* Posts by Nigel Whitfield.

1049 publicly visible posts • joined 12 Jun 2009

How to choose the right screen size

Nigel Whitfield.

Do your own maths!

I'll post the workings for all of this on my blog later, so you can see how we calculated the figures. It's fairly easy from that starting point to work out the values for a different screen ratio.

Peugeot compo cam aids amateur espionage

Nigel Whitfield.

They are also ...

... purveyors of finest Germanic Pornography to gentleman with an interest in musical theatre and working out.

Nigel Whitfield.

Ah yes...

She's just opposite the old Morgan Computers shop. There's a woman duplicated on Charing Cross Road, outside Foyles, and another lady near Holborn who's had her feet stolen (both pictured on my blog).

We did come across some alarming leopard skin print curtains, but there are limits to what we can show on a family website.

Boy George promises to cut employment rights

Nigel Whitfield.

Careless legislation costs jobs

One interesting, and not often discussed, side effect of the watering down of employees rights is that far from helping create jobs in the UK, it can actually end up costing them.

Back in the fag end of the Major administration, the company next door to my partner's workplace was in some difficulty. In fact, they had factories in various places around Europe, and the one in Hoddesdon wasn't the worst performing.

But, thanks to the fact that we weren't signed up to the Social Charter here, and the UK workers had fewer rights, it was the site that got closed, because it was simply easier to ditch the British workers than those elsewhere in the EU.

Now, perhaps this will only happen in the margins, where the savings from easier disposal of UK staff can outweigh slightly worse figures from another site elsewhere, but it certainly does happen.

Remove too much protection from workers and yes, you might make a few companies decide they'll set up here - but largely because they know they can just close down again really quickly. You run a risk not of creating real jobs, but of engineering a situation where the UK is Europe's go-to place for easily disposable temporary labour.

That might look good for the balance sheets, but it's not going to be much fun for the people actually doing the work.

Nigel Whitfield.

Stark contrast with elsewhere

In the UK we seem to have this idea that the only way we can strive to be competitive is by ensuring that workers have as few rights as possible, and this suggestion would seem to be the latest in a long line; sooner or later, it won't surprise me at all if someone in government listens to Boris Johnson's suggestion that the rules for strike ballots be made even more stringent than the ones applied to general or mayoral elections.

Meanwhile, the country that has performed best in Europe over the last fifty years seems to have done pretty well without having to curtail so many of the rights of workers, and indeed while signed up to the Social Charter.

It often seems that other European countries take the view that if you treat staff well, they'll behave well, work well and be more productive. The UK approach seems to be that you need to be able to terrify them into submission with the threat of losing their job.

David Cameron wants to push all of Blighty online

Nigel Whitfield.

Short timespan

Ultimately, everything probably will be online. But 2015? You're having a laugh!

It will take much, much longer before it's a practical proposition, I think.

And if the government sees it as a way of saving money, it should be the one that's paying for the infrastructure to make this possible, not the most needy.

It would be quite possible to come up with a cut down system that was severely limited; it would even be possible to set up a virtual network if you're using mobile broadband services, that only allowed access to .gov.uk services, paid for centrally, rather than by shifting costs on to users - and likely costing less, thanks to scale of purchase.

But there are going to be plenty of people who are in their 70s or 80s who could quite easily still be living reasonably independent lives for another 20 years; I really think that any plan to move government solely online needs to be talking in those sorts of time scales - and perhaps working towards a situation where a cheap device - the 2020 equivalent of a netbook or basic tablet - is affordable enough in large quantities that it can be distributed to almost every household.

If the potential savings from closing offices and doing everything online are as great as some suggest, then even distributing free equipment to the 26 million households in the UK will be good value. If you restricted it to households receiving income related benefits, you'd be looking at fewer than 6 million - so a capital outlay of 600 million would get all those people one of these refurbished PCs right now. That, incidentally, is a fifth of what the current government is planning to spend on reorganising the NHS.

In some ways, a bigger cost (which is why the current scheme is so keen to recruit volunteer "champions") is actually explaining to people who've never used a computer how to do everything online, and how to stay safe, and so forth.

