Re: He was never snarky, pompous or clever-clever.
I still wish we could have got a glimpse of where he worked.
I'm sure we'd have all had our minds blown at the computing nirvana he would have created.
2921 posts • joined 11 Jun 2009
I still wish we could have got a glimpse of where he worked.
I'm sure we'd have all had our minds blown at the computing nirvana he would have created.
Well really all I'm saying is you tend to get different results from someone who HAS to deliver to reap the benefits than someone who gets the benefits win or lose.
SteviSi and Dan Mattrick are two prime MS based examples.
Both may be 'amazing talented guys' but both managed to deliver the wrong product and were shown the door accordingly.
However, they were laughing hard with a spring in their step as they went through it.
We have people given great responsibility to deliver important products who really have nothing to lose if they screw it all up.
When I managed a project, if it got screwed up I would be fired and leave with just my desk stuff No golden boots, no mega share options, no multi-millions to fall back on.I therefore, always delivered what was required, when it was required.
Instead we have uber-rich Dept. heads that have nothing to lose other than a bit of embarrassment (maybe).
So all they do is play the exec playboy lifestyle, creating their 'vision' or 'legacy'. No need to worry about what the CEO thinks as well "he's got to pay me $20 mill if he wants rid of me!"
License to w*nk about really.
Was spot on then.
I was speaking to a chap today that shifts several thousand PCs a month. He cant shift stuff quick enough, doing crazy business.
Whats he selling?
Reconditioned dual core 2GB Dell business desktops circa 2008/9 with Vista or 7 on them. The hottest computing tech around at the moment. Like gold dust apparently.
According to him no one wants new i5/i7 stuff. It just sits there. Folks have wised up that the new stuff is largely pointless.
I bet Intel isnt happy about this.
Also another factor is that if you check a lot of DVD movies from the past 5 years is that many of them rarely come in at over 5GB.
A lot will fit on a single density DVD. Very few use the full 8-9GB of space available.
Many of my earlier DVDs in my collection would come it at around 7GB+.
I dont know why. Maybe to reduce the quality so Blu-ray would appeal more?
I love my Meridian gear.
Beacuse its pretty much impervious to tweaking. It just works as it should out of the box. You can just get on with listening to the music.
I used to hate it when a person would post so proudly that they had bought a new £2000 Naim CD player only then to be shot down by being told he had to buy the optional £500 power supply upgrade "to make it sound right!" Charming! Why not make it sound right to begin with?
Talk about treating customers with contempt. But enough of the loyalists swallowed it.
And as mentioned earlier, VanDamme cable is all thats needed really. If it's good enough for a lot of recording studios then its good enough at £2 a meter from my hi-fi too.
....if MS especially is going for a 4 year cycle with this console rather than a 8 year one.
Test the waters with a new approach and then deliver a new machine in a few years time aimed towards what succeeds.
Would both of them had gone so long had the downturn not happened in 2008?
So you don't think it was MS's plan knowing that chances are the cross platforms will be developed to the lowest spec machine all along, so make Sony push out a more powerful and therefore more expensive box and have them sell it at a lower cost to make them haemorrhage more cash?
I don't reckon there are many corks popping at Sony just yet.
...until the first major price drop.
Just too rich for my pocket right now.
...than to open up Task Manager to see a time intensive app using 25% across all four cores in 2013.
Ah yes you are right! Good to see the 'Consultancy Agencies' earning their money by copying all the others and stating the bleeding obvious.
Churnalism at it's best.
...last week...and the week before that.....
Can we have some new stories please?
1. To protect financial and state secrets etc. from espionage/criminal experts.
2. To stop the chap who nicked your laptop from looking at what's on it before he sells it in the pub carpark for £30.
I think most of us fall into the second category.
Adobe launch the .psdx format for those using the subscription version.
"Oh you cant open the files....you are on CS5?!"
I said we'd see some major U-turns.
Though it might also have been the fact the new EULA for the Xbox One used up 800MB of ram to store.
All good news I guess.
Also Mattrick looked a major dick throughout this whole affair. I predict he'll be announcing his 'moving on' soon?
Chances are if he did a brief spell in Swedish clink he may find his cell roomier and better than his room at the embassy.
Probably better internet access too.
I would agree with you if my customers who are largely domestic and small business were telling me they didn't want Windows 8. Customers really don't mind. That's my fact.
So far the only ones that have said they don't want 8 at this time are the ones running Sage. That's because Sage doesn't currently officially support it. That's fine because Sage can be a pig to get working on a supported platform at times.
So far my experience of real world customers are not anti 8. They really don't care. The big question is "will it be faster then my old machine?" Hmmm its a 1.7Ghz single core with a 40GB HDD. Yes I think so.
Downvotes because I dared cross the "You are not allowed to say you had a positive experience with Windows 8" picket line.
