Re: What could go wrong?
Phew, luckily it was commented out.
15447 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Jun 2009
Is it really a surprise? You can be in the EU and opt out of things, but you can't be out the EU and opt in to things.
Why? There's about the same legal basis for the UK doing that as there is for Australia doing that, i.e. none. All the remaining 27 countries would have to re-write every law and treaty that makes the EU what it is to accommodate the Tory party's exceptionalism. Presumably if you went to Eton and Oxford this seems perfectly normal to you, but not to everyone else.
Pray tell, how was this port opened in the first place and, more importantly, how did the ISP close it without a backdoor?
You might be able to go to the router's webadmin page and turn it off, however some ISPs set things up on the router so you can't. Lots of potential for fun because the port your ISP uses for TR-069 is bound to become public knowledge, the ISP might not have shut everyone from outside their network out because they're clueless like that, and then you have every botnet around banging on that port for that ISP and something's bound to give.
having a proper sandbox and permissions model from its 1.0 release.
Nope. If it were proper you could have denied each permission individually, and you've not been able to do that until only recently. And the app may crash or refuse to work.
Android was better OS than alternatives available at the time
Then you didn't try Symbian or WebOS.
... I doubt they'd have had the same business model (subsidise it forever and run everyone else into the ground) and Android would have been one choice out of several. It was pretty terrible until relatively recently and the only way it's survived is due to its price tag.
Perhaps if Google hadn't bought Android, Essential would have had more of a chance.
In my case it's my fucking bank leaking my email address (I have a unique one just for the bank).
They also say that due to GDPR they won't be able to transfer money from another bank by direct debit, which was a fairly common way of doing it in Spain as it sidestepped tranfer fees from the other bank. I guess it was fine when they were growing as they needed the customers but now they're king of the hill it's just another costly service they wanted to get rid of and "because GDPR" was a nice excuse.
Go to another bank, you say? There really is no choice, they're all as shit as Sabadell.
It applies to all businesses processing EU citizens data.
So in the EU every organisation will be GDPR complaint, even for the US visitor.
Outside the EU I guess few will bother about checking everyone's nationality, but if they want business from EU citizens in the EU they will become GDPR compliant for everyone everywhere.
Maybe Kieren didn't see the funny side this time as regular commentards know his home is full of these things. Right know if I were in that position I'd be getting rid on all of them, a sort of modern-day version of the end of Poltergeist.
prior to my S9 Google was set to only listen when I pushed a button telling it that it was allowed to listen.
Nothing can go wrong there.
Uninstall or disable all Google apps except Play and Services, remove microphone, location, and camera permission from those and pray they don't alter the deal further.
Google Duplex sounds human when it calls to book appointments - Google Duplex will disclose that people may be recorded during conversations
This appears to be something that allows things to be booked or ordered via a Google app or website and it rings the business in question and talks to the person to book or order whatever it is.
There's a recording in the link. I hope any business puts the phone down on the Googlebot when it calls, if they can tell the difference (apparently only those places where they are legally obliged to say their call is being recorded).
Given the major stories each one has broken and the work that went into producing each one, the Grauniad and the Heil aren't exactly equivalent...
You can also argue the public has lost respect of the journalists given some of opinion pieces and straight made-up bollocks that is passed off as news.
Seems like there's no difference between Facebook and Google, except Google's made developers show a dialog box so it looks like the developers have a responsibility for something, which they don't because Google have defined themselves as the data controller. They can't have it both ways.
Perhaps, if GNOME started gathering some basic data on a larger scale about how people use GNOME the project would make different decisions.
Doubt it, if you take the other example (Firefox) it turned into competition between UXers to see how they could out-stupid each other, using metrics to justify their decisions where they could and ignoring them where they couldn't.
Read their T&Cs for Europe - they have COPPA cut-n-pasted into them courtesy of the firm belief that the only law which applies is USA law and it is universal.
So much this.
And they can replace that with GDPR. The boot's on the other foot now.
classifying food snapped in pics
Obligatory: Not a hot dog.
It seems they had gained the rights for the Vega but nobody (or nearly nobody) was paid, so now programmers are explicitly stating RCL don't have rights for the Vega+ just in case RCL claim they have the rights for the Vega line of consoles.
Maybe this is part of the reason for a Vega+ V2.
A utility company would not be able to add artificial restrictions to their supply and remove them if the customer pays a special fee.
So if the Internet is to be treated like a necessity (which it probably is these days), paying extra to unlock certain parts of it goes against that.
"Cable companies that provide internet access contend that in a free market, so long as they disclose it, they should have the right to control their product including which websites download quickly, which websites download slowly and which don't download at all... in principle, I agree with that" followed by "Internet is a necessity: it's like water, it's like electricity it's like a telephone".
How does the first part tally with the second part? A necessity shouldn't have artificial restrictions unless you pay more to make it work the way it was supposed to in the first place.
It's nice he's decided not to follow the party line (we scratch their backs and later on they'll scratch ours), but I still can't follow his argument.
Up there it would apparently be easy to spin up 1000 e-mail addresses so a Facebook account is needed. Now down here it's apparently easy to spin up 1000 Facebook accounts so your photo album is needed.
It's stunts like this that brought about GDPR in the first place.
"The whole system could be built on a federated, disaggregated and self-organising peer-to-peer command, control, communications, computers and intelligence (C4I) network – effectively a combat cloud. Such a system should be able to draw on reachback access to cloud-based servers, but be capable of resilient operation provided by command and control applications across a variety of in-theatre platforms. From an operator’s perspective such a system will handle user requests for information and data passage as an intelligent assistant service."
I think all they've done is publicise how difficult it is to get Windows 10 onto another platform. They they took ages to come up with Windows 10 IoT for the Pi and when they did they came up with a nobbled version (Core). Now they have Windows 10 IoT for the Pi, why couldn't they have flipped a few build switches and targetted this other ARM board instead?
There does come a point where the the historical "the way we were"-ness about TV series has some, dare I say it, cultural value and it should be made available on-line. When you've flogged 2000 DVDs of some 70s series, you're not going to flog any more.
I think there's two whole episodes of Micro Live on iPlayer. Why not put the whole lot online? Have BBC marketing decided there's some as yet some unidentified section of the public that wants to buy a box set of one-screen long BBC Basic programs?
News programmes, the whole lot, just put it all up. Perhaps then we might find out that the past isn't as rose-tinted as some would have us believe and it might not be a good idea try and get back to something that doesn't exist.