And that's one reason why you may be better off doing this over a much longer timescale, because the number of people whom you will have to train will be much smaller, as more people will have had exposure to computers through school and work.

Nigel Whitfield.

Perhaps ...

... because some of us think that it's unfair that the poorest should be excluded from getting the best prices.

From the tone of your comment, I suspect you think "socialist" is some sort of insult. But we are apparently, as Mr Cameron insists on repeating, all in this together. Though he tends to temper that creed with massive doses of selfishness and hypocrisy, some of us prefer to take it at face value.

It really doesn't seem fair to me that those who don't have enough money to afford a computer, or a stable enough income to trust energy and comms companies with free access to their bank accounts, should end up being penalised by having to pay more.

Nigel Whitfield.

What's this really about?

I'm tremendously cynical about this "all must be online" idea. As Pete 2 says, there are some people who don't want to go online, and the idea that MLF has espoused at times that somehow you might not be a proper citizen if you're not online is utterly repellent to me.

While the cost of these computers seems pretty low to those of us with comfy jobs and somewhere to live, even £92 - let alone a tenner a month for the connectivity - can be a substantial chunk for some people.

And sure, someone will come along and say "But they can afford Sky TV," and maybe some people without internet access can. But does that give anyone else the right to say "You can't have X, Y or Z, you must spend your money on a net connection instead" ? I really don't think it does.

I have a feeling that there are other agendas here; there are libraries that provide computer access, and post offices that provide people with government services, and plenty of people who seem to think that the government should be cutting back on spending in those areas. It seems to me that one of the things that is potentially going on here is that the cost of providing people with access to government services is being shifted on to the service users themselves by making them pay for computers and net access.

And if that's the long term plan, then actually i think it's pretty disgusting, telling the less well off what they can spend their money on, so that those of us higher up the chain might manage to get away with paying less tax. Seeing that at least one of the packages available comes with a voucher for Mecca Bingo really doesn't inspire confidence, either.

There certainly are lots of benefits to going online, but I really don't think forcing pensioners to spend their income on it is a brilliant idea. A better use of government resources, in my view, would be insisting that outfits like energy companies make sure that their best deals are also available to people who can't afford a computer.

WTF is... IPv6?

Nigel Whitfield.

As mentioned ...

... one of the big obstacles to this is the availability of cheap customer equipment (CPE) that supports it. You can buy some expensive routers that will run IPv6, but according to the ISPs I've spoken with, there's not a massive amount of kit that's ready - though some seems to be almost there, give or take the occasional firmware update.

Hopefully as new models roll out over the next few months, there'll be more CPE that's capable, and then things will start to move, especially as some of those ISPs finally use up their remaining allocations of addresses.

BT's 21CN is IPv6 capable, and it can be made to work over the older parts of their infrastructure too, I gather.

Nigel Whitfield.

Can't think of one

Most people will be using dual stack for a long time - IPv4 websites aren't going to go away for a long time. So if you have IPv4 installed for that, you may as well use it on your home network, either exclusively, or alongside IPv6.

It's perhaps worth playing with, if you want to gain more understanding, and practise typing those addresses, and we'll look in more detail at how you can go about doing that fairly soon.

But for casual use, not a massive case to be made for it right now, I'd say.

Worth remembering that you may have to address security in a different way, depending on how you do things. For example, my main network is firewalled via the router, but IPv6 connectivity is (currently) provided via a tunnel, so the router doesn't intercept anything coming in that way, as all the work's done by my OpenBSD box. That means that as well as fiddling around with IPv6 itself, I had to get my head around configuring the packet filter on OpenBSD to protect machines on the LAN via IPv6.

That won't be a problem when consumer routers appear, with built in IPv6 firewalls, but for now it's an extra consideration for anyone who wants to tinker.

Nigel Whitfield.

There are ways round that

Privacy addressing is one solution to that; essentially, when you have so many addresses, it's possible to use a different one every day, or to have each application on a system use a different address.

