Re: And yet the best part is...
> ...that almost everyone so far has merely scoffed at the very idea of a threat to Linux
That's because there has been no real indication of what to check.
2416 posts • joined 26 Jan 2009
> ...that almost everyone so far has merely scoffed at the very idea of a threat to Linux
That's because there has been no real indication of what to check.
I think that if you posted this on a law forum they would think you were telling a bad joke.
Plus you have the signal strength to consider. Will aliens 1000 light years away be able to become addicted to our crap network TV shows? I rather doubt it. I would be surprised if our emissions are recognizable as such even 100 light years out.
> It took me months just to get my Dad to mount images,
Don't be an idiot. Besides the fact that it's no longer 1994 and Linux automounts things, ANY HTPC should be set up as an appliance. It will be just like any other appliance (that doesn't run Windows).
If someone can't use a Tivo, clinging to Windows won't help.
Computarded family members don't touch the Linux on an HTPC.
That is how they can use a Sony BluRay player if you have one.
> When was the last time you could get such significant upgrade of a PC for $35
The last time I saved an old PC from the dumpster by putting a cheap Nvidia card into it.
> I see that @"Voland's right hand" is another person who completely and utterly misses the *entire point* of a RasPi.
True. But he has plenty of company though. And those people like to sing the praises of the PI for applications that it's not really suited for.
Some of the shameless fanboy gushing needs to be mitigated by a little bit of justified skepticism.
Been there. Done that.
It's funny how people who clearly have never touched a real luxury brand in their lives (never mind actually owning one) like to fawn all over some generic bit of crap as if it were something other than what it really is.
The right Ford centric comparison to draw here is Lincoln.
...essentially the same thing but with some superficial bits of trim added.
Of course. Abuse the nerds. All of the drooling mouth breathers in Communications or Journalism or the Business School just love that idea.
Take the group that are kind of trying to hide out from constant abuse and heap some more abuse on them because quite frankly they are one of the few groups left that you can get away with subjecting to blatant bigotry.
> "Too qualified" is a euphemism for "we'll have to pay you more than we want".
With an MS in graphics, it sounds like your best bet is trying to break into the game industry. That said, you have to compete with H1B PhD talent with more education than you and more experience than you who will (likely) accept a lower salary than you.
I remember when I could demand more money than those types because of my citizenship status and my role in the company.
Outside of the game industry you would probably be thought of as only qualified for a junior role in some other specialty and a junior position isn't going to pay squat.
The "age" thing is another possibility. Older "senior" developers seem to be less flexible, less trainable, and less able to adapt to a new corporate culture. Sometimes, they also aren't really that senior either.
America and England are two nations separated by a common language.
Battlefield Earth was ridiculous propaganda for Hubbards litle cult. They toned this down for the movie. Although I think it would have made it even more of a hoot.
It's like accidental satire.
Oh god. They managed to take a better executed cast of characters (from the TV show) and managed to trash the thing beyond all recognition. It (The Source) was like some horrible fan fiction brought to life.
Battlefield is much more tolerable if you've actually read the book. Then the whole thing is a big joke on L Ron Hubbard and Scientology.
It's almost like a Verhoeven film but they're taking themselves seriously...
> Runs fine dont see the need to update to a newer model as the big corps seems to have run out of ideas.
Quite. Any of the reasons I would upgrade come down to "bigger and better" rather than "new and innovative". I'm mostly still waiting for an Android device to come along and displace my fat Archos.
It's ever so slowly getting there...
There are entire states and countries that reside in the dessert. Some of these are pretty affluent places too. If a smart phone has a problem with dust and sand then that's a serious problem.
Again... it's like these people in Silicon Valley don't actually live in California.
They're not doing too bad of a job so far. According to all of the cult members, Android should have failed by now. Yet it continues to eat more and more of Apple's lunch.
> It's just not legally possible to do that,
Sure it is. This was standard practice for large server operating systems at one time.
I've been witness to the OS license on a server expiring.
It's something that may cause a massive consumer backlash if applied to a Microsoft product, but it's perfectly legal and has been done before.
> Windows 8.1 outperforms the latest Ubunto in copying large files if that's what you mean.