Well I struggle to agree at 2002. I see many single core laptops from around 2005 with 80GB 4200rpm HDDs and 512MB of ram in them and they are unusable compared to a simple C2D machine from just a few years later. Not worth upgrading either. Folks think those machines 'work just fine' but then sit them next to a modern dual core machine and you just see how much time is wasting.
I always mandate that a dual core machine should be given a second chance but a single core goes to the skip/recylce ASAP.
I agree to an extent of Office 2003 My copy of 2003? From my cold dead hands....
Well there is always the one in a million that actually likes/bothers to edit his home movies or the odd gamer. :-)
But yes for 90%+ of the worlds population the need to up the CPU ended some time ago.
Now replacing that HDD with a SSD that's another matter...
Yep, it's not hard for folks to get to grips with.
I just feel MS has brought in a few high up execs that are making the most heinous and basic of tech crimes -
The crime of making big assumptions.
For a while MS was pretty good at delivering what folks wanted and adapting to their needs (say around 2007 to 2011) but recently it's switched round to "this is what we think you need, if you don't like it then f**k off!"
Just look at the dick in charge of the Xbox One for example. Talk about customer empathy failure.
I can imagine that a lot of great stuff has been designed to prototype level but then stuffed in the archive due to potential pathetic/trivial patent/licensing conflicts.
Thinking back how many of these exact same articles have we seen on the Reg over the past 6 months?
Seems like we get one every two weeks with us all posting the same stuff running to 2-3 pages of comments and flames.
I just hope we are all using AdBlock if that's the case.
Yeah that's the reality I've found with introducing my customer to their new Windows 8 machines. It's really not a problem moving folks from XP to it. A few minutes of hand-holding (I still did that with folks moving to 7, Libraries anyone?) and they are good to go.
No one has asked to go back.
I think you got your thickness wrong too.
But your point is correct, the hardware for the lower end of the laptop market has to be kicked up the arse sooner rather than later.
If you look at the machines in the £350-£450 range from the usual suspects its no wonder no one is buying. I'm sure they can still make a compelling product in that price range especially if they expect to sell a shed load.
Yea people have all the PCs and laptops they need generally. They also tend to buy them as and when they need them. Not just wait till Xmas. If you laptop packs up you need a new one pretty quick, not wait for 4 months.
At Christmas last year most folks I knew were looking to buy tablets and smartphones to supplement the laptops and PCs they already had.
Yes the OS is irrelevant.
It's the fact that since 2007 or thereabouts folks just don't need to upgrade like they did.
If a customer comes to me with a old laptop that's got a dual core, 2GB of ram and a 160GB HDD and its in good condition I don't bother to tell them to buy a new one I just service it and tweak it and away they go. Probably good to go for another 2-3 years of Facebook use.
I wouldn't have said that to a customer in 2007 who came to me with a 2000 spec laptop.
I remember a time when I was upgrading my CPU every 4-6 months! Now its every 4-6 years. I can't be the only one doing this. This will have a knock on effect.
In fact a lot of the newer gear I'm buying these days is 'less powerful' than the stuff I bought a few years ago. Why? It uses less power but still get the job done.
It's the hardware that's the problem not the software. However, laptop manufacturers could pull their finger out to make the sub £500 laptop market a bit more interesting.
Or is it the fact that if most people switch to such low to zero support required machines all pushing to the cloud you and many others will be out of a job?
Yeah I love mine too. I've ditched my tablet and now use the Samsung Chromebook. If you are a big forum user then its just so much faster.
Managed to convert quite a few people that were going to buy a £500 tablet to get the £229 Samsung and so far no complaints.
Got a grand to spend then?
At this stage I'd rather pay £60.
I feel that becoming a politician is too much a leg up to a further career, social/corporate climbing type scenario.
Certainly in the UK I think a lot of newer MPs are only doing it as they see it as a stepping stone to greater glories and wealth. The fact that they have to hear from old Mrs Tompkins and her cats for 5-10 years is a small price to pay, especially if they can wrangle a senior cabinet position.
I think this is basically encouraging sociopaths to power rather than those that actually want to serve their country and it's people.
It's time that the role of politician was totally revised and all the responsibilities and perks that go with it. Essentially cutting off any potential social climbing (not being able to take up any directorship/consultancy roles with any company you may have had dealings with as an MP for at least 5 years after leaving office. Not being able to write about your time in office, stricter salary and expenses limits etc. etc.) and betterment.
Basically you do the job for the love of your country and to make it better.
Not to land some fabulous consultancy role or Directorship at BAe the day after you quit/get voted out.
Ah still haven't managed to find the Desktop yet then? ;-)
I thought that was the market group for 99% of games?? Always has been.
Indeed, apparently, Sony has let slip that all the DRM measures to enable the same or similar system as the Xbox One are there in the PS4.
It's just that they will let the developers choose to enable it or not. Hmmmmmm.
So we could well see it happen in the future.
I expect to see a few U-turns from both Sony and MS before Xmas.
