* Posts by Juillen 1

237 posts • joined 22 Jun 2009


Doom at 25: The FPS that wowed players, gummed up servers, and enraged admins

Juillen 1

I used to be sysadmin for a pretty big ad agency at that point.

During the normal day, there were so many requests about mapping drives and the like, it wasn't funny. Then came Doom.

I set up a server, inside its own NT domain, and gave people accounts on it on request. Doom was on a share that came up when office hours ended, and closed at 6am. That's all the info I ever disclosed on that machine to people. No help mapping drive, or swapping domains.

You'd be amazed at how quickly people learn to map drives when their fun is at stake! :) Never heard a peep about mapping drives after that.

BOFH: State of a job, eh? Roll the Endless Requests for Further Information protocol

Juillen 1


I've so missed BOfH! Good to see it back, and with a scorcher no less!

Health secretary Matt Hancock assembles brains trust: OK, guys. Let's cure NHS IT

Juillen 1

Bits where it matters.

Having worked in the NHS IT arena, and specifically with data, this 'lighter touch' is a good move, as long as it progresses properly.

From what I'm seeing, it's more that there will be enforced open standards of interoperability (so results from one system will be guaranteed acceptable to the inputs of another, with the guaranteed existence of mandatory fields).

This, if mandated, will really help avoid lock in to proprietary systems (especially suites of systems, where you buy one, then have to stay with the vendor for the rest, and have no idea how to get data out of it apart from a clunky web interface with no simple export).

All for leaving local IT to do what the local Trust needs, but setting some standards in stone across all Trusts for data exchange sets the groundwork for joining things up properly, while allowing each place the flexibility to optimise for local conditions.

Wouldn't say I'm sold on it all, but it's an interesting development, and far from the "Bang the head repeatedly on the desk because of sanity overflow due to listening to the sheer stupidity being spouted" condition that was prevalent when the NPfIT of old was proposed (with its timescales).

Intel hits target: 27% of staffers are female? Apparently that's 'full representation'

Juillen 1

Re: Complaining About Cause Instead of Effect

Plenty of girls take up PhDs. Though they're very rarely in Computing Tech (which is what this is all about). They tend to dominate in the biological sciences, and avoid engineering.

As long as there is encouragement in whatever field people want to enter, all's good. And also as long as people aren't forced into areas that aren't their strength or preference to fill a quota all's good.

In pure choice societies (Sweden, for example), women tend to prefer the more traditional roles, as do men. This goes dead against what the Social Science theories that have gained traction said would happen.

I'd say I'd be quite happy if people ensured that there was no restriction from entry to a field; that's what getting the best people for the job allows. Forcing people into roles "because numbers" is bad. And discriminating against a huge sector of the population "Because there are already lots of them at a place" is also bad.

It is 2018 and the NHS is still counting the cost of WannaCry. Carry the 2, + aftermath... um... £92m

Juillen 1

Kinda like sending your car back to the manufacturers saying it was faulty because someone broke the back window and nicked all your stuff from it and spread manure on every surface.

Juillen 1

Re: Envy of the world...

Rest of the world's hospitals got hit by this too.

Juillen 1

Re: Correct me if I'm wrong ...

Some places "outsourced" by spinning off their IT departments as independent organisations "affiliated" with the NHS, and with their original Trust being initially their sole client. It apparently made a saving on the books (though tanked morale, productivity and incentive to stay doing the job).

Lots of places dug the heels in and are refusing to do it.

Microsoft hopes it has a sequel better than Godfather Part II: SQL Server 2019 previewed

Juillen 1

Re: It somehow reminds me of the dusk of the minicomputer age

MS-SQL is still a big hitter. MySQL lacks a lot of features you want in Enterprise; PostgreSQL fills that gap a lot better.

Generally for commercial work, SQL Server or Oracle are the big go-to engines for relational still (with Oracle taking a bit of a hit).

PostgreSQL has a fair appearance in the Healthcare sector, but not usually for primary clinical systems (most of those still go with MS).

