Presentations
Complex ones just dont work on Libreoffice.
You can use svg yes... but then you cant share with work colleagues.
1568 publicly visible posts • joined 25 Jun 2009
Several times.
None of them worked.
The main problem with developing something is understanding the problem, and how (as in function) to solve it. Very rarely it is a technicological problem.
And by understanding, I mean fully understanding, down to the gritty details.
If you are able to both understand the problem and define the solution, you are probably able to express that with code.
This seems to be like previous solutions.. that wanted to have clueless people solving problem. Only to find that clueless poeple are.. well, clueless. And if they make the effort not to be clueless, yes, the first few times they would use the "code free" solution, but that will feel limiting quite quickly and go and learn to code properly.
So you either get bad solutions or you get solutions that could be better with proper tools.
that being seaid, some industrial processes, etc do benefit from this approach.
I mostly agree.. but not with the last statement.
If the were large enough to matter, they would find their order books full. BUT then their managers and directors, coming from the same pool as the rest of the industry, would decir to offshore "non critical tasks", etc, large benefits would come, and client loss would follow, as they are paying for premium services, and if it is average quality, they would go for the cheapest.
Making a jammer is extremely easy as you say.
Banning them and their use would keep most people honest, as the ones that do have knowledge are limited, and those that have the inclination even more limited.
Most navigation systems support inertial.. even in android, etc.
Example:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.olympio.inav&hl=en_GB
Also, most chipsets/OS combinations use several frequencies and several satellite systems, plus network triangulation plus wifi.
You mean LORAN and eLORAN
Hey best thing:
https://www.nlb.org.uk/InformationCentre/News/Documents/UK-speeds-ahead-with-rollout-of-eLoran-stations-to-backup-vulnerable-GPS/
Lets demolish these expensive pieces of equipment:
https://www.maritime-executive.com/article/europe-gives-up-on-eloran#gs.UxcCsGI
The things should be illegal.. it took me about 2 mins to find a specialized uk website for the devices.
They ofc have devices that block 2G, 3G, 4G, Wifi (2 and 5Ghz) and GPS with a single device.
Could not be more illegal...
I refrained from posting the url, as I dont want to give them more publicity.. but man.. I hope it gets banned.
I am not one to like bans, as in "think of the children", but these things should be banned unless "a good reason is given".
This is why the 99$ per year +iDevice developer is a thing.
Yo have to spend at leas 150$ to try to pass defences.. and invest in automating associating idevices to accounts.
At 100.000 devs expelled, that would have been 15 million dollars of added expense.. not huge, but a dent, and most low level hackers are deterred.. or deterred enough to go to Android.
They should put a 1000$ deposit, that you will get back after a year. THAT would deter most of them.
It would also make tracking them way easyer.
I disagree, even if you remove that from npm (I saw you there..)
Using libraries is most times the best solution. Reinventing the wheel is not only problematic.. it needs plenty of work, both to do and to mantain said wheel. Also, it might be a bad quality one.
Way better to use a good quality library.
That Cornwall machine reminds me of the subway ticket machines in Madrid.. when the change to the euro happened, I was "smart" enough to put plenty of pesetas (the old currency) in the machine to buy a 10 ticket pass... well, the machine smartly hanged, put an "our of order" message and spit the coins.. to the floor.
Couldnt complain much, as the machines were made by my employer...
Well, them being TTL and also being chain multiplexed buses done with cables... I guess it is obvious what happened.
I think they were also unprotected, so that could have fried the multiplex, but that is just a guess.
I had to admin one of those, and I did not enjoy it.. the thing was slow, and because of age, not very reliable if you needed to turn it off (and we had to, I know that is a bad idea)
meetoo works.
What you do is present a free alternative to your competitor, and burn money.
As you have a position of power, you have lots of money. Your competitor doesnt have that much, therefor both "lose" in the market: but as you are the one with deeper pockets, you end uo winning.
I used to provide forums, and there people could interchange ideas, opinions, whatever.
That has some costs, including my time.
Naturally, I was keen on having ads. Using ad platforms.
As the adblockers went mainstream, I had to close the forums.. I was not only not being paid, but I was losing money.
I was providing these services as a service to ppl.. for fun mostly.. but people dont want to put their money... they would rather have a facebook group than a proper forum with subforums, etc
As far as I know, they are on 1000 carss per week, or 52.000 cars/year, the current reduced target was 1800 per week,or 93600.. we shall see, I would say 100.000 model3 cars per year will be achieved tis year..
According to the wakipedia
"Tesla's initial target for making 5,000 vehicles per week was March 2018[22][23] but by early 2018, that was carried over to the end of June"
Err no.
First, the patch has to be stable. It is NOT.
