Re: good old days...
This schoolgirl did, although I didn't choose "BOLLOCKS" of my text of choice. :-)
283 posts • joined 30 Jun 2009
This schoolgirl did, although I didn't choose "BOLLOCKS" of my text of choice. :-)
And this is why they invented Dropbox (etc). That's where my book stash lives, as well as about three actual devices.
The wankers running the gas-fired turbines said they didn't get 'enough warning' to spin them up. It was complete lies, since they were warned a few day in advance that the gas-fired capability would likely be required when the weather hit.
Of course the govt was at fault for not ringing them up first thing in the morning of the storms to ask "Are those #*@*% things on yet?"
If you're going to imitate a Mickey-Rooney-quality "Asian" accent, get your Rs and Ls right. The Chinese pronounce Ls, the Japanese pronounce Rs. So your "Chinaman" would be Japanese given that sample. But never let accuracy get in the way of an ethnic stereotype.
Actually, for us non-American colonials (in NZ), "kindergarten" refers to pre-school for the ages of 3-4. We start at age 5.
If you're running the Professional edition, just use GPEdit to stop it. There's plenty to google on using group policy to limit how Windows update works.
Yes. the profiling is so advanced that when my Buddhist Sri Lankan-born boss and her similarly-spec'd hubby travelled to the US during the Bush II years, on their Australian passports (being citizens for 30+ years), they were stopped and searched - at length, the "please step into this room" treatment - at every single US airport they transited through on their journey.
No criminal record, no military service in birth or residence countries, no visas to China, Russia, Cuba, Middle-East nations yadda yadda in their passports, no ticking luggage, and the purpose of their two-week visit was to attend an academic conference at Georgetown University and see family members in two other cities.
There may be things you could say about what Sri Lankans of the military persuasion do to Tamils in that country, but as far as I know, the yanks have never been that fussed about that. Buddhists aren't really that renowned for their suicide bombings or jihads at the best of times.
Of course, they did fit the advanced profile of being suspiciously brown in skin tone. And sure, it seems that the US border guards are improving their detection rate based on such techniques by exponential rates at present.
I have W10 Pro at home, and it's fine in terms of being able to be locked down. GPEdit is your friend.
And no, as far as I'm concerned, work kit remains just that. I'm not letting my personal data anywhere near it.
Er, how are the potential failures of MODERN SSD storage potentially any more risky than other storage devices? Bad firmware = bad firmware, no matter what the storage substrate.
I remember having to replace 300+ Hitachi drives in the early 2000s - good old spinning rust, manufacturing fault with the actuator or actuator arm, I can't remember which. Ok, most of that was preventative replacement, once Dell finally admitted the problem, but a 1/5 failure rate was pretty noticeable prior to that.
Ugh. At least they have an API now, though. So pipe the data out of the crappy application and set up a decent one. As for the email functionality, at least no-one's trying to resurrect that (keeping it running in zombie mode is something else).
Are you serious?
In Exchange, you can lock down a list to only allow specified senders. It takes about 5 sec, via the GUI or Powershell. We generally control these via another group -e.g. $list-senders are the only ones allowed to send to specified list. Even if one of the permitted senders screws up, the Reply-Alls don't go far.
If you have any smarts, and you're actually allowing end-users to set up email lists, you'd run some kind of script on a schedule to check for email-enabled groups with (recursive!) members > $number and verify that all of those have sender restrictions on them.
For the NHS, the fact the storm went on for that long is appalling - it should have taken approx. 2 mins to lock the list (assuming someone had to logon to a box to set the restriction). Give it 15 mins for someone to verbally raise the alarm... (although, again, if end-users can set up the lists, you'd expect some pretty gnarly monitoring to be in place to actually raise an alert itself, even just seeing if the queues are filling up.)
And from the sysadmin side, I am amazed anyone uses still Sendmail, for precisely that reason.
In the early 2000s, Hitachi manufactured a whole run of HDDs for Dell computers, and lucky us, we decided to refresh hardware in two of our student labs while these units were still in active release.