Git it girl! Academy tries to tempt women into coding with free course

Juillen 1

Re: Feel free to be patronised

Where did you get the info "Women can enter the healthcare sector at any level, from care assistant to surgeon. Men seem to only be allowed to enter at doctor or above."?

I know quite a few male nurses; they took up the field because it interested them, and they either didn't have the grades for Doctor, or just weren't interested in it over Nursing.

They're pretty happy in the jobs.

However, most of the male population simply aren't interested in Nursing and the duties it entails. So there aren't many male Nurses.

Everyone screams patch ASAP – but it takes most organizations a month to update their networks

Juillen 1

Re: It depends

You don't work in the mainstream Sysadmin role do you?

I work in the medical sector, and we have to have service packs validated by the vendors of medical systems (Linacs, CT scanners etc.), and in some cases even individual updates. If you don't have that, you're running a medical device without its CE mark.

If you do that, you're liable for any damage or death (yes, that's what happens when medical devices fritz sometimes) caused. Oh, and kiss goodbye to ever working anywhere again in the IT field. And maybe even get jail time for it (I've seen inquiries into medical tech where things have gone wrong, and jail time is a very, very real possibility).

May seem very easy to you that "something breaks, so you fix it". What happens when the break corrupts databases and takes down other (you thought) unrelated systems (oh, to have a nice clean delineation of systems!). It's an absolute nightmare.

That's why you test what you can actually apply first. This can take a couple of days; in the meantime, you're basically doing a risk assessment that says "The chances of us being hacked are lower than the chances of killing people/taking the company down for an undue length of time due to untested behaviour".

And that's the nature of a risk assessment; occasionally the risk materialises.

If you think things are a binary "easy" evaluation, you're absolutely wrong. Especially when there are limited resources/budgets to invest in systems to keep the infrastructure ticking along properly. Even with huge budgets, there's still an element of gamble.

Whichever way you go, you stand a chance of being damned, but by taking the test->apply cycle, there's a better chance of still having a job and a career at the end of it.

Basic bigot bait: Build big black broad bots – non-white, female 'droids get all the abuse

Juillen 1

Re: as if we were the only country on earth with such a problem

Heard of the term "Red Fascist"? When an organisation uses Fascistic tactics in the name of their cause, then they fit the bill.

Antifa are generally seen as being the modern equivalent of the Brown Shirts, so pretty nasty.

I could create a death squad and call it the "Pink Fluffy Unicorn Love Team", and it wouldn't alter what they actually do.

Brit spending watchdog brands GP Primary Support Care a 'complete mess'

Juillen 1

Re: Hmmm...

Ahh, but you assume all hospitals are spherical and exist in a vacuum. Makes perfect sense from then on. :)

Juillen 1

That would be the insane way that Hospitals are forced to work.

Each year, you get an allocated budget. In most years, you'll really need more than your budget, so you scrimp and save all year to try and make sure you can cover emergencies.

Come the end of the year, if you have money left in your budget, you don't get a hearty round of applause for being efficient. The accountants turn round and say you didn't need as much money as you claimed, so they cut that money from next year's budget (plus, they _also_ remove the 3% per year 'efficiency savings' that every department needs to make).

If you don't spend the money, it can cripple you the next year (on capital spend). Unlike businesses, there is no concept of saving money in the bank to build up a war chest that'll let you get the really natty things you'd really like in the long run; you simply make a capital bid in the year to see if someone will fund you that year.

It's a bit better with Foundation Trusts, but not much.

CEO of struggling storage biz Tintri quits

Juillen 1

Very sad.

They had nice pieces of kit. Used a few in my time, and thoroughly liked them. Reliable and nippy.

Imagine you're having a CT scan and malware alters the radiation levels – it's doable

Juillen 1

What about the Linacs?

There's been a lot of talk there about CT/MRI, but the big problems would occur with the Linear Accelerators used in cancer treatment. If you manage to target those, you could do some serious damage.

Daily Stormer booted off internet again, this time by Namecheap

Juillen 1

Re: "Never give a Nazi a break." - this all depends"

Lovely post hoc ergo propter hoc logical fallacy (Nazism was defeated because the Allied Forces WW2, therefore the Allied forces fought the war to defeat Nazism). This is incorrect. WW2 was fought because German and its allies were invading countries. The Allied Forces fought back against this.

