screw-ups and incompetence
Sufficiently advanced cluelessness is indistinguishable from malice.
See Also "By their fruits shall you know them" Mathew 7:16
691 posts • joined 17 Jun 2009
Sufficiently advanced cluelessness is indistinguishable from malice.
See Also "By their fruits shall you know them" Mathew 7:16
To make the typical bad detective show "Enhance" of photos into "reality" so convincing it can fool a jury.
Like where they take 3x5 pixels from a dirty CCTV camera last serviced in the 1970s and get not just the license-plate number but an estimate of how long since the car was last washed and a list of roads it has traveled since.
Could be a real boon to "parallel construction" unless someone grows a conscience at rats out Ofissah Plod.
I'll just leave this here:
What Not To Write On Your Security Clearance Form
A little tale of how a childhood fascination with cryptography led to later life infelicities.
Of course, only criminals and people who have access to U.S. nuclear launch codes imagine the FBI to be "bad people", right?
Sure some conscript Israeli soldiers might be careless about using personal devices for government business, but surely no high-level U.S.govt personnel would be that careless. :-)
Only if it hits the Trump (extended) family, Russian Oligarchs, or some Saudi Princes. America has a variety of people, and businesses, but the ones not on the most-favored list can hold their breaths until blue (or red) in the face and their concerns will not be addressed.
Note that the businesses most likely to take a financial hit are on a very different list. Except maybe Palantir.
Well, MSFT has presumably long wanted to have their hardware considered on a par with the reliability and polish of Apple kit. Apple has been happy to help them achieve parity.
That said, in my mostly MSFT-free computing life, one (or three, depending how one counts) of my favorite compute-on-the-go products has been the Kyocera laptop (TRS-80 model 100, Olivetti M10, NEC 8201) that, IIRC, was spec'd by MSFT, with some software written by BillG himself. Runs for days on AA batteries that you can get even in places where clean water and reliable power are in the distant future.
It amuses me that Almon Strowger invented his automatic telephone switch specifically because the telephone operator in his home town would connect calls intended for him to a competitor (both were undertakers) who just happened to be the operator's husband. His belief was that an incorruptible machine would be an improvement.
Fast forward to today, when your ISP is probably knobbling your DNS requests, possibly in addition to your OS vendor (and perhaps a few others, wearing hats of various shades of grey). Not to mention the various rank-fiddling by search engines, recommendation sites, and SEO. How's that "incorruptible machine" thing coming along?
Meanwhile, isn't "secure DNS" also subject to MITMing by a number of players, and dependent in any case on the certificate issuers also being incorruptible, not to mention invulnerable to malfeasors?
Before you open that (CA) champagne, note that the current administration is hell bent on eliminating things like the CA emissions standards. And with the recent resignation from SCOTUS, they'll have the power to do it. Say goodbye to regulation of pollution, data-whoring, gerrymandering, purging voter rolls, etc.
The printer's laser or inkjets may just print dots, but they are controlled by software in the printer. If it is capable of printing Postscript files (without the host rendering that made "Windows Only" printers such a joy), the (software) render engine in the printer could definitely add the steganography. AFAICT, one could write a "simple" PS program to play chess with the user, by sending each "move" as the full state of the board so far. May not need that for printers with local "font cache" that persists across print jobs.
And as others note, one could mess with the character rendering or kerning to obviate the need for Yellow Journalism (Ummm, Bacon!)
I do wonder which countries have made (or about to make) possession of a Brother, Samsung, or Tek printer incontrovertible evidence of Treason.
Gotta go. There are two gentlemen at the door saying they need to do scheduled maintenance on my Brother laser-printer. Something about my not yet installing the latest firmware update.
A former coworker was hauled out of a US Secure Communications facility when they finally figured out that he was in fact a Canadian citizen (as he stated clearly on the forms he) months after he was given his clearance.
As for "tell us about everything you could be blackmail for", how's that working out for the thousands whose files were leaked by OPM. Any jail time for the patronage-based hacks there?
because of a certain founder's propensity for this sort of thing.
Not that it doesn't happen elsewhere. My workplace affair was with someone from another department entirely, but then, I wasn't a CEO. There were plenty of folks who spent a fair bit of time on mahogany row and had no apparent responsibilities. Thus has it ever been.
And if all else fails, just say "Pardon Me"
Hint: Not engineers or Military types who have actually been in combat.
