Re: UPS failure
Listen, don't mention the UPSs. I mentioned it once, but I think I got away with it.
15450 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Jun 2009
Skype isn't P2P any more, everything's been going through MS' supernodes for a few years, and messages can blocked (e.g. you type a link to a phishing website that's on their list) so they know the contents of messages too. They're not going to change that with the move to web clients.
Wire (wire.com) has Windows, Mac, Android, iOS, and web clients. It doesn't have Windows Phone but Windows Phone is deader than Skype. Microsoft can fragment Skype until it only works with Windows Desktop and Windows Phone and then they'll be utterly surprised to find that nobody is using it.
There's also appear.in which is web only, but it has the advantage of not having a crappy broken UI, unlike Skype.
It's both, probably a little more 2) than 1). She's not particularly interested in how it works or why they can't give her the messages, she just wants them and she'll block WhatsApp till she gets them.
"This is what happens in several investigations. Operators comply. Google complies. Why can't WhatsApp comply? Brazilian criminals see a shield in WhatsApp, a safe haven to commit crimes and plans executions." link
So she'd like them to remove E2E encryption and store messages.
I don't think it's an EU directive, it just is more technically unreliable to make a washing machine mix 50-60ºC water from a combi boiler with cold water to get a 30-40ºC wash, plus you run the risk of ending up with shrunken doll's clothes. Many hot fill washing machines never take hot water in for the colder washes anyway, they heat up cold water.
Even so, Houser's not pleased.
Seven days ago, May said that strategic British businesses would be protected from foreign takeover. Given what's already gone, I can't think of anything more strategic than ARM. So today Hammond says this means everything's great.
If Germany had an ARM, they wouldn't have let this happen.
The UK is at risk of having everything worthwhile bought up and dragged over the border.
No, they prepropose that one may own one's gadget.
If the software a device is running reaches end-of-life, why shouldn't the owner be able to stick another OS on it? Are you going to tell them they shouldn't put Linux on an old desktop PC or Cyanogen on an old mobile phone either?
If Samsung suddenly pushed out updates which locked down the bootloader on obviously unsupported devices then that would also be viewed as a shitty move by most.
Hunt's staying with the NHS as he did so well last time.
The Energy part of the Dept. of Energy and Climate Change has been eaten by Business Innovation and Skills and the Climate Change part has disappeared. The UK needs an energy department separate from business to keep the lights on and be somewhat immune from lobbying by the energy industry. Climate change, well, are we back to it doesn't exist? We will be because Leadsom will probably be in charge of it.
As for BoJo, I think given his post it's more important what people abroad think, not what possible interpretations we can make for May putting him there.
I don't think she's that particularly clever. She couldn't answer basic questions about the IPBill in the Commons Committee and she must have spent half her time at the Home Office on surveillance issues of one kind or another.
Would it have broken if MS hadn't decided to offer a free upgrade? No, they'd have carried on using Win 7 or 8 anyway apart from a handful of fanboi masochists who might even have bought the retail version of Windows 10 instead of buying a new computer.
Fecking analysts.
Facebook believes white pampered fratboys make them the most money and hire accordingly. Why? Because that's the company culture. Because Zuckerburg built up the company that way from scratch.
Now ask anyone from an ethnic minority if they'd like to work in a building full of white pampered fratboys. I don't know, I'm going out on a limb as I'm not an ethnic minority where I am and haven't experienced it but I suspect a sense of self preservation kicks in. I know I'd have one if I lived in a country where I could get shot by Rosco P. Coltrane because of the way I looked. Life is bad enough already without working with a load of fratboys on top of that.
And I wouldn't work at Facebook either because I don't agree with the data mining and they'd be insufferable.
First of all the name Autopilot, obviously borrowed from aviation, does not imply that you can have a snooze, hop in the back seat or read the paper. Do you see the pilot and co-pilot just wandering around the plane whilst letting the autopilot on a plane do its thing?
They are fully trained as to what an autopilot actually does. They will get fired if they do. Not the same thing as being alone in your own car.
Let's say Tesla caves in and calls it Driver Assist. Do you think that the man watching the DVD would have done anything different? That the lady who accelerated her husbands Tesla into a brick wall wouldn't have? That the man who crashed into a field because he refused to place his hands on the wheel despite the car asking him to do so repeatedly would have put his hands on the wheel?
Look I'm no aviation expert or behavioural expert but I think common sense dictates that the answer to the above questions is no, no and no.
Indeed, but common sense has to compete against a childhood of watching Knight Rider. Autopilot implies more hands off. Nobody is going to read x pages of EULA to check what the Autopilot can or can't do, they're going to go "yeah, it's got Autopilot, sweet". This is also how Apple's phones are sold, by marketing to people who have no idea what it really means, but they know it's cool. Have you read iOS's EULA? Has anyone? Thought not.
The other difference between Teslas and the rest is you can 'drive' with your hands off the wheel for longer.
It all gives a sensation of autonomy that the rest don't have, but it doesn't mean that Teslas actually have it either. Tesla can't handwave away problems and say it's "Beta" because that's Silly Valley culture, they're in meatspace now. You'd never get a Rainbow Road screen on a Volvo to distract the driver with.
By the way, Consumer Reports copied me.
Let's have a look at how he's qualified for Minister of State for Universities and Science. Some chap who's been to university and has a science background would probably be the basic requirements.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jo_Johnson#Education
Eton, Oxford, studied Modern History, Bullingdon Club, friends with... George Osborne. And Boris' brother, of course.
So much for meritocracy.