd be stuck with from the original buyer would be those things that couldn't be accommodated with a simple on/off switch, such as wheel styles/sizes, bodyshell colour etc. Imagine being able to head to your local used car dealer knowing that, so long as they had *any* BMW model XYZ's in stock, you'd be able to reconfigure any of them with whichever spec level you wanted, rather than either having to patiently wait for the right spec level to show up in a dealer somewhere, or compromise on spec just because you needed to get a car sooner rather than later...

Now, there absolutely is real scope for BMW to use this as an opportunity to double-charge owners for access to certain features, but let's not overlook the potential benefits.

Hive to pull the plug on smart home gadgets by 2025

ChrisC Silver badge

Re: constant problem

Would be nice if all "smart" TVs included a simple way for users to disable the additional features, so that those of us using the TV as a monitor wouldn't have to suffer the extended startup times and more convoluted UIs, and those of us who do make use of the built-in smart apps initially can then continue using the TV for the lifetime of the panel without being constantly reminded just how quickly the manufacturer gave up on providing updates for the apps, if they ever bothered to provide them in the first place...

Watch a RAID rebuild or go to a Christmas party? Tough choice

ChrisC Silver badge

"Incidentally, another reason people like to try to get drives from different lots is the idea that a firmware update might kill a drive"

Doesn't even have to be a firmware update that kills a drive, given that one reason to release firmware updates is to fix bugs (sometimes critical) in the firmware you already have on your drive...

On the wider point, I guess one reason people like the idea of populating their arrays with drives from different batches/manufacturers is that, whilst the points you make about general failures are entirely valid, what you don't seem to have touched on here are those completely out of band failures that happen every once in a while, and cause a particular model of drive to suffer significant reliability problems completely out of keeping with anything else at the time. Granted, these don't seem to occur as often as they used to, but maybe for those of us who still bear the scars of having lived through such times (I was the "lucky" owner of both an IBM Deathstar and a Seagate 7200.11 with firmware SD1A...) there's some inherent reluctance to trust in statistical modelling etc. when our gut instinct is screaming at us to never ever trust all our data to the same manufacturer/model/batch/whatever, just in case we end up being part of the next big drive reliability scandal...

That being said, I appreciate your insider perspective here - the more good quality information we have about likely causes of array failures, the easier it becomes to push our (irrational) fears to one side when deciding how to set up an array in future. Coincidentally, I'm in the process of speccing a new RAID setup for home, and was umming and aahing over whether to populate it with a set of "identical" drives, or go to the extra trouble of mixing and matching manufacturers, suppliers etc, and I think your comments here have just made my life a bit easier.

First-ever James Webb Space Telescope image revealed

ChrisC Silver badge

Re: Frustrating...

I'd prefer a Cobra Mk3, but yeah, the sentiment is the same... It pains me to know that, no matter when I'd been born or how long I might live, there will *always* be things from my history that I wish I'd been around to see, and things from my future that I wish I could be around to see.

Pentester says he broke into datacenter via hidden route running behind toilets

ChrisC Silver badge

"remember it is always about more than just IP access"

IP or "I pee", sounds the same to me...

Rufus and ExplorerPatcher: Tools to remove Windows 11 TPM pain and more

ChrisC Silver badge

Nope. For me, the last time I reached stage 3 with Windows was with 7.

Thanks to having now been required to use it for the last 4 or so years (I prefer not to have to recall the exact date at which the downgrade from 7 to 10 was inflicted on me) at work, I'm now somewhat begrudgingly at stage 2 with 10, but can't see myself ever reaching stage 3 (*)

Meanwhile 11 still has me firmly pegged at stage 1 based on the past few months of experience with it on my new personal laptop, and unless they do a u-turn on their crazy UI designs and give us old fogeys a nice classic UI theme again, then it's unlikely I'll ever get beyond stage 2 with that either.

(*) although if IT decide to foist 11 on us at some point, then I'll most certainly reach a pseudo-stage 3 for 10, insofar as, compared to 11, I bloody well will declare it to be the best thing since sliced bread etc. This shouldn't however be taken as a sign that, compared to any of the genuinely decent versions of Windows, I now think it's any good and have therefore reached a true stage 3 acceptance - merely that it's the lesser of two evils and I'd be lamenting its loss from my work PC every time I boot up into the 11 desktop instead...

