Re: "very poor information security practice"
A government who repeatedly leave huge quantities of sensitive information on trains, taxis, park benches, public bins?
Well yes, they've had a lot of practice and know what they are talking about :-)
2038 publicly visible posts • joined 17 Jun 2009
I'm can't quite reconcile gorillas going round threatening people and high technology which can hoover up internet traffic and replay later it for closer inspection and storing belonging to the same organisation.
This is possibly because they don't.
In the original article they where described as 'Whitehall types' that turned up at the Guardian. Now it has been reviled that our glorious leader sent the head of the Home Civil Service around. I've not heard that any GCHQ Spooks where present.
"If the police believe that an individual is in possession of highly sensitive stolen information that would help terrorism, then they should act and the law provides them with a framework to do that. Those who oppose this sort of action need to think about what they are condoning."
Yeah, because in 1984 that is how it all started, the Oceanian government limiting people's access to hardcore porn, it all went downhill from there.
In 1984 Porn was only banned for Party members. There was a whole department in the Ministry of Truth producing porn for the Prols.
"Numerous documents are now in the public domain. As a result, there is no longer a compelling government interest in stopping those of us with knowledge from sharing more information, especially when this information is likely to help allay public concerns," Microsoft general counsel Brad Smith wrote.
The public now hold us in equal contempt with politicians and bankers and are no longer buying our stuff. If you want us to be able to spy on them for you in the future you better cut us some slack and publish something that makes it look like we where not at fault.
Real coders use butterflies
So now can they reduce the noise of the Met's helicopter when it circles somewhere above my house for half-an-hour at three in the morning?
No those are deliberately noisy as its a well know fact that terrorists hate the sound of western helicopters and will run out of their hiding places to shake their fists at them, making it easier to detain them.
PS if you don't know a terrorist in you area, then its you!!!
We have lots.
The real question is how many of them work, and of those working how many have a high enough definition to be useful.
PS IIRC Data protection laws say you can ask for a copy of any recording of yourself by a cctv camera operated by, on on behalf of, a public body.
What happens when you search for Hoovers in the USA? Do you get a list of vacuum cleaners or people. If Google knows that you have been searching for the history of cleaning products in the USA it can take an educated guess as to which set of results are advantageous to you. If you don't like it you can turn off the personalised search results.