I guess I will have to grab some of my BD images and find a Win8 box then.
Although the problem with Windows in this regard really isn't speed. Something like this is really more of a batch job. The problem with Windows is it's stupid locking and how it handles that locking during a large copy operation. What should be a partial fail becomes a total fail.
Then you need obscure and arcane tools to work around what should be a simple single drag and drop operation that your great grandma could handle.
This approach also makes it harder to deal with malware/adware that piggybacks on freeware and shareware packages for Windows. I should be able to toast any DLL if I want to.
An outdated Mac is much less of a threat it itself and others than a Windows box that's not being maintained.
> and for a version of Office that actually works.
I have never been impressed with msoffice. Not now. Not ever. Back when companies were originally turning it into Microsoft's 2nd big monopoly I was less than impressed and wanted to use SOMETHING ELSE.
msoffice is just Lemming-ware.
General purpose computers should adapt to the hardware depending on what input devices are connected. Interfaces that are appropriate for one kind of terminal, are entirely inappropriate for others. The user shell should be able to know what is connected and act accordingly.
Different inputs require different approaches because they don't all have the same capabilities.
Terminal sans mouse. Graphics terminal with mouse. Touchscreen. IR Remote. These are all capable of different things and apps need to reflect that. So does the shell.
if there is a mouse attached, or no touchscreen attached then this tablet nonsense should hide itself by default.
Feed the output of lsusb into some if statements. It's really not rocket science.
The dreaded "fragmentation" of Linux involve a small number of UIs that each are less unlike each other than Metro is to anything else. The kicker with Linux is that if your OS vendor pulls a Metro or a Unity, you aren't just hung out to dry. You can just use what you're used to.
What allows that "fragmentation" is a double edged sword and it's not all bad.
It means I can retain my UI when Canonical runs amok.
If you want to really annoy and confuse "normal" users, give them a Mac.
I had trouble just getting past the price tag...
> Which search replacement do you use?
What happened to "It's Unix"?
> Nature documentaries.
The most striking parts of Prometheus were those helicopter shots of Iceland in the beginning of the film.
Duncan presented as a flu patient. NO ONE gets a blood test for the flu over here. People like to talk about US doctors going crazy with the testing but I've never heard of anyone ever getting a blood test for the flu. X-ray perhaps. Strep culture perhaps. But no bloody blood test.
Not that they would have been looking for the Ebola to begin with. (That was kind of the problem)
It's easy to second guess with the perfect knowledge of hindsight. Not quite so easy in real time.
...and fluid replacement is a key part of Ebola treatment.
The HMO option typically has a significantly smaller network due to lower reimbursement rates.
The better doctors are likely not available on the HMO option.
There are "cash-only" medical clinics popping up in the US too. Their cash prices are more in line with the "insurance discount" prices or sometimes even lower. Taking insurance and "medical billing" out of the equation greatly simplifies things.
THIS is why Americans are skeptical of Big Government run healthcare. We have Medicare and Medicaid which are both kind of disasters already.
I will happily take a treatment that keeps me alive. Perhaps someone else that is more altruistic will develop a permanent treatment while I am waiting.
Without an actual number your kinds of claims are meaningless. You (and everyone else) are taxed at some rate that's not disclosed. That has to compare against what we pay out of pocket. With no data whatsoever, it's pretty hard to actually make that comparison.
Americans probably have more to spend either way. They just choose to ignore the possibility of a future calamity (of any sort).
Someone mentioned the idea of non-free health services needing to compete with fine dining (and other luxuries). People would rather pay for a pedicure than a doctor. If you think this would be a problem in the UK. Magnify it by 10x across the pond.
I don't like saying nice things about Obamacare but it did eliminate that "pre-existing condition" problem.
Based on what some people have said regarding referrals to specialists, I am not sure we have it so bad on this side of the pond. (even with the warts)
A place called "emergency room" is just as the name implies. It's for emergencies. If you weren't really having an emergency, you really didn't belong there. Hospitals are a big part of the problem in American healthcare .They are robber barons posing as non-profits. ER visits are a cash cow and you and your insurance are going to get milked.
There are drop in clinics in the US that are much more appropriate for non-emergencies.
