Re: Too small?
I did a Hiroshima sized jobbie once. Boy those chillies were hot...
5478 posts • joined 18 Jun 2009
I did a Hiroshima sized jobbie once. Boy those chillies were hot...
North Korea have been digging tunnels deep into rock since the 1950s. I heard someone on the radio suggesting that the most worrying thing was the idea that the top bods in the regime think that they (personally obviously - sod the rest of the population) might therefore be able to comfortably survive nuclear retaliation.
I'm not sure I buy that idea, as surely spending the rest of your life hiding in a tunnel, however luxurious, is nowhere near as fun as being the boss of a whole Stalinist theme park. Where you can oppress your population, have the finest goodies that money can buy, meet Dennis Rodman, march your huge army around, and generally play God. I guess we so far out on the edge of sanity, that it's very hard to work out what the hell the regime wants out of anything. Makes them very hard to predict.
...causes ablative pressure on a uranium jacket...
As it's finally getting colder now, I went to M&S and asked for a uranium jacket.
I've no idea why that police helicopter has started following me around...
Also you can tell a real earthquake from a nuclear fake-quake. Real ones are deeper, and last longer. And you'd need to release the right radioactive goodies for the atmospheric detectors to pick up. Easier to fake small bangs with lots and lots of TNT - or a fuel-air explosive, I'd have thought.
Or could you get a million people in a big cave to all jump up and down at once? If North Korea wins the synchronised trampolining at the next Olympics, you'll know I was right...
The reports I've read suggest that the Norks are only able to make enough material for 2-5 nukes a year. So they've tested at least a year's supply. How long do they last before you have to reprocess the uranium due to too much decay? What's the shelf-life of a nuke?
Anyway they've not got many, so may not wish to sell them. Plus there's a good chance selling one would be traceable. The retaliation after that might be quite serious. The regime might struggle to survive without imports of fuel from China - that would almost certainly tip China over the edge into becoming an enemy. I doubt the regime can survive that.
Also they're under very serious sanctions now, so ships can't just leave North Korea - which means the nuke would almost certainly have to be smuggled via China. Which might also upset them somewhat. It's possible though, they may be mad enough to sell or use them.
But selling the technology is nothing new. I don't remember the exact details of who helped who now, but look up the AQ Khan nuclear network. My recollection is that China helped Pakistan's nuclear program, as a counter-balance to India getting them in the 70s. Pakistan was a bit light on missile technology though, so they were helping various people in exchange for missile technology. I think that was principally Iran and North Korea, but possibly also Libya (not that their nuke program seems to have been all that serious). I don't remember if it was Pakistan or Israel that was cooperating with the South African nuke program.
Iraq had a mix of Russian, Chinese and self-modified Scuds. I don't think they were using the North Korean tech. Again I think Iran and the Norks were cooperating there, so Iran would not have been best pleased if North Korea were helping their main enemy as well.
I don't remember reading anything about Syria's program, so don't know who they were talking to. The AQ Khan network was broken up over ten years ago, and the Syrian project was more recent. I wonder if they were using Saddam's old scientists - his nuke program doesn't seem to have got all that far, and Israel bombed the French reactor in the 80s - but they must have still had the info. Or they could have been talking to North Korea.
Tis all very convoluted.
All the other tests were underground, and I read a news report in November / December that they were carrying out digging works at or near one of the previous test sites. So I don't quite know why most of the stories I've seen in the papers said that this test was a surprise. And this is likely to have been underground too.
Admittedly China say they weren't told in advance. But then if you remember in December Kim withdrew his girlband from Beijing, because they were only getting a Politburo member in the audience, rather than Xi Xinping himself. And I read speculation then that this was because the Chinese might not want to be seen to endorse an upcoming test.
The neptunium thing was interesting. I didn't realise it was useable in weapons. But according to that authoritive source of knowledge Wiki (as I quickly Googled it on reading the article) - the US released info that it could be used for nukes in the 90s. The same article said that no-one has been known to try, as it's harder to isolate enough of the stuff than uranium/plutonium.
I seem to recall the British Green Parrot (great name by the way chaps) was selectable yield. From single figure kilotons up to maybe hundreds. So could be used either as a tactical or small strategic nuke.
Even the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs yielded double this device leaving open the possibility that they actually just got 6000 tonnes of TNT together.
I remember that theory being put around for their first test, which was even smaller than the last three 5-10 kt ones. But I read about the last one that the detectors placed around North Korea detected the expected nuclear material in the atmosphere.
