15% increase in cloud revenues when cloud spend is running at 20% CAGR should be regarded as a fail, not something to shout about.
162 posts • joined 27 Jul 2009
15% increase in cloud revenues when cloud spend is running at 20% CAGR should be regarded as a fail, not something to shout about.
"To get a patent, you have to be SPECIFIC about your invention.."
Not in the US you don't.
"Once Voyager 1 runs out of power, it'll head towards planet AC +79 3888, aka Gliese 445, 17.6 light years from home"
Its headed to Gliese 445 right now, whether its got power to run the instruments makes no difference :-)
How long until it gets there? Anyone know?
Good comments but your maths is as fragile as Salesforce's accounting.
$120/year = $10 month :-)
All you needed was the last bit "out of sync with reality".
From the anonymous source
"Microsoft wanted us to go for a Canadian data centre, which we can't as the data has to stay in Europe."
WTF are they doing developing with real customer data?
You omitted the cost of the components ($220) and did your maths on the assembly price ($4) only.
Which is why your assertion is so far off the mark "its not even wrong"
"keeping your terrorist contact list and itinerary it's better written on Rizla (cig wrap) crunched-up, then wrapped in cling-film and kept in your mouth during border x-ing [according to Dutch WWII resistance & provos in '70s]"
No, not your mouth :-)
If the data in your transactional database is "dirty, inconsistent and full of errors" you have a fundamental problem to deal with first, and no doubt some very aggrieved customers..
There is a PaaS Exadata-like product.... Exalogic. It is crazy expensive.
Well, it it is crazy expensive. But its not PaaS nor Exadata-like at all.
Exadata-like would be the Exadata PaaS service.
"At the moment there's no PaaS Exadata-like service"
Other than the Oracle Exadata PaaS service you mean?
"First, you must separate between development and production. For development, I don't want to setup an bunch of users or other security constraints. So, no default security, that only would slow down development in the first place."
So now you have two different sets of code, one for production, secure, one in development, not secure. So HTF do you test if Prod is secure if the dev version isnt? Security is a lot more than what connections you have.
And HTF do you avoid bugs in Prod that are there because of the security you have in Prod that isnt there in Dev, so you can't test Prod code fully? "What, you found there is a bug when xyz secure feature or access via port nnn is turned on that deletes transactions at random? Who'd a thunk it eh? I certainly didn't when i shipped my code out direct from non secure Dev to Prod and only then and untested turned on a couple of Db security features"
"It costs relatively little to live there, its much much warmer and the quality of life is far better than the UK."
Quality of life for YOU is, I'm sure. Not for the majority actually living there though.
Downvoted solely for irritating misspelling of "developpers" throughout.
..... bought a deadly aircraft that doesn't work if its a bit cloudy????
The stories say 6 million records exposed, but from the sound of it it was a fairly low scale amateur operation one customer at a time to enable them to intercept handsets, rather than they downloaded all 6 million records and flogged on the info, which i'd have thought would net more than a few dodgy handsets are worth
I thought there was water at the poles?
OK its a 'bit' colder half the time, but otherwise isn't it pretty much the same in term of resources, easier to land on and take off from, and a heck of a lot closer?
.. to the problem of Google Maps "Hopefully this will eliminate the wrong turnings due to Google Maps’ erroneous audio guide that frequently yet inaccurately tells me to “turn left” when I should “turn right” (and vice-versa) regardless of what the street map itself indicates on-screen."
Simply walk backwards everywhere. Problem solved ! Simples.
And everyone was avoiding walking on it!
I"m not surprised !!
..... oh the irony.
Since the original 1975 referendum didnt meet these criteria, that clearly should also be invalidated and thus the last 40 years of EU related laws repealed as there was no backing for them?
"Why does everyone expect that the European community will just sit and wait while leaving the UK parliament decide everything? ."
Because (1) there is no mechanism to eject a member and (2) in a delicious piece of irony, were that ability to be introduced it would have to be done as a treaty change for which there would need to be a unanimous vote, which the UK could block (so we could leave when we wanted and not when Johnny Foreigner decided, thank you very much).
They want a phone that works, is safe, and still is after 2 or 3 years
But the " is safe" bit isn't true, especially "after 2 or 3 years"
Of course if the users are in blissful ignorance then they may still be content.
Blasting ammo away isnt as crazy as it sounds.
It has a "sell by date" so there's a reason to use it up anyway, and out of date ammo has a cost to be returned and "recycled" (you cant just chuck your old bombs in the local landfill as with your ginsters ! ) which can make it cheaper to use it than return it, and the deals to buy it are usually long term to assure supply so there's a constant supply coming in.
"Doesn't this mean that they are storing previous passwords in plaintext?"
In a word, no.
You enter "Password_4".
System sees last digit is a number, replaces that number with n-1, generates hash result (for Password_3 in this example) and sees if it is a match with existing password hash. If it is, slapped wrist.
"Introducing earthly microbes to the surface COULD pollute the environment"
Its pretty much certain that earth origin microbes have been landing on Mars, intermittently, for the past 4 billion years. This would be due to large scale Earth impactors spreading debris into space, some of which will almost certainly have found its way there, just as its happened in the other direction.
Sure there's a lot more obstacles in the way of an organism surviving than from a borked rocket, but over this timescale, it must be almost commonplace.
"Even worse maybe they analysed the problem/specification and knew that it would not solve the problem"
Anyone that did that, would not win the contract, because the idjuts who run these tenders dont want to hear the truth. To coin a phrase, they can't handle the truth.
So all you are left with, is people running teh same game as said early on, bid at a loss, make it up on changes.
This is why no SMEs will win these contracts either, they can't bid at a loss, nor can they accept the onerous Ts&Cs anyway.
