Re: Er, seemsd to have missed....
Garmin Descent is £1000 or £1300 if you want the cock-watch metal strap.
They've found that niche by going after rich wannabe divers. So a specialism in the sea of generics.
730 posts • joined 21 Mar 2009
Garmin Descent is £1000 or £1300 if you want the cock-watch metal strap.
They've found that niche by going after rich wannabe divers. So a specialism in the sea of generics.
Some nice features on the X: great screen, larger format. But it sucks in so many ways with that facial recognition being a royal pain in the arse and a lack of a button means holding the damn phone in two hands.
So a lot of 'meh' with that X somewhat devalues it's worth.
Hardly surprising that the 8's more popular
It's staggering just how many domains MS use in their 'products'.
People won't move for that requires a change in operating system which effectively means moving to that Windos crapware. Apple may treat their customers really badly, but Microsoft.... Just plain no.
The new keyboards and Macbook Pros are horrible with a keyboard where it's hard to feel the position of the keys, not to mention are outrageously expensive -- the new Apple "Magic" keyboard is now £150.
Nowadays, being an Apple customer does leave one with the feeling of being treated like a wizard's sleeve.
Can't help but wonder that should this pragmatic approach be adopted by ICANN that there needs to be some monitoring as some LEAs may sell their access as a revenue generation opportunity. Thinking of Hicksville TX not caring for those pinko commie liberals
Would be nice to tax them until the pips squeak.
They can be our (tax) product then and do something useful for once.
> The answer has to be 42.
The Czech Republic and Slovakia?
It was down this morning. Too much traffic for the maps to work. The Met Office was also attacked by the hipsters adding frippery over functionality, although the BBC has just turned this up to 11 with their vanity bonfire of a working site -- they've apparently deprecated weather fronts and isobar labels in favour of bandwidth-hogging satellite views.... FFS.
The BBC does a reasonable job of Educate, Entertain, Inform. They've paid for Blue Planet -- Netfllix and the others wouldn't touch an expensive program like that. Radio 4's a national institution.
Problem as I see it is you get rid of the BBC and you end up with that stinking pile of utter shite that is Yankee Vision, i.e. pretty much any US TV station. One can see why Netflix et al started in the US -- their existing channels were utter unwatchable bilge interspersed with uncontrolled advertising.
The other issue is cultural. It's bad enough with the Yankee invasion from the internets. With no alternatives giving a UK / any other country view, we'd just become proxy Americans. Where's my gun I want to be a teacher... Trump's a genius...
One example is the BBC scrapping their weather website for the utter dumbed down crap run by a third party.
If they'd listen to people who *work* rather than people who *play* we'd have lovely 1:1 at 2000x2000 resolution (or more). People who *work* tend to use portrait for *work*.
Garmin now have an Apple-priced dive watch. The Garmin Descent is £1000 and will certainly compare very well to the likes of similar priced Suunto watches. Obviously Suunto's asleep at the wheel. IMHO the Descent is a far more attractive wearable than Apple's fugly offerings although beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
There's definitely a market for specialist sports requirements; sailing, climbing, hillwalking, skiing, diving, flying. One of the main requirements doing these remote pastimes is battery longevity.
Why is everything about the children these days? Animated talking turds, instagram filters...
It's like the world doesn't give a shit any longer. Please, WALL-E isn't an insightful documentary.
It's piss-easy: stand on a beach at the water's edge and look at a ship at sea. Even without binoculars, you can see the ship disappear over the horizon. Watch the hull disappear first, then the superstructure.
Anyone who sails going back millennia has known this.
In fact when sailing, when sitting in the cockpit, if you can't see the bow-wave of a moving ship, it means it's more than about 2 miles away.
My Apple Mouse (Mighty perhaps) loses its connection every ten minutes.
In the words of the air crash news reporter: Sum Ting Wong.
Used the Apple mouse for years and don't get problems on Macs. Although... sometimes a VM running WinDos can shag the connection when it contends.