Second, if you want it for gaming.. well, good news, the impact on gaming is minimal.
Also, unsecure by default is a horrible option.. (as you also point out), as is running in "unsecure mode". For the common good, processors should try to be at least reasonably secure.. and if people start running computers with known vulnerabilities that can be exploited with a asimple javascript/flash/whatever in the browser.. well, more zombies and bad for everyone when massive floods take down services, or extortion mafias demand money from etailers. And yes, they do, I would even call it "standard".
These platforms tend to privide 90 to 95% of what you need.
And it is the missing part that converts it into hell, as these blackboxes tend not to play well with other parts.
Another problem is cost. You are now charged "per use", or "per 10k uses", whatever.
It seems nice.. but how do you control that? It is not easy.. and it is completely out of your control.
https://www.ipe.com/ofcom-review-questions-bt-pension-holidays/33418.fullarticle
So yes, they stopped funding ... and now claim "hey, there is no money!!"
"Like many companies, BT's pension scheme was in funding surplus in the early 1990s. As a result of tax changes, it was not beneficial for the company to maintain a large surplus. Like many companies, BT did not make contributions into the main scheme between 1989 and 1993, although pension liabilities continued to accrue,"
I can either sacrifice my front garden or not charge my car.. and yes, I probably cant put a charging station in front of my house.
As for batteries being charged in say 5 minutes.. I dont see how this could be done, the amps required would make it impossible.. and add to that the batteries would burst in flames...
So many things are going to change in the next years.. chargers everywhere I guess.
Even your approach, being better, is not as good as what is needed: the full front of an airliner on a sled as aerodynamics are important.
Then you could properly test it.. but it would be expensive.
The testing, while bad, seems better than we thought last time, good job reg for obtaining something.
I guess we all knowthat going for the windshield is not the true target, so my educated guess is that this is FUD and they are actually worried about the other critical part. And testing that would be many millions.. and they dont want to do it.
The UK government SHOULD make an agreement with other governments a do a joint study with other governments.. but somehow I feel that they dont believe that much in international cooperation. The components of airliners are basically the same all over the world, and the savings would be huge.
I will keep with the spirit of the article and not say the part of the plane that is most vulnerable... but yes, we all know.
Toothless.
The main problem I see being a foreigner in the UK is that authorities canbreak tbe law with legal impunity. Nothing bad happens to tbem unless they create political problems.
In Spain and most countries (not including USA and Canada) it is a crime to make illegal decisions while knonwing they are illegal if you are an official. Granted that they are not prosecuted as much as they should and that it is not that difficult to avoid being prosecuted (being incompetent is not illegal).
I love the uk and I would like these people ignoring the law to be things of the past.
My 2 cents would be that records are improperly stored and the workers have too much work.. and because cuts have been made they just cant cope.
The problem with fishing is that most fishermen are out of jobs because a few companies own all the fishing rights.
Even with a hard brexit this would not be solved. Yes, we would recover part of the rights, maybe 40%, but the one to win tbe bids for them would be the big companies.
And as we believe in free market they would mainly target the export market, and use the cheapest extracting method: big ships with few fishermen and most of them foreign.
The problems is leakage and volume
Look here for leacage:
https://www.tecategroup.com/ultracapacitors-supercapacitors/ultracapacitor-FAQ.php
0.03mA might not seem much, but if you have them at 100% capacity you have 1.6mA, and you probably want them fully charged.. and that is a problem.
So you would need electronics to have them at the best compromise charge level, and also to prevent the supercaps from damaging the battery by leaving it 100% flat.. also you need electronics to balance the supercaps and adjust voltages.
Conclusion: you need to have your own specific IC to control these supercaps plus the real state for them to be inside the phone.
I would say that a company like apple should have the resources to pull this trick, but it is not as simple as just using supercaps. It only is if you are connected to a power supply.
Note: I know about this becuase I designed a system with supercaps, and they are trickier than you might think. I ended up dumping them as the cost was too high (5$ I think, considering board plus components, not supercaps) and they consumed way to much space in my board. They do work brilliantly.
I ended up using a Ni-Mh OTS solution. Lithium is not something I want to be responsible for (as in fires, etc)
MicroSD cards make phones less reliable, use more power (as the process stalls) and are way way slower than UFS storage. So companies shun them.
As for user replaceable batteries.. well, it makes it impossible to have a thin sealed phone, and also they might disconnect and give problems.
So I understand their reasons, even if I myself prefer to have these options.
I would rather have quality over quantity.
In 1982 we had a navy that was very good against submarines, but rather lacking otherwise.
An expensive type 45 would obliterate enemies that are serious theats to Type 21s with little danger, as they can with aster missiles, using advanced sensors, etc. The 45 is capable of destroying air targets the 21 cannot even detect.