Re: Wrong security model @DAM
Upvoted for all but "... some people are okay for paying taxes for which they get shit healthcare and large mansions for parliamentarians."
First, I don't know what "shit healthcare" you are talking about, but if you mean access to GPs* (especially in England and Wales), then blame the recent successive Ministers for Heath, who have deliberately made the system worse for their own reasons. Also, you need to address the attitude in the medical profession - being a GP is, for some reason I cannot understand, a second-class option**.
Secondly, what other funding scheme do you want? From previous postings you seem to very much in love with the Libertarian "all taxes are evil; the free market will sort it all out" model. Since it can easily be empirically shown that such a system (such as the USA's clusterfuck of a healthcare "system") is a guaranteed way to drag down public health to third-world country (hence not tax-funded either) levels, then what system do you propose, and why?
OK - off-topic, but you brought your opinions about sensible heath-care funding into this :-) So, sort-of on topic: I don't understand computer gaming. The most complicated game I ever play on the computer is Spider Solitaire, but the Kerbal Space Mission thing that some folks have mentioned on rocketry threads here looks interesting, but I can't see a case for spending money on time-wasting stuff for the computer - it's a tool. However, I am certainly all for people having control of the things they own, so good on fail0verflow for working on this.
* I'm assuming this is is the case because, overall, hospital care is of a very high standard in the whole of the UK. Outpatients' services and A&E are creaking a bit, but this is due to the problems listed above, which come down to government policy decisions over the last 35 years. Paying out of your pocket wouldn't make them any better (how many private A&E/outpatient services do you know of? Very few, because there is no money in it.)
** On the whole, if I was starting yet another career and decided to go into medicine, I'd be quite happy to consider being a GP. I don't see their work-load as being particularly onerous compared to hospital doctors, and their pay is at least on a par with hospital doctors of the same experience. The relevant factors - for me - would be the differences in team-working (to this day I still miss the team-work experienced when I was a nurse), and whether generalisation would suit me better than specialisation. However, ask a proto-doctor what they want to be when they grow up, almost none say "GP", and this is strengthened throughout their training. If we want to increase the number of GPs (whatever the payment method), we need to address the culture in medical schools.