The fact Nazism as a major political power was defeated was a huge bonus.

I suspect that like Flat Earthers and Anti-Vaxxers, they'll never entirely go away, but as long as they're confined to fringes, monitored to keep people safe, and treated humanely (giving them a chance to humanise the mainstream, and realise of their own accord that they're dead wrong in this ideal), then they'll be kept from doing harm, and numbers kept as low as possible.

London cops urged to scrap use of 'biased' facial recognition at Notting Hill Carnival

Juillen 1

Absolutely.. And nobody would bat an eyelid. There again, I suspect there aren't many people banned from The Proms.

Witcher 3: Wild Hunt – a true monster in the making

Juillen 1

Re: 7/10 at best.

Rather than Skyrim, try Kingdoms of Amalur..

Anonymous threatens to name cop who shot dead unarmed Michael Brown

Juillen 1

"*No doubt formed of all-white or majority-white team headed by a white boss reporting to white superiors".

You do realise that's incredibly racist, right? If you turned it around and put "black" in there, you'd be hauled in front of a court for speaking that in public.

Microsoft's NEW OS now runs on HALF of ALL desktop PCs

Juillen 1

Re: Its not suprising..

Just a few things, Chekri:

"employees will manage just fine when they aren't coddled and will take no more than thirty minutes to work it out"

No, most of them won't. They have jobs to do, and they're already harried and hassled as it it (and quite a few of them still don't get Windows 7 fully, and ask all kinds of strange questions, because knowing the oddities of Windows isn't their real job). Some will take weeks to get it. And in the meantime, having to think about it slows their real job, which means the company takes a huge productivity hit. Would you be happy knowing in an overstretched healthcare environment, the medical staff were at 50% because they were trying to work out what the hell the tiles were doing, and why screens kept flicking up and vanishing?

"these are the same people who somehow managed to work a smart phone, drive a manual vehicle and do their tax return without your finger up their backside"

Most over in the UK have tax done by PAYE scheme. No need to do your own tax return and waste all that time when it can be rolled into a generic process. Driving a manual car takes months to learn to drive (and sometimes years to do so safely). Change the side the steering wheel's on, and put an auto shift into the bargain, and make them drive on the other side of the road, no training, and a LOT will not be safe, or happy, or effective.

Many smartphone users are using them just for the phone. Maybe a shopping list or two, but not a lot more. Even that took them quite a while.. And all that time was their own time, and their mistakes had no major consequence (again, I mention clinicians, life critical roles etc.).. You're comparing apples and oranges.

What you're advocating will work in a small group of people (though the rebellion may still occur), but when you're trying to make it fly in a company of thousands of users, the overwhelming majority of who don't want it, find it interferes with their work pattern, find NO ADVANTAGE in it (the real showstopper; how do you justify the advantage to them, apart from "newer, shinier, and Microsoft want us to go that way"?) and leaves them in a far more anxious state, it really is a no-no in the majority of uses. For tablets and kiosks, sure.. Great interface for that.. But as a desktop metaphor?? Nooooooooo..

Boycott Firefox, gay devs urge as Mozilla appoints JavaScript daddy as CEO

Juillen 1

Hmm.. Wonder if they use JavaScript at all? If they do, then they're the biggest damn hypocrites in existence.

Molyneux: Working at Microsoft is 'like taking antidepressants'

Juillen 1

Re: Confirms my view about Microsoft as a cult

It'll take a _long_ time for the corporates to abandon their established working install base of servers/databases/web/authentication/bespoke applications that rely on running on Windows. A LONG time.

Still, it happened with UNIX, and Novell, so the future is always an interesting place, but the big incumbent (UNIX as an app server) took a LONG time to be replaced by Windows in the volumes it has.

The writing is generally on the wall for most large companies.. They're like historical empires, and those have the habit of gaining ascendancy for a while, then lapsing into small states or vanishing entirely.

