It's not news, it's the latest Twitter scandal
FFS, is this really news? "Someone followed the wrong account on Twitter! Next, our reporter on scene."
535 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2009
I think the problem is the type of ex-military people you encountered. There's a certain small subset of senior officers who don't actually have any talent aside from following a process and giving orders - which makes them very similar to most senior civil servants or senior bosses in big gov contractors.
It's this unholy triage - big contractors, senior civil servants and senior brass - which make MoD procurement such an utter, ongoing disaster.
The majority of leaders I have met in the Army are good, by necessity. It's in the civilian world that management seems to be generally awful.
I suspect that's more to do with PRINCE2 and ICL than any military background. I've had good and bad leaders in and out of the military. Granted, a couple of the worst leaders I've had have been in the military, but they ended up in leadership positions through luck; the military process weeds out a lot of the worst. On the other hand, management in IT seems to actively recruit PHBs.
"hopeless"? It would be news to most soldiers that they're considered hopeless.
Also, IT is nothing special. It's a big industry that needs lots of people - why shouldn't soldiers (or anyone else) retrain to enter the industry?
Not entirely - there was a good article on the people Farcebook uses as moderators. Basically, poor English speakers are what they like, so there's a lot of people in developing countries. They have fairly conservative or traditional views on nudity, sex and abortion, but aren't so bothered by violence.
http://gawker.com/5885714/inside-facebooks-outsourced-anti+porn-and-gore-brigade-where-camel-toes-are-more-offensive-than-crushed-heads
Not everything in the world is the fault of the US.
One answer: China. China would never firewall off NK. All internet access to NK goes through China, and some of the NK units are apparently even working from China.
China backs NK to the hilt, regardless of the cost. The thought of facing a unified democratic Korea terrifies China, for economic, social and strategic reasons. Also, they still pay lip service to the communist alliance, even though China is now a gerontocratic kleptocracy and NK a dystopian Confucian autocracy.
Kim Jong Un could sleep with Xi Jinping's wife and kick his dog and China would still support NK. Hell, in addition to their worldwide low-key heroin operation, NK runs a massive crystal meth distribution network in neighbouring provinces of China, and STILL China does nothing.
I'm not defending them 100%, but the energy companies only make a small profit percentage-wise. Of course it's billions of pounds - if you provide a service to millions of people you will be making billions.
The lack of foresight and poor short-term planning is not really up to the energy companies, either - that's 100% the responsibility of DECC or whatever they're called these days. DECC under Miliband was really DCC, since they apparently didn't give a shit about energy provision.
The ISS is low by orbital standards. Bringing an enormous, irregularly-shaped blob of ice and dust into an orbit that low would most likely see it fall to pieces and then to earth, making a pretty light show for the people below.
The ISS apogee is 418 km, while even a geostationary orbit is 36000 km. With an asteroid, you really want to park it far away, and the moon is ten times geostationary at about 360000, which is nice and far away but still somewhere we have gone before (and hopefully again soon).
@Potsherd
Don't try that one on me. I did a tour of Afghan three years ago, and worked closely with the ANP and ANA. My team coordinated reconstruction with the provincial governor's office.
The guys shooting at us, meanwhile, were a mix of Afghans and Pakistanis, with a smattering of Chechens and Arabs. They beat, shot, imprisoned and extorted the local people - basically a cross between bandits and mafia. The "hostile force" was the Taliban.
@Mad Mike
Civilians carrying weapons and shooting are no longer civilians. They are now legitimate combatants, and can be targeted with lethal force. In fact, if those civilians are not wearing insignia, carrying weapons openly during combat and obeying a chain of command then *they* are war criminals.
The people who abused prisoners went to prison. Remember that? Yes, maltreatment of prisoners is a violation of the Geneva convention and a war crime, and people from both the US and UK military have rightfully been locked up for that.
Guantanamo Bay is a bad solution to a worse problem. We are fighting a global organization of people who target civilians, hide in civilian clothing and don't themselves obey the Geneva conventions or follow a chain of command. What do we do with the prisoners? Bear in mind that they are war criminals themselves for the reasons in this paragraph. Technically, in a formal war, people who behave like Al Qaeda can legally be shot out of hand on the battlefield.
Can you cite any specific incidents that were actually war crimes? Because surely Manning's lawyer would have used those in his trial.
The guy violated his military oath. He didn't take it up with the chain of command. He didn't take it up with the Inspector-General. He didn't contact his Congressman/woman to initiate a Congressional investigation, which has awesome power and would have quickly found any war crimes.
Of which, incidentally, there weren't any. There were no actual, honest-to-goodness drag-them-to-the-Hague war crimes in the entire Wikileaks haul. There were plenty of unpleasant things, like people being shot up by helicopter gunships - but war is unpleasant, and hopefully we all know that.
Copies of his leaks were found in Bin Laden's compound. As a trained intelligence officer, Manning knew - he knew - that this information could lead to the death of people he was supposedly protecting. Hopefully no-one here is going to defend Bin Laden.