Obviously, the prefix will still enable things to be narrowed down to a particular network, but that's really no different from how things work now.

Books biz talks up Kindle effect

Nigel Whitfield.

VAT can come down, but not go to zero

As far as I know, it's not actually possible for a government to remove VAT from something, or move it to zero rate, without agreement across the EU, presumably because of harmonisation/single market rules.

However, there has already been agreement in the EU which would allow (though not require, sadly) countries to charge VAT at their reduced rate for eBooks. The reduced rate in the UK is 5%, so it would be quite possible for the chancellor to decide to do that.

Some countries have it even worse, with VAT rates of as much as 25%, even on printed books; not that that's much consolation.

Nigel Whitfield.

Don't forget ...

Even in the epub ecosystems, prices for some books are set by the publisher, just as they are on Kindle

TVonics DTR-Z500HD Freeview HD DVR

Nigel Whitfield.

Perhaps

It's been sitting here for around a month or so now, and I've not had any mysterious things happening (or at least none that I can't put down to other causes; for example, watching a recording of The Event from C4HD last night, one segment had the audio messed up, with no dialogue, but I've seen that happen on 4HD with other recorders too - seems they don't always switch back from stereo to 5 channels after the ad breaks properly).

So, I'd give a qualified yes, and it was happy even at the end of the chain of devices connected to my aerial, where other boxes have suffered failed recordings due to low signal.

It'll be interesting to see how HD boxes fare over the summer, with any tropo lifts, together with the increased power on digital muxes around the country as switchover proceeds.

Nigel Whitfield.

Update, errata

A couple of points; a mistake I made (mea culpa) - there is an EPG search; it's just not immediately obvious.

Fast forward is tolerable at the highest speed, though you do get some of macro-blocking. There are other options worth using too, though. First, there's resume playback, so you can jump back to where you were. And the same screen allows you to enter a number of minutes to jump to and then start playback. Finally, there are the skip buttons; admittedly they are limited in duration, but the combination of those will likely cover most common needs.

As for the score, I think it does deserve the figure it got; we do have a standard way of calculating the ratings for RegHardware. Essentially, this doesn't offer as much as the Humax, but it does provide features (notably Dolby Transcoding) that are missing from some of the others I've looked at.

It's got a pretty straightforward interface that should be simple for most people to grasp (even if they don't find the EPG search), but lacks some of the extras found on, for instance, the Digital Stream or IceCrypt boxes.

Citroën lifts lid on looming diesel hybrid

Nigel Whitfield.

Blame PSA

Since their acquisition of Citroën in the 1970s, they seem to have tried to stamp out all the signs of originality that made some of the earlier cars design classics. It's only in the last few years they seem to even have been willing to acknowledge the heritage of the brand, though I'm not the only Citroënaut to be a little suspicious of their usage of 'DS' to label some of the new cars.

The CX and SM were pretty decent designs (and the series 1 CX cockpit was delightfully bonkers, too; barely a flat surface anywhere), and the DS still turns heads whenever you take one out on the road.

Some of the old Panhards were pretty stunning, like the Dyna Z, and I think the 1959 Facel Vega was pretty striking, and the Delage D8 from the 1930s was stunning. Others have a soft spot for some of the Renaults, like the Floride and Caravelle.

So, it's not that the French can't design good cars - a wander round the annual Retromobile exhibition (usually February in Paris) will soon dispel that idea. But it seems the accountants won't let any manufacturer that aspires to the mass market do anything interesting any more.

Nigel Whitfield.

Hmmmm...

It may be economical, but it apparently it won't have the hydropneumatic suspension as standard.

I'll be sticking with my DS23 for a while yet.

Hertz offers Londoners e-cars for hire

Nigel Whitfield.

Congestion charge not much of an issue

Both Hertz Connect and Streetcar (which I use, and has many more cars in London than Hertz) pay the congestion charge for you, on all your bookings anyway. So, choosing one of these electric ones won't make any difference at all.

WTF is... 4K x 2K?

Nigel Whitfield.

