Audio
Could this insulate my house, so I can listen to White Zombie even louder but not frighten the neighbours?
766 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
will also repair the financial bust, pay your mortgage, increase macro-economic efficiency, lower factor costs across the board, enable sustained manufacturing output at better than 100% of capacity, cause NORK nuke tests to fail, comprehensively trounce Linux, change Torsvalds' mind, bring the USA Republican party back into contact with earth and reality, induce the PRC to actually be democratic, bring peace to Iraq, bring peace in Palestine, remind Likud and it's far right partners that land promises emitted by burning bushes are not admisable in court, cause such a melting of the hearts of Bush & Blair that both will hand themselves over to the UN war crimes tribunal, eliminate corruption globally, and help you achieve orgasm every time.
No better than 50% they find the Higgs boson. If they don't it is a disaster for everything after the standard model, and also for Big Physics. There is a real story here concerning the current state of physics, the past 30-odd years of same and what happens if the LHC does not produce the desired goods.
You wankers have nothing better to do than jerk off with HL alternate story lines? You might as well be wanking on string theory - at least there are an infinite number of them, whereas HL has a limited number of story forks.
And, except for my post, what the fuck does Mary Whitehouse have to do with anything here?
Rackable bought two things with SGI: the name and some very nifty common address space across multiple box tech. I dunno if the common address space stuff will sell (you know IBM Power racks do make much of it) but 'SGI' the name carries some weight. There is a lot of respect in at least the grey beard set for SGI. I'm not a grey beard but my last sysadmin job - they had dozens of 15 year old SGI boxes still running nicely. How many top 5 x86 pizza box vendors can make that claim? HP clusters where I work are given no more than 5 years to replacement, as much for failure rate as new hardware available.
SGI minis and mains had system bus bandwidth like few other architectures, and SGI sold shared-memory-multiple-box systems built on the bandwidth ... 64+ cpu with common address space was *not* in the same market as the PC but that was SGI's bread and butter. Comparing SGI product to PCs is like comparing IBM minis to PCs - SGI was primarily a mini & mainframe player, not a desktop player.
That said the company never seemed to be able to escape it's industrial scale graphics persona. SGI boxes were well used for dbms and the like: the bus was a killer, but SGI failed to get much buy in once it had to venture outside the 'graphics' arena.
Are you thinking mostly about O2 & co, not the big stuff SGI made?
Just imagine if Blair & Bush had had fully automated military and police forces in 2002! Nobody would even know there was an Iraq war, the tortured and mutilated bodies would still be piling up in Abu Graib, Iran would have been invaded (because well, wtf, why not?, it's not like it would kill brits or yanks) as would Syria, N.Korea, Canada (for letting the 9/11 terrorists in, ahem), and so on.
Call me a luddite, I just don't trust politicians with this much direct power.
I bought an eeepc 1000HA last winter. It came with Windows XP Home edition on it.
XP Home cannot participate in domains. Yet, when looked at the services control panel all the MS NetBIOS networking bits and pieces were turned on anyway, wasting RAM and presumably some CPU cycles.
So I wiped the disk and installed Fedora 10. I am happier now.
Good day.
Nothing is wrong with borrowing good ideas from other products. I don't know who really invented, say, drop down menus, but they are undeniably a good idea and adopted by everyone.
WRT FF: Office 10 has no traditional drop down menus, just some sort of strange big button. Everyone at work who uses Office hates this - it is a bad idea in that it obscures the menu driven commands. Now, some people in Mozilla are saying FF must adopt Office's weird one-big-button menu scheme, which seems more like slavish imitation than considered borrowing.
I note also KDE 4.x which seems for all the world to want to look and work just like Vista. There was nothing wrong with the 3.5 UI - it works very well. Yet KDE 4 was released with most functionality missing, but by God it was shiny and looked a lot like Vista!
Gnome is plainly a knock-off of MacOS UI.
It does seem that the UI people in a lot of OO projects have no more ideas than those they find inside shiny boxes from MS and Apple, and have a powerful need to copy those ideas regardless of whether or not they are good ideas.
Seriously.
Java = slow but runs anywhere there's a Java runtime. Oh, wait.
Python = runs anywhere there's a Python runtime. Oh, wait.
Assembler = you think C++ is too much for normal people?
Smalltalk & spawn = you are mad.
How many Python & Java runtimes/interpretters, and how many assemblers, are written in their native lang? Most of theme are written in C or C++!
C++ is a fine programming language. So is C. The reason they are still around is that they are fine languages. Programmers make mistakes while coding in all languages, it's not the fault of the language.
Entirely aside: IMNSHO, if you can't handle pointers and addresses and reference variables, then there was something lacking in your education. Memory addresses are fundamental to computers.
Well, for one thing, a lot of disenfranchised USA right wing culture warriors seem to have shown up. You know the type: got a problem that needs thought or analysis - n/p just claim it is a gov't plot backed by the people not on the right wing of the political spectrum, add a little hate and a lot of contempt for differing views; problem solved!
