disband the USPTO
So VoIP+FTP is patentable now? It's not completely bloody obvious to anyone "skilled in the art"? What the HELL is the USPTO using as filters for these applications, lobotomized baboons??
1244 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Dec 2008
In other words, Microsoft would like to keep stealing and trying to drive i4i out of business. They not only want to have their cake and eat it, they want i4i's cake and eat that one as well, without any sanctions or penalties.
I'm quite curious as to how the courts will react. US courts are extremely politicized, so it's really a toss up.
That's what the suit seems to be about - the specs seem to have lied.
Hardware and raw capability wise, I consider the iPhone to probably be the current "best phone". What AT&T and Apple have done to this beautiful hardware should have the fuckers who made these decisions castrated, cut into small little bits, jumped on, set on fire, then hurt in really horrible ways. Its for that reason I'll probably never get one.
Interesting. When someone signs up to a company with a defined benefit plan, surely they need to renegotiate the employment contract to change that? Or are companies now allowed to unilaterally change anything they want in a contract without so much as a by-your-leave?
We obviously still need unions today, because corporations are STILL of the opinion that employees are just so many slaves they can abuse at will.
Microsoft has bought judges before, it'll buy judges again. They'll have the injunction reversed before next week. A Canadian company doesn't have a chance in a politically motivated American courtroom. Courtrooms whose judges are either elected or whose appointments are dependent on political backroom dealing. This is now a high profile case, and you can bet that Microsoft is going to call in a couple of markers to make sure the next judge who sees this follows the party line.
Mind you, this is the same company that continues to push for software patents. I doubt they'll stop doing that either, knowing that the system they're pushing for usually favours the rich and powerful companies. Such as Microsoft.
Perpetual copyright through the back door. Complete elimination of fair use. The ability to take public domain works and by slapping some encryption on them removing the work from said public domain.
Congratulations are in order to the RIAA and MPAA, as their goal of becoming the new "London Company of Stationers" and completely reversing the 1710 Statute of Anne has come a few steps closer.
I just hope like hell that other countries don't follow in the US footsteps, even with the billions being spent on lobbying by these dinosaurs.
The only obvious choice is a Rube Goldberg device made of paper (and latex)
At a certain height, the balloon expands enough to nudge the paper wad, which drops down onto the papier-mache lever, which pushes the pin into a second balloon. Upon bursting, this ballon releases the weight tied to the flywheel, which spins up, letting the cardboard tube hanging from it fly outwards and strike the pigeon. Taking flight, the string tied to the pigeon's leg pulls the ...
and so on.
Can someone please just raze the US Patent Office to the ground please, taking all its asinine policies and incompetent decisions with it? NONE of what Microsoft or other software companies is patenting is "not obvious to a skilled practitioner". NONE of what is being patented in the software field actually encourages development and innovation. All it does is make more lawyers very, very rich.
Yeah yeah yeah, it's their phone, can do whatever the hell they want with it. I wonder at what point they will have pissed off "enough" people to realize that they are actually hurting themselves?
As for me, I'll not be purchasing any more Apple products for a while. They did great with the iPod, the iMac and Powerbooks. Then they let marketing scumbags (or maybe accounting) take the reins. First the iPod Touch ports were changed JUST enough to force people to re-purchase accessories (consider me fucked over then). Then the insane decision to tie the iPhone to just one substandard provider in each country (I'll do without, thanks). Now their idiotic censoring of apps in their store.
Fuck'em with a rusty chainsaw. They can go hang.
Emery sees a job getting done slower..... and a backward step
you see precision and care
they see workers who never need to take breaks, don't join unions, and only have a one-time capital investment and minimal maintenance vs actually having to pay someone a wage.
I bet the robots see an opportunity to get familiar with handling boiling liquids, not to mention the sword and shield practice, all while getting ready for when they take over.
Good luck with that. Given what Murdoch has turned his so-called "news" papers into, I'm probably better off getting my "news" from any one of a dozen bloggers. They'll be more accurate, for starters. They'll probably be providing a more balanced and reliable view of the world as well. This is the Murdoch that has slowly (or quickly) turned most of his papers into print versions of Fox News after all. I wouldn't pay for it.
Murdoch obviously learned from Asper, the one infamous for stating that newspapers weren't in the news business, they were in the "selling soap" business.
Yeah, it's got nothing to do with "beauty standards". It's got everything to do with false advertising. If their products require a photo retouching session (either with Photoshop or the old fashioned before-Photoshop way) to attain what they are claiming their product will do, THAT'S false advertising.