Set up your TV

Those who want tips on setting up their TV correctly can of course refer to the handy guide we published here: http://www.reghardware.com/2009/08/19/hdtv_setup_guide/

WTF is... 3D printing

Nigel Whitfield.

RepRap

That's partly what RepRap is about (and indeed what the 'Rep' in the name stands for). It can print all its own plastic parts, and has also been used in the creation of some PCBs, though of course things like the motors are a bit tricky.

Nigel Whitfield.

Indeed they will

HP's website lists the price of a spool of black ABS at £650 plus VAT. Based on the specs, that's roughly £1 per cubic centimetre.

Nigel Whitfield.

Video now added

Sorry - link got missed out inadvertently.

Game stocks shops with Tesco 3DS consoles

Nigel Whitfield.

Warranty, probably

Responsibility for problems with something you buy in the UK lies not directly with the manufacturer, but with the retailer.

So, in theory, if anything went wrong with these pre-owned units, the warranty would have to be dealt with through the original retailer.

It would be interesting to know what Game says regarding warranty on these units (and other pre-owned gear they sell.

How returns are handled by Nintendo will be interesting too; most of these stores probably just send equipment straight back when it's brought in as faulty, so it wouldn't necessarily matter on the face of it if they were returned to Game or Tesco. But they may need to keep track of where a unit was bought from for accounting and other purposes.

O2 tariff rejig bundles tethering with data

Nigel Whitfield.

Phone subsidy?

These figures are just weird... I always imagined (and I'm sure that's why the phone companies say they do it) that part of the reason for higher prices on phone-included tariffs is to recoup the subsidy on the price of the phone.

That's fine, and reasonable. But on the 600 and 900 minute deals here, O2 expects you to pay £5 or £5.50 extra for the privilege of already owning your own phone, if you won't want to tie in to a 12 month contract.

So what exactly are they subsidising if you agree to a 12 month contract? A fiver seems a pretty hefty amount (around 25% on that 600 minute deal) to charge as a premium for wanting a month to month package.

No thanks, O2. Nice try, but not interested on those terms.

Make streaming a felony: Obama

Nigel Whitfield.

TransPac

Just as worrying is the little note at the end about the Trans-Pacific agreement; such agreements, including some under the auspices of the WTO, often contain some rules and regulations that seem deeply at odds with fairness to the consumer, or any pesky environmental and safety rules that might get in the way of big business.

Politicians often seem far to ready to impose these potentially binding agreements on countries, with little public discussion. While people in the UK rail against the various failings of the EU, it is at least a somewhat more democratically grounded institution than organisations like the WTO, which plenty of free market fans seem quite happy to support.

Spaniards bemoan 'joke' speed limit cut

Nigel Whitfield.

110 is fine

As others have said, 110 is fine, and probably saves a fair bit of fuel. It's not as if they've halved the speed limit or anything like that.

I'd quite like to see something akin to the system in France, where there are wet and dry speed limits on the motorways - 110 and 130 respectively.

Library e-books to become too tatty to lend

Nigel Whitfield.

To be fair to Overdrive ...

They don't seem terribly happy about this either.

Libraries still buy the books that they want to use via the OverDrive service, and I think in that regard OverDrive acts like a distributor (in fact, for a while they also powered the WH Smith eBook store).

They've announced that following this decision by HC, they've removed all the HC books from their main catalogue of library eBooks and put them in a separate one, so that librarians can't help but notice that HC eBooks aren't the same as everyone else's.

Nigel Whitfield.

Worth noting ...

... that in the various discussions about this around the web, there are some pointing out that eBook lending via libraries means authors lose out.

While that's true to a small degree - though I'm not sure how many people really would buy books if they couldn't borrow from the library - there's also a big difference between the US and Europe.

The US doesn't have an equivalent of the Public Lending Right, which provides authors with an income based on loans from libraries. Since that's paid direct to authors (at least in the UK), it doesn't really make a difference to publishers. But it may have an impact on how some authors and those who speak for them view libraries as a whole.

Europe confirms raids on ebook publishers

Nigel Whitfield.