No Notch niche: Minecraft man in rift with Oculus after Facebook gobble

Juillen 1

Re: ..a multimillionaire already ..... can afford to walk away

Not a word.. It's a phrase.. "Not an idiot".

Triple-headed NHS privacy scare after hospital data reach marketers, Google

Juillen 1

Re: Anonymised data - why the problem

Except aggregate data isn't susceptible to inference attacks. Only the per-patient data, which isn't included in that dataset.

Windows XP market share GROWS AGAIN, outstrips Win 8.1 surge

Juillen 1

Re: That has got to be embarrassing for Microsoft

It'll be because most of the world don't really care about OS. They've bought a PC back in the days that XP came with it, and it's been doing sterling service for them since. It works on the old machine they've had, and now they're being told that they need to spend about 20-25% of the cost of a new PC just so that they can carry on doing what they already do? They have no interest in Win7 being good. And from the ones I know, they have absolutely no intention of moving anything to windows 8 (some are actively avoiding getting new hardware because it comes with Windows 8, because it just irritates them to use it, and they have better things to do than be irritated by something that's just supposed to work for them, not dictate to them.

This is the idiocy of MS Marketing. Technically, 8 is a good move forward under the covers. Forcing that ridiculous new interface (that pisses off an awful lot of people) on everything just for the sake of politics (which it was) is insanity.

When I first heard about Windows 8, it was supposed to be one API for everything (code once, run on any device). That would have been great. Especially if they'd allowed a GUI to be alterable (so you could have Win7/XP lookalike if you wanted), it just ran Win 8 apps. That would have really had people jumping up and down with enthusiasm. Instead, they fragmented the devices (code once for each OS type), and forced the GUI to be the same in all use cases..

That, guys, is why you don't let Marketing make the tech calls.

Battling with Blizzard's new WoW expansion and Diablo revamp

Juillen 1

Edging quietly away from Blizzard..

I've never played WoW, primarily because I'm a 'casual' player, and don't want to have cash siphoned from my account every month for something I probably won't play that month.. I'd feel obligated to play to get value for money, and that doesn't sit well.

Guild Wars 2 hit the sweet spot for me. A nice little story (or set of stories, as it turned out) with a free to play system. You can grind if you want for the "bragging rights" items, but they don't affect gameplay hugely. A slight advantage, but that's about it.

Diablo 3.. Well, that one was a huge letdown. I bought it late, and reasonably cheaply, and I still regretted it.

Diablo 1 through 3 give a challenge. In D2 there was (sort of) a story that perked you up from time to time (I loved the cinematics and the story they created there, and I can still remember feeling sad at all the bodies in the Harem). The amount of customisation allowed you to tweak the game to play how you wanted it. The voices all carried depth (ok, it was the narrator, or Deckard Cain in the main, but hey, they were _memorable_).

D3 has some of the most wooden voice acting I've come across.. I'd expect it out of a bargain basement no-name title. The story is completely formulaic (where it exists). There's nothing that leaps out and you and makes you go "That's new!"..

The sad fact is I've not completed it. Not through difficulty or anything; it's just because I got bored with it. There was no real engaging storyline that made me wonder "what comes next?". There was nothing exciting about bluntly mashing everything in sight with no real worry about anything.

Top Brit docs wade into GP data grab row, demand 'urgent' NHS England talks

Juillen 1

Re: Approved.

No, it's not. Approved purposes are medical research. And the data is pseudonymised (i.e. if you're not inside the NHS, which has this data anyway in this form, it's not readily identifiable).

Insurance companies and profit makers get Green data, which is pre-aggregated.

GPs slam NHS England for poor publicity of data grab plan

Juillen 1

Re: Eventually

But you didn't got to any of the factual sites that explicitly stated what was, and wasn't included in the various tiers of data? You know, like the ones that the NHS has put out there for information?

Juillen 1

Re: Anonymised my arse

Why, oh why, is everyone harping on about "Postcode is the killer on this, with date of birth", when those two are explicitly not available to commercial entities (unless it's a "private hospital" like Bupa or such that will be performing your operation in the private sector, who will need your medical record to not kill you while they perform the primary care activity, for which this data is reserved).