ChrisC Silver badge

Re: Interesting Tool

"as long as I can remember at least a few letters of whatever app I'm looking for"

And therein lies the big problem with this start menu concept. It's great for quickly finding the stuff you use regularly enough to have committed their names (or more accurately, the strings which cause them to appear rapidly in the start menu search results) to memory. As a method of finding all the other stuff you use on a less frequent basis - the app you installed a year ago to recover a file from a SD card, and which you now vaguely recall having somewhere on your system having been prompted to think about it again due to an urgent need to recover another file fron a SD card, say - it's almost entirely useless.

So you then fall back on the graphical rendition of the start menu contents, which in the old days would (for those of us with time to spare on keeping it tidy) be a fairly nicely arranged list of stuff like "Games", "Accessories", "System Tools" etc, with the occasional random company name thrown in there to remind you that you hadn't yet worked out where the best place was to store the shortcut to "Whizzbang Industries MetaWangler 2.0". These days however, thanks to the brains trusts in the MS UI division deciding that all of this user-generated organisation of the start menu is oh so old fashioned and no longer necessary, the start menu degenerates into a long alpha-sorted list of stuff with little or no organisation which is a complete pain to have to scroll through trying to find the thing you *know* is installed on your system, but which is now hidden, needle/haystack-style, in that big long list of crap without anything to make it stand out.

The enhanced search functionality in the W10/11 start menu is one of the few things I genuinely do like about those OSs, and miss having whenever I'm working on my W7 boxes at home. Everything, and I do mean everything, else about those start menus OTOH, I regard as a distinct step backwards in useability compared with the classic user-focussed start menus of old. I know there are ways to tame the start menu, but none of them are particularly easy (in comparision to how older versions of Windows handled things), and some may not be feasible to use on systems where you aren't the owner (installing third-party OS-level hacks on my work PC, even when I've got local admin access, isn't something I'd want to be doing), so whilst articles like this are bloody useful as a way of highlighting ways to workaround the latest Seattle fuckwittery, sometimes there's no choice but to use what Windows offers by default.

As for locking the UI team in a room... hands up how many of us would trust MS to introduce a theming system once they've consigned the last of the good old UI elements to history? Mmm, that's what I thought. So no, rather than letting them out only once they're done replacing those old elements, I'd keep them in there until they've then ALSO implemented the theming system AND created a bunch of native theme options that fully replicate the classic UIs. Oh, and then I'd just throw away the key anyway, as punishment for having inflicted so many utterly shit UI designs on us over the last few years.

Google location tracking to forget you were ever at that medical clinic

ChrisC Silver badge

Re: Google's minimum viable response

"but even then, with some reasonable footwork (all it takes is a pernicious private eye and/or their flunkies), it can be deduced that the 'suspect' was not in any of the establishments covered by such a location-blank."

I think you missed out an "other" there - the only way to be in with a shout of showing that the "suspect" was visiting a clinic etc within the blanked-out area would be to show that they weren't in any other establishment within the area, and even then there's always the "I just felt like parking up and reading a book/having a nap/doing something else that wouldn't generate a digital footprint for an hour or two before continuing my journey" defence.

The Raspberry Pi Pico goes wireless with the $6 W

ChrisC Silver badge

Re: I/O

"I'm willing to bet that MOST uses won't need anything like the various I/O it supports."

True, I was more coming at it from the angle of comparing what the Pico boards offer I/O-wise compared with other similar entry-level devboards like the Nucleo.

ChrisC Silver badge

Re: I/O

Mmm, best go storm the AMD production facilities and get them to stop churning out CPUs, so the fab capacity can be given over to Intel...

Not sure just how much clout the the RPi Foundation has with fabs, but I suspect that if the likes of ST, TI etc. were *that* desperate for whatever small slice of production capacity is now being occupied by production of the RP2040, then the RP2040 simply wouldn't be in production right now. The fact that it is in production, along with a load of other chips which you could just as easily argue (*) don't need to be in production due to them just being wheel-reinventers of no discernable use to anyone, suggests that the supply problems with some of the more high-profile chips such as STM32 is a little more complex than a simple case of "is there enough fab capacity of any type anywhere in the world".

(*) at least if you subscribe to the previous posters apparent belief that once there's something already on the market filling a particular niche in said market, no-one else needs to or should attempt to bother coming up with an alternative.