Transparency is good - but Manning didn't do the right thing, nor did he do it in the right way. If you break the law, you go to court and then to prison. Given the diplomatic and possibly the security damage he did, in explicit defiance of a military covenant that he willingly entered into, he has secured a reasonable sentence. Think how many Republicans are choking on their cornflakes at "out in ten years", if it's any consolation.
"I bet the Jews did this!" That's pretty blatant racism there, Steven. The guy is a US citizen, but because of his ethnicity you assume that he did this evil deed. It also fits the classic anti-semitic trope of Jews controlling things. Moreover, as others have pointed out, it's a stupid suggestion too. Do you think there's some special flag in the reporting process for reports from Palestine?
As for getting on watchlists - get over yourself. A stupid comment on a random website doesn't warrant attention from the security services, or you'd be watching most of twitter.
Broadly speaking, where does this hostility and suspicion of Israel come from? Sure they're not perfect, but what country is? Right next door there's a civil war raging that's killed more people in two years than all Arab-Israeli wars in history.
Indeed - the armoured/motoized spearhead was a novel concept in 1939/40 and punched deep into the opposing forces lines, fracturing the resistance and allowing the footsloggers to mop up.
By 1943/44 everyone had got it, though, thus the stunning failures of the German Army in 1944. At Falaise they tried their usual armoured attack, and the US/UK said "Haha, nope", sidestepped the attack, and attacked on the flanks, leading to the cheery sight of a quarter-million Germans trying to run away down one road. The Soviets, meanwhile, launched Operation Bagration which utterly demolished the German Army's eastern front, and this time it wasn't at the cost of a hundred thousand Russian lives.
Nazi Germany stomped over everyone because they used manoeuvre warfare (developed from British and Soviet ideas) properly. They also had speed, aggression and surprise on their side in launching their invasions, so they smashed through neighbouring countries to early tactical victories. They didn't have the resources or manpower to mount amphibious invasions or conquer all of European Russia, let alone Asian Russia. A lot of their invasions were supplied with the war spoils of the previous invasion - Skoda tanks from Czechoslovakia in the invasion of France, French tanks (especially the chassis for artillery) in the invasion of Russia, etc.
Once the slog set in they were in trouble. The British Empire alone had more industrial capacity and manpower than Germany. Add the Soviet Union and the USA, and the Axis was doomed in the long run. German industry was actually rather inefficient too - eg, Germany had 239 different aircraft in service over the course of the war. If a Panther (arguably the best tank of the war) suffered mechanical breakdown or battle damage, it had to be shipped by rail back to Germany for repair, since they were handcrafted to a certain extent.
@OP Iglethal
More than a decade ago and yes, the NK people wouldn't know what the rest of the world was really like. They thought they had "Nothing To Envy" (title of a very good book about defectors).
Nowadays more and more NKs are aware of the dystopian hellhole they live in, but what can they really do about it? They're raised as worker drones from birth, and any dissent of any kind is brutally and instantly punished, extending to the dissenters entire family. Even trying to escape the country is highly likely to end in death or your entire family in a prison camp for the rest of their lives.
@Triggerfish
Yeah, I didn't think you meant it that way, but it read that way and I wanted to clear that up. :)
It's always converts and clueless who take anything to extremes - unfortunately in some mosques there are people who are willing to steer that to violence. I remember reading an interview with one radical female convert to Islam; she said when she converted she told her children that Islam prohibited alcohol. Her eight-year-old daughter asked her "Does that mean you won't drink so much any more, mummy?", and when the woman replied yes, the daughter said "Yay!". Lady, if your eight-year-old daughter is worried about your drinking, the problem is not alcohol, or Western society, it's you.
@Triggerfish
The Koran forbids alcohol from grapes, so technically it's only wine that's off-limits. More to the point, however, trying to say who is and isn't a true practitioner of the faith, from outside the faith, is not very cool. Demanding absolute adherence to scripture just buys in to the extremists viewpoint.
I suspect the Syrians being tortured/shelled/bombed/murdered by their government would be quite happy to switch to being beaten and bugged by the Saudis.
Look, pretty much everyone can see that the Saudis are governed a bunch of religious thugs in a dictatorship. The scary thing is, that's still better than what a lot of other people in the region and around the world have to put up with. We (as in the West) have to deal with these people, much like we have to deal with the junta in Burma, the kleptocratic gerontocracy in China and all the other various governments around the world. Money and cooperation talks, of course, so they get an easier ride than eg Iran or Venezuela, which have the money but are hostile.
Since you seem to have such insight, what's your solution? Invade like we did with Iraq? Sponsor subversion like we did/are doing with Libya and Syria? Or act like a rational entity with limited resources, and engage with them as best we can?
If a hypothetical NK NGO watched Fox ... they would see a TV presenter condemning the President - calling him incompetent and un-American, even - and *not being sent to the gulag with their entire family*. How can you seriously compare the two? Yes, the West has plenty of faults, but we don't have starving children dying in the streets, nor do we execute entire families for not loving the Dear Leader enough.