All the commercially available info does not have date of birth, postcode, or any identifying information. A basic search through the released information tells this plainly, but nobody seems to have read that (just the 'scare stories' running round Facebook).

Juillen 1

That's because there isn't.

Non identifiable information is available for non-care purposes. Identifiable ("Red" in all the blurb that's been released) is for primary care purposes only. The other variants (pseudonymised, and outright aggregated unidentifiable information) is the only info that's available, with the pseudonymised protected by pretty draconian requirements for obtaining it.

Juillen 1

Re: Did get a leaflet

There's a GP toolkit on the official website.

GPs are a commercial entity (subcontracted to the NHS). Them not spending the time (5 minutes, from the reception desk, where I often have to wait because they're chatting to each other about TV programmes when I come in on an evening session) to grab the document from the official site is a bit lame.

Juillen 1

Wrong, wrong wrong. That's "Red" data, which is for front line emergency care (i.e. if you're having a major op in a Bupa hospital or something).

you're thinking of Amber and Green data, which do have those things removed. It's in all the published information about it, and it's strongly worded in the Information Governance requirements for the NHS (which the ICO can fine a hospital or organisation hugely for breaking).

The sheer amount of misinformation, and lack of reading of readily available factual information in this thread is staggering. It seems like Facebook is becoming the source of "this is a fact" information these days, and nobody wants to put in the effort to read the readily and easily available facts (a simple Google search would have disproved what you've just written by reading the NHS published information on what goes where).

Juillen 1

Re: What leaflet?


You're getting horribly confused there, and the misinformation in your post is staggering. I think you've been reading a lot of scare stories, while not reading up on what is what.

'Red' data (which is first line care only data) is the only one which contains a date of birth and a postcode. Those of course being 'identifying' information. Companies simply can't buy that. To get it, there needs to be a whole horde of legal steps that involve the patient directly..

The first point that a company can begin to acquire information is the pseudonymised "Amber" data, which specifically, in every release that has ever been made about it, specifically mentions they replace the post code and date of birth with tokens. If a country wide research project reveals some worrying spikes in some demographic, that can be reported back to the NHS, who can then refer that back to identify the group at risk, internally (this info can't be passed back to the research group, as it would break the NHS Information Governance restrictions, but it is info the NHS has that is very useful).

Part of the requirement is that any company accessing this needs to abide by an extremely punitive access agreement (the kind that would result in a company being sunk entirely, and the names associated with that company not really being able to work in the industry very easily afterwards).

What you're thinking of is "Green" data, that is pre-aggregated, and contains large scale demographics, without anything that could identify someone (unless you're scared that reporting to your GP for a rash in Manchester in 2013 would uniquely identify you).

Please, don't carry on the scare mongering. There are definitely things to think on about Amber data, and they are being considered.

Now, that's not to say there aren't issues with pseudonymised data; there always will be (any information carries risk). The trick is to balance that risk so society, and its individuals, get the best return for any risk. That's the aim of this, and it's having a fair stab. The debate should _always_ carry on, but it should always be done with facts, not something your mate said in a pub that he'd heard from the dustman who'd got it from his son in the playground from someone who'd read it on facebook, so it must be true!

Have a read of: http://www.england.nhs.uk/2014/01/15/geraint-lewis/ for a quick overview. It's fairly easy to dig out the factual side of things from the official NHS sites, which publish what the data sets contain, and who can access what levels. There's really not a lot of excuse for getting it that badly wrong.

Dodgy Kaspersky update borks THOUSANDS of NHS computers

Juillen 1


*Cough* You work in the NHS in ops or IT service delivery do you? I thought not..

If there's the slightest change that isn't agreed by the Unions (and Linux is a big change for the whole suite of software that's required and available), the Unions can, and will invoke walkouts or strikes if necessary. There's a hell of a lot of negotiation involved.

From XP -> Win7 isn't necessarily a retrain. There's the familiar start button kinda thing, and most icons on the desktop. Win7 to Win 8 is. You'll note, there isn't much windows 8 in industry.