ChrisC Silver badge

Re: I/O

At least you're being offered delivery dates at *some* point in the future...

ChrisC Silver badge

Re: I/O

Apples and oranges - if the sort of stuff you're working on really does need 128+ I/Os PLUS a seperate SDRAM peripheral, then clearly you're not working on the sort of stuff where lower pin count micros would be of use. Many of us do however work on stuff where the capabilities of the Pico would be a nice match (especially in this W form - how many other small processor modules are there that feature onboard wifi like this, hmm?), and some of us will even be working on stuff where it'd be considered rather over-provisioned in the IO department.

So if you can't see any real positives in having this on the market, then that's because it's not aimed at you, but it doesn't mean the positives aren't there for others to see and have their interest piqued by...

Misguided call for a 7-Zip boycott brings attention to FOSS archiving tools

ChrisC Silver badge

Re: the ability to take software and break it into dozens if not 100+ 1mb files

Nowt wrong with OS/2, especially when compared against the rancid abomination that passed for Windows 3.1's attempts at multitasking... Anyone who needed to be able to efficiently run multiple Win3.1 applications in parallel would really have been doing themselves a giant favour by running them under OS/2 - the first time I fired up my newly-purchased copy of Warp and saw how Amiga-like it made my PC, after having been cursing it for the previous few months every time it ground to a halt until whatever task I'd started came to an end, was the day I realised for the first time just how powerful PC hardware actually was, and how godawful Windows 3.1 really was...

You need to RTFM, but feel free to use your brain too

ChrisC Silver badge

Re: Check you can complete before you start

"This is along the lines of..."

No, because in your example the obvious instructions on the front of the machine merely instruct the user to follow all instructions, without guiding them to find the additional instructions hidden on the rear of the machine. Unless they use their initiative and go over every inch of the machine with a fine tooth comb to see if there might possibly be any other instructions listed somewhere else, then they won't find the all important one.

In the aforementioned test, the first instruction they're given tells them EXACTLY what they need to do to pass the test - following that one simple instruction is sufficient to direct them to the additional instruction at the end of the paper. There's no ambiguity, there's no need for them to have a sufficiently evolved sense of curiosity that they go looking for something they hadn't been told was there, they just need to follow a clearly worded instruction to the letter, no diversions, no freestyling, no making stuff up as they go.

ChrisC Silver badge

Re: Check you can complete before you start

"I would assert that "THESE INSTRUCTIONS" is ambiguous as it could refer to just the instructions before the the start of the questions."

Isn't that the point. The obvious set of instructions at the top of the paper tell you what to do, and step 1 tells you to read the entire paper before proceeding onto step 2. On reaching the end of the paper, you find an addendum to step 1...

It could even be suggested that the addendum at the end of the paper isn't required anyway (other than to provide the instruction for handing in the paper immediately vs sitting there twiddling your thumbs until the end of the test period), because, as written here, there's no step 3 that says "answer the following questions". Strictly speaking anyone who does start answering the questions is going off-script and doing their own thing by making an assumption as to what it is they're being asked to do based on prior experience of seeing *similar* looking papers where they did have to answer the questions.

Not enough desks and parking spots, wobbly Wi-Fi: Welcome back to the office, Tesla staff

ChrisC Silver badge

"the office must be where your actual colleagues are located, not some remote pseudo office"

Soooo oh Musky one, how does that work if you're based in the US but also spend part of your working day interacting with colleagues in, say, the UK sales team?

I'm also thinking that this eeediotic edict opens the door for a group of employees to hire a beach house somewhere and all move in there for a month or two - if all of your "actual" colleagues (as opposed to, what, exactly? Are there a load of actors employed by Tesla to roam the halls pretending to be colleagues?) are in the same building as you, and you're all working there, then, umm, isn't that by your very definition "the office", and therefore perfectly OK?

As much as I admire some of what's emerged from Tesla (I've said it before, I'd love to see them licence their powertrain tech to other car manufacturers and just focus on that side of the business, rather than trying to actually be a car manufacturer in their own right competing against companies with decades of hard-earned experience in how to design and build the complete car package), it's becoming increasingly difficult to have any admiration for Musk as a company leader. Disparaging comments which show his true disdain for WFH and a complete lack of empathy for anyone who, despite the struggles they might have faced in order to comply with whatever WFH mandates were in place in their areas, still managed to get the work done, place him squarely on my list of "people who's opinions I no longer respect".