Waterstones are very pricey

With a price differential like that, it's clearly not an agency priced book; despite the horrible interface, it's worth checking with WH Smith, Kobo and some of the other stores that sell books in ePub format. Waterstones is very often the most expensive.

I did a few comparisons last year; four books that I bought to take on holiday in August were £17.18 at WH Smith, £17.12 on Amazon, or I could have paid £33.86 from Waterstones.

Even after the introduction of agency pricing, Waterstones were still expensive - a selection of books I was tracking last summer was £184.62 on Amazon, £205.95 at WH Smith, and £227.95 with Waterstones.

If I were Sony, I'd very much regret having jumped into bed with one of the priciest eBook vendors in the UK; it can't be doing the image of their readers much good at all.

Nigel Whitfield.

Yes, but

There are of course plenty of free eBooks available - but that's only a helpful argument if they're the sort of books that someone wants to read.

Resources like Project Gutenberg, or the free books available from Kobo, Baen and many other sources do mean that yes, you can find plenty of stuff to read without spending money.

But if someone wants to read The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, or the latest Dan Brown, or any of a huge number of other things, pointing out that they can get anything by Dickens from Gutenberg, or some free SciFi from Baen doesn't solve their problem, does it?

Nigel Whitfield.

ePub is all very well ...

But despite the theoretical competition, even prices there have gone up. Waterstones - the retailer that Sony has tended to push their customers to - didn't even attempt to compete when Kindle appeared in the UK; some of their prices actually went up.

And that was before the introduction of Agency Pricing which pushed up prices of some books by a few pounds.

The Doctor Who Experience

Nigel Whitfield.

Some has been borrowed

Certainly at least one of the Daleks on display is marked as on loan from a private collection.

Interestingly, some of the items have descriptions saying "this is the actual costume" while others don't...

Nigel Whitfield.

The walk through is new

Some of the bits and pieces will certainly have been seen elsewhere, but the central 'walk through' part is brand new.

Nigel Whitfield.

That was my thought

But no, it's a closed wifi network, which will have things like voucher offers, background material and additional stuff for the deaf.

It's a great shame it wasn't switched on for the test day, because I too thought "That's weird, wouldn't Bluetooth be more straightforward?"

I guess they know that they can deliver a wider range of material via WiFi and a local web server, but I can't help feeling that they will have to explain to quite a few people how to select the right network and connect to it; once that's done, then the standard hot-spot landing page mechanisms should help point people in the right direction.

Nigel Whitfield.

'Cos I'll do most things for money (but I won't do *that* ...)

I had tickets for the test-pilot. I write here often, and there's a fair bit of cross-over between the fans of gadgets and those of Doctor Who, apparently.

So, it seemed only polite to offer to write about it for the lovely people here.

Nigel Whitfield.

To be fair ...

There have been exhibitions dotted around the UK, including Glasgow and one down in Cornwall as well.

I suppose the logic for this one is probably that London is a reasonable place close to the home of BBC Worldwide to try it out, while the production base in Cardiff is the show's home and so a logical final destination.

Of course, wherever you put this (or indeed, anything by the BBC) there will be people complaining that it's either too biased towards some particular area, or that they're spending money pandering to shouty people in the regions.

Nigel Whitfield.

Educate, inform and entertain?

I think that sounds like a job for the Science Museum; I'm sure they could get tons of people through their doors with a 'Science of Dr Who' show.

But you are right, in that there are lots of things that could be done, given the show's longevity, the range of topics that it's covered and the wealth of material they must have in the archives.

With enough space and time (see what I did there? ;)) you could probably find ways to work most of the subjects of a school curriculum into a really comprehensive Dr Who exhibition. But, if they can't find space for more than a couple of hundred words about each Doctor, there's not much chance of a gallery of, say, all the historical figures he's met over the years.

D-Link Boxee Box DSM-380 media streamer

Nigel Whitfield.

Apple Fanboi?

You know, it really is possible to see product reviews in terms other than "Does the reviewer like Apple or not".

