It looks like they built a giant Dalek, sprayed some glue on it and pasted on some straw.
2939 posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
"I feel that at least I would have the ability to configure it as I wished and not have a Google/Apple/Windows backdoor."
If the mobile operators are pushing for it you can expect it's because they want to own the backdoor. And to lock you into their content source.
Don't expect anything better then Android, and quite possibly worse. If the operators put in enough money to get a say expect a T-Mobile app store, and an AT&T app store, and ... Forget updates it's time for a new phone and a new contract.
You will end up having to do that same thing you can already do with Android, root the phone and install a non-official ROM.
I bought my first "smart" phone this year, mostly because I needed to have mobile email for work. I had a Motorola Razor flip phone before that. I went for a Nexus 4 as the least crapped up phone available.
That seems to be more or less standard. Same for privacy policies as well. They have pages of stuff that all seems reasonable and well defined but some place in the middle will be a vague bit they can read anyway they want.
The result is...
Bla bla bla you can't do anything we don't like. Bla bla bla we can do anything we want.
"will now be able to access, view, and edit Word, Excel and PowerPoint documents"
I already can, on my Nexus 7 too. And it's free/cheap for a variety of apps that can open office docs.
Maybe this will work better for round trip, but so far I have not been desperate enough to need to edit something on my phone/tablet. It is handy to be able to read one though, but don't need 365 to do it.
What next? With Microsoft Skype people will now be able to make calls on their Android phones...
They could have saved all that if they had taken the "start screen" out back and shot it when everyone but the yes men told them it sucked back on the technology eval release, the beta release, the RC and the final...
They are still trying to pretend it's great, it's all the customers fault because they don't understand.
You know I've seen a few cars with built in GPS and a stand alone GPS stuck on the dash because the latest update for the built in unit were too old and out of date. Also cars with factory sound systems with Apple docs, only to have Apple change something. I had to update my 71 MGB to run on unleaded fuel too.
The problem with "smart" TV is you know you will be lucky to get updates 5 minutes after a new model is released. Chances are you will have the TV years after they added any updates to the smart stuff. Only idiots with too much money are going to buy a new TV every 3 years.
While it's the same for a media player (my original WD TV box is mostly useless now) it's a LOT less to replace a media player then a TV. Chromecast is even cheaper, if they add a few more features it will be much better then paying extra for a smart TV.
When Chromecast v2 comes out, not a big deal to upgrade and keep your current TV.
The $18 was poking fun at the original poster.
But this is a civil suit, the idea that someone who is at best a moderately successful artist lost $18 million between what they paid her, and what she thinks she would have received if they had not keep selling her catalogue seems silly/unlikely. Just because the record label have been able to stick a ludicrous value on an MP3 is no reason for this.
Could she even cancel the contract? Did she sign a 20 year contract and then wish she didn't but they said too bad? Why would they keep selling the catalogue if the contract was cancelled?
If millions of people liked the song, and she was able to cancel the deal 8 years ago and they keep selling it, then maybe $18 million would be ok.
""a version of Word that's only liscensed for private use"
Really? It does ring a bell, but a reference would be most welcome (for amusement purposes if nothing else)."
It was widely reported at the time...
Here you go.
No, it is a bad product. I have one, got it for free but I carry a Nexus 7 with me that I paid for.
MS thought they could be Apple (this seems to be the major problem for the last couple years) and sell direct and keep all the money. When that didn't work out (there is one of their booths in the mall next to where I work, I've never seen them sell anything) they tried to get other stores to sell them. They still didn't sell (I'm SHOCKED it tell you SHOCKED!) so now MS is going to have dedicated store in a store in Futureshop/Best Buy so they can not-sell Windows 8 stuff. If it was any good they would not have a problem getting stores to stock them.
There are no hordes of people that wanted a surface, if only they could find one.
I have the current 16 GB model, and I'll have to wait for it to show up in Canada anyway, but...
Will it work with the old docing station?
It has slimport like the nexus 4 (not that useful to me) but will it have USB2go (Old Nexus 7 has it, 4 didn't)
Not sure if it's worth upgrading yet.
It's the whole house. The adults can't access stuff they might need for work, or just want to see, so they turn it off. Now no protection for little Jonny.
Much better to put a filter on little Jonny's computer. For a 5 year old as simple as using a safe DNS service.
It's not fit for purpose. Unless the purpose is to make points with the Think of the Children crowd.
"the majority of internet users who don't know one end of a CAT5 from the other"
Maybe because there is no difference?
"A surprising number of parents simply assume the internet is already filtered"
"but the technically illiterate wouldn't know to select it"
Everyone, please think of the stupid people.
If someone is THAT technically illiterate their web browser window is going to be 1/2" after you add all the toolbars.
" so by forcing everyone to make a decision the new scheme will force those who opt out to think about what they're doing."
Opt in is just as much "forcing everyone to make a decision" as opt out. Think about what your doing? As in do you want to be on the I'm a pervert sicko list?
So "think of the children" is not enough. Now it's "think of the children of stupid people".
And as others have said... The devil in the detail
We have "smart" electric meters, and they use them to charge you almost double when you need power. It's not as bad for the summer rates, but winter you pay peak rate when you get up for work, and get home for dinner.
But now they have given us "smart" water meters. I don't get the idea for that as it's easy to store water so there is no advantage to shifting the time of day you flush. They were only reading the old meter about once a year, with then just sending a post card in the post to report my own reading the rest of the year. It's battery powered and they claim it's good for 15 years. The notice about installing the meter came with a nasty note about court orders if you tried to refuse the new meter.
They trying to get us to buy the new stuff they want to sell by pushing the stuff that sells under a bus.
Want to sell phones? Stuff not-metro on PCs and even servers. When people tell you it's crap, add more colours, animated backgrounds, but don't let them kill the phone interface.
Want to shift people (who keep skipping upgrades) over to pay for life 365? Cripple the licence for boxed office software.
They were hitting off shore with this app kill. Much like the US when they took the domains of poker sites, or grabbed people passing through the US who ran off shore poker sites. Expect any filter system they push through to protect people from gambling sites too.
If they can make off shore sites a bit harder to access, then they hope at least some of the money will end up being lost at local scams instead of going to over seas scams.
Maybe MS were just trying to force things.
You know the lower life forms pushing fake pills and such will ignore it anyway. Most of the rest will do their best to weasel out of it (see their definition of DNT). They will say they didn't track you... they followed you, totally different (in the same way that an "email blast" is totally different then sending a load of spam).
You just have to see who is the first to say "hell no, we are going to do it anyway".
As long as secret gag orders and the secret court still exist I have to assume that there is a new order that tells them to release a few requests that did turn out to relate to crime, and say that's all of it. Don't talk about all the big fishing trips, or direct access to networks...
Yelling Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain, is not working.
"There never was any subsidy. Only installment payment."
The big Canadian providers sort of give you a subsidy. You can be sure they pay for the phone during the contract, but the price says the same after the contract. If you sign up for another contract they will give you a $50 credit or "free" voice mail for 3 months. Have your own phone? Same price. They say you might as well take the free phone because you are going to pay the same anyway.
You have to go to one of the smaller providers to get a deal if you have your own phone.
They are starting off trying to deceive.
You can get good non-Apple (or other) chargers. Like the Monoprice one. I have bought several things from them including doc cables for my iPod that were just as well made as the Apple part but FAR cheaper, not much more then the dollar store cable that fell apart taking it out of the package.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019