ChrisC Silver badge

Re: When the show is run by clowns

Are you suggesting Elon is a bit vain?

Totaled Tesla goes up in flames three weeks after crash

ChrisC Silver badge

Re: Am I the only one

Nor will there be any point in having an auto-driven vehicle in the first place, given the only routes it'd be able follow safely are ones consisting of nice straight and flat roads joined by very easy turns, all taken at a nice sedate pace so as not to cause any wheelspin/slip, and where at the slightest hint of rain/frost/snow the vehicle simply refuses to start up for fear of never being able to reach its destination in one piece...

Windows 11 22H2 is almost here. Is it ready for the enterprise?

ChrisC Silver badge

Re: MS dropping peripherals support - AGAIN

"So, which set of competing concerns should take priority? What is the proper balance to strike between all of these interests?"

How about prioritising the needs and desires of the users, especially given how much effort MS have put into trying to encourage/coerce/hoodwink people into switching first to 10 and now to 11, rather than being happy to just leave them alone to use whichever older version they were happy with?

Make the default mode of operation safer and more secure by all means, but don't take away the ability of users to use older drivers if they choose to do so. Stick the option to enable this in the back of a locked filing cabinet in a disused toilet etc. etc. if that's what it takes to prevent the unwary from stumbling across it and unknowingly opening up their system to all manner of attacks, just make sure the option is at least available *somewhere* for those who are very much aware of what it means to enable it.

ChrisC Silver badge

Re: MS dropping peripherals support - AGAIN

"but it's not really something Microsoft has control over"

Depends on whether or not the problem is caused by changes MS have made to the way drivers interact with the system - in theory, so long as you can still physically connect the peripheral to the PC, then it ought to be possible to continue using the original drivers to drive said peripheral so long as the OS lets you, because the hardware hasn't changed, the original drivers haven't changed, so the only thing left that could change and break stuff is the OS. At which point the ball would very definitely be back in MS's court.

Problems can also arise due to MS messing around with how Windows deals with new devices when they're first connected, which can make it harder than it ought to be to even attempt to install older drivers - when I tried connecting my old Canon Pixma inkjet to my new W11 laptop, as soon as I plugged in the USB cable (noting that at this point I hadn't tried to pre-install any of the old Canon drivers I still had lying around), 11 was automatically enumerating it as being something other than a printer rather than simply deciding, as it ought to have done, that it actually had no idea what it was I'd plugged in and leaving it listed as an unknown device in need of manual driver installation. You know, a bit like how older versions of Windows used to behave when new stuff got connected. Again, that's on MS and MS alone.

ChrisC Silver badge

"users will still need retraining before venturing near the user interface – for reasons known only to Microsoft"

It's not just MS - this is a recurring theme with many UI redesigns across a variety of products from different companies. Seems to be a case of UI designers in general not being content until they've changed things sufficiently that the users *have* to pay attention to the changes one way or another, rather than simply continuing to use the new UI without giving it a second thought...

*scene cross-fades to a design studio somewhere in central London*

"I say Tarquin, the latest focus group study shows our users are able to navigate the new UI almost as quickly as the old one, am I reading this report correctly?"

"I know Lavinia, I know, something's gone terribly wrong here, what can we do to make their lives miserable again?"

"What ho Tarqs, Lavvie, wouldn't it be a splendid wheeze if we, you know, just move *everything*?"

"And change the colours to be less contrasty whilst we're at it?"

"What about removing some of the visual cues users rely on to know which parts of the UI can be interacted with?"

"My god, I think we've got it! Quick, get those changes pushed into production - no, skip the test phase, this is TOO important to delay - and away to the wine bar we go for a celebratory drinkie-poos"

*credits roll*

Yes yes, I know, hideous stereotyping of graphics design people there. But you know what, after suffering the effects of their handiwork in various products I use on a daily basis over the past few years, my ability to be nice to them is practically exhausted, and I now regard them as fair game for whatever levels of ridicule and scorn get thrown their way by users fed up beyond our capacity to cope as we struggle with UI design changes that offer so much less than they take away.