Would go as far as to say that the new touch Apple Magic Mouse (at least 6 years old now) is IMHO the best mouse I've *ever* used. The old mighty-mouse (with the little roller nipple) wasn't much cop when it got dirty.
For balance, Apple also made one of the worlds worst mouse - that truly awful puck thing.
It's showing people sailing past it. It's clearly marked with 8 yellow buoys and two of the Montgomery's masts sticking out of the water. The Montgomery's a favourite place for people to do a day trip from Chatham, Gillingham, Rochester etc. as a little trip out into the Thames Estuary.
The people to the south of the Montgomery, on The Isle of Sheppy, are either the webbed-feet locals or people sailing dinghies/jetskis.
Is that Rees' Mogg(y)
It's alive. Oh no it isn't...
Poxy Apple cables fray. Lightning connectors are fragile and fluff magnets.
Never understood why they couldn't separate data from power just like laptops etc. Couple of large-sized conductors on the outside of a device. Anyway, it's all moot as wireless charging will fix all that. Maybe.
Deleting customer data becomes a nightmare when it's hidden in system log events.
@lucki bstard: 'I have always thought that the gender ratios in IT sucked' - And you did what about it apart from being that annoying person who complained and never did anything.
Like what? It is a *fact* that IT, technical and engineering are male-dominated professions.
You're looking at the wrong end of the telescope; the place to change this is to get a larger supply of women interested in geekdom.
However, as the old adage goes, what does a developer use as a contraceptive....? His personality.
IT just isn't cool to women. Why?
@ratfox: Depends who you are and how you do it, actually. Google is pretty much known to everybody, so their candidate list is everybody. But they also organize Anita Borg scholarships and participate to events encouraging women to work in tech in general and at Google in particular.
Isn't the point of recruitment to get the best fleshy organism for the job regardless of any other aspect?
You appear to be saying that you start by narrowing the field, not by competence, but by some other factor. Then what you've got left is what exactly?
I.e. you're looking for the best of the bunch not the best available for that role.
Throughout my entire 40 year career in IT one thing has always been the same: there's very few women in *technical* jobs. I've worked with a few but a fraction of the number of men. When I used to teach, the more technical the course the fewer - if any - women would be present. Same with IT technical conferences, very few women.
There's lots of women in project management and support. Same with testing and training. But so few in really technical roles. Same in other technical roles such as airline pilots.
Why is this? I've no idea why there's so few female geeks. Seems to be some deep-rooted sociological reason.
However it does strike me that discriminating in *any* way when recruiting is just plain dumb -- "positive discrimination" just means you've a much smaller candidate list.
When the GDPR finally comes into effect, will faecesbook et al be obliged to delete the biometric hashes?
How can one prove that they have done this?
The tagging's done by some fb member associating the picture to another fb account. Do they keep unassigned (orphaned?) hashes just in case? Isn't this against the spirit of GDPR?
Do you need to patch Edge after it's been used to download a proper browser?
Pity it can't be deleted
If there is no cycle path, I've got news for your budy - it's not your space. You have no right of way over any other road user just because you are on a bike. You get to queue with all other road users, you self righteous, self entitled cyclists.
Riding along about 75cm from the kerb. Car overtakes leaving a clear metre alongside cyclist. Then veers in front of cyclist slowing down or stopping, closing up the 75 cm such that it's impossible to cycle past resulting in cyclist having to slow down. Yet there's space for the cyclist to pull out and cycle around the car or queue on the outside; i.e. the car driver just blocks the cyclist for the hell of it.
If only the UK roads were more like the Dutch roads where there cars have to give way to cyclists. Cars would have to slow down and consider other people for a change.
UK cycling does seem like a civil war at times where some ignorant car drivers have no appreciation for cyclists and vice versa.
Or... Sounds like they're the same organisation that tried to get the law changed so that cyclists can never be held responsible for collisions they're involved in.