L/R politics being a spectrum, there is no centre as such - if you're more right than me then I'm more left than you. Despite that we might both be to the right of Attila the Hun.
All of which makes an interesting book in this connection 'The Origins of Totalitarianism' written by Hannah Arendt.
You should have said 'As an ignorant person of Jewish decent...'.
[West] Germany has, since not very long after the end of WWII, taught the truth in it's schools about what the Nazis did, about 6 million murdered Jews, and the other forgotten 6 million: mixed communists, gays, Roma, persons with disabilities, others.
What Germany also did was ban the Nazi party, and it's iconography. The salute is a bit of Nazi iconography, yes?
I recommend you pick up some books and read the history of West Germany from the period 1945 to, say, unification with East Germany. Then you will be less ignorant.
I mostly agree with your points in your last post above, but I am curious: what is a "small bear brain"?
Other thing: back in the day Novell had a product call Zen Works. Among other things it could be used to deliver apps to the desktop. It did not run installers on the target machines, rather it copied files and registry settings based on before and after snapshots of an exemplar machine. I used it to install all kinds of odd ball crap that did not have anything like SMS compatible packaging. This approach could roll out FF with preset settings. I do understand that FF does not really support the user profile or machine profile scheme that underlies central admin in Windows networks. To the degree that FF uses the registry, further registry updates via Zen could be used to control FF (though in truth I don't know how much FF does use the registry). Just saying there are other ways to skin the cat.
I must say, I have not done Windows sysadmin in 8 years - so if SMS is no longer around I hope you will be tolerant. I'd not at all be surprised to find out Novell had deep sixed Zen - that company has ever been skilled at shooting itself in the foot.
Well, all I really care to says is this: (1) if you (AC) arrogate defining what the debate is about then you can use that to make anyone's point that you disagree with irrelevant; (2) granted many people here are talking about roll-outs, packaging and the like, doesn't mean I can't say something about web app compatibility - for which see my first post on this thread, my case in point was a follow-up to my initial post.
Have a nice day, and do try to engage with people who do not see things all your way - it will broaden your mind, ans this is something you would likely benefit from.
The point of my case in point is that the end users will call support and they don't care or perhaps even know that Flash and FF are really two different products. Support still has to deal with it. Obviously State is not talking about running Linux, but my example still illustrates that a new browser may have issues, and support still has to deal with them.
As for dismissing my example: I work in a Linux shop - several hundred people using Linux on the desktop. Don't tell me that Flash/FF just *did* work properly for me, I clearly observed that it did not. But... I never have problems with YouTube or Google video on the very same machine. I suspect you will now dismiss me as a luser - but the fact remains that support in State would still have to deal with the problem.
The cost of using a piece of software is not just the price of a license: it is also the cost of supporting it and verifying your apps will work with it. You have to pay the techs and sysadmins to support it and you have to qualify your existing systems to run on it. If you are an IE shop then you must account for the time and therefore cost of training your techs on FF.
So, sure the browser is free, but implementing it is not. If State has in house web apps designed for IE then in all likelyhood those apps must be modified to work properly on Firefox. This is because IE and FF do some things differently - ever try writing cross browser CSS and DOM-scripted apps? There are lots of pitfalls in the differences of implementation between the two browsers - and since State has never used FF you can take it as given that it's web apps need some changes for FF. If some web app craps out on a shiny new FF roll-out you still have to pay people to fix the web app - that takes time and money, probably at overtime rates.
If you have a small shop, then switching, or supporting both browsers, may be pretty simple. The bigger an organization gets the more work is involved in this kind of thing. State is a very big organization!
This stuff is obvious to anyone who's worked as a LAN admin, sysadmin, network manager, CIO, what-have-you. It may not be obvious to people running small shops or to home users.
I'm using FF 3.5 on Fedora Linux and I do have Flash installed correctly.
The video noted in the article refuses to run!
Now then, Scott 7, I suppose if you were State's CIO you would fix that for me and the rest of State single handedly and at no charge, wouldn't you? You'd work over night if required too.
No, I thought not.
I'm not normally one for poking at the reporters, but...
That cats do stuff like this was reported in a new study some, IIRC, ten years ago. Cats mimic the sounds of new born babies when they want something from people. It was reported widely as a 'funny science story' on TV news and also in newspapers.
I'm not suggesting that we need to "tighten the purse strings on those wastrel boffins", but anybody who watches or knows scientists ('specially those in the soft sciences) knows that publishing a cute puffball paper - that recaps existing knowledge - often counts for as much as publishing doing original research.
Could a physicist get away with publishing new research that establishes, oh, I dunno, that light has both a wave and particle nature? Or a mathematician publishing new research that shows that, surprise, lines can only be locally parallel in non-euclidean geometries?
How come journalists can?