RISC OS: 35-year-old original Arm operating system is alive and well

ChrisC Silver badge

Re: Good and yet a little disappointing at the time...

AAA was supposed to be the successor to ECS, but manglement incompetence-induced delays meant AGA ended up being hacked together instead to provide at least *some* level of upgrade for the A4000 and A1200.

You might be thinking more about the Hombre chipset that was proposed as a replacement for AAA given that, by the time that was expected to finally emerge from the labs into production, it wouldn't have been anything like the upgrade it would have been had it launched as planned a few years earlier. Hombre was the point at which the chipset would have given up any pretence of trying to remain backward compatible, allowing it to focus on the sorts of graphics techniques required for the Amiga to remain competitive.

Pretty much the entire Amiga story is a bittersweet saga of greatness tinged with countless cries of "if only", "what if", and "dear god, why" throughout, and of a small and utterly dedicated team of engineers working miracles in spite of management attempts to hinder them almost every step of the way.

The Archimedes story is rather bittersweet too - a truly world class system designed from the ground up here in the UK, which managed to almost entirely fail to capture the attention of the masses, ending up as a niche education machine and ultimately living on only (*) as the ARM processor, and in the fond memories of anyone lucky enough to have used one at the time.

(*) as someone who earns a comfortable living designing systems with ARM processors at their heart, I'm well aware that the ARM-spinoff side of the Archimedes story is a genuine success of the UK tech industry and so, generally speaking, definitely not worthy of being idly dismissed as an "only" footnote. I'm just trying to - badly perhaps - make the point that despite the success ARM has become, it's still rather sad that the Archimedes wasn't able to latch onto any of that success and survive as a complete system to continue demonstrating to the world just what you could do with a well designed processor driving a well designed OS...

ChrisC Silver badge

Re: Good and yet a little disappointing at the time...

I dunno, as an Amiga owner who's best mate had an A310 (though by the time he'd finished upgrading it, describing it as a mere A310 was doing it a disservice), there were a few games in his collection that I'd have loved to have had at home - Interdictor and Chocks Away are the first two that come to mind which, IIRC, were only ever released on the Archie (although the Amiga did have games of a similar bent), and unless it was just something I dreamed up whilst under the influence of a heavy cold or something, then I'm sure there was also a stupidly good game that allowed you to create your own tracks with jumps and loops and so on and then go racing around them - a bit like a fusion of Stunt Car Racer and Hard Drivin, plus some of the "earn points by crashing in spectacular ways" game mechanics that the Burnout series introduced many years later.

Plus, although they both did eventually get ported over to the Amiga, for a while the Archie was the only way I was able to play Zarch and Conqueror, and without doubt remained the best place to play them even after the ports.

Still, regardless of which system you owned or had access to back then, it was a truly epic period of time to be involved in the home computer scene, and articles like this always make me happy as they whisk me back on a nostalgic trek to those good old days.

Know the difference between a bin and /bin unless you want a new doorstop

ChrisC Silver badge

Re: Clean desk policy

They may well have done in this case too, but if said drawers are anywhere other than right next to/under your desk, so that adhering to the clean desk policy doesn't require you to trek over to the far side of the office, or, heaven forbid, a completely seperate storage area so remote from your desk that to get there you'd have to seek approval from your manager under business travel procedures, then it wouldn't be hard to imagine how this short cut might come about...

Password recovery from beyond the grave

ChrisC Silver badge

Re: Legal issues

That is what I said. It's also what I expounded, explained, mentioned, indicated, noted... Whilst the rich and varied nature of English might make it a pain for people to learn, it's also part of what makes it such a nice language to use. Wouldn't life be dull if English was such a tightly controlled language that there was only ever one correct way to say something?

ChrisC Silver badge

Re: Legal issues

"How are they protecting the rights of the deceased by stopping the family from accessing the account?"

By ensuring the contents of said account are dealt with in accordance with whatever instructions the deceased left in their will?

FWIW, a family member can act as executor of the will, in which case they'd have access to the account, so it's not strictly true to say that family members can't access the account once their relative has passed, merely that a different set of rules over who can and should have access to it comes into play. It's not the law/organisations being asses, there are some good reasons why things have to work the way they work when the person whos property you're talking about is no longer in a position to control said property.