Still, a lot of people go to the ER when it's really not at all appropriate.
Sometimes a patient already has a relationship with a particular hospital. That hospital might also be closer to your GP or one of your specialists. Although EMTs should have good feel for "what's best for the patient" in the absence of any stated preference.
What you are complaining about is numeracy fail. Unless you are planning on milking the system, get a plan with a higher deductible. Then take the premium savings and put it into a savings a count. Put it into Health Savings Account if you can. Then not worry about how high your deductible is.
If you don't have some sort of expensive chronic condition, there's no reason for a low deductible.
> So how is this any different to PC makers selling you a machine with a drive that is partitioned down from its stated size to accommodate the cab files to reinstall the OS?
One of those does not take up a double digit portion of the available storage. The other one does.
Californians. That's who. They have some pretty demanding consumer protection laws.
it's odd that those people sitting in northern California never considered this problem. Perhaps the droning of the fanboys drowned out anyone who could have suggested that Apple was making a mistake.
Apple products alread aren't exactly speed demons. So your excuses about lack of external storage really don't hold any water at all.
The whole "we're not so shallow" act is oh so stupid. You have to be into someone if you are in a long term relationship. You can't ignore your inner animal forever. Sooner or later your revulsion of your partner will rear it's ugly head. Then the marriage will implode.
You can't ignore your inner animal. You need something to keep yourself from strangling the other person when things get difficult. Genuinely fancying them helps in this regard quite a bit.
Many ideas sound good or "enlightened" when you first hear them but are ultimately completely impractical or ultimately highly destructive.
Eternity will likely include a few dark days and you need ever advantage you can get.
> Still waiting for an easy and free way to play legit Bluray disks on Linux.
That's not even a given under Windows really. BluRay is a really a user hostile format.
> Fascinating insight into the mind of a serial copyright abuser, thanks.
No. You're just a corporate apologist eager to strip real people of all property rights in favor of corporate overlords.
> Um, no. A company exercising their legitimate option to territorialise its rights. An
There is nothing "legitimate" about that what so ever.
> It is that thing they fool you into thinking you can buy like a DVD but is in fact a DRMed crap like UV.
I can crack it open just like a DVD and store it in any format I like. Where are the tools to do that with UV?
> Couldn't agree more. How many beige PCs do you see in the shops these days?
For the most part, PCs come in one color and that's whatever color happens to be the current color choice du jour.
The wood grain classic radio chassis is something you'll have to beat the bushes for and then build yourself.
Engineers for the most part don't cause the problem. Salesmen do. Artificial churn is needed in consumer products so that their gravy train keeps moving. Career minded managers also need to be seen "doing something". Things can't just stay still. Someone somewhere needs to change things in order to justify their existence.
Although Unity and SystemD demonstrate how this affects everything, even stuff without sales departments.
I tolerated the stock OS install on my Chromebox for all of 5 minutes before I felt compelled to put a area Linux distribution on it. It still adequately manages those 90% of those light duty tasks. It just plays nicer with the rest of my network.
Idiots will always force you to be "condemned to tech support". The OS really doesn't matter. The idea that it ever was was just a myth perpetrated by liars trying to sell you something.
As far as being "condemned", you're already there with the Chromebook.
It's already Linux. It's just a very crippled variety of Linux that you have less control over. Running a proper Linux allows you to avoid iPhone style stupidity like "cloud printing".
20 years? I already have 20 year old data that has survived the test of time by being always online.
Things don't need to be stuffed on a shelf somewhere. Tech has moved beyond that already. It's an irrelevant, unnecessary, and bogus limiting requirement.
Plus offline media still degrades. You can drone on about what are essentially just averages but you will never know if your stuff is safe unless you actually check it. You may be unlucky. At least online copies of your data can be checked for bit rot.
1TB thumb drives will be cheap and widely usable before any tape technology is.
Of course Bill would deny saying something like that. It makes him look like a real big idiot in hindsight. Although his products do that well enough anyways.
Some people still like owning things. If you don't want to fiddle with lots of little bits of physical media all of the time, then a big hard drive is the obvious option. Not everyone trusts the cloud or even has a decent connection to it.
What do people store? Anything they still own.
Blurays are 35G a pop.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017