I'm riding my lightweight road bike, which has a carbon fibre frame, along a city street and crash into you when you I cut across in front of me you. FTFY
The biggest nause when riding a cycle in a town is the ignorant drivers that don't leave enough space for a cycle to pass on the inside when they're stationary and puking out fumes. So the cyclist has to cut outside of that car in the centre of the road, then cut back in front to get to the inside lane if the next car hasn't blocked it.
I fecking hate it when a car goes past and immediately closes up *my* space and then they stop a few metres ahead in traffic. I now have to pull around that stationary car and you whinge about it...
Must add axe attachments to the handlebars.
Make those bastard pedestrians have insurance. And children. And dogs. And cats. And all those squirrels...
Yay, says the insurance industry...
If a cyclist causes an accident, just the same way as a pedestrian, then they are liable? Except the bill's possibly picked up by the Motor Insurers Bureau -- which was implemented when insurance became compulsory -- or the car driver's insurance.
Relative to the number of cage drivers having accidents, how many are caused by bicycles and not by car drivers behaving recklessly?
I will give you an eminently compelling use. If I had not bought my watch a couple of months ago I would have died four days ago. It woke me and convinced me to call an ambulance and now four days later I am home, alive, healthy and happy. Otherwise I would not have made it through the night.
Do you have two iWatches; one on charge, one on the wrist?
Double-click the button?
Oh, you're wearing those white ear-ring substitutes. Do be careful when cooking as one could end up in the pan.
There's one big problem with the iWatch: beauty is in the eye of the beholder. To my eye they're fugly as uck - a massive black square with as much artistic refinement as ornamental columns on a house in Essex.
If they were they'd be responsible for their content.
Given that some content's been viewed more times than all episodes of "TellyTubbies" / whatever, maybe they are publishers?
Most iPads don't leave the house.
You don't commute or travel then? Brilliant tools for the job. Reading, listening, watching...
It was worth it for shits and giggles alone.
Retro, as in retrograde, going backwards.
I've an iPhone 6 with the wonderful touch ID which is really reliable and incredibly convenient. The phone seems to work well enough and as a little computer/smart phone is fine.
I fail to see any reason for spending any money on an "upgrade" to any of the current phones whilst my existing one works. There's so little benefit in the new phone compared with the iPhone6. Sure, the new one's lightly waterproof which would be nice to have, although in ten years of owning iPhones -- since the iPhone 1 -- I've yet to drop one in the bog (phone that is).
Aside from waterproof, there's sod all else which is worth spending how fecking much you piss-taking greedy bastards...!!! Honestly it comes to something when they're quoting "better graphics performance" as a benefit when there's sod all wrong with the old one (that's a feature not a benefit BTW).
Anyway, the only reason they need facial recognition is because some bellend removed the wonderfully slick fingerprint reader.
I hate this also. Unfortunately, I think the only real solution is to switch to Linux though.
But which Linux?
Seriously, which Linux to switch to? As a Mac user also sick of Apple buggering about and having given Windos up well over 10 years ago (Vista, just say no), it would be useful to examine switching to a Linux. But which one?
Sony PCs were full of crapware. Are their phones like that too?
Electric launching trolley that gets the aircraft up to operational altitude, separates, then returns to base for recharging and launching the next one? Aircraft now needs smaller engines for the cruise?
No doubt bootstrap and the other frameworks will just roll over and add the Apple-sponsored code then virtually every boring fashion following unfriendly graphics rich vapid website will just work.
These frameworks are a pox on design; Frontpage for the Millennials
And they don't even give you a wireless charger for your £1000+
No worse than a £4k MacBook not Pro not having a mains cable.
We deserve all we get for putting up with this treatment.
4. Ditch Itunes
Bloated POS that constantly pushes the Apple music service. iTunes used to be OK, but the last few years has seen it downgraded each time Apple push a change (can't call it an update as they seem to bugger things up whilst adding a few more emojis)
"Picky" is a nice simple music playing application. Now iTunes lives in the "Apple Crap" folder never to be used again.