One machine after another, disks would fail to spin on boot - not every time, but as time went on, the drive jamming got progressively worse. (I can't actually recall now what the real issue was - perhaps the actuator or spindle itself.)
As this went on, the boss jumped up and down at Dell, who *finally* found the problem with the Hitachi units and actually acknowledged, that yes, they (in fact the entire workstation) would be replaced under warranty. It took a while to arrange swapping out nearly 100 machines, so I could enjoy the googly-eye effect from bleary-eyed students in the lab as I went around thumpa-thumping the northeast corner of each box before lectures started/.
And has anyone requesting home support actually heard from a real engineer? Without paying loads of cashmoney up front?
My one and only consumer interaction with MS (the one-a-year freebie support) consisted of some purported "MVP" telling me the reason I had a niggly issue with Start Menu searches (in Win 7) was because of a virus. He didn't even attempt to ask me to rebuild the search cache, check the search location configuration, etc etc. No, it was a virus. Even when I told him I had done all the above steps, it was *still* a virus. My computers have not had a virus since circa 1990.
And no, he didn't want me to prove that wasn't the case by supplying a report from any AV he proposed. He "resolved" the case with the "solution provided". Even if it had been a virus, he actually hadn't provided a solution either. The thing that particularly grates my cheese is that there was no mechanism of providing feedback on the "support" I received from that moron.
My experience with Premier Support has been consistently great, so that was a rude shock.
Except the purported "facts" are not actually facts, for many of the people who have received speculative invoices. Which, the last I heard, is illegal in this country.
Not to mention that the principle of the presumption of innocence (and thereby, the burden of proof residing with the accuser) is a legal principle going back to Roman law as codified by Justinian in the 6th century. Modern legislation and case law is based on this principle, with additional definitions around standards like "preponderance of evidence" or "more probable than not" required for civil cases.
The supposition that a yearly figure provided by the ATO equates to a fortnightly income spread equally across 26 fortnights over the year is patently false for probably most of us, including those of us who have never in their lives received a Centrelink payment. Nor can it be determined from the ATO data that anyone received X income in any specific fortnight over that period. It certainly doesn't meet a test of "more probable than not" that someone double-dipped during any fortnight they received payments.
Also, that supposition is known and has always been known to be false by staff on the ground, which is why the review process (once a (former) Centrelink client's income was flagged by matching with the ATO data) was manual prior to this govt's budget-boosting exercise based on entirely false figures.
Privacy law downunder, compared to what EU regulation was even in the early 2000s (when I was living in the UK), is complete and utter shite.
My first IT jobs were in the UK, and I was trained on privacy stuff accordingly. Doing IT work in Oz and NZ still continues to gobsmack me with the breathtaking liberties organisations can take.
A retired senior Centrelink worker wrote a post that says that the former process (after the data match) was manual precisely because they KNOW that tax figures are yearly, and their payments are fortnightly. And they did the work of following up with employers and so on - I sure as hell don't keep 6 years of my pay slips!
But you know, they save staff costs by scaring the sh*t out of people, and by ensuring people who are already "disempowered" in many ways (sorry for the wank word, but it's true - people who are on the dole often aren't the most technical, and the challenge process is online-only) are more likely to simply pay up rather than go through an opaque and challenging process. It's challenging even for people who have been in reasonably-skilled work for years and who have the pay records! (See The Guardian for the pieces written by the guy who started kicking up a fuss last month.)
Also, I don't actually believe the govt spin that 80% of the debts are genuine - I think it's 80% that haven't been challenged, which is something else.
Finally, from a technology point of view, there is some room for improvement. There is no means of recording a fortnightly breakdown of your earnings (assuming you have the proof) on the form that they've provided to challenge the debt.
People like to sh*t over Exchange for some reason (metaphorically speaking), but I have had plenty of cause to be grateful there's a single-line command that can yoink that kind of thing out of every mailbox in the organisation.
