Re: I've said it before and I'll say it again...
Quality :)
3110 publicly visible posts • joined 9 Jun 2009
Pretty soon it all stacks up.
.. which makes the abysmal state of their security (OPM being a very important case in point) all the more inexcusable.
Here in Norway the Army is testing it for use by tank drivers...
http://www.tujobs.com/news/238400-see-the-norwegian-armed-forces-driving-with-oculus-rift
Sure, they may still look silly, but... would you say that to someone driving an armored vehicle?
Oh sure, but only after I paintball the cameras :)
I've seen no mention of it for ages.
Ah, do not despair! :)
The changes to the code that brought you LO v5 are apparently in preparation for that. I quote from their features list:
LibreOffice 5.0 is the corner stone of our mobile clients on Android and Ubuntu Touch as well as our upcoming cloud version. It is also the first version to come in 64 bits for Windows. As such LibreOffice 5 serves as the foundation of our current developments and is a great plaftorm to extend, innovate and collaborate with!
I'm personally not so keen on the idea, but I can see it being useful in many situations. It helps that they also managed to reduce the code base. Maybe I'm biased, but this new version feels snappier than v4 so I think the upgrade was worth it.
What's any of this got to do with Annie Lennox?
I think it's more Nine Inch Nails (yes, I know it's originally by David Bowie, I just like this version better :) ).
THAT, my dear friends ... would be a film worth watching. Let's be honest here, it would be a damn sight more interesting than yet another Marvel film.
Being Hollywood and all, tens of tons of money would roll in, thus paying for both legal teams, and Universal would still post a "loss" on the venture.
Ah, but the sheer irony of seeing that film being pirated would be worth it on its own :)
Better to home in on the control signal...
You reminded me of a recent Dilbert :)
That would still be a useful approach if their fixes indeed addressed vulnerabilities. As far as I can tell their fixes simply open up holes elsewhere - a bit like digging a hole to fill another one.
It makes you wonder what sort of approach to coding makes you end up with a game of security whack-a-mole.
Unless, of course, the original intention was indeed to code a game of whack-a-mole :)
I think you should have linked to the twats page. If enough people do, they might start to understand...
I like the idea of filling up their logfiles with choice insults, but I think they have spent more money on lawyers than on technology (as the article indicated). It is not a given that anyone will EVER look at the 404 logs..
Having digital art equipment reviewed by non-artists is about as useful as someone who can't drive reviewing a car after sitting in the driver seat, wiggling the wheel a bit and shouting "Vroom! Vroom!"
Love the analogy :).
I think YMMV - artists that need precision won't go near these products, sure, but I can see artists that spend their time sketching out basic ideas (or work with coarser strokes) jump at the chance of having something portable that doesn't cost the amounts that Wacom wants (let's face it, you've bought a second PC at their prices), yet has enough functionality to rough something out.
Anyone in the audience who professes to being an artist? (not me, I don't even feature in amateur league when it comes to freehand drawing anything more than stick figures :) ).
Can someone tell banks and places like TP Online
With a bit of luck the lawyers will wake up to the problem of liability through negligence. By formally declaring SSLv3 dead and buried, and by refusing any connections from the grave there is no credible argument that anyone still relying on this code is doing anything at all for security.
This means that when problems appear it's not just consequential liability, it is also likely to attract regulatory fines as well. Personally, I think the way to fix this is to make banker bonuses payable to any victims - I reckon it would turn the City into a powerhouse of cybersecurity in, umm, a week, tops :)
And yet copyright is now death plus 70 and no doubt Disney or some large corporation will achieve perpetual copyright at some point.
Maybe not copyright rights, but rights to free use of your images into perpetuity is already standard fare in Google's Terms & Conditions. OK, they do their level best to avoid using the word perpetuity (just in case someone actually reads it), but just read it for yourself - it's not hard to find. I think it probably is with Facebook as well, but I don't use it...
5 years to prepare a 76 page document that any decent developer could have written in a few days...
It's a classic not-invented-here as well: the right answer to that has been around since 1995, but hey, that came from a British standard :)
I think Swift's main attraction is that it's one platform to bind them all :).
I suspect the cunning plan is that by bringing Swift into Open Source, Apple ends up with more people feeling capable of developing applications for iOS and OSX, but being able to code doesn't immediately imply an ability to make it user friendly.
It'll be interesting to watch what happens. Apple tends to be less into public beta testing so I don't think it's a big risk for coders to invest time in Swift (it's not going to disappear overnight), but what interests me is how quickly they will adjust any issues or add missing features. Apple has never struck me at being terribly good at communicating (and by that I mean two-way, not marketing :) ), and Open Source only really works with bidirectional engagement.