Unless of course they're also releasing trace elements of that at the same time.
But this does seem too small for fusion.
Also I don't know why all the speculation that not only have they made the leap to fusion (as they claim) - but also managed to miniaturise at the same time.
Although I suppose it's possible that this was actually a test of a mini A bomb, and they're lying about the H bomb bit.
Still they haven't yet managed a successful large missile test launch have they? So they'd still have to put the things on aircraft or ships. Or a suicide sumbarine. Surface in New York harbour and kaboom.
Have they managed to sell enough fake Viagra to afford to pay SpaceX, now the price has come down? Perhaps try to buy a cheap launch on a re-used Falcon first stage through a false company?
I'd say the bigger risk is Elon Musk. He's got his rocket that can now land vertically. He's got the new space capsule coming in by 2017-18. He's got electric car capability - so should be able to master the monorail with ease. I bet he can get from a standing start to an H bomb, before the Norks can go from A bomb to miniaturised A Bomb. The moment he buys a private island or dormand volcano is the time to take him out - just to be sure...
It injects a dose of speed into your ear, as you talk, while sending a signal to the other person's phone with your weight and the dose it's given, so that their phone can dose them up to a roughly similar level.
They're working on a helium supply for the next model, so that your faster speech also achieves the correct level of squeakiness...
Ah, the childish joy of ending a call with the satisfying snap of closing the phone was great when I had my trusty old Motorola Razr. Much nicer than just pushing a button. It's a real shame.
I still think my ideal form factor would be something like the old Razr with a 4G radio and WiFi sharing, so I could read the odd email on a slightly improved screen - but could resort to a small tethered tablet for any actual smart stuff.
Or I'd be happy with sensibly priced 2 SIM deals, where I can have data only for my tablet, and a bit of both on the phone. But I think my wishlist is too unusual to be catered for.
Even on a 4.8" phone, the Lumia 735 I use, I find browsing the web not very pleasant. I only do it when there's no alternative. I'd much rather tether my iPad. My brother's got the big iPhone 6, and I admit that the web's a much more pleasant experience on that - or a Galaxy / Galaxy Note - but they are a bit too big to hold comfortably on long phonecalls. And speaking to people is what I have the phone for. Apps are mostly what the tablet is for.
Plus, when you get new glasses in a few years time, the drink will no longer work with them, and no update will be forthcoming. Forcing you to "upgrade" to a new kind of drink...
My glass only holds a pint. Where am I supposed to put this 2 GB driver?
I'm not using a second hand rocket unless it wore a condom the first time...
The 8 year old in question is amazingly quick at getting an iPad to do what he wants it to. However he also has the amazing ability (and has since well before he was able to read) to click on the right things to get him to where he wanted to be, even if that was clicking on the "ignore this dire warning of consequences" button, or the "I agree to give all my personal data to Apple/Facebook/ISIS/Donald Trump to do with as they desire" one.
Mostly he's done that on an iPad with little in the way of consequences. He's starting to do it on his Mum's laptop - and that's going to need clean-up again, and my suggestion is to give him a user account with no permissions (it's not his).
On his own machine, he should have more control, so he suffers the inconvenience of having to clean up his own mistakes. With some help of course. But I'm not his Dad, and I'm not going to be in daily supervision, so there'll have to be some compromise with practicality. And it should be less fragile than Windows, especially if he hasn't got root. So long as I can give him enough permissions that he doesn't feel like it's not his machine.
I haven't been on USENET since I was using UNIX back in the 90s. Perhaps the nostalgia will jog the memory.
Playing around with Linux has been a possible project for me for a while now, and I may just do that so I can equip the family kids with the odd Raspberry Pi and see if any of them are interested. However I'm more focused for now in finding a distro to get this little laptop going so it can be used. I've got other things on the go to keep me occupied. Educating myself into being a 'nix guru is a long-term project - getting this netbook into a useable state should ideally be something I can do over a weekend.
Cheers. There's some minimal distros based on Slackware that I came across, designed for netbooks and other old slow kit. But I'm going to need to pick something with decent numbers of active online posters, so I can hunt down answers. Given my meagre UNIX skills are now rusty/redundent/forgotten/useless.
I got the impression that the Acer Aspire One was one of the more popular netbooks, and still has some techy love online. And that seems to be the case, as I've found that some distros specifically have support information for running on them. And that's looking like the most likely thing to sway my choice, given I may need all the help I can lay my hands on.