...AND the mitigating "technical solutions", as alluded to in the article. Such as the backup the vendor doesn't actually provide or charges several body parts for. Such as inter-site replication (if they offer it).
It all adds up, and frankly for apps that are used by all staff, such as email, particularly if there is a high service expectation, I don't think it makes sense once you get into medium-sized enterprises, unless you literally have no on-prem IT at all. Or if the on-prem IT is insecure and unreliable.
Sure, use the cloud to supplement your backup solution. Use it for apps that are not business-critical or have a small user base. For what remains, BE CAREFUL.
But unfortunately it (in any of the three variations) doesn't support the primary 4G bands used by the mobile services I'm on in Oz and NZ (two different providers).
I could live without the storage expansion, but having to use 4G bands with less coverage is a deal-breaker.
I think they cover the bands used by Voda, but I'd set my phone on fire rather than use them.
Try and get that all up and running in a day, complete with robust HA. Exchange just works, for enterprises with more than a few dozen people.
Yeah, thanks, whether or not a drone being ingested into an engine during a critical flight phase can cause a catastrophic failure - btw Concorde crashed because of a small strip of metal - frankly, as a passenger, I'd rather that pilots were entirely undistracted by things buzzing them outside the windshield while they're on final approach to an airport like LHR, FRA, LAX etc.
Bollocks. Sendmail isn't even the best MTA. I'd rather Postfix as my gateway x1000.
Exchange is frankly unrivalled in the enterprise for scheduling, shared mailboxes, general mailbox management, HA, etc etc etc. Set it and forget it.
WIN+R > "cmd"?
That's the way I've accessed the command prompt for nearly 20 years. That's not going to change.
I mean, with all this screaming, you'd think that MS was doing away with it altogether, which is patently not the case. They're rejigging a couple of shortcuts, FFS.
So they'll not "pry cmd.exe from my cold hands" and yet you use Cygwin anyway. Logic fail.
I detest Cygwin - back in the NT/early 2000s days, I installed Perl on servers to get away from the dreaded VBscript when you needed to chain a lot of stuff together or do heavy string manipulations.
But PS is even better than Perl in terms of Win systems management, and is pretty good with strings/regexes (although the -match syntax is odd). I just wish PS had an equivalent to DataDumper, which would help old batch scripters get used to what's going on inside arrays/hashtables (yes, you can do get-member, but that's not the same).
I'm no Mac fangirl, but frankly, if you detest windows so much, why on earth aren't you running PS on a Mac?
It sounds like your environment is virtual, but there's workarounds for installing a Mac guest.
That is literally the worst haircut I've seen on a gay man. Although the "Trump junior comb-over" doesn't really favour anyone.
Yeah, I don't know what the angst is, other than breaking laws. How many consumers are using telnet with these devices?
For those who are, you'd expect they'd be savvy enough to use another way to get in and reset their telnet environment, although then again, the apps that are supplied probably don't expose that configuration interface.
So, maybe an app update to allow that config to be exposed, assuming they're not using port 80 and no key exchange to do it.
SSH would be more of a conundrum, although I suppose if it's compromised, the same mitigations would apply.
Two years to fix that little number. If you're not *paid* to go searching for problems, assuming you actually have the skill and know-how, how often do you do so?
“Scanning conducted by our researchers revealed that there are at least 256 vulnerable services accessible online,”
So who is correct? You, or the researchers?
Well, I live 4.5km from the centre of town in a state capital, and yet I can only get 4Mbps on a good day. So yes, perhaps I'd only choose to connect at 25Mbps, or even bloody 12Mbps, but at least I'd actually get those speeds.
Yes, I'm sorry, how is that different to the regular c*ckups and delays to service when changing over copper lines at times? Obviously you've never had to get ISDN lines changed in the past.
And if they're not having to maintain two separate sets of infrastructure everywhere, then perhaps the whole thing will be more seamless/better resourced (if the latter is currently an issue).
I don't know, I think that "startup" implies quite clearly that the thing is not designed as a standalone business expected to make its own profit in a few years.