Pretty much all military gear (and stuff like the Space Shuttle) is "designed" by Congress, under a process of maximizing campaign contributions to members of the ruling party at the time.
This is similar to how major corporations select, e.g. a travel agency for all corporate travel based on whose brother-in-law owns it. Or a mandated car rental company based on the CEO's holdings.
I am reminded of a U.S. Civil war repeating rifle that was basically a revolver with a longer barrel and a stock. Visualize the difference between ones grip on a rifle as opposed to a pistol. Now think about "chain fire". For some reason, a large number of these rifles were "lost crossing a river".
Disney already owns ABC, which was spun out of NBC way back when as part of an anti-trust action. ABC leans left, sometimes obviously so, making for "popcorn time" when/if Fox crawls into the same tent.
As a fellow Comcast victim, I agree, Disney may occasionally do stuff like claiming to own fairy tales from before Walt's grandparents were born, and killing off Bambi's mom, but there is absolutely no comparison to the evil that is Comcast.
News at 11.
Well Actually... The Less/fewer thing is one of those "Zombie Rules" that tend to be trotted out by a certain sort of self-taught grammarian (OK, including myself, in younger days), while irritating folks who actually study grammar.
Or follow some of the references, in particular
Meanwhile, what the heck rostering have to do with a Nun's clothing?
You can perhaps tell that Language Log is one of my favorite ways to avoid Getting Stuff Done (along with ElReg)
A common lie told with a straight face, _or_ composed by someone who confuses "value" with "price".
This was brought home to me by an author commenting on the impending release of his latest book. The file containing the image for cover art was _many_ times larger than the (SGML-ized for typesetting) text of the entire book. So I guess the publishing industry does indeed assume that people judge a book by its cover.
(well aware that this will attract down votes, but I suspect I am not the only one who would prefer to skim the text transcription of an hour-long video rather than stare at the screen for an hour with no guarantee of payoff)
Should I be concerned that our Android ecosystem son is about to marry an iPhone entranced woman?
They at least managed to compromise on Alexa as their nosy-servant choice.
is for people who can afford to own one. If you buy your printing from someone else, like FaceBook, expect to be out-bid, or simply find them "too busy" or "out of ink" if you run against their relatives.
When I wear a watch (rarely, but not never) it is to tell time. More importantly, it is to be able to tell time with a glance not likely to be noted by the folks I am attempting to guide on a schedule. Pulling out a phone is bound to be more noticeable than managing to gesture as part of conversation and just _happen_ to place the watch face in my field of view.
It's not a smart watch, BTW. It's a windup soviet 24-hour watch. Never needs charging, other than being wound for under a minute for a day's "charge". Never buzzes to tell me that some marketeer has a VERY IMPORTANT OPPORTUNITY for me. Just tells time.
I will readily confess to not being most people, but long ago stopped believing I was unique or (equally improbable) universally representative of all people.
Get a flashback to the opening scene of Cryptonomicon when reading about bank cash queues?
Now the real question is whether cannabis dealers can use it, since apparently no regular bank will deal with them, regardless of state law.
Well, it will make sure any Islamophobe hangs up, when they hear "This is Abbas"
Maybe we could just require phone bots to speak with a Votrax or Cylon accent?
Hey, let's require Frank from Comcast Security to be frank about not actually being from Comcast Security.
Surely these simple requirement will make the world all rainbows and unicorns again.
Hey, they were just doing due diligence. Can't have a robot impersonating a dead Russian poet to buy a car.
The usual way is to demand a credit card. This at least sorts out the ones too young to reach Mom's purse while she's not looking, and the slightly older ones who can't get one of the many for sale online (did Silk Road require age verification?). Avoiding infinite regress might involve buying a gift card with sofa-change.
Of course, the sites would _never_ charge anything to that card, and have rock-solid security so the alleged credit cards of a few million little darlings will never be stolen.
... where an algorithm is developed, tested and released as a product.
What decade (Century? Millennium?) was this posted from. How are Wham doing those days?
"Normal Programming" as she is practiced today rarely involve algorithms, and pretty much ignores testing other than the "user presses button A and, usually (sometimes?) B happens". _Very_ little "User presses somewhere near the margin of button A, or to early, or too late, What happens?", and almost never "User is attempting to Get Shit Done on some machine which differs in some miniscule detail (OS version, or w.x.y release of one of the hundred dynamic libraries, rather than w.x.z) from the exact setup used by the developer on the day the 15 minutes of testing were done, if done at all.