Although my first choice will be something a bit more limited, with a child-friendly 'task based' UI, which still needs the ability to get to a proper desktop. But searching so far hasn't turned up anything likely looking.
If this does go well, I'll be looking at Raspberry Pi for his next birthday.
Thanks. I'm not sure we're ready for the command line yet. Although he does have a rather cavalier attitude to downloading stuff off the internet. The downside of learning in the iPad walled garden is that it's an awful lot easier to screw up a PC - but he's just used to being able to safely download any freebie from the App Store.
He's not allowed an email account yet, but I imagine he'll probably want webmail - rather than client based. In general though I can't see the command line being all that attractive - so far he's more interested in what computers can do, rather than how they do it.
A decent browser is the most important thing, and he's going to want Flash (spit!) in order to play online games and watch iPlayer and the like. Youtube to watch Minecraft stuff most of all. Note to self: sort out Minecraft. He also likes to type lists and stories and the like.
I don't want the thing totally locked down, as he is showing an interest in IT, and so he should be able to learn by tinkering. It would help if his parents were IT literate, but they're not that great, so by going Linux I'm ensuring that all problems get referred to me. I guess setting myself up as root, and giving him more limited permissions is the way to go for starters. Is it possible to allow a normal user to download stuff from the repository?
Then pass him full control if he doesn't break anything. He's already a danger to the health of his Mum's laptop.
I can see this becoming a real time-sink, and forcing me to start learning about Linux, in order to stay a few steps ahead of him. I suppose if stuff doesn't come back, the internet and man pages will sort me out. Although I must annoy jake by saying I never liked vi...
Is OpenBSD 8 year-old friendly? I confess I've never seen it running. I'm looking for something approaching the simplified task-based UI of the original Linpus, or if not then something Windows like.
I've not done much research yet, but was wondering if the old OLPC OS was still going, or if there's something similar cooked up for the Raspberry Pi?
A quick bit of looking has brought up many distros I've never heard of, no surprise, and a few I was expecting. So Mint and Puppy look promising.
I think I'll avoid Ubuntu/Unity, as I'm going for minimal footprint. But maybe Lubuntu or Xubuntu are worth a look?
Have seen nice comments about Crunchbang, but only vaguely heard of it.
Thanks for the reply. My nephew decided he wants a new OS, and handed me the Acer to do over Christmas. So I've now got round to having a look.
I'll check out the hard drive, I've no idea of the tech specs, and didn't realise there were different models.
My nephew has found my Mum's old Acer Aspire One. Which is barely used, as was the fate of many a netbook.
A quick bit of searching found that the OS hasn't been updated since 2009, the last viable Firefox it will run is 7, and Youtube block versions that old.
I haven't yet come across a forum for users of these things, though I suspect that more searching might do so. As I know they had lots of techy love, and techies like to keep old stuff going. I met an old friend last month, who is still using (with many eBay trips for spare parts) my old Sony Ericsson P800 (great phone), which I gave to him in about 2004/5. It was a very nice nostalgic feeling to play with the old thing.
Anyway, any quick thoughts on the best Linux to chuck on this to give it a new lease of life would be much appreciated. The nephew is 8. So if there's a version that replaces Linpus and gives a more limited UI that's easy to use - I'm very tempted.
Otherwise thoughts on whether to go Mint, some flavour of Ubuntu or whatever would be useful.
I last used UNIX in 1994, but I'm sure I can catch up.
Thankyou for your attention, please now return to your Friday afternoon beers.
I've heard that British sausages are mostly made of lips and arseholes.
Personally I think it's just bollocks...
[I'll get my coat. In my defence, this is the family Christmas joke.]
Apparently in Scotland, the sausages can actually be square. I don't know why they don't call them squausages...
I can't bring myself to fork out £300 now. And I'm not even paying. I could have an iPhone, but resent the cost, even though the company picks it up. Actually I don't like them either. I love my iPad, but as a phone iOS doesn't quite cut it for me. I don't like the email client, or the address book, or the failure to properly separate my work and personal mail/contacts.
I admit to lusting after the Galaxy Note. But £150 gets a good Motorola or my current Windows Lumia 735. Although from Andrew's rude comments, I'm suspecting Win 10 may kill my liking for the platform, and drive me to Android (which I find a bit fiddly).
As I've been saying for a few years though, it's impossible to justify flagship phones costing more than the best tablets. Often by hundreds of pounds from the same manufacturers! Only the weird model of mobile purchasing encourages this madness, and it can't last.
