Re: poor security
> Fuck all. Stop blaming the victim.
This isn't your piddly personal email server. This is part of the government. They are no "victim".
2541 posts • joined 26 Jan 2009
> Fuck all. Stop blaming the victim.
This isn't your piddly personal email server. This is part of the government. They are no "victim".
Not sure about that really. I am not convinced that the GOP honestly examined their screw up with Palin any more than Democrats at large are willing to admit that Hillary screwed the pooch.
Sure. The fact that she did everything wrong doesn't mean she isn't responsible. Do you even hear yourself. Any you gits wonder why you alienate people that have voted for Democrats for decades.
There has been a 3 way split since the Revolution.
If you are one of the established political parties, you can depend on your own partisans. You can write off the other partisans. What's left is the middle. You have to convince people that don't drink your brand of Kool-Aid to vote for you. You also have to excite your own partisans more than the other camp does.
The Dems annointed someone with the juice associated with being married to a past president. This someone was hated by the other partisan tribe. The whole mess with Bernie split the ticket, annoyed their base, and alienated the center.
Meanwhile, fundies were rightly focusing on future supreme court nominations rather than the libertine character of Trump.
Believing that we're fucked is one thing. Believing that we are powerful enough to done it to ourselves is another. This doesn't even get into the question of whether or not we can do anything to stop it.
Beyond all of that, there is the very obvious question of "Why do you littering gits need an armageddon narrative to start doing the right thing and 'leave no trace'? ". Not that the armageddon narrative helps, you still trash any place you have a large gathering.
I found the level of detail in all of this to be rather peculiar. We can nail down what was supposedly a foreign intelligence operation to the point where we can try and indict what are basically a bunch of CIA/KGB agents. This sounds like a more robust investigation/evidence than what might occur for some domestic organized crime bust.
> There were proud boasts in detailed blog posts after the US Presidential elections claiming that their voter suppression campaigns
In Yankee states? Seriously? That's an epic bit of geographical and historical fail there.
If you are worried about the elected monarch then the pooch has already been thoroughly screwed. It's screwed because you've already subverted the system. The system is supposed to prevent th elected monarch from becoming a problem. THIS is the proper lesson to learn from the failure of the Wiemar Republic. If you think that you need to "fear men that say mean things", then you completely misunderstand history and governance.
...versus the pervasive narrative posing as "journalism" that the vast majority of the media pushes constantly? The vast chunk of the "professional" news media are shameless party rags shilling for one particular political party. Compared to that, a few more posts on social media is nothing to get your knickers in a twist over. It doesn't even shift the needle when compared to what nonsense people are already sharing amongst themselves.
Democrats demonstrated that they have a much larger wing nut contingent during the last election to a level that's much more embarasing if you previously identified as liberal or left or center left. You can't blame the Russians for that.
Even if the nonsense was authored by a Russian plant, our own wing nuts willingly propagated it. At a certain point, you have to take responsibility for your own stupid. Doesn't matter if you are the DNC or some random nit wit.
So what? If you really think a few Russian hackers can compete with CNN, Facebook, or the Koch Brothers than we're all in much more serious trouble than anyone is willing to acknowledge.
What kind of DOPE thinks that they can take ANY THING away from a secure facility? Even if you are dealing with a "normal" client, it seems like what he did would be just wrongful. I would expect that there would be an expectation to communicate with the client about everything you are doing including the replacement of faulty hardware and including taking the customer's property off site. I am not sure ANY ONE would be comfortable with the idea that their proprietary data might sprout legs and leave the building.This seems like a Sheldon-esque sort of gaffe.
Lay off the Kool-Aid. SQL Server isn't any cheaper than Oracle. Both are expensive payware. Microsoft is just better at marketing.
Oracle predates industry standards. So the fact that they have some of their own proprietary APIs (that include COBOL) is not as exciting as you make it sound.
Also, Oracle hasn't had "only" proprietary APIs for quite a long time.
> Microsoft know the vast majority of users will eventually want features like
...like what's been in Oracle for ages? So there's no real point in bothering with Microsoft then.
IT isn't "sexist". It's a brutal meritocracy. This is especially true for places like Silicon Valley. A lot of guys can't cut it and do little more than occupy space. They would quickly get ejected from a high demand IT environment.
Women self select against IT for painfully obvious reasons that have nothing to do with this "sexism" narrative. HELL, this sexism narrative is one of the things keeping them away. It takes what little supply there might be and reduces it even further.