That's what the bastards should be nailed for. Where's Trading Standards when you need them?
Predictable really. The government in various countries has been found "not liable" for such things as promises made during a campaign (it's not a contract, apparently), "not liable" for accidentally executing the wrong prisoner, and now, in the UK, "not liable" for destroying the lives of citizens due to sloppy bookkeeping and a total disregard for privacy or accuracy.
Leaving the UK was possibly one of my better decisions, definitely.
Many works are in the public domain. If Google manages to obtain a NEW copyright on those works that are in the public domain, then that is theft, pure and simple. If, however, Google is simply providing those works in a different form without expecting to own copyright, then I say good for them.
The well-reviewed (at the time) Sony Viao laptop and the Mac G4 laptop were purchased at about the same time in our household. That would be about 7 years ago.
The Sony lasted about 3 years before it became pretty hard to upgrade enough to run latest codecs, software, and other items. It just ran out of steam. Couldn't even run linux on it due to various driver issues. It's now pretty much a doorstop, the battery having failed and me being unable to find a replacement in this 3rd world corner of the world I'm currently living in (Canada).
The Mac is STILL in use (albeit occasionally now, but was used routinely until a year ago). It can run up-to-date software, and even though it can't now be updated to the lastest MacOSX, the version it has is current enough that I'm not running into too many problems. I figure its time has just now come up, and it might get retired to a quiet life as a firewall or something.
So, effectively, the Mac laptop had twice as long a lifespan as the Viao. If we'd tried to keep up, we would have needed TWO so-called "Microsoft" laptops to keep up to a single Apple laptop. Which, to me, means that even if a Mac laptop is just under twice the price of its competitors, it's still a better deal.
As for Apple as a company, unfortunately, I probably won't be buying many of their products again. The shenanigans they've played with the iPod / iPod Touch / iPhone have really soured my opinion. When I bought my iPod Touch, I expected all my iPod accessories to work with it. I was wrong - NONE worked. I had to re-purchase several important ones (car charger), but once I figured out I was being ripped off for no reason. For instance, there is NO mechanical reason that the space between the slot and the earphone plug had to be 1mm wider on the iPod Touch, other than to deliberately stop certain accessories from working. Let's not talk about the locking of the iPhone to sub-standard network providers, and their whole App Store attitude.
So, Apple probably has better products at this point, but their marketing people are so evil that I refuse to look at their products any more. I'm tired of getting ripped off. That said, I'll still be having a really close look at the tablet, assuming their marketing idiots can keep their fucking scumbag attitudes away from it and not fuck it all up. Which they probably will.
PCI really is a joke. Current client has an official PCI compliance certificate, obtained from one of the poor sods who paid at least $20k+$10k/yr for the "right" to issue said certificates, yet his security is utterly laughable (it's what I was hired to fix).
PCI compliance is a scam, a ruse, a fucking bad joke.
Only because Gates would like Microsoft to be able to import more really cheap labour from India, pay them crap, but have them tied to the company such that if the complain they get fired immediately and sent away again. There are a lot of unemployed "smart people" in the USA, but they aren't getting hired. One of the reasons they aren't getting hired is that companies like Microsoft would actually have to obey the law then dealing with these people. Unlike their foreign imports.
Apple designed colour version of the illiad iRex, with colour e-ink screen and 40 hour battery life? That would be nice.
Or at least something with a sensitive enough screen to allow it to accurately transcribe my chicken scratches, then convert them to legible text. If they can do that... whoa!
The whole "Verified by Visa" thing is a crock of shit whose ONLY purpose is to put the onus for lack of Visa security onto the customer. If you forget your password, you just need one extra bit of information to change the password there and then to make the purchase. Not exactly secure AT ALL, yet it allows Visa to pretend.
That's the thing about innuendo. If you understand the references, then you've already heard a lot worse. If you don't understand the references, then you never will.
It's the dirty-minded Puritans who are the main cause of the problem. They understand the references, and therefore think that everyone has as dirty and filthy a mind as they do. Instead of letting it go, they complain because somewhere, someone might be having a good time and that can't be allowed.
This is the same kind of busy-body fuckwits who are killing the innuendo in your typical panto, and turning them into Hollywood versions of the Smurfs.
It's obvious that Britain didn't do enough to kill off its Puritans. Time for another purge, I say.
Note that it article seems to imply that the employees were talking about career path and long term planning whereas the managers were talking about compensation packages in the here-and-now with no regard whatsoever for career paths. Which is pretty typical, since most managers I've met can't plan more than 3 to 6 months in advance and wouldn't know a technical career path if it bit them on the arse.