"Normal Programming" involves picking a couple libraries with snappy names (possibly only considered snappy by the PHB) and asking "Will it blend?"
The application of XOR to manipulating a cursor on a video screen might (barely) escape the "blindingly obvious" category, but it boils down to the "XOR Bit-splice" technique that was known and used (but of course not patented, because software patents were not a thing) in the days of tube/valve-based computers. Yes, I have used at least two (well, three, but of two types) such computers. Taking a well-known technique for altering memory contents in a reversible/configurable way and adding "but do it to memory that is scanned out to a screen" is pretty borderline.
Not the only such. The Heatherington ( +++ AT ) patent is pretty clearly based on longstanding communications techniques and, among others, the way tape-drives of the 1950s recognized the "Tape Mark" (end of file) indication. Attempts at avoidance of the patent have saddled the modern world with, e.g. Bluetooth devices that can be suborned with in-band text.
Finally, there was a time when CS professionals were explicitly not considered qualified to be patent examiners, IIRC. So all software-based patents were by definition examined by unqualified examiners.
I assume its email output will very closely resemble those timeless tomes allegedly generated by various managers it has been my misfortune to report to.
in the decision to drop 3G (and 2G) is the spookosphere. Since one feature of Stingray and friends is to force all phones in the vicinity down to earlier standards with weaker encryption, dropping support for those earlier standards would surely call attention to the presence of a (probably unwarranted, in both senses) fake tower.
Won't someone think of the snoopers?
"Once the Rockets go up, who cares where they come down. That's not my department say Werner Von Braun"
And of course Ike warned about the Military Industrial Complex almost sixty years ago. Not that it was new then. It's a tough call, whether you prefer:
A) The part where very effective (but expensive) weapons are developed and manufactured to defend Freedom and Democracy, only to end up winning territory for drug lords and religious fanatics,
B) The part where huge dollops of the defense budget go to tech that will never deliver on its alleged performance, if it works at all, but which leaves a hole where the budget for arming and armoring troops actually in combat would be.
Either way, Freedom and Democracy are at best a tertiary concern. Senator Pork and CEO Barrel are doing fine, thank you.
Again we can look to history for guidance. Once upon a time I was given the conference badge for a VP (because the company was too cheap to buy admission for "grunts" and the VP couldn't be bothered to attend) The conference was CES, before they banished the porn to another building. In that day and age, one did not simply download an app, verify credentials, re-try the "I accept" button until some server deigned to sign you op for the newsletter. The badges were embossed like a credit card of the day. One swipe and mild crunching sound later you could "express interest" in their catalogue. I asked a friend to use his borrowed badge for the tech info that interested me, while that VP got a lot of (paper) catalogues for a variety of interests, in the office mailbox.
Of course, taking a clue from Apple, who just change the currency symbol so a 999USD laptop became a 999GBP laptop, we can expect Aibo 2 to be offered at 196200GBP (1800USD x 109). One could probably get one of the Royal Corgis for less.
Or does anybody else think it's odd that MIPS, which started out in big-iron has worked its way down to cheap embedded and learner toys (unless you are Chinese and gunning for Top500 slots), while Arm, which started out in learner toys and cheap embedded is now moving into servers?
What's next, Windows Phone in a watch with shrunk Itanium? (Wow! Spell-check in this box does not recognize that word. How the mighty have fallen)
The dirty little secret of both cable and DSL providers, essentially since they became a thing, is that the bottleneck is usually not between your home and their "head end". It's usually somewhere between there and "the cloud". You and your neighbors may each get allegedly 100Mbps, but only if you are getting stuff that's originated (or cached) on their system. If you dare venture on the real internet, you will all be fighting for the same bandwidth. Some may recall the "Cable Hog" ads run by the DSL providers when cable started competing with them. Yeah, well, the DSL guys did the same thing. In 2000, I was working for a settop-box maker, and was able to read one of those expensive reports on the actual state of U.S. Internet access. Seems that both cable (allegedly 1.5 Mbps) and DSL (allegedly 128Kbps, IIRC) were actually provisioning their systems for something like 20Kbps/subscriber, apparently on the idea that "how fast can one person click a link, and what are the odds his neighbor will do it at that exact time?