Personally, I find the iPhone interface incredibly annoying, and while I have reservations about the lock-in with AppleTV, at least it's half the price of this, and if you don't mind tinkering, will do pretty well on the media playback front.

Given that the user experience for UK-based online media is so poor, and that that's one of the main reasons you might consider spending £200 on this instead of less than £100 on something that will play most of the media you have on your network, no I don't think 55% is terribly unfair.

If you want iPlayer, for example, you'll get a far better experience from any number of Freesat receivers, some Freeview HD kit, and assorted other bits and bobs. For a large number of ordinary punters, that side of this product is really not ready for prime time, and that affected the score dramatically.

Where this excels is as a media player for content on your own network. But really, is it worth paying £200 just to get some fancy indexing options? I don't think so.

Ask yourself, if this didn't have the online media support, would you pay that price, when there are media players available for under £100 that can do as well? Would you be happy if we gave it a high rating when there's equivalent kit (and we do consider value in assigning scores) for far less?

In my opinion, the Boxee Box fails on the value for money front. And it certainly fails on the UX front as far as online content is concerned, for users in the UK.

That's why it got 55%. Not any other reason. And certainly nothing to do with speculation about whether or not I like Apple.

Card surcharges face super-complaint

Nigel Whitfield.

What about BACS?

It's not just card charges; people like BT introduced charges ostensibly for people who pay by cheque, claiming it costs more to process payments. But what they really do is penalise anyone who won't pay by direct debit.

I'm pretty certain that it costs BT next to nothing to receive a BACS payment that I send via internet banking, but they still charge me the same few quid as if I were paying by cheque. And, given their alarming incompetence when it comes to creating accurate bills, I've never been willing to let them have a direct debit. (BT ISDN2e provides, it seemed to me, a dazzling array of options, each of which could be billed incorrectly; and the merest enquiry about calling plans could get you slapped onto something with a committed call spend hundreds of quid higher than you'd ever made in the past)

Companies should not be allowed to penalise people unfairly for ANY particular payment method, not just credit cards.

Effectively, BT and other companies use surcharges to increase basic fees for those who don't trust them enough to pay by direct debit.

Sky loses pub footy case

Nigel Whitfield.

Not at all

The issue is not that there is exclusivity of rights per-se, but that the way it is done prevents people from buying from elsewhere in the EU.

The point that quite a few seem to have missed is that - as is widely thought my many people - the result of this is that the PL sells rights on a pan-European basis, instead of regionally, then there are very few companies with the scale and resources to buy them.

Sky is one (Mediaset has been mooted as another). Sky already has retail operations in the UK, Italy and Germany. If it bought pan-European rights, it would then be able to retail through partners in other countries - in just the same way as it retails through TopUpTV and Virgin in the UK.

There would be competition, because you could buy from different broadcasters. But effectively, as with the situation in the UK now, Sky would set the base price and the only way anyone could offer a lower one would be via different bundling arrangements, or selling below cost.

There is no suggestion at all in the ruling that rights will have be to sold to multiple people per territory; simply that when someone has rights to one country, chasing after the punters like this is not on, and is a breach of the single market rules.

This ultimately makes the rights to a single country less attractive, because a few (though not many, I bet) will buy from elsewhere and put up with on-screen graphics in a different language, and needing another dish. Some companies may aggressively try to push their sales into other territories, rather than tacitly going along with the middle men who typically do this at the moment.

And so, as the value of single territory rights drops, because of increased competition, it becomes more likely the Premier League will want to sell across the continent. And, at the same time, the big groups like Sky will see a chance to grab a stranglehold by buying those rights, and retailing via partners.

So, if the country by country regime falls by the wayside, there is a very real possibility that, far from getting to stick it to Sky, as many people fervently wish, they may actually end up stronger (or, if not Sky, one of the other big European media groups may triumph).

Nigel Whitfield.

Absolutely nothing

This ruling is about the rights holder saying to someone "Ere, you can't buy that from Greece, you gotta buy it in the UK"

That's not the case with porn channels. It's not the rights holder stopping people from buying them, it's the government, essentially not allowing them a UK broadcasting licence. That's entirely separate from this case, and when it comes to "moral standards" the EU broadly allows different countries to set their own agenda.

