Re: missed opportunity
Try getting a user to hold a scope probe and watch the 50hz hum jump. Shirley this proves the user is radiating and is the source of the problem!
1073 publicly visible posts • joined 7 Sep 2006
I'm with you - right tool for the job. Standard office tools have a place but far too often we get engineering drawings somehow created in a spreadsheet and sent to us. That's room plans, schematics, mechanical panel layouts, anything to avoid using a proper CAD system. Completely inappropriate but cheap! As the article says, they are trying to reduce the amount of email, empower more of the workforce and do things differently - makes sense. Google started about 10 years ahead of Microsoft on collaboration and I'm not sure they've caught up yet.
True story:-
Lady asked to go into bank to draw out some money for her father.
No problem says the cashier - let me update your passbook while you're here.
Passbook updated. Hang on - unknown transaction - withdrawal from an ATM.
Cue big argument - cashier insists the system cannot be wrong. Lady insists her father cannot have withdrawn the money as the ATM was 100 miles away and he is too ill to travel. Cashier insists the system cannot be wrong. Argument escalates to senior supervisor who insists system cannot be wrong, no one can keep track of another person 100%, ill or not.
Lady says she can prove it was not withdrawn by her father - he hasn't got an ATM card.
Money duly restored to account.
Moral of the story - the system cannot be wrong. Except it can and you have to prove it.
Sympathise with this.
Today I used this little program, unmodified, and it still saves hours:-
// Withdrawable Plugs Program
// RG Started 29/10/96 last updated:- 4/11/96
// C++ - filename = wd.cpp
// IDE Notes :-
// set editor tab size to 3
// load project wd.prj
I am sure other readers will have more ancient stuff they still use?
"Consider that 17025 specifies that exhibits cannot be outside the exhibit store for more than n minutes at a time."
Not true - that is not in the standard. The word "exhibit" doesn't even exist in the version I have. It may be in your procedures, but that is a different problem.
Otherwise known as doing it properly with records i.e. ISO9001 without the old manufacturing bias. Minimum (external) cost is about £2k to £3K for the first audit for a small lab, then £1K per year after that, plus your own time of course. Any labs not already certified to ISO9001 may find this hard, but the 2 standards are very closely linked and compliance with ISO17025 means you are operating in accordance with ISO9001 (says so in the introduction).
"we pressure the computer makers to ship LINUX versions"
Whilst I admire the sentiment, I don't know how you are going to do that. The fact is money talks - if enough folks bought something other than Windows (enough to affect the stats and the bottom line) then change would come. But sadly few people are that interested in this petty squabble of ours and therefore buy whatever is in the shop and from whoever has the largest marketing budget/slush fund.
For what it's worth, my last machine at home running an MS product was Win95 in 1996 on a second hand computer.
Regarding "two days quarantine", this would hit one of the main uses of email for business. We transfer drawings and specifications by the bucket load every day instead of using the postal service. We also receive orders that way - and they ring up 5 minutes after pressing send to make sure you got it (yes really).
So probably not realistic for health services either.
The desktop version of old (2003?) had a facility we liked a lot - called shared spreadsheets or similar and it sort of worked most of the time. The trouble is it was very flaky and would hang - we got fed up of round tripping it through openoffice every week to clear out the cruft.
I have tried the online version but it still has a way to go in the user friendly department.
Open/Libre office never got there either.
“long-range combat search and rescue” or “long-range high-speed delivery of mission essential spares and stores"
That's what drones are for. You can buy and operate a lot of drones for the cost of any chopper.
Immense range, lower risk to operators, high tech so keeping business happy with upgrades and replacements.
Surely this will be the future for most robots. Not all, of course, but central management and control solves a lot of day-to-day problems. This is already happening with infrastructure kit (electrical power, for instance) - you plug in new kit and it downloads all its settings from central management. Some kit has been doing this for decades (industrial controls) so it is only a matter of time before the mobile robotic chromebook arrives.
The folks who swap the kit in the field could be significantly de-skilled from days of ye olde fault finding.
Blame the algorithm?
After all, how much does one report of "bad" count against 50 "likes" - I am sure it won't be a real person looking at this until the scales swing the other way. If these images were in a hidden/private group it shouldn't be a surprise they were appreciated by the members. I wonder if any accounts have been suspended yet? Any arrests? After all, the real names policy will make it easy to identify them . . . . . . .