"Does anyone still think we're alone?"
You fool! God's clearly up there! :-)
3215 posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
"Does anyone still think we're alone?"
You fool! God's clearly up there! :-)
Yeah, but it's largely pointless on the minituarised screens embedded in their watches
Not just you, hence my reply. Though would suggest OP makes sarcasm a bit more obvious if that was the case... unless they genuinely thought Apple were supplying a 500MB drive?
But little hint, if you set out to pedantic, make sure you're also correct - for example, what's a "500mb" drive? Would that be a milli-bit? Meaning the disk can only store 500 milli-bits, meaning 0.5 bits? How would that work then? Stretch it further to question if it's a milli-barn if you like..
"Where does Apple find 500mb hard drives? And, why bother."
Because it's a 2.5" disk, and that's quite a popular capacity for that form factor?
"Fortunately, the company said it will give affected customers free downloadable content, with instant access to all Rocksmith mini-games, by way of an apology."
Cue people unaffected scratching off their activation codes, claiming they didn't get one, getting a fresh activation code to give to their friend AND a bonus of DLC and the mini-games. Result!
"Astronomers have spotted a supersonic cosmic jet blasting two million light years from the centre of a distant galaxy's supermassive black hole."
"“Like The Pirate Bay, these websites are profiting illegally from distributing music that isn’t theirs, without permission and without paying a penny to the musicians, writers and producers who created it,"
Are they just allowed to outright lie these days? Not sure where they're profitting from it, but it's certainly not through distributing music.
"Of course, because the greenhouse gasses are still building up, it takes more and more ice each time, thus solving the problem once and for all."
"ONCE AND FOR ALL!!"
Be even odder if it did have a 1080p camera, given it can't playback those files!
"But the iPhone4 average UK TCO was well over £1000 at launch.....(yes you paid less cos your amazing, but almost everyone didn't)"
Google "TCO smartphone". You'll find that most smartphones (including iPhones) have a similar TCO according to analysis. iPhones may seem to be premium but as already pointed out, hold their value at the end, which gets taken into the TCO calculation.
"Their annual upgrade & expansion costs are in the region of £550M. Spending £10M on one piece of kit that has caused two big outages (and maybe causing internal headaches) plus a massive dent in customer (and investor) confidence is a reasonable business decision."
Yes, now it's a reasonable decision - but the OP was suggesting replacing it after ONE incident.
Also, be under no illusions this is one piece of kit - it'll be one system.
"why do you need to call it an 'exoplanet'?"
Maybe it used to be an Irish planet? Previously it was an O'Planet, now it's an ex-O'Planet...
Orion - the local galactic arm? The nebula? The constellation? The space craft? The nuclear propulsion project?
You'd think with all the words we have available to us, we wouldn't have to be overlapping so massively in space-faring term :-)
@Cam2A - yes but the post above (big ted's, which I suspect they were trying to reply to) did.
"But definitely a reason to not buy anything they produce until they get a positive report that all the problems are sorted and the workers are happy with conditions etc."
Or an Xbox... or a PS3... or a Wii... or a Kindle... Or... Or... the list goes on.
I believe it's limited to geolocated IP addresses, same way as iPlayer works. Requires a bit of VPN to work.
Don't think it's been declared an official record yet. I suspect that's because they're mulling over whether they have to do the usual speed record thing of asking him to repeat the feat in the opposite direction...
I did wonder this, seems a bit draconian that the system as it's described can assume agreement from a driver to pay just by driving onto a piece of land that may or may not be clearly identified as a paid car park. Are there even barriers involved here? I assume if I pass a barrier, I'm probably going to be paying something, but I also assume there will be a space for me.
And don't get me started on the multitude of airports that are now charging a quid just to pick up or drop someone off..
"Still, all of us EU citizens now have 1/503,492,041th of a Nobel Peace Prize. Let's raise a glass to that"
Yup, in yo' *face*, Rest Of World! Haven't felt this proud since I won Time Person of the Year back in 2006 :-D
My CRT TV has a weird after-glow when I switch it off, help! :-)
You're right, we should probably write off an entire product line whenever we find a fault in specific instances.
I'm no fanboy one way or the other, but sheesh!
No one is saying it's a backup strategy, but yes it's true that HDs tend (granted, not always) to signal their failure (SMART indicators for a start, physical signs of death like clicking) allowing you to get most data off it if you haven't already and total failure of disks still generally allows for some element of recovery at specialist labs (again, not cheap, but possible).
SSDs on the other hand tend *not* to signal their failure in advance and the options for recovery once they do are a lot more limited.