PCI is partly to blame for this as they've allowed TLS1.0 until June 2018
Means there's no strict reason to shut down TLS1.0 now, so many companies put it off. As a result there's a stack of web services out there that call using TLS1.0 which need core upgrades to use TLS1.2.
> So do what Google won't do: make privacy a big deal.
In this day of facebook and twitter you bring up privacy?
I feel a lone voice in the wilderness by not being a product of the companies who slurp everything.
> Developers use Ctrl+r until the ink wears off their r key.
You mean Cmd+R. Not all of us use windos.
I remember seeing one for the first time. The only instruction needed was "press the home key"; everything else was so blindingly obvious and natural.
Compare that with those awful Symbian and MS Phone interfaces of the time. Zooming pictures - no. Simple internet access with autozoom - no. Simple to use menu interface - no.
True innovation from Apple.
Where's the subsequent innovation Apple? Lost your mojo have you? The iPad interface is fundamentally a big iPhone, so incremental. The watch.. just can't get past the fugly looks. Apple TV, nope. Macs, not a lot of innovation -- that touch bar isn't innovative as it's just a modified touch screen.
It'll hurt those greedy avaricious bastards, but they are trying to lock you in and charge a subscription. Can't see the point in an Apple Telly where they're charging you >£100 just to be stiffed for the rentals, etc.
Amazon made it a no-brainer; £30 for the Fire TV stick which includes BBC iPlayer and a whole host of other applications for free. Amazon now seem to be dropping the number of free shows and films they used to do. They've also buggered up the user interface so it's much harder to find anything.
But for £30, I can kind of live with that.
Being doubly screwed by Apple isn't going to wash. Pay loads for the hardware, then pay top dollar for the content. I've never bought anything from Apple iTunes for exactly that reason: they're bloody expensive and everything's the same price -- even when it's out of copyright. At least Amazon does different prices for different downloads.
Was nice to read an article which really shows Apple on the back foot. They need to get back to their root markets, like making Macs again.
the Paint Shop Pro 9 I got for free bundled with an SD card will serve all my image manipulation needs
PaintShopPro version 4 worked for me for years until a Microsoft update shagged it.
Adobe are a bunch of greedy avaricious bastards. FireWorks was way better than Photoshop; Macromedia took the money and ran. Then Adobe killed the competition.
Why has no other company done anything like this? How did Adobe end up as the Jabba the Hut on top of the pile?
The Trashcan Mac was a failure, Apple really needs to recapture the truly professional environment once again. Their OS is much better than the latest Windows versions, but their hardware is ridiculously overpriced for what it is.
If only Apple gave a shit about the pro market. They just seem hell bent on getting out of the Mac market altogether; squeeze those pips for nearly twice the price they used to be even a couple of years ago. Little wonder they've a cash stash the size of most nation's GDPs.
The WWDC used to be exciting, but now it's just a bunch of fanbois and no substance -- Buzz Lightyear appeared in the 1990's.
Apple computers used to be so good, now they're just becoming as dull as you can get - and slower with each release of their operating systems as they add more and more pointless crap (Siri in a laptop, WTF?!?)
There wasn't so much cheering at this year's event, and even the (presumably paid for) whooping sounded rather forced.
More like the politburo listening to Kim Jong wotshisface; applauding when told.
Looking for innovation with Apple nowadays is like looking for intelligence in a Trump tweet.
If I can't wear a watch doing everything I do, then what's the point? Wearing it in the shower, washing a car, swimming, scuba diving....
Problem is the cost of adding "intarweb connectivity" to some device is so low that there's no money to fund proper development & support -- especially as it's pushed for by the twitterati marketing-oriented chimps.
Maybe some 'fines' will work for the larger organisations. For example if Hoover/Dysan/whatever decided to add IoT functionality to their hoover to send updates to an app to remind the operator that the bag's full... Hoover/Dysan/whatever are a big enough to go after when their IoT device is compromised. This would put the brakes on some of the stuck on stupid ideas. Obviously it wouldn't work for "the little people".
Will they both call random people from your address list?
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2018