It's things like this
It helps to know which Senators have a clue and this type of proposed legislation is key in pointing out those who are, shall we say, lumen impaired.
4662 publicly visible posts • joined 27 Apr 2007
At least in the US our dear Uncle Sam has this thing called a Universal Service Fund to which phone companies make "contributions", mandatory of course, which are necessarily passed to their customers for the privilege of having a line. The FCC tells us that this is supposed to subsidize the costs of the rural population and that passing it on to customers is optional but the only other option is passing it on to shareholders... yeah, as if that's gonna happen. Now, back when I was single and had a land line, my contribution was approximately 25% of my bill.
"A ban on Apple products would certainly hurt the company, and quite possibly the US economy"
Come now, that's a bit of a stretch don't you think? According to Google Finance they have 34,300 employees and a bit over $10 billion cash in pocket, so it isn't likely they would rush to lay anyone off, at least for a few days. While I'm sure it would cost them a few dollars, they are hardly on the brink and even if they were, they aren't that important regardless of what some people might think.
"... or the twice the loss suffered by victims."
But the "authorities" have not the vaguest clue as to who the victims really are or what their losses might be.
"HP, Apple, Dell all victimised"
Exactly the problem, how do you determine how they were hurt? By counting the number of lost sales, meaning guess, due to the forced inflation of prices. Do you also include the loss to consumers who did pay the higher price and include in the accounting the lower per unit profit made by the corporate "victims" based on consistent margins or does the margin need adjusting? Indeed, do they just slide up and down the elusive supply/demand curves and pick a point they "feel in their gut" to be right? Yeah, I thought so too, $100m it is then.
But the terrorists are very stupid - at least as stupid as most governments in the grandiose, over complicated, making a statement, Dr. Evil kind of way. The whole thing really has been bad theater since the WTC attacks. Let's face it if they really wanted to instill terror the easiest way is to pick the targets where people feel safe, like the Wally World down the street. The problem with that is they won't get the press coverage they want so they have to look for "high value" targets that are protected by gubbermint song and dance.
I'd also wager that old sweat didn't hang around long in the arid heat of the Turkana Basin. The whole BO thing probably got started about the same time we got clothes to hold on to the sweat and the church figured we shouldn't be naked when it's hot. Before I figured the church out, I always wondered how Adam and Eve were bothered by being naked when so many indigenous people in tropical climes don't seem to care so much.
It says that the people in _your_ circle who have something more than a plain mobile are more likely to have an iPhone or RIM device. It doesn't say anything else. The people we know are generally very similar since we tend to associate with folks who are very like ourselves. I'd wager Chris DiBona's associates predominantly use Android phones and that most of the people Donald Trump knows are well above the poverty line.
To show how pointless your comparison is, I personally know one person who owns an iPhone, one Android, at least five have a "crackberry" and well over a dozen have Palm phones... did I mention I know several people who work at Palm? Also for the record, I prefer the simplicity of a phone but I plan to upgrade to a Nokia C1 as soon as it's available.
IMHO, they were using the points as approximate latitude and longitude substitutes. As such Sri Lanka and Fiji point out relative longitude and Thailand and Northern Australia indicate latitude. I suppose the reasoning is that perhaps people can more easily visualize the range on a map with geographic names than they can with sets of coordinates.
The fax is alive and thriving! Of course it is doing it alongside IE6 in thousands of gubbermint offices. Hell, I've had the official types asking me to fax them a copy of a service manual... fully knowing that it was 90+ pages long. Why? This particular government office prohibits email attachments and those that are sent get stripped out by the server. He was, fortunately, able to receive an overnighted CD.
I switched Firefox's user agent string to appear to be an iphone 3 and most of it worked just fine. It did spit an error telling me I needed quicktime and to download it, which is odd since it actually is installed. If something else didn't work, I didn't find it during my brief test. There you have it, all anyone has to do to make a "vendor-neutral" version is strip out the user agent sniffer from the javascript file. Besides, if it didn't work in other browsers it would be more impressive to point out those things that don't work and say "X, Y, & Z" are much cooler when viewed with Safari... I wonder why they don't.
Perhaps you shouldn't be relying on Boyle's Law (p*V=constant), instead try the combined gas law (p*V/T=constant) and account for temperature. Since temp is not going to be constant between sea level (~295 K) and 60,000 feet (~217 K) you might not climax as early as you'd like, not that I think PARIS would mind. Yes, it'll be cold but you won't have trouble keeping it up, you also might want to use a dry gas to prevent condensation and icing.