The speedtest results may be an artifact of running a peer on their own network, so it is not actually measuring "speed to the internet" but "speed to somewhere on your ISP's network". Comcast was caught doing it back in the day, and assume that ATT is up to their usual antics, especially since being acquired by SBC (Sodomized By Cowboys)
on Halo 2600 carts to feed the addictions of my guests?
number one on the list of things not to say in response to "Unlock your phone, ruffian", as it will presumably cause your subsequent demise to count as justified homicide on the part of the police.
("He was impeding our vital investigation into felonious mopery and fly-tipping. How else can we do our job?")
"... cause a judge to throw it out of court?"
Only in a country with the rule of law and judges that are not chosen politically. Maybe.
So, when a thief trips a motion-detector and as a result is recorded in the act, do they have copyright in the resulting image/video? Can they withhold permission for it to be shown as evidence against them?
discusses a judge (sanely) dismissing the argument that smashing the surveillance cameras you know about does not give you a "reasonable expectation of privacy" with regard to the ones you missed.
Well, many of the reddest states who depend on federal subsidies, paid for by CA taxes. yes, CA is a net exporter of taxes to the federal government. Of course, Washington and Oregon might welcome the boom for their ports.
BTW: Anybody who equates "Democrat" with "Liberal" should check into DiFi's persistent support for "Whatever privacy invasion the police claim they need".
@onefang: I suppose it might if the alternative is losing out on deeply discounted (subsidized by U.S. Taxpayers) top of the line military hardware for their love and peace patrols. Or the threat of a "terrorist money laundering" investigation of some top officials might sway the decision. It is indeed brown envelopes all around.
"Oh, Reginald, do me"
"Finding movies featuring Reginald Toomey"
"Honey, why is Amazon recommending DVDs of old Reginald Toomey flcks?"
I suspect that an installation that does not have a chrooted TFTP server probably has bigger problems.
Not to mention that having an intruder on my LAN is probably of higher priority than protecting against someone who wants to _read_ a copy of the firmware for bespoke lab instruments.
Would it run on WfW? I still have a few licensed copies on (formerly) sealed floppies. Raises the question of whether the "Breaking this seal..." contract would apply, as the glue sealing the envelopes rotted away some years ago.
Anyway, if someone has a set of samples to mimic Votrax. we could combine them with your speaker driver and a text-to-Votrax driver I have around here somewhere. Isn't Science Wonderful?
I recall many years ago when someone (ESR?) published a sound driver (maybe for ALSA?) to allow one to use the PC speaker as a generic audio output device, so you could, for example, play your pirated Duran Duran mp3s _anywhere_ (until the sound stack broke again).
Compare and contrast to my memory of setting up racks of headless servers where ticking the "Server" install config would load up an impressive collection of audio and video drivers, in case I wanted to watch a movie on the non-existent monitor with 5.1 sound via the non-existent sound card.
You'd be surprised how difficult it is to send data encoded as a typical modem signal through the voice codec of a typical mobile phone. Or maybe you wouldn't, if you had ever used a decent landline and are now familiar with the crappy voice quality over most mobile networks. Then think about doing that with anything over 50 bits per second and full duplex. I would love to hear about promising research in that area.
Pittman, or Gregg? Or did the various commenters mean steganography? Just remember that shorthand is a bit of a dinosaur, like stegosaurus. Oh, wait, I have that wrong way round.
Can't speak of humans, but back in the last millennium I read about a study of crawfish (under whatever name is locally used. Freshwater mini-lobsters). They apparently use externally acquired grains of sand in the equivalent of our inner-ear balance organs. Scientists with a sense of humor, or possibly just a mean streak, placed some in a tank with "sand" containing iron filings or some such. After an interval to allow the subjects to refresh their "sand", the boffins applied various magnetic fields and took notes on the subjects' attempts to right themselves.
Of course experience suggests that when a bug is created once, it is propagated everywhere. Apple has been a real master of this lately.
People moan when kids are given access to tech in school.
People also moan when kids show no interest in STEM subjects.
I think you have explained your own conundrum. Tablets as they are today teach primarily one thing about tech: It is unreliable and capricious, and will defeat most attempts to Get Stuff Done (tm).
It's a miracle when a child exposed to technology only through such a device is interested in "Technology" at all. "Yeah, we realize that getting waterboarded can be unpleasant, by why have you lost interest in swimming in the Olympics?"
Well, for one thing, an exemption for Major League Baseball from paying minor league players minimum wage. I am certain that is one of many such blatantly corrupt insertions. Welcome the the U.S. Here's your lube.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2018