EU makes USB-C common charging port for most electronic devices

ChrisC Silver badge

Re: 48V vs 50V

I think the "jump out" part of the previous comment is the bit to focus on here - it's voltage which controls how close you need to get to a conductor before current will start to flow through your body...

ChrisC Silver badge

You're assuming that, if the device was actually demanding all of that 240W from the PSU at the other end of the USB cable, then all of it would be going directly to the charging circuit, rather than the majority being expended on driving the CPU, GPU and whatever other power-gobbling stuff is crammed within the chassis of any laptop capable of making use of a 240W supply...

ChrisC Silver badge

OTOH, placing the sprung contacts in the socket (a la Lightning) rather than on the cable (a la USB) runs a close second in the "dumb ideas of the 21st century" rankings, and depending on exactly how ham fisted you are when connecting cables, or the environmental conditions in which the device is being used (sockets with unsprung contacts are less prone to being damaged whilst cleaning out accumulated crud from the bottom of the socket recess), may even warrant promotion to the top spot...

ChrisC Silver badge

Re: The BS 546 Brexit connector next

Leaving aside the inaccuracies that other commenters have already picked you up on re how many people might be classed as red-green colour blind, I'll instead focus on the other inaccuracy here - namely the idea that being colourblind renders you entirely incapable of differentiating between reds and greens (other colour combinations available on request, see catalogue for details)...

As one of those people who's learned to live with classic male red-green colourblindness, I can assure you that wiring a plug when the incoming flex is using old-school UK insulation colours has never been a problem for me. Neither is being able to tell the difference between red and green traffic lights, red and green LEDs on consumer electronics devices, red and green balls when playing snooker, Irish and Welsh rugby players, the red and green sides on those little "FEED ME NOW!"/"I'm stuffed, give it a rest" cards you get at Brazilian restaurants or anything else which non-colourblind people constantly seem to find baffling that I'm able to differentiate despite my claims to be red-green colourblind...

It's correct to say that some (a minority) colourblind people would struggle with some/all of the above, but for most of us the only time we really struggle is when asked to try differentiating between more closely spaced shades, or between colours which are differentiated by the addition of one or the other shade - e.g. don't ever ask me to try choosing between blue and purple towels, curtains etc, because chances are I'll look at them both, even when they're placed side by side, and go "umm, they look the same to me", and genuinely mean it rather than just saying it because I can't be arsed to make a decision...

Microsoft accidentally turned off hardware requirements for Windows 11

ChrisC Silver badge

Re: Win 10 is good enough

It's anything but shallow IMO. The UI is the very essence of how you, the user, interface with the machine, so being provided with a UI which appeals to your specific preferences damn well ought to be THE most fundamental requirement for any UI design specification...

The way I see it, modern UI design feels like it's been driven by people who look at the UI as being a static graphical element which has been made to look as beautiful as possible in PR screengrabs, but which doesn't actually need to be useable in any way, shape or form. Legacy UI design OTOH was driven primarily by the desire to create something that worked as a dynamic interactive link between meatsack and silicon, and to hell with what it might look like when viewed as a static screengrab in an advert or whatever.

Hence why modern UIs seem to focus so much on trying to make the UI look like something that wouldn't look out of place when printed on high quality paper for a coffee-table book about something stylish. All that whitespace and subtle, simple iconography and typefaces looks drop dead gorgeous when viewed as a design concept - there are times when W10 and 11 genuinely take my breath away at how nice the UI can look when you just sit back and gaze upon it from afar.

As something a human needs to be able to interact with OTOH, it's all a complete pile of shite. Give me skeuomorphic icons, 3D bevelled edges and all the other stuff that modern designers heap scorn on as being oh so out od date and past its best, but which, for those of us who spent several decades using early WIMP UIs, served us just fine across god knows how many different versions of OSs running on different systems, across widely differing screen sizes/resolutions/colour depths...

No more fossil fuel or nukes? In the future we will generate power with magic dust

ChrisC Silver badge

"Researchers at the University of Lancaster’s Physics department, Royal Holloway London, Landau Institute and Aalto University in Helsinki cooled superfluid helium-3 to almost -273.15°C inside a rotating refrigerator, created two "time crystals" (which are impossible) and brought them into touch (which is impossible)."

Damn, all that hard work, and still only 1/3rd of the way towards earning themselves a celebratory breakfast at Milliways...