Marjorie may have won the war...but she hasn't wont the battle!
Maybe they feel it's time to let it go.
I'm kind of in the same boat. I don't swap games or buy second hand stuff much so the DRM doesn't affect me at all. In fact in reality it probably wont affect as many folks as everyone is saying. But I am amazed at how complicated a company can make stuff.
MS seems to want to Apply Adobe's old upgrade/licensing methodology to all its products in basically confusing the hell out of them all.
MS really needs to look at all this feedback and essentially dump anything that a consumer would have to read at least twice to understand.
This is why since 2003 we go to Canada instead to spend our tourist dollars.
Last time we went Canadian Immigration got really concerned with us...because we said we were going to Whistler.
Yes they were worried we would be disappointed because they had had no snow there.
Why he's just the same as Bush before or Romney had he won. As I mentioned, Democrat or Republican, at their core they are the same corporate sponsored lapdogs.
Do you seriously think that if the Republicans get back into office next time they will be switching off all these systems? Like hell they will. I don't think you'll be seeing any great server bonfires around the country.
Plus I'm sure Obama inherited a lot of snooping systems from the previous administration.
Look at us here in the UK. Before the last election the Tories manifesto was very anti Labour's new IT snooping bill. But just a few weeks after they got into office it was all "Oh actually this looks a jolly useful idea!"
Whoever you vote for.....
Yes the US government system wasn't actually created to "get stuff done for the common man".
It was to keep power to the land owning/trading elite. Something it still does very well today. Basically Democrat or Republican, the corporate/1% agenda carries on regardless.
After all, what can the average American do? Come next election, vote Republican?
However, it is much the same in most western 'democracies' now. All the parties have been bought and paid for.
I really don't know how we can change it. It's rigged very heavily against us.
Yes always amazed at the change of policy from the IRA days to today.
Back then it was a day or two of outrage in the press then all back to normal. No one panicked, no one said we should live in fear, just carry on and ignore it as best you can.
I think that method was far more preferable. This is why I have always felt this change of policy has little to do with actually defending us from terrorists. It's more about legitimising snooping and restrictions on liberty for average citizens.
Odd that all during the Cold War we were kind of under the impression that our Governments felt the old Soviet way was the wrong way but probably in secret they were very envious of what the Soviet regime had created.
Malaria would decimate any on that list.
I've always said terrorists have never taken away any of my freedoms, just my government.
To be honest I reckon most of it is a smokescreen for building a huge monitoring network so the ruling corporations/financial institutions can do full profiling of us all to weed out those it wants to live/work/consume and those that can wither and die in the cold.
Oh indeed. Personally as a Brit that's had to sit and see folks from the US laugh at us for our UK Govt. announcing new monitoring initiatives I find this quite frankly hilarious.
Especially when the same folks covered their ears when I said they would be naive to think the same wasn't happening to them.
"They wouldn't dare cos we got ourselves a constitution, democracy and guns buddy!"
Yeah see how that worked out for you. Just as powerless as the rest of the world's citizens. At least mine had the decency and courage to let me know it was snooping.
Welcome to the real world!
Now we'll get loads of talk about "rising up and taking back our gubmint!" except nothing will happen as this is nowhere near as important an issue as the banning of 16oz sodas to the average American.
I had a Caterham delivered in boxes in 1997. Does that count?
Plus in my experience comparing a 45 minute PC build which only needs one screwdriver with building a car is a bit silly really.
Plus you can still buy an off the shelf tower unit that's far easier to fix.
If you buy a All-In-One just make sure you get that John Lewis 3 year warranty.
Yep that's the problem...people don't think about it. Like RoHs built kit is just so reliable these days, especially cheap laptop spec kit with the higher end Intel chips in cramped hot locations.
"Oh its stopped working!"
"Did we keep the box it came in?"
"How do we get the hard drive out?"
"Going to cost £500 to repair!"
I see these machines as a real liability. If you want a all in one then buy a mid-range laptop and take the hit. After all these machines are basically that laptop with a 27" screen thrown on it.
Plus the term mobile worker has changed a great deal over the past 5 years.
I don't class those that work at home as mobile. Nor those that answer the odd call whilst out on a fag break.
I used to work for a large multi-national and our mobile workforce (account managers/inspectors/investigators/engineers etc.) was probably less than 1%.
Wow 40% reduction in performance with encryption??!!
You might want to pay for someone to do that properly or change the encryption software.
I've fully encrypted quite a few laptops and the performance drop is negligible.
Certainly haven't seen a drop from 80MBps to 50MBps type thing. Maybe 80 to 78.
IIRC I wrote up that in a few years when you sit down at your 'hot desk' back in the office there will be a electric meter beside it wanting a 50p before you plug your laptop in.
Ahhh so you cant have one without the other then.
So the restriction is due to the depth/thickness of the phone.
Thanks for that Richard.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2018