The ECHR sometimes (eg gays in the military, anti-discrimination) does sometimes get involved in the moral issues, but only when a case is brought by someone, and it tends to follow, rather than lead on liberalisation.

Nigel Whitfield.

Doomed? I'm not so sure

I'm really not convinced that Sky is doomed, as I hinted above.

I'm no fan of Sky, personally, and I think it will be great for viewers if they can get things cheaper. But while this may look like a slap in the face for them and the greedy sods of the Premier League, I wouldn't be so sure, just yet. It may turn out to be something of a pyrrhic victory for the consumer.

Ultimately, it will depend on the final ruling, and what the Premier League does next.

Best case for the punters, if selling rights by territory is deemed not allowable, is that the Premier League decides that they'll sell rights on a European basis, non-exclusively, perhaps one broadcaster per country. Ordinary punters will still be able to shop around the continent to find a suitable broadcaster and buy a package at the price that suits them. They may save money - but in fact, I'm not honestly sure how many people will do this, given that they'll probably need a second dish and receiver set up to do it.

Some will, sure - but how much will they save? If that Greek broadcaster can now only buy a package that includes the rights for the whole of Europe, will they be able to retail it quite as cheaply as they can at the moment? And will the saving be enough for fans to put up with the extra dish and foreign language commentary?

Worst case is probably that the Premier League decides to sell a single exclusive set of pan-European rights, to just one broadcaster, which may then sell on the rights within some territories, to local retail partners. Perhaps the EBU members could club together, but do you really think that's likely? Far more likely that Sky - with their existing operations in Italy and Germany contributing - would be the one group that snapped up the package.

Sky and the Premier League are pretty close, not surprisingly, and they will almost certainly be working out ways in which they can turn this to their advantage, no matter what the outcome. I know that's not a popular opinion (waiting for all the thumbs downs!), but they're certainly not going to shrug and say "Oh well, that gravy train's stopped, never mind"

Nigel Whitfield.

Ummm, no...

Sorry, but "with anything that is sold in multiple countries in the EU, the EU dictates that stuff is equally priced" is wrong.

There are plenty of examples where that's patently not the case. What the EU says is that people should be able to shop freely, and buy from wherever they want, and the hope is that a single market will, ultimately, lead to the harmonisation of prices.

But they can't dictate that things are equally priced because a) they don't like price fixing and b) retail taxation (eg VAT) isn't harmonised across the EU, or even within the Eurozone.

The main reason people buy a car from one country instead of another is precisely because it's cheaper, due to differences in things like first registration fees, and an EU insistence that thing like warranties aren't restricted when you do that.

There are lots of areas where people do shop cross-border, because it's cheaper - they do it in some areas for alcohol - the Baltic has a busy trade of ferries carrying drunken Scandinavians to and from Germany - or tobacco; around the Irish/NI border, the flow of traffic depends on the relative strength of the currencies. And sometimes, yes, local outlets near borders suffer as a result.

Notwithstanding firms like Apple, who now set a uniform EU price for the sake of simplicity, prices do vary considerably between countries, and (except in cases of profiteering, like wholesale mobile roaming rates) the EU doesn't generally have a problem with that.

What they do insist upon is that you have the freedom to buy from where things are cheaper, and in this case, the Advocate has decided that that freedom should trump the right of the the PL to sell by territory.

Nigel Whitfield.

Sort of ...

The PL sells rights to a broadcaster, but they sell the right to broadcast those programmes to a particular territory (which is why, for example, the Sky contract says you should be in the UK; using a Sky box in France, say, is a breach of that contract).

And, in some countries those rights might cost more, depending on the popularity of the Premier League (or whatever else is being sold) and the circumstances in that country. For the UK in particular, the PL and its players have grown fat and greedy thanks to Sky's determination to beat other broadcasters off, and hang on to the rights.

In other countries, if there's no competition, then the PL might not get much for the rights, and so the local broadcaster can sell them for less to their own subscribers.