Call me paranoid, but I note they're using version 2 of the GPL, not version 3 which protects people from submarine patents. So they get this stuff to infect non-Microsoft code, then turn around and start suing people. That's a very Microsoft move right there.
Embrace, Extend, Extinguish. It worked in the 80's. It worked in the 90's. I'm guessing it will work for them in this decade as well, and people will just keep helping them make it work by being trusting fools.
...
Beware the beast, he is the devil
Who grabs your hand and leads you in
Beware the beast, he is in revel
He guides you to fire
If it's such a huge pain, and there are so many users affected, why don't they get someone to fix it for them? That's what "open source" is all about, right? You don't have to go back to the controlling organization to fix something, you just go ahead and do it.
OpenOffice is hobbled by the fact it has to remain almost a clone of MSOffice or the mouth-breathing idiots who continue to support that anti-trust giant won't even consider it. Which is a pity.
A copy of Shakespeare in digital form cannot be copyrighted. It is simply republishing a previous work that has entered the public domain.
A copy of a painting in digital form should not be copyrightable, for exactly the same reasons. If a publicly funded gallery wants to digitize them "for the public good" then it should, by damn, keep those works in the public domain. To do otherwise is to return to a pre-1710 state of affairs. What do they want to do next, reconstitute the London Company of Stationers perhaps?
The US patent system is so broken it's become a joke. From encouraging innovation, it's gone to rewarding patent trolls who add nothing but legal expenses to the field of technological innovation. Let's also mention that anyone suing in a certain Texas jurisdiction for anything obviously doesn't have a case that would stand in any other court, and is just hoping for the partisan jury to award them the equivalent of a lottery prize so they can continue to milk the very sick, very broken US patent cow.
To those who don't "get it": check out what "anti trust" really means. Check out what "abusing a monopoly position" means. If the US hadn't been such lazy, incompetent shits Microsoft wouldn't be able to continue their tricks today. Instead, it's now up to the EU to stop that giant from doing to others what it did to Netscape - abusing it's monopoly position and killing off competition.
If that means that Microsoft be forced to offer an "auto-install" option for the user's choice of browser, then so be it. Frankly, I don't think it'll be enough, but it's a start.
I'm sick and tired of the Microsoft shills trying to redefine the term "criminal behaviour" to mean something less than harmful. Trying to let a company that everyone KNOWS acts illegally when it suits it to keep on getting away with that behaviour.
Microsoft started it's life with a lie by selling a product that they didn't own yet. They went from strength to strength doing just about every illegal trick in the book until they became dominant, then continued their illegal tricks right to the present day. The only people who are big enough to put this giant cockroach down are large governments. Thank the gods the EU is up to the task of taking this behemoth on since the US government basically just gave up on its duty to protect the public.
Go Opera. Keep on fighting, because SOMEONE needs to stop this pit of corrupt pestilence from continuing to crush innovation and continuing to train people that sub-standard products are somehow "OK".
Yeah, what he said.
Microsoft is basically lying that these people are "normal people". They're actors, paid to select a Windows running product. Which is ok, but they shouldn't lie and pretend that they are, in fact, "people on the street". Apple might stretch things in their ads, but they don't outright lie in them.
As for prices: when you compare apples to apples, Apple prices are in line (except for what they charge for memory, that's a total and utter rip off). It's when you start comparing Apple to rotting unidentified biological matter that Microsoft and their shills get to say that Apple is "way overpriced".
Odd. Here I thought LABOUR was in charge, not the Tories. I guess you really can't tell one authoritarian dictatorship with no regard for personal liberties from the other these days. Be their name Brown, Blair, Bush or Thatcher or , they're all the bloody same bullies everywhere you go.
So Microsoft builds security into its products "from the ground up"? BWAAHAHAHA! Thanks for the laugh. I guess there's a difference between "having security in mind" and actually "having security". Be nice if they ever got it off their minds and into production.
Yes, Apple could do a lot better on the security front, mainly by vetting and demanding greater security from 3rd party vendors and by having a better security framework for their windowing system. But at the core MacOSX is still based on OpenBSD, currently the most secure of the 'nix systems. so at least they got that right, assuming they're still in contact with that group. Given the increasing power of the short-sighted fuckwits in the marketing dept vs the generally competent technical side of the company, I'm having my doubts.
Problem is that there's a lot more malware targeted at easily fooled idiots these days, and those are never in short supply, no matter which operating system one looks at.