Re: The Forbes article on this suit
<quote>If they were seeking to charge EVERYONE based on the value of the finished product (or a specific set of features) then it is non-discriminatory and as such is okay.
Under FRAND Apple would need to show that Qualcomm was seeking to disadvantage one supplier or the other. And I think more specifically FRAND has to do more with the "Terms" than the "Pricing" anyhow. That is, everyone should have to follow the same licence restrictions.</quote>
Hmmm, I'm pretty sure that charging more for a more expensive model in the same lineup of any brand would also count as discriminatory. I believe FRAND licensing is supposed to end up with pricing based upon the number of units of product you which to purchase rather than where in your product lineup it gets used.