Office XP to Office 2007 was a retraining. 2007 to 2010, not so much. 2010 to Libre Office would be a definite.

Really, after working in big companies on international IT projects, and working inside the NHS in IT ops, running my own show, and consulting with various companies, I hear the kind of rant you're coming out with, and it's almost invariably from people who have never run heterogenous systems, never done major migrations, and never had to be involved in the whole business aspect. The "Well, we can rip everything out over a few weeks, and put it back so the lights look the same, and nobody will notice" plan is something I've seen time and time again. And it leaves a lot of extremely unhappy users, failed services, and project planners kicked out on their derrieres for incompetence.

Oh, and Linux boxes do run antivirus. For a good reason.

Juillen 1

Re: So to the downvoters of testing...

You really don't work in that kind of environment do you? The way this works in enterprise is that they run very light teams on operations that keep the servers running, monitor and tweak the systems that host hundreds, if not thousands, of applications, check logs for security intrustions, upcoming errors, run diagnostics, herd requested changes through the process and so on.

Where you have a rapidly changing application (such as anti-virus, where if you don't have the absolute to the minute update and you get compromised by lack of it, you can lose your job), there is a balancing of risk very much in favour of trusting the third party. And you have a contract that hurts them if they take down your infrastructure by oversights such as this (and 'insures' you for any damages etc.). Contrary to what you seem to believe, there isn't infinite resource to check absolutely everything all the time, and if you try, it's a long, long queue. The job is managing risk, and in this case, it's the risk of being exposed to a virus infection that may leak your sensitive data to the world (big, big risk, and a fair likelihood), or the major vendor fails to test correctly to the level that it damages your infrastructure.

New application suite and antivirus definition update are two completely different things.

Juillen 1

Re: Why would you standardise on *one* AV solution?

Wow.. You think there's only a single antibiotic on the market that everyone uses, because all infections are magically cured by it?

There are loads of antibiotics, and a whole array of drugs used to treat conditions, largely because there are strains of infection, mutation, slight differences in weaknesses between them and so on. If you simply had one drug for one condition, you'd have a reasonably ineffective drug that would get rid of some conditions (screwed if you weren't one of the ones it treated), and it'd very soon be the factor that every infection mutated to overcome (the big target).

You're more likely to get a job if you study 'social' sciences, say fuzzy-studies profs

Juillen 1

Re: What If?

Essentially, many of them are. Researchers in the field of psychiatry which lead to the treatments are the ones who break the ground (backed up with neurological scans, biochemical analysis etc.), and get to prove the results, rather than rely on quackery. Once the results are in, and methodologies laid down, the less qualified practitioners get their side in the field (hey, I studied hypnotherapy long ago, and took a strong interest in behavioural psychology as part of my comp-sci degree; the part that had me going into AI and ALife).

If science hadn't been applied, we'd still be exorcising the PTSD patients.

Juillen 1

Re: Maybe...

Most of the medical practitioners I know of (hey, I'm in a hospital, so that's a good number) have no problem stating things eloquently and lucidly. A few possibly don't, and that's where you have dictaphones and medical secretaries.

Good managers are good managers irrespective of where they come from, but they better understand the parameters of their remit (non-IT managers in an intensely IT technical arena are extremely hamstrung in their effectiveness).

Interestingly enough, referring to IT staff as "peons" is a very quick way to end up with any of your projects that require any form of tech engagement to be put towards the end of the list (hint; it's a lot of projects, and the list can be long). If that's your attitude, damn glad I'm not somewhere you're a manager.

Juillen 1

Re: Bashing the liberal arts

If your university was trying to teach science by rote, then it would never have had people pass, not with any grade that would be useful in the real world.

Analytical thinking is the foundation of science. If you can't analyse, you can't follow a path from hypothesis to conclusion. Half the problems are about removing personal bias and belief, which, it seems, your history teachers were actually advocating (so, not really teaching "history", but how to discard factual basis to create a revisionist agenda). So, it doesn't seem to have covered information gathering (more information hiding, and bias selection), analysis (you're not analysing anything in that setup, merely trying to select partial information to fit a preconceived stance), and definitely seems to be turning critical thinking on its head.