Just imagine the audience is naked. That gives you your pshychological edge, in order to dominate them. Of course, if your imagination is too good, you may require counselling afterwards...
I could give 90 minutes on the 1999 Water Regulations. I've already got the Powerpoint slides and everything. In fact, I've even got posters pre-done. You're entitled to CPD certificates too.
OK, so it's a bit dull. But you'll be grateful for it, next time you're up to your knees in zebra poo on a January site visit to London Zoo.
Or, I could probably do 5 hours on the various problems my Mum has had with technology - and how I've tried to solve them. My favourite being, "I had a box pop up on my screen 4 days ago saying that I might get a virus, so I just clicked on OK and carried on browsing the internet. Is that something to worry about?" Sorry Mum, could you try being a little more vague...
Let go sadly. Off to pastures new. You can find him on Forbes though. Was very sad, I missed his lecture in June. But had a wedding that day.
So the timing couldn't be better then! FIFA's President and his annointed successor just copped an 8 year ban today. Charges to follow shortly no doubt.
More than half the governing board are also under investigation or facing charges.
They need a new boss, PDQ. And just in the nick of time, Chehade is free in March. It's perfect!
I would have thought that it's unlikely that you'd be massively downvoted and upvoted at the same time.
Try being rude about Google...
If you make fair points against MS, Apple etc, you tend not to get many downvotes from the faithful. Google tend to split opinion more. They've got some real fanboys, some died-in-the-wool haters (for various reasons) - and quite a lot of people are rather wary of them becasue of the huge power they have in internet-land.
I've also managed some +20 -10 vote type posts on Tim Worstall articles. I guess anything politics related can end up working that way.
Oh and Bitcoin. But there don't seem to be so many true believers left nowadays. So nowadays if I make a comment on the foolishness of a system with built-in deflation (or the similarities to the scams I saw when playing EVE Online...), there's only a couple of downvotes from the remaining faithful.
I've also noticed a new trend for downvoting bad puns. I love a dodgy pun or two, and enjoy it when you get a pun-off between a few commentards. But now instead of just ignoring the jokes they don't approve of, I've noticed a few +40 -5 ones. Everyone's a critic...
There already is. Admittedly it's not the most user-friendly,and it's a shame that they took timestamps away.
At the top left of this post, replying to you, will be a little grey curly arrow. hover over that and a tooltip says "in reply to". Click on it, and it takes you to the actual post this is a reply to. Puts it at the very top of the page.
Not the most elegant solution. I'd like them to introduce proper threading, or find some way to improve the comment-usability-jungle. But there is something.
That smile at the camera thing isn't new. A friend has a book about photography - and it talks about the etiquette and expectations of being photographed, and how that changes the results.
One of his examples is a picture of a woman standing on a beach, with a big smile on her face, but at her feet is the body of her husband who's just died of a heart attack. Someone took the picture, and she just automatically smiled for the camera. Presumably if she'd just bumped him off, she'd have done a better job of hiding her emotions...
Or there's the pictures of the troops returning from the evacuation at Dunkirk. Again lots of them smiling and waving to the camera. But the ones they weren't aware of show them looking like shit, as you'd be if you'd just lost a huge battle, retreated for a week and then been stuck on a beach under constant air attack for another one, only to then have to wade out to a small ship and get evacuated - all while still under constant aerial assault.
Also evidence from a lot of the troops was that they felt ashamed of themselves, and many expected to be booed on their return, not cheered. So they weren't really in a smiling mood.
Anyway, if you smile all the time, people will wonder what you're up to.
I enjoy the idea that there's no english word for lingua franca, even though the global lingua franca is now english...
Look, when we said we were a family friendly company, we didn't mean that!
I'd have expected Naval computers to run SeaP/M.
Congratulations on mentioning the sound design.
I channel-hopped to a film the other day (ah yes, the 70s King Kong film), where the goodie walks across a big tree trunk that's been laid over a ravine. The sound effects of his footsteps were of a man in a very echoey room, walking across a polished floor. I presume they were on a budget and got rushed. I found it strangely jarring.
Not that Star Wars exactly had much of a budget. But the sound was consistently excellent. And iconic. I also remember really enjoying the nice sounds, even more than the visuals, when playing Tie Fighter, and whichever the FPS game was in the late 90s.