What would make it really interesting is if an Android SDK emerged from a 3rd party, which is possible if it's really Open Source. I don't think it would harm Apple much, but their reaction would be worth watching.
So blame the developer of the music app and tell they if they don't correct this you'll find a different app
Umm, no, this is actually an iOS message. It's a shorter form of "as we get a share of revenue, it is our duty to remind you that you have disabled the last vestige of overcharging mobile vendors have when you're abroad". That message would just be too long to put on a screen, hence the shorter form. :)
I like iOS in general, but that doesn't mean it's perfect. This is a good example of one of those nuisances you have to put up with when travelling.
Simply make it mandatory that management and whoever designed the thing have to use them - no escape, no excuses and no alternative options like shopping at the competition who were smarter by avoiding the idea altogether. Either this results in things that are actually usable by normal human beings, or it'll cause a premature abort of the project whilst still in the testing phase.
It's actually an approach that could work on many levels. I suspect if they forced the Microsoft coders who came up with the ribbon interface to actually use it it would have never gotten past the planning phase, ditto for Vista and TIFKAM.
What sucks is to have that kind of tech but also having to run along beside it pushing a cart with your mate on it so he can film it from a good angle. Of course the stop at the end sucks even more for your mate if you slip and fall.
Yes, that surprised me too. I would have expected a segway, a tracking drone (maybe they couldn't get one that wasn't armed:) ) or even another robot..
Love the article. I have experimented with remote control things, and the first pain with a smartphone is that you will always have it locked to prevent it from inadvertently dialing someone, so before you can use it you have to unlock it.
Then you have to start the app. Which needs to connect, which again takes a while. At which point you discover it's clung on to some public or FON access point name so it's not even on your own network, and by the time you have fixed that its battery has finally run out because it's the end of the day.
I'll stick with normal switches. Just because you CAN remote control things doesn't mean you actually have to. It also ensure I still occasionally physically see the devices I use..
Lovely writeup, especially the summation
It requires yet more surface space (when will someone create an internet-connected table to hold all your IoT products?)
It does things that other products in your home already do but not as well and at a much higher cost
It connects to other IoT products for no discernible reason and with no practical outcome
It provides wonderful sounding but ludicrously unlikely scenarios where your life will be improved
It has its own phone app
It's been given over $1m in funding by people who should know better
I really want an article upvote button :)
Although, given all this metadata analysis which the spooks seem so fond of, you'd have thought it not beyond the wit of man for a telco to observe that a particular trunk subscriber makes a vast majority of outgoing calls, most of which last only seconds, and has very little downtime
Now there is an amendment to the Patriot Act that would get popular support, or call it the USA Freedom from Robocalls Act (UFRA). Given that its tentacles are global it would also nullify the idea of hiding across the border.
All we need is a plausible connection between robocalling and terrorism. Anyone? :)
Well, you can still buy ink, fountain pens and paper :)
No, your option is a simpler one. Inform yourself of all the factors that matter to you and then make a choice that fits YOU. This is why interoperability is so great: for everything you do, you choose the gear that fits your needs, budget and risk profile.
This means you build a backbone focused on interoperability and then plug in whatever you need. I personally also prefer to use IMPA/SMTP/CalDAV and CardDAV rather than Exchange but for some that is a bridge too far. Your accountants like Excel on Windows? Fine, but make sure they save in .xls (not .xlsx - avoid the "x" formats as the bubonic plague they are).
Your designers are far more efficient on Macs? Fine - that is quite happy talking all manner of RFCs including SMB, and off you go. A bit of platform diversity also protects you from a complete cascade meltdown when another ILoveYou virus lands, or when someone codes an effective drive-by virus for a Mac or Linux box (that it hasn't been done yet is no guarantee of the future).
Want to go Open Source all the way (even if not entirely Free)? No problem - your backbone will support it.
Even before Sir Berners-Lee defined the URL idea we were already working on interoperability (which was easy then as most of it was Unix based). It's one of the most valuable features of the Net - make sure you keep that feature alive.
And on some cars, but probably not modern ones, turning the engine off by key could cause the steering lock to engage. Not a good thing in a moving car
I think that only happens when you actually pull out the key - just turning it to an "off" position will not cause the steering lock to engage. That is, in the cars that I have used, I don't know if this applies to all makes but it strikes me as a sensible safety measure.
No biggy, remember, METADATA can't stop bombings at marathons, can't lead to the revelation of another person, contains nothing personal about you!!
Yup, we definitely need a <sarcasm> tag, but just on the off chance you meant it, the obligatory link to a remark made by someone in public about meta data. Note that there was no indication he didn't mean what he said, and he's in a position to know.