Warning: Colleagues are unusually likely to 'break' their monitors soon

ChrisC Silver badge

Re: What is the market for these devices?

"If the service is only for users possessing an Xbox Games Pass then it is reasonable to assume the user already has an Xbox"

Not so reasonable - the game pass also gives you direct access (i.e. install/run the game locally) to the game library via a Windows PC, as well as cloud-based access (which I'm guessing is what these TVs/monitors are also using) via Android and iOS, so there's no need to have access to an actual XBox to make use of the pass.

When management went nuclear on an innocent software engineer

ChrisC Silver badge

I visited Wylfa perhaps 10 years before you, and the tours then were similar to how you've described them, other than I don't recall being given anything else (other than the dosimeter badge) to wear. As you say, there's nothing quite like being able to see it for real, with just a viewing window between you and an actual real life, and very much operational, reactor hall.

The sad state of Linux desktop diversity: 21 environments, just 2 designs

ChrisC Silver badge

Re: The curse of overchoice

"But all cars have.. 4 wheels"

Except for the ones that have 3...

"...the same handbrake..."

So far in my 30 years behind the wheel, I've driven a "grand" total of 12 different cars from 5 different manufacturers, and have experienced three quite different methods for applying/releasing the parking brake - calling it a handbrake would, for the 2 Mercedes in that collection, be rather misleading given that applying the brake on those required use of a foot pedal near to, but under no circumstances to be mistaken for, the actual brake pedal...

"...gear system and pedals in the same place (except no clutch on an automatic)..."

Centre console, column shift, flappy paddles, or however it's done on an EV where there aren't any gears in the traditional sense... For a manual, is reverse to the left or right of the box, and do you have to pull up a locking collar, push down on the top of the gearknob, or just wiggle the stick until you get it past a detent? For an auto, is it a traditional looking shifter you push/pull fore and aft, or a dial you spin left/right, and does the shifter/dial give you access to the full range of box modes or does it only give you the basic PRND stuff with manual selection of specific gears/modes handled via controls elsewhere?

Pedals - same position yes, but EVs are starting to bring a whole new world of pedal behaviour into the mix which has the potential to confuse the crap out of someone used to how pedals work on ICE (or older EV) vehicles.

"...the same essential dashboard info, window, light and wiper controls generally in the same place."

Generally in the vicinity of the steering column or surrounding dash area yes, but still sufficiently non-standard to give rise to some problems if you're trying to drive an unfamiliar car and something happens suddenly that causes you to act on instinct and muscle memory, reaching for a control you KNOW is there on your daily drive, only to find that either it's not there at all on the car you're sat in right now, or that the control that is there isn't the one you were after.

So the analogy with OS/distro choice doesn't feel too far off the mark here - yes, there's a certain level of similarity between different cars/OSs in terms of their fundamental design/behaviour, but there's also plenty that isn't the same even within the basics, and what might suit one person perfectly well might be seen by someone else as a "WTF were the designers thinking there?" moment.

Microsoft tests ‘Suggested Actions’ in Windows 11. Insiders: Can we turn it off?

ChrisC Silver badge

Certainly not the best overall, but given the particular combination of hardware I had at the time, it was easily the best of the 9x sub-genre for me thanks to its ability not to randomly fall over in a quivering heap due to my attempting to use one of those newfangled USB-connected thingys that were starting to become popular back then in place of the serial/parallel/bespoke-connected stuff we'd been having to use up to that point.

BOFH: You'll have to really trust me on this team-building exercise

ChrisC Silver badge
Happy

One of the great unspoken advantages of WFH...

...is that when the weekly dose of BOFH includes classic lines like

"There's something missing from the A hole," he hints.

it's only the cats who get to observe my reaction. Ah, superb stuff once again.

We can bend the laws of physics for your super-yacht, but we can't break them

ChrisC Silver badge

I like how your "not kidding" note is related to the idea that someone might like goat milk for brekkie, rather than the idea that someone might want a goat farm on their private jet.

I mean, the latter, yeah sure, what do you expect from an oligarch, but actually wanting to drink goat milk (vs imbibing it via one of its more palatable forms - e.g. cheese, mmmmmm), now you're just being silly...