In general the sets were also amazing. Particularly as it wasn't a big budget production. Although I'd quibble with the realism thing on one major point. Space is dangerous, and I presume they're using artificial gravity - but surely the designs should be a bit more fail-safe. So maybe smaller rooms. Although at least in the Star Wars universe they've managed to invent the humble seat belt, something that seems to have been lost in the intervening time between now and Starfleet getting going. Is it because they don't want the Klingons to call them sissies?
Also, why do people insist on designing their space stations with lethal multiple-storey drops scattered about all over the place. And very few guard rails. No high-vis marking on the edges of steps (or lethal 15 storey drops). I guess Vader got annoyed with all the Health & Safety types - I can't imagine anyone long survivng the utterance of, "Lord Vader, you have failed your compliance testing"...
Ah yes, I still do this with the Legionella regs.
Oh, you don't want to bother with a risk assessment? Sure, that's OK. You remember the Barrow-in-Furness case don't you? Oh yes, she was acquitted of manslaughter. After 4 years, a retrial, a couple of hundred grand of legal costs and a £70,000 fine.
People tend to go a bit silent on me after I say this. But it often has the desired effect.
In the Barrow-in-Furness clusterfuck the council replaced the engineer in charge of their pool with an architect. Who knew nothing about water quality. So she apparently sacked the legionella testing contractors, as she didn't know why they were spending this money. Controlling the water quality in swimming pools and cooling towers is a bugger of a job - whereas architects are best left to draw pretty pictures.
I filled my car up in Epson once. Never again! I had to sell my house to pay the bill.
I presume you're an unpaid reputation manager for Linux. The problem is that if you come across as a smug self-satisfied arse, that what you're achieving is to manage to reduce the reputation of Linux. Which would be a shame.
Linux is great. Windows is also great. Lots of people were very nice about Windows 7. 8, not so much, but I happen to think 10 is quite nice. For those who disagree, 7's still around.
This is a problem about scummy vendors installing more software than you asked for. Which would be equally possible with Linux. Obviously in a lot of cases this is user-error, in that they're installing stuff they shouldn't trust. But there's also Oracle and Adobe doing it, who should bloody well know better. And of course Google are the ones paying Adobe to do it, with Chrome and their crappy old toolbar.
I'd love to have seen the anti-virus vendors bin Chrome as malware. It installs itself on people's PCs when they didn't ask for it - therefore in my book it's malware.
I admit it would be childish, and who wants to get into a pissing contest with Google anyway.
I noticed a few years ago that loads of people who don't even know what a browser is ("I click on the blue E to get to Google...") had Chrome installed. And I noticed that it was getting dodgily downloaded all over the place, along with that bloody Google toolbar. But I've not seen it do that for a while, until I went to download Flash last week, and saw that it had replaced McAfee Security Scan as their ticked checkbox crapware of choice again.
This place is the anti-Skegness. Sure, there's a screaming gale off the sea and it's pissing it down. The difference is that the precipitation is warm - thus eliminating the risk of freezing to death. You'll need some pretty good sunblock but your deckchair will still blow over. I bet the nightlife is better than Skeggy too...
Oh God. Don't mention the P word!
My Mum hands me her Macbook because the printer won't work. OK, what's your password? What password? The one for the laptop? What one for the laptop? Try guessing the three other passwords of hers I already know from fixing her email/phone/whatever - which she also always forgets the password to.
I once spent half an hour on the phone to various BT 1st line support staff who simply wouldn't deviate from their damned script - setting up a friend's Dad with a WiFi router, back before they came free with broadband. BT had managed to set up his account without an email, so I couldn't reset it - and he'd lost the paperwork - and their indian call centre staff either couldn't or wouldn't understand the problem, and kept trying to get me to reboot the PC with that horrible USB router. In the end I gave up and found some dodgy software online that unhashed the password in XP - I hope XP protected other passwords better...
Still I was given a couple of bottles of wine. Which was nice. Then I was rather embarrassed by a knock on the door a few days later, and I got a delivery of a 15 bottle case from the local wine merchant. It was quite nice stuff, so they probably spent as much (or more) on me as paying someone. And I was perfectly happy to do it for the original contracted price of a cuppa and bacon sarnie while I worked.
What is the most common colour blindness clash? Oh yes, green and red. So why the bloody hell must these people insist on having one light that changes colour. As I said above: Aaarrrgghhh!!!!!
I believe it's something like 8% of men who suffer from some sort of colour blindness problem. It's not even 1% in women - presumably as they all took the precaution to get 2 lots of X chromosomes.