So, you reckon the science departments were teaching poorly, but you were taught well?

Want to keep the users happy? Don't call them users for a start

Juillen 1

Great, but...

Every step of nicety and negotiation takes time. If you're in a business that pays for this service.. Wonderful.. If you're in a service that treats things as a treadmill that the technicians can never catch up with.. The politeness is a luxury that can't always be afforded when people decide to be less than helpful from the 'user' side.

Snap-happy blogger babe posts catcalling blokes' mugshots online

Juillen 1

Measured response.

There is such a thing in the world as a measured and appropriate response.

Given that most of the gals I know find a whistle (or other light hearted compliment) to be generally amusing, and on the days they don't, they have a rather scathing (but funny) response, I don't see the problem.

It's not revenge porn being published (that stuff deserves to have people committed to a monastery where they'll not get any until they sort their heads out), but it has all the hallmarks of minority vigilante justice. You know, where the small subset of people decide to impose their own world view on a majority that has a different way of thinking. In this case, the end result of the imposition is a lessening of interaction, and a further isolation of people (most of the 'banter' interaction assumes that people are generally amiable sorts, and initiating the interaction leaves the initiator in a slightly vulnerable position; scathing comebacks often happen, and can leave the initiator red as a beetroot.. But that's accepted as a possible outcome).

Assuming people are generally friendly and amiable is a good thing. Far better than assuming people are hostile by default (which has increasingly been the case over the last 20 years or so), which can very easily lead to increasing social isolation (which is becoming rather a huge problem).

Things like this.. Well, it's broadcasting to a large audience (who have no idea of what was actually going on) a personal (and probably entirely skewed) view of a situation, conceivably causing problems for some of those 'shamed'. There is no determination of what the situation really is. No appropriate response, just an assumption that the writer is right, everything else is wrong, and that it's ok to play the victim card to get potentially heavy retaliation against whoever you choose.

There's a word for this, and it's called "Bullying". It's a far more clever and manipulative version of bullying than the stereotypical thug in the playground, but it's still definitely bullying.

Years ago, when I worked in a variety of bars, I did a little experiment and put a mirror to this kind of behaviour'. The banter of the women, and the light hearted swats and things were met with extremely terse and accusing responses. Without exception, it was met with bafflement, derision or in some cases upset that offense was caused (even though it wasn't in reality; it was a debate style stance). Women just didn't understand why it was 'wrong' to make contact when they chose, or to have a little verbal banter. They were correct, but most of them, if you turned it around, believed it would be inappropriate to subject a woman to that. The only reason that was brought up for why it'd be inappropriate for it to happen to a woman was "well, they're women". Most, however saw the point.

One memory that really still makes me chuckle was back in my cycling days when a car load of gals drove up a hill I was cycling up, and whistled and cheered at me.. Then they drove down the hill and back up with the explanation that they just had to get another look at my legs and arse... That made me laugh, feel a lot better about myself, and actually made an otherwise crappy day a lot better.

So, thank you to gals that know that it's ok to be friendly and have banter out of the blue. Thank you to people who reach out and have a laugh, and assume you're a friend they've never met. Long may that continue.

Hollywood: How do we secure high-def 4K content? Easy. Just BRAND the pirates

Juillen 1

"Paying users won't notice"

Really? That was supposed to happen with the current HD protections. And they flake out, causing all kinds of strife to people who just "expect it to work".

" users might even be allowed to create a copy"

There again, the probability is that they won't. Someone might decide to just hand me a million quid and a ferrari for the fun of it.

"Only the thieves will complain"

So, only people who break into your house and burgle it will complain? Oh, you mean people who copy it? So, you mean copyright infringers? That's a different legal context and an entirely different thing.

With the valid point that you make (an attack based on duplicating a legitimate user's content, framing them), you overturn your point about copyright infringers becoming accountable. They're not stupid, and they will find a way to make sure it's not them that gets brought to book. It may, however, catch one or two people who home duplicate (you know, how home audio taping killed the music industry, and the VCR killed the movie industry; the people who did all that damage.. They need to be locked up and criminalise for all the damage they did to industry, don't they?)..