The smart ones gravitate towards jobs with better pay and more respect. They gravitate towards professions that are glamorized by our culture rather than shat upon by it. This should not be a shocking result.
Get over yourself.
This is about CLASS and not gender.
A female oncologist is as elite as anyone else. A nurse or cleaner is not. Each of those women made their own personal choices and is now living with them. The consequences here were never a mystery. NO ONE deserves a pity party over this stuff. They certainly don't deserve one just because of their genitalia. THAT is the opposite of equality.
A cleaner simply isn't that valuable. They shouldn't get shit. If you want to live large then you actually need to earn it. This includes putting in the prep work required to make more money. Nobody owes you a damn thing.
The fact that a nurse gets paid less than a physician is just and good. It places the individual incentives where they need to be so that someone is there to save your sorry ass.
If you start shitting on those of us that have spent out entire adult lives working to do better, then we will stop and you will shit out of luck when it matters most.
> I bought a 500MB SCSI drive, in 1995, for video and animation work, thinking that it would be enough last me for the full MTBF lifetime of the drive. Now I couldn't even fit my music collection on something that size.
Forget about now. Just a couple of years after that I had multiple classes of multimedia data that would not fit on a mere half gig. Music was just one example. That ship sailed a long time ago.
By the time 1G hard drives came out, there was more than enough user data to fill them up with. I archived stuff on CD's in those days.
Unless your taxes can be sent in on a post card, they are too complicated for a machine. The rules are just a little too complex and subtle. It's a bit like law.
In the US you need a post-doc degree to be a tax lawyer.
It's not about keeping the accountants employed. It's about keeping billionaire campaign donors happy.
> Let's not forget that he has the Republican party behind him, Ted Cruz has been very vocal for such a change to NASA.
That's quite a bit of spin there.
Ted's position on the matter is that we shouldn't toss the thing after we've spent a ton of money on it. If it's still useful, we should still keep using it.
> The next generation should be taught to believe whatever their local pastor and Koch brothers tell them - not this fancy pants thinking business
The fun thing about high school level physics is that you can do it yourself. You can't do that with "climate science".
You are committing numeric fraud that would make Disraeli blush.
You are conflating "GDP" with anything concrete.
The real ranking is more like #5 with countries like Germany, France, and the UK spending less.
>> Today I teach Physics to our next generation.
> This is not needed for real estate speculation and swapping Slavic trophy wives every few decades. So there is no reason to fund it.
Physics is very handy for teaching genuine, practical, repeatable science. You can do real science, on your own, in the class room. It makes you far less prone to being vulnerable to every flim-flam man that comes along. This drives "science groupies" nuts though.
REAL civil engineering is very relevant to real estate.
Numeracy is also very important in business.
> eliminate the Department of Education entirely, leaving education up to the states and local gummints, which is how things used to be.
No. It's always been like that. Creating a new ministry in DC really didn't change that. What happens at the local level in your own town still is the most relevant thing. That includes local tax measures, the local school board, and even your own PTA.
Americans really need to be bludgeoned with a civics text book until it starts to sink in.
The rest of you have an excuse.
> How do you know? You take it on trust from the very same scientists
I've lived long enough to experience it personally. Kids get excited about a cold snap or some unusually nasty weather and I get nostalgiac rather than going into a media induced panic whining about "climate change" that had to be "re-branded".
> No, they are just being the best democracy money can buy.
Climate change is now taken as an article of faith. If you indicate any kind of disagreement, people start building bonfires to burn you with.
At this point, fixating on watching the fire burn doesn't really make any sense any more. We know the house is on fire (or rather, you're certain of it). We're way past the time to actually do something about it. That action may be nothing more that getting your ready bag and running out of the house.
Spending money to watch the house burn is a bit dubious at this point. Not wanting to spend that money any more is not what you think it means.
> I am surprised the Russians have not done it already. With all the vehement russophobia promoted by the USA lately this is very long overdue.
Democrats have selective amnesia. They forgot who shuttered our manned space program and who we now have to hitch hike with in order to get to the ISS.
Also, people don't go into enough gory and graphic detail even when they do go complaining to the doctor. They leave important things out even when they have a problem and they're hoping the doctor will be able to figure out what's going on.
Nobody wants to go to the doctor. They don't want the bad news.
Meanwhile, plenty of patients are sharing their deepest darkest medical secrets on Facebook already.
This kind of "survey" might be horribly skewed. Those that don't have any medical history to speak of may be spiking the results. I suspect this is one of those things were different experiences will alter the results considerably.