Sure, if you say your business is in a startup phase, or maybe even "do you want to invest in our startup?", fine. As soon as you say the startup IS the business, or a startup is a KIND of business, then you're talking buyout as a "strategy" once your VC dries up.
Ah, but adding the Oxford comma in your example would have confused the issue if you hadn't used the word "parents".
"I'm sure my father, Boris Johnson, and the Queen would agree."
So your dad is Boris, eh?
And if you wanted to fill in your census in such a scenario, then you would presumably have the minimal intelligence required to turn off the VPN if you'd received "you must be residing at an Australian address at the date of the census" geoblock warning.
If they'd planned for the idiocies of VPN-users, I'd object to my tax money being wasted, frankly.
Most of us have actually moved on from 1994, actually, and we even no longer wear belt holsters and pagers.
Yes, there are some old farts who fit your lovely stereotype of wanting to block progress of any kind, but the majority of us - by far - do not.
Yeah, so you get one old fart who likes paper-shuffling and patching with their hand-crafted script they have to manually update with each patch release. Most of us sysadmins live in the real world, thanks.
I use Logparser - one of those awesome MS apps like Robocopy. Shame they can't extend that kind of quality to their OSes or Office.
Logparser will process a structured text file (doesn't have to be CSV - it's easy enough to create parsing rules) using SQL-type queries, and is lightning fast. Outputs to CSV, text, on-screen sortable grid and even graphs.
If you've got big log files (or even not so big ones) or lots in a series, that's the tool to use.
In my experience, HERE is not reliable enough for route-finding in Australia/NZ, certainly not compared to the TomTom, which has never led me wrong in these countries.
In each country, HERE has let me to remote forestry roads that peter out in the middle of nowhere (yes, I knew it was wrong each time, but followed the routes out of curiosity).
And with most TomTom, devices, you can pair your phone, and use it to answer calls, etc.
You can "nationalize" what you like, but the name of the party is the Labour Party. Just as it's the "Labor Party" in Australia, a country that uses Commonwealth English spelling, but the party founder was a Yank.
I love PowerShell and use it hourly at work, but I think it's bloody stupid idea from MS.
It's bad enough they aliased "ls" to Get-ChildItem without (again) the same functionality, but creating default aliases that mask well-known tools that exist outside the shell is stupid.
If you want to create your own aliases inside PowerShell, that's all good, and if you want to use a well-known name for whatever you've rolled, that's up to you. But introducing it as a default, stupid.
Thanks for giving the rest of us grown-up and real-world Windows admins a bad name (18+ years Windows experience, but I'm also a RHCT).
Sorry, that's garbage. MS has had their Hardware Compatibility List for the various products forever, and if your config is not running on the approved hardware, it's unsupported. Ring up PSS about something not on the HCL, and they'll politely pss themselves laughing.
If they had any brains, they'd make the HCL for the Azure stack super-restrictive, which would almost effectively cause vendor lock-in, but without making it look like they're trying to line their mates' pockets for no reason.
It hasn't been DSD for ages.
Are you seriously running your updates the same day they were released? Wow.
Being an "expat"/immigrant who's lived in both the UK and Australia, I have to say UK drivers are much better on average than Aussies in traffic. If it's a big highway with nothing much around, yes, the Aussies are better (not so much dithering).
Since when? Even if an app consists of one exe, there are also generally a shedload of dlls and registry entries.
Sure, there are apps like Putty that consist of a monolithic exe, and Portable Apps leverages some tricks to make more complex apps portable, but I'd hardly call it a "PRIMARY selling point".
And in the example given in the article, that's precisely the use-case they have here. Multiple interconnected tables. Relational database.
Uh, the millions of businesses that rely on Dell server kit don't seem to have any problem with it. Home users are something else.
I wish the writer would revitalise it, because it does have some slight bugs that need fixing - it crashes on me maybe once a month. And there are probably some security holes (not that I use it to logon to anything other than comment forums).
I tried FF again recently, but meh. As is Chrome.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017