Microsoft: We're nearly OUT OF STOCK of Surface 2 and Pro 2

Juillen 1

Re: Surface RT - I have one

Yep, I've used one, and (the pro, as it needs active directory integration etc.). It's not too bad, to be honest (at least the Win8 UI works for the tablet form, rather than the travesty it is on the desktop).

However, it's not a "wow" that's enough to tempt people away from the rich ecosystems that are the iOS and Android platforms. It may have a place in business, but that would require a lot of training (and maybe putting Win8 on the desktop, which very few businesses are thinking seriously about), but it'll have an extremely tough time getting a footing in the consumer market, especially at the price points MS are pitching (hell, you can get an Android that'll do everything the Surface will for most users at a fraction of the price, AND it'll have a wealth of apps).

My money isn't on MS at the moment. It's an OK product released into a saturated market; you know, the kind of thing that you need a revolutionary product that makes people sit up and go "This is something new, and does things the other can't"..

'Stupid old white people' revenge porn ban won't work, insists selfie-peddler

Juillen 1

Re: The real moral of the story is...

Well, when you really want the job, and the employer has to pick between two equally qualified people, you'll probably be a tad remorseful that the pic got out when the other guy gets the role.

There again, there may be some place that do hire you because they've seen naked pics of you.. I'm not so sure they're someone I'd be comfy working for.

How to design a storage array: NOT LIKE THAT, buddy

Juillen 1

Re: Whatever.

Weird.. In running an enterprise setup, I tend to find that things tagged as being Enterprise level require support minions, have pretty detailed documentation that you get the vendors to dredge up for you on request (no futzing around on Google to see what someone managed to post somewhere 3 years ago), and has an uptime in years (24x7 systems). It's also replaceable (in the main) because it's architected to be replaceable.

Rarely had issues with support contracts, and the vendors don't play silly buggers. They play to the document. If they say they'll deliver, they do, otherwise they get hauled up.

Any migration to another system needs diligence and attention to detail. If you don't apply that, you're going to fail. Badly.

Sysadmins fail to fix NHS IT snafu, HUNDREDS of appointments cancelled

Juillen 1

There really are a shed load of problems that can happen on the network.. AD just complicates it further up.

ICAHN'T with this guy: Activist investor gives up battle with Big Mike

Juillen 1

Good news!

Icahn rumbles on about his army "improving shareholder value", but doesn't mention increasing the lifespan, reputation, quality or long term profitability of the company. Just the short term "Shareholder value".

In other words, if you hold shares in it, he'll strip it to the bone in the short term to give you a lot of fast money to put in the next company he dismantles, undoing the hard work of thousands of man years in mere months (and fattening his wallet in the process).

I tend to use Dell in the Enterprise context, and am quite fond of it. Don't have much to do with their PC wing..

Total cost of that axed NHS IT FIASCO to taxpayers: £10.1bn

Juillen 1

Re: Disgusting

Actually, brought to you by Tony Blair. We're just still paying for it.

'But we like 1 Direction!' Rock gods The Who fend off teen Twitter hate mob

Juillen 1

Re: I particularly liked...

Thought you got that every evening if you lived in Cardiff centre.

YouTube Wars: Microsoft cries foul as Windows Phone app pulled again

Juillen 1

Re: "technically difficult and time consuming"

Because they prefer the "private" API version that you can pay them to license (and is compatible with native code apps) due to the optimisations you can make, rather than the open and free HTML 5 license.

MS want to get the benefits of the private (pay for licence) API while not paying for it. They're trying to say that using the HTML5 API "is too difficult for them to get working, so it must be Google's fault, so they'll just use the pay for API for free because they want to".

This, of course, is a similar rationale to the piracy debates, with the difference that a good chunk of the pirates have no money and go for personal use, whereas MS have one of the biggest war chests out there with billions in profit every year, and they stand to have this as a 'feature' on software they're selling (if it wasn't of value to them/end users, they'd have quietly given up)


Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019