I sometimes have to resort to going and getting a green thing to hold up against the status light, so I can tell what colout it is. When it would be so much easier to use blue and red, or blue and green. Or, in fact, almost any other possible colour combination you can think of. Even easier - just have two lights.
In my case it's the result of a different visual impairment anyway. So while I'm on the subject I'd love people to print things a bit bigger so I don't have to carry a magnifying glass around whenever I have to fix something. Because 6pt black writing on a black background is always so easy to decipher...
My leccy tripped last night, and it was nice to see that someone thinks that 10pt type is the appropriate size to put on a box that's going 7 foot high in a dark cupboard - and may well be viewed by torchlight. Thanks for that one guys!
Sorry to see you go Tim. Your pieces were interesting, well argued and fun to read. As well as sparking lots of good discussion afterwards. So I'd have thought you generated your fair share of clicks. On the other hand, I broadly agree with you on economics, and maybe El Reg needed someone from the other side as well, to not annoy the more "lefty" readership?
Anyway I accidentally discovered you were on Forbes, while reading Frances Coppola about Eurozone v Greece round 15, in June. There don't seem to be many comments on there though. No commentard bunfight to join in.
Everything can be sterilised - you just need to nuke it from orbit...
Two problems with this statement.
Firstly, what happens if the item you're trying to nuke is already in orbit? Surely you now need to take off and nuke it from the next solar system. It's the only way to be sure.
Secondly, I've seen the documentary Godzilla. Sometimes when you nuke things, they just get bigger, and angrier.
Bread makers are great. Mostly not as good as doing it manually, but still not at all bad. Although weighing, mixing and kneeding the dough only takes ten minutes, you've then got to be around for the next 3-5 hours, depending on what you're making. Well unless you're doing soda bread, or things like pita or naan.
The most convenient bread is sourdough - as it takes longer to rise, so you can make the dough before bed, and cook it the next morning. If you try that with normal breads, the yeast overgrows and they go bitter.
Soup with fresh bread is a lovely Saturday lunchtime treat. Or set the timer on the machine, and wake up to the smell of just made bread. I've got a teasmade as well, so can wake up to a cuppa.
Fight, fight, fight!
It's funny, because I know someone who works in cancer research, and the area she's involved in is how to bugger up the blood vessels that supply the tumour, and stop it from growing any more.
And then along come this lot, with their take one stick of dynamite every 4 hours to help the cancer get more blood and spoil the whole thing...
It's amazing just how many different areas of promising research are going on, and how many improvements are made to various treatements every year. As well as new ones coming on stream.
I'm sure we'll never "cure" cancer, it's a natural process after all. But I'd imagine that things will continue to improve, and I suspect at an increasing rate too - given the multiple approaches under investigation.
But remember, only one person can live forever, and that's Connor MacLeod.
Don't worry, I'm far more crusty than that. I was born in the decade of flares, brown Austin Allegros and Roger Whittaker children's LPs. Which I was reminded of only yesterday when I found 'I can see a nasty spider' on Youtube.
So the year of the bug perhaps.
I know a guy in his 70s who fell for it, and the only thing that saved him from computer doom was not knowing his Apple password.
What's most annoying is that I'm around to fix all his technology problems. So why the hell he'd talk random bastards he doesn't know who want paying to fix problems I'll do for a cup of tea or some fish and chips...
He lives a street away from an excellent chippy. My tech support is always available for people with those kinds of advantages.
I was born in the year of OS/2.
But I'm just warped...
Can you get bacon and egg muesli?
I'll have the full English rabbit food please.
Chewing asbestos, on the other hand, is quite delicious.
Lots of words are like that. So Rowan Atkinson can do wonders with the single syllable that is "Bob".
Our family used to foster a girl with autism, and she liked to use words just for the sound of them. It's something lots of children do, but she did it with more dedication.
The absolute relish with which she pronounced the final "t" in toast was a thing to behold. She also loved to draw out over-enunciate "basically" and "absolutely" (back to the lovely oooh sound there).
And then the aggressive "K" sound in buckets and baskets - so she had a little speech in the same way Dustin Hoffman did in Rain Man with "whose on first" - except in her case it wasn't when she was nervous, but when angry or upset.
On which subject, I rather like the sound of the word (phrase?) rumpy-pumpy.
You can roll the initial R, and then it sort of bounces along. So does one retire to ones rumpus room in order romp and generally engage in rumpy-pumpy?
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017