I wouldn't trust a government agency to be competent. On the other hand, I do have an interest in sharing information with other patients even in a dodgey place like Facebook.
It's not just the whales... The real pain point with databases is the cost of software if you are using the overpriced and overhyped commercial vendors. That will add a nice magnification factor (2-5x) to the impact/cost of this kind of slow down.
People aren't so much "obsessed with tax rates" as they are aware that the government pulls this shit. I remember a particular tax that was meant to be TEMPORARY and dedicated to the local public transit system. Once it ran it's course, it got snarfed up by the local taxing authority, made permanent, and applied to the general fund.
They had trouble passing a tax measure like that again for obvious reasons.
> medical system that is 100x more expensive then ANYWHERE
My big procedure cost the same here in the states as it would in London. At a certain point the narrative induced exaggerations don't even pass the sniff test any more.
It's simply not the role of judges (at any level) to inject their personal politics into their decisions. They are there to apply and interpret the law. They should be as close to "justice machines" as possible.
They should even resist the temptation to bend to public opinion and the mob.
No. The data is in control of a US company. Changing it from data to money really doesn't change a thing. They are trying to play a shell game in order to hide from the courts. The courts should not have any of it.
If a foreign corporation was doing this kind of thing in the US in order to hide from their own courts, I would have no problem with it going the other way.
This situation is nothing like hiding money in the Cayman Islands.
I wouldn't expect any more than 1 in 10 Brits to even understand the question. I would expect most people to look at you like you have two heads after asking them that kind of question.
So you expect a laptop with 2.5TB of SSD storage to be sold at Walmart/Tesco type prices?
Yeah, a machine with a Xeon processor or 4 NVIDIA compute cards will set you back a pound or two too.
Although they also have cheaper machines.
It's easy to turn on a dime when you can execute civil servants for not being up to snuff and you don't have to worry about silly things like democracy or civil liberties.
The "overnight charge plan" only works if you are nothing but a commuter. Do anything else and your approach to batteries becomes completely unworkable.
I'm no fan of socialized medicine, but repairing the current leaky ship probably makes a lot more sense than building a new one from scratch.
> Like it or not, Microsoft are the choice for almost all businesses,
It's not 2000 any more. You need to get out more.
School kids these days don't even get the whole platform wars thing to them. To them it's a strange oddity for dinosaurs. They don't care about what brand of OS or application they use. They move between them all with equal agility.
If you think a kid these days needs to be taught a particular brand of software, you're way past the times.
> Blindly making changes to Linux config files you don't understand is likely to end in tears as well.
The great thing about text files is that they lend themselves very well to in line documentation. You can have very nice explanations for everything you might want to change. No special tools are required and the entire "hive" is very nicely partitioned. They're easy to view, edit, and backup with generic tools.
One problem with the registry is that you end up with crap in all kinds of weird places. Stuff is cryptic and byzantine and hostile to human interpretation.
The registry is over centralized over complicated trash that just barely gets along now that the underlying file system is robust enough to make up for the fact that the registry itself is a sad joke as a database engine.
The fact that a system will strongly type data doesn't prevent you from inputing total gibberish.
Is the Under the Linden subway line still under construction? They were calling it "Under Construction Street" when I was in Berlin last.
Even if you save in MS it will still be the latest revision and bugger any of your legacy MS users.
That's been MS SOP since they still had to sabotage Lotus.
Pretty much all of that bespoke vertical stuff should be going into the cloud just like everything else. It doesn't matter if it's in house stuff written by Munich itself or something they sourced from someone else. The vast bulk of their stuff should run inside of a generic web browser at this point.
Look at the calendar.
Meh. When it comes to software, even dodgier options from Google manage to do the trick. Forget about more robust desktop applications (on any platform).
Pretty much everything you've mentioned is actually MORE of a problem on Windows rather than less.
So you're saying that every piddly little contractor and tradesman and individual that wants to make major renovations or build something needs AutoCAD. That sounds derangely beaurocratic even for Germany.
The elephant in the room here of course is Apple. If they can't migrate off of Windows because they have a crazy number of Windows only applications, then that equally prevents them from running MacOS. Not only that but it sounds like this would be true for the entire country of Germany and not just Munich.
Sounds like an awful lot of power to hand over to a foreign company.
> Why on earth would they move to a cut down OS that has less functionality and worse security even than Linux?!
The same reason anyone ever bothered with WinDOS... "everyone uses it".
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2018