Re: It's worse in France
Isn't it ironic when the more socialist country has the higher inequality? Not that I'm surprised.
2624 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Jan 2009
Being equally wealthy doesn't work. Not only do we have different interests, and one of those interests may indeed be being more or less wealthy, but also pursuing those interests requires more or less wealth. This is, however, seen only from the end.
As Phil O'Sophical wrote, inequality encourages progress. And without progress we wouldn't even be discussing wealth but hunting down some animals and collecting berries. Phil also mentioned that some are happy with less and we shouldn't push them to do more. Absolutely true. But the flip and really ugly side of the coin is, that those who wanted to do more, those who are ambitious, wouldn't get much of a reward for their efforts. Of course, they'd still have the intrinsic reward though.
Now tell me, Chris W, how motivated to work would you be if all of your income is taxed away? This is what being equally wealthy means.
Unfortunately it seems that human nature is that some always want more than others and are not happy being equal.
I'd rather say: fortunately the human nature is that we all have individual needs and wants which we do not share with all other human beings. Yes, some want more. Maybe more wealth, maybe more freedom and free time. Some like to travel, others prefer reading, and so forth.
Would life be worth living if we all wanted having the same, being similar? At least, I think it would be bloody boring. (Some communists tried it. It didn't work well.)
No, it isn't.
If you don't like society and state how they are, you can, at least to some degree, indeed leave them behind - I do have sympathies for your "dropout" vision. But another way would be playing an active part of society and trying to change what you don't like.
For example, quite a few western European nations do not have a long democratic tradition and their citizen's attitude is still pretty much us against the state and vice versa without realising that they are not only part of the state but they are the state. Problem is, such people make it too easy for politicians to disconnect from them; then people get frustrated and resign further from politics. Then again, I fully understand that not many want to engage in politics, it's tedious with little reward.
Chris W, may I ask you to elaborate for I really cannot see your point and why this would be offensive to you. Did you never have any luck in your life except for this one time, although I hesitate to call that life, as a sperm?
Then again, I might fail to understand because having graduated from university without any debt at all (and very little if any wealth neither) I probably should count myself to this club.
I think you've answered your question already: demobilise has been around but can newly be spelled with a z.
Seriously, there are quite a few words where I'd raise the same question. And even more others which are over my head. Not sure if I even want to know what cu**-bitten means or which anatomic conditions it requires.
And what is it with "toilet-paper"? Are we going the German way now?
Joe User
Of course, they don't factor this in. Their calculation only includes costs and profits. Had they ever heard of opportunity costs and hence factoring in risk as well, they propably wouldn't have arrived in the deep shit where they landed.
Rosie, what you are saying is that 6% of your working hours actually are cool! I guess that's considerably above average :)
They want to get them while they still are girls and probably believe that both working in tech and cool are fiddling fondleslabs and goggling google glasses. You know, before realising the painstaking part that actual IT work is.
"You get a needle stuck into each follicle and an electric current is applied. Has to be done for each individual hair."
Mike Smith, and why would you do that? Are you a ginger?
Wouldn't it be more efficient to mount an electrode to each side of the face and apply a suitably large voltage? Oh, there's brain in between. Never mind.
I'm purely guessing here. The idea was to call for tenders and then decide for the best submission. But no one at BBC had the slightest idea how to define the specifications for this DMI. So, they started with a call for tenders to write a call for tenders. And for this, of course, already some consultants were needed, likely some that were going to bid later on as well.
And this was just the start.