Was just thinking that, I'm pretty sure a large number of people (including me) were realising just how cheap the external disks were in PC World compared to internal drives via the usual channels. Made for a nice change at least. Probably part of the reason they were also sticking up signs limiting 2 per customer.
On a non-IT related note, coconut milk went through a similar supply shortage.
So play with the numbers however suits you best - it's a lighthearted calculation based on a google fubar. Reduce the radius by x and increase the mass by y, where xy=10^6, as already explained.
"Maybe I'm missing something obvious but if the escape velocity has increased 1,000 fold along with the gravity, how exactly has the radius shrunk?"
Because escape velocity is calculated using both the mass and the radius of the earth, specifically it's sqrt(2GM/r). So to achieve the thousand fold increase, you can either keep the mass or radius constant and change the other by a factor of 1,000,000 (Mass up by this value, or radius down by this value), which if you read the rest of the article, they do both these options.
Or you can play and get a variety of options. You could put mass up by 1,000 and radius down by 1,000 and achieve the same result. Or any other factors of 1,000,000 (m up by 2, radius down by 500,000
What's more insane is the suggestion to downgrade to the older version, 15.0.1??
You know there are more to staff costs than salary, right?
"If any of our readers would like to test this, please share your results in the comments below. Ah, go on…"
Sadly the comments for this page will probably close before any reader experiments could conclude
"Few would argue that the film deserves its legendary status."
Can't tell if you've phrased this badly or are saying it doesn't deserve legendary status? I'd be ony of many to argue that the film deserves its legendary status.
If that was the first and only picture they'd taken with that camera, then sure. But it's not.
Rather pointless comparison, but no, I don't think that article asked for your sympathy anywhere. Merely reported on the remuneration packages of the top brass at an IT company, generally seen as a view of how well or badly a company is doing currently.
"But who tracks the trackers?"
"I dunno, coastguard?" - Homer J Simpson
Agreed - suspect Orbcomm would have known the risk parameters when they signed up to be an additional customer on that flight. From reading the article it appears it technically could have placed the sat in orbit but due to ISS constraints it wasn't allowed, Orbcomm would have known that this sort of variance was possible.
More specifically, it's nine times more likely to suffer *an* engine failure (and even then, not quite), but certainly not nine times more likely to fail entirely.
"It is doubtful that 'we' are in the centre of the universe (contrary to many religious credos) but it is remotely possible. So yes, space is mind boggling big, probably even bigger!"
As I understood it, we *are* in the centre, but so is everything else, only because to have a centre, you need to define an edge.
Easiest way to consider it is to think of yourself on the surface of the earth - are you in the middle of its surface? Is anyone?
Raises an interesting point, you would say "trundled across the Earth for six days", so why not "the Mars"? I reckon that technically it's correct - though doesn't scan easily... yet
Just be relieved they haven't started Instagramming the pictures...
re: the "bullshit" a/c comment. I didn't say you couldn't uninstall IE8, just that it was a convoluted process:
I recall a time when MS claimed that IE was embedded so deeply into XP that it was intrinsically linked with the OS. As I understand it, even today just having IE installed can leave the OS open to intrusion regardless of whether you use a different browser.
To remedy, just try and uninstall IE8 from an XP installation. Note that you'll have to uninstall SP3 first, then remove IE8, then reinstall SP3. Easy!
Buy it from another supplier then - mine took a week in the giddy days of the month-long waiting lists. Granted it's now sitting here on a desk with nothing to do yet...
OK, I'll bite. Overclocking works because the manufacturer of the chip has tested it for the highest guaranteed clock. They err massively on the side of caution in the majority of the times, and so there is always room for overhead. The tolerances involved in the manufacturing process means there is always a safe overhead (they won't build a chip that *just* operates inside the clock frequency, as a minor glitch could make it go wrong) so it's a case of figuring out where that overhead reaches you. It's trivial to find too, run soak tests until it goes wrong. Pretty much every CPU will find 10% margin and that's without tweaking voltage levels.
Where are you finding a faster system than a Pi in that price range and that form factor then?
A hologram of your former crewmate, a creature who evolved from the ship's cat, some Scutters and a talking toaster.
I did see the article and think "oh, it's Wednesday, must be re-tune time..."
Erm, if true, you'd think they'd have mentioned it in the keynote.
Jelly Bean was tuned towards these benchmarks? Hardly unheard of in the computing industry.
"So much to do at Cartmanland, but you... can't... come (especially you, Stan and Kyle)"
"In engineering vise iPhones have been just piece of crap, except on UI design and in mechanical terms"
Erm, what other engineering is relevant to a phone exactly?...
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017