Thinnet cables are no match for director's morning workout

ChrisC Silver badge

Re: 10 base 2 network

So someone who might be finishing off a genuinely important bit of work is just expected to drop everything, pull themselves out of the zone and end up having to spend even longer completing the work later, and head off for lunch just because the boss says "jump" and their underlings say "yes sir, how high sir?"

There's being a team player, and then there's being a minion to the PHB who thinks they have the right to control your life. Unless there's more to this anecdote than has been written, the problem was the boss expecting everyone to go eat at the same time, not that the rest of the team were expecting it from those random team members who weren't always able to join them without being coerced. That's not a particularly pleasant sort of team environment in which to spend your working life...

ChrisC Silver badge

Re: 10 base 2 network

Interesting that you've interpreted that anecdote as indicating the problem lies with the random colleague who had one last thing to do, and not with the control freak of a boss mandating when and with whom their underlings took their lunch break...

For me the solution would have been to find somewhere else to work where the boss wasn't a complete arsehole, but that's just me and my intense dislike of being forced into regularly occurring (perhaps even daily, by the sounds of it here) artificially constructed work-related social scenarios in MY time just because someone in the team thinks it's a jolly good idea.

ZX Spectrum: Q&A with some of the folks who worked on legendary PC

ChrisC Silver badge

A quick Google images search for "ZX Spectrum box" confirms your recollection, and a similar search for the boxes of other popular 80's computers reveals much the same for those machines as well.

Windows 10 still growing, but Win 11 had another bad month, says AdDuplex

ChrisC Silver badge

Re: W11? Personally I wouldn't bother upgrading and I use W11 daily!

I'm not aware of anyone needing to pay to switch from 10 to 11 at the moment. And if/when the free "upgrade" path is switched off by MS, given how little benefit there is from switching from 10 to 11, I'd be amazed if more than a handful of users bothered to pay to get their current W10 system running 11 instead. Switching off the free "upgrade" from 7 to 10 made somewhat more sense, as whilst the visible changes on 10 weren't to many peoples liking, there were some undeniably useful improvements under the skin which some 7 users would have felt willing to pay for if, for whatever reason, they'd missed out on snaring it as a freebie.

IMO, it's quite likely that (rounding errors aside when counting the totals) the only people who'll ever pay for 11 are people like me who get it by default when buying a new PC, but if you're buying a PC with Windows installed then it makes no difference which version it is, MS are still getting their licence fee out of you either way.

ChrisC Silver badge

Re: W11? Personally I wouldn't bother upgrading and I use W11 daily!

I got W11 preinstalled on my new personal laptop, whilst my work laptop remains on W10. Other than the one-time hit of having to relocate the start menu back to where it ought to be, learning to right click on the start menu to access the task manager, and learning to live with the lack of ungrouped/labelled taskbar buttons (I've deliberately avoided investigating any of the 3rd party shell hacks so far, because I've wanted to give native W11 a fair chance to prove itself to me), I've so far found nothing in W11 which makes it stand out as being sufficiently different to W10 that it merited a whole new version number to itself.

Hell, so far I've not seen anything that would even merit it being classed as a service pack back in the good old days when Windows had such things, rather than the dreaded "feature updates" MS now like to ram down our throats. Quite why MS felt the need to brand it as a whole new version, rather than just roll out the changes as part of their ongoing efforts to keep W10 users guessing what their OS will look and behave like after every update, is beyond me.

So for now, I haven't seen anything in 11 that would make me want to upgrade from 10 if I was given the option to do so, however I have seen a few things which make me wish my new laptop had come with 10 instead. More accurately, I wish it could have come with 7 instead, otherwise it sounds as if I actually like 10 whereas I merely prefer 10 over 11, but that's like saying I prefer being hit in the face over being kicked in the nuts...

ZX Spectrum, the 8-bit home computer that turned Europe on to PCs, is 40

ChrisC Silver badge

Re: No rampack

There might have been wobble on some Spectrums, but it wasn't a feature common to all. I had an original 48K with an Interface 2 hanging off the back, and an AMX Mouse interface hanging off the back of that - despite the dire warnings in the IF2 manual that the pass-through was only to be used for the ZX Printer (what a rebel I was in my younger years :-) - and the only wobble as such was a *slight* bit of play between the IF2 and AMX interface, but nothing like as bad mechanically or electrically as the legendary wobble of a ZX81 ram pack.