What an amazing coincidence that it just so happens to cost a nice round sum of £50k to ensure that they run at break even, despite not knowing up front how many companies will certify and therefore how much revenue they will make. If there is an excess at the end of the year, will they hand it back?
I also wonder, how does mandating £50k a year fit into the SME-friendly mantra of GDS & Government IT?
Since with the app I use you can only pay for a whole day, I cant see that happening, but even if its by the hour, for someone with the capability to run up a fake GSM base station, I think bigger opportunities than stealing £2.50 from parking receipts will be available.
So they can do what? Pay my parking for me?
Renting to use it over very limited internet just doesn't make sense.
You woudn't be doing that though.
You would be using it locally. The 'cloud' aspect is a misnomer, all it means in this case is, every now and again it checks you've paid your dues. All the photos and the app still reside on your computer.
Maybe the chip is 20 cents, but then there's repeaters every few metres which will bump the effective cost up to, errm, whatever a repeater costs, maybe $20, so the chip cost is an irrelevance !
Plus add the cost of installing the power cabling to run the repeaters, and the hassle of that.
So you might as well, as a comment above says, just run wires and embedded sensors.
Back to the drawing board I think.
Looks like a backdoor to me.
You can use as much as you've paid for. Fill your boots !
The only shouting would be your manager when he discovers what a wheeze you thought it was to spend the entire budget on a joke.
Why are you wasting both your time and hers, and not telling her "we are buying cloud storage now" ??
Oracle arent just selling "in the old model" (and there are customers still buying "in the old model" BTWso they'd be mugs to stop selling that ! ), they will sell on premise, public cloud and indeed private cloud, if that floats your boat. same as do IBM I'm sure.
It does require an intelligent customer with the wit to ask though.
".... that it is in practice very difficult to piece together a browsing history"
Well why do they want it then?
My 6 or 7 year old iMac is happily running the very latest OS (well, apart from yesterdays update :-) so you are utterly clueless. I presume you dont actually have a Mac but wish you did so have made up an excuse so its all OK with you not to have one?
"It is my computer, my software, and therefore by rights my choice."
I think you'll find it ISN'T your software.
it will therefore record your bank balance as all values between $0.00 and your actual balance.
Wouldn't it be all values between minus the maximum amount that could be held (eg you are in significant overdraft) and whatever the maximum amount a balance could be?
eg from (say) -$9,999,999,999 through to +$9,999,999,999 ?
I think (OK, I KNOW) you missed the irony/humour there.
That way you can read on to the second 'page' without faffing around pressing buttons
But not the third page, or the fifth. So, you'll just press buttons half as frequently.
And for that, you probably pay double, get worse battery life, more weight, more inconvenient to read, and a mechanical hinge that inevitably will be far more fragile than not having a hinge at all.
Other than that, it sounds like a great idea.
This, at first glance, seems to suggest a new licence is required each time an expense claim, by a new employee, is processed - so only one is required per new employee. If, as I suspect, its the other way round - a new licence is required for every time an employee submits a new expense claim - then I'm lost for words!
You only need be lost for words because the article is pretty much bunkum and so is what the quoted DEFRA spokesman said.
They will licence at so much for every 100,000 expense claims per year (whoever made them), or some such bulk transaction figure. Only a few items are licensed on this per transaction mechanism. Pay once every 100,000 (or whatever)
They will also licence each employee per head, one-off for HR. Do it once, dont need to do it again, ever.
To add the 100,000 transaction licenses to the employee count for HR makes no sense, its like adding up how many gallons of petrol you buy in a year, how many seats your car has, and then deciding your car uses that number of seats every year.
you can’t plausibly be a space-faring nation with an insular viewpoint
outdated societal structures like slavery .... but also happen to have spaceships
China ? India?
"Amazon doesn't break out the financials of its Amazon Web Services cloud business in any detail, but the business unit under which it reports earned revenues of $1.34bn in its most recent quarter alone."
And didnt Amazon make about $20 profit or some such?
The only nasty is if you were dumb enough to install an app not on the app store, via a link sent you in an email.
I dont think a fix exists on any OS to stop such idiocy.
Given their walled-garden approach, I figured they would have set things up so that executable code could only be modified by the store app, and only during an install requiring your password.
This is for "side loaded" apps.
So, you would receive what is likely an unsolicited email.
In the email is text that says "how would you like to download such and such an app"
You click on the link.
You install the app
You are an idiot.
Is not just those two options. They will still accept credit cards but plan to entice customers to use it with coupons and discounts.
"Apple in particular has a policy of not allowing apps in their store which compete with functionality provided by the phone. Apple Pay is in the phone so CurrentC won't be able to get their app into the Apple Store."
Nope its already in there (US store only for obvious reasons). As you might guess its attracted rather a lot of 1 star scores (1 being the minimum) over the past day or two.
The Android version in the Google Play store was at about 1300 1 star reviews when i looked yesterday.
Apple have no need to ban this app since its a complete dogs dinner of usability with added security issues, in particular the potential for a hacker to hoover your bank account dry.
Add to that, it will probably add about a minute to your check out process with its clunky "scan a QR code" process.
Ridiculous kneejerk response. Like Microsoft, Apple IBM and any other huge software vendor, they have millions of customers, its wholly impractical at that scale to contact each and every customer, the back end support systems will anyway have details of for example, the person in procurement who made the order years back, rather than an actual person responsible for bug fixes.
They also all have have systems that you can connect to which will tell you what needs an update for the actual software you have installed rather than what you bought (not the same thing at all) which any responsible IT organisation will be using and monitoring, rather than waiting passively for Oracle / IBM / SAP etc etc to send an email to "fred@procurement dot com" who probably also buys software for every other vendor as well.
systemdwith faint praise
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017