But all that's possible on the understanding that those broadcasters then don't sell subscriptions to people in other territories; and the Greek one is clearly quite happy to sell them to a Portsmouth pub owner. At which point, the PL steps in and says "Hang on, we thought we had the rights to that, sod off"

The EU already has rules that say you can't prevent reception in one country of broadcasts from another (with very few exceptions, which don't include this). The rights regime is the thing that's supposed to stop Greeks selling cards to UK residents, and it's that that is likely to be determined to be against the EU rules.

You're right that the Greek broadcaster doesn't have to sell at the same price to everyone; that's not at issue. They could charge more to a UK customer, for extra admin, or because they feel like it. But what the Advocate has said said is that, regardless of the rights, they should be able to sell to that UK customer, and the PL shouldn't be going round fining someone just for buying something from a country in the EU where it's cheaper than in the UK.

Nigel Whitfield.

Don't get too ecstatic

On the face of it, you might think that this is great - and there are lots of good arguments for the tearing down of territory-based rights restrictions in various ways.

For a while, you might even be able to buy a cheap foreign card and point your dish at the right beam to pick up football for a bit less.

However, if the PL is no longer able to sell rights per territory, what happens next? Is there a cheery free for all, with people all over Europe buying cards willy nilly? Or will the PL decide that they will sell one package of rights for the whole of Europe?

If they do that, who do you think has pockets deep enough to buy those pan-European rights, and potentially sell them on to 'partner' broadcasters in other countries?

UK probes ebook pricing

Nigel Whitfield.

Astonishingly ...

When I was writing the 'WTF' piece about eBook prices, I spoke to some pretty senior people in the publishing industry who, when I asked them if the industry was making the same mistakes as the music industry when it comes to digital media, responded by saying they they didn't accept that the music industry had made mistakes!

Nigel Whitfield.

Yes, for now

You can, indeed. Though given the massive cuts to the library services, it will be interesting to see which way that goes.

And don't forget the lunatic fringe of the publishing industry, which thinks that borrowing books from libraries is, well, only going to lead to piracy if you let people do it at home, so best if it's restricted so that you have to take your ePub reader to the library to fill it with books. I wrote about this as a companion to the WTF on ebook pricing last year, see http://gonedigital.net/2010/11/23/libraries-and-ebooks/

If that does happen, in tandem with library closures, then borrowing eBooks from libraries will be a lot more difficult than it is now.

Nigel Whitfield.

VAT could be lower

It wouldn't be possible to remove VAT from ebooks completely - you need cross-community agreement for more zero-rated things, apparently - but it could certainly be reduced.

There is already an agreement within the EU that would allow books - in any format - to be rated at a country's lower VAT rate, and some have taken advantage of this.

The UK lower VAT rate is 5%, so it would be possible for the government to move eBooks into that band.

But two things: a) that would be dangerously close to supporting artistic endeavour, and so unlikely under the current government at best of times, let alone when they're dead set on reducing the deficit

b) frankly, it wouldn't surprise me at all if a reduction in the VAT rate was swiftly followed by the publishers increasing their prices for eBooks, in order to maintain what they see as parity with the printed editions (neglecting, as they do, the fact that they allow sellers to discount print versions, but not electronic)

Orange blames switch for data problems

Nigel Whitfield.

Similar experience

I've had similar experiences using Orange in Canary Wharf, where coverage has been absolutely atrocious at times; you would think that in an area like that, they might try to provide a reasonable signal, but I've had to spend ages wandering around the gardens of Canada Square trying to find a signal so that I can reply to an email.

And don't even get me started on their billing chaos, largely as a result of trying to use one of their roaming data packages (just google "My orange billing hell" instead)

Icecrypt T2400 Freeview HD DVR

Nigel Whitfield.

Reporting back...

I scheduled overlapping recordings on BBC 2 and Five last night, and shut the T2400 down while it was tuned to 4HD.

The startup channel this morning was Channel 5, which left me feeling quite dirty considering the chav-tastic content they have on this time of day. But at least now you have an answer