When the US was really an agrarian nation, people didn't have trucks or cars. They had these things called horses which pulled various carts, carriages and the occasional sleigh. It wasn't until this little thing called the industrial revolution was well underway, if not finished, when people really got cars or trucks. Besides, the whole truck fad in the US was due to government largess handed to the big three in the form of a 25% tariff on the foreign competition. Before that trucks were, by and large, spartan work vehicles with stiff suspensions but now they are fairly car like with plush interiors that you really don't want to get dirty much less clean with a hose the way we used to.
"It is of course puzzling why Rosenberg did not use the evidence of her own eyes to decide Google Maps' instructions were best ignored."
Perhaps she isn't the sharpest knife in the block.
"Almost as puzzling as why she has set the lower bar for suing the world's biggest ad broker at a mere $100,000."
Well there you go, she isn't exactly as bright as burning magnesium now is she.
I was looking forward to a comparison of three different solutions not a single solution from Three. Isn't there an equivalent for the TM or something to indicate this is a trade name and not a number? Couldn't "Three" use leet and spell it Thr3 or something?
Damn... shuffles off, head down, muttering to self, kicks pebble...
Complex systems are a lot more difficult to diagnose and repair. Pumping heat short distances is a fairly simple thing that only gets more complex when it has multiple jobs and longer runs. A window AC unit is easier to fix or replace than a centralized one. Also, when the ice cream in the freezer melts it's nice to know it has nothing to do with how much hot water was used in the shower.
I don't mean to imply they are stupid, as true as that might be; I'm implying they tend to find the correlations they are looking for at the expense of other things... see the difference? It happens all the time because many researchers are looking for a link from A to B. They weren't looking for causality only a cum hoc ergo propter hoc connection. Why should they exclude people with a BMI under 19.5 even though the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute define "normal" as between 18.5 and 24.9? Could it be because it might skew the numbers? If the whole point is to indicate that BMI was rubbish, why use it to exclude anyone? The baseline was simple, prescribed meds for a physical illness vs obesity. If they want to make fuzzy grand claims, I'm going to question it. Keeping researchers honest isn't ranting, it's just looking for where they got their hockey stick. Why, I'm even glad there are ACs like you to keep me honest. ;)
Oh, in case you were wondering the paper is here, but it will cost you; http://www.nature.com/ijo/journal/v34/n3/full/ijo2009258a.html
For free, another article is here; http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/bmiillness.htm
Sorry, just calling bullshit. "Among the over-forties obese people were significantly more likely to be taking medication for a health problem related to physical factors". So is this to mean that a major factor is taking medication? Any medication? Like birth control pills, hormone supplements, pain killers, etc. Do vitamins count also?
Please at least tell me they have causality figured out? You know, a person who has a condition for which being overweight is a symptom and is therefore on meds compared to the one taking meds, such as corticosteroids, and one of the side effects is weight gain.
Does the study take into account the financial resources and acumen of individuals? Starving people aren't likely to be able to pay for meds. Folks who can navigate the government systems are probably more likely to be well fed and have better access to health care. The wealthy fat cats aren't called fat cats for nothing and might have a personal doctor on call.
Finally, does the study investigate if people who are older with medical problems might be less active and therefore tend to be heavier than their healthier and more active counterparts?
Oh, I can't help but wonder the collective BMI of elected officials since the Task Force on Childhood Obesity has recommended BMI tracking, which has been included in proposed legislation. Food desert my arse.
By your definition, what with all that depressive whinging, you must be female or you're an "emotionally crippled generous man" who's late getting back to your cave. Now run along AC, you've no time for a pint as you wouldn't want the one who wears the pants to really start nagging.
WTF were they thinking? Grad school courses are singularly focused and the books are ones the student is more likely to keep for reference after graduation. Go after the books they are going to ditch at the end of semester from subjects of no real interest and are usually found in undergrad degrees. Still going to need the highlighter and jotting functions though.
First "the system is being used to track everyone." Now that's fixed, lets move on to the efficiency of such a thing.
It seems that there are roughly 190 million international travelers who are traversing the latex gauntlet that is e-Borders. Now then, 48,682 are selected for closer examination by a low paid glove me tender tech. From the special few, our Mr. Rubber Finger picks out 2,000 to arrest; no let me guess, mostly unpaid traffic fines right? So the rate is about one in 95,000. I wonder how the rate compares to that in the general public. It would be nice to know the number of convictions from the arrests, alas...
I understand that updating applications and changing browsers is a high inertia proposition for some companies and governments. I also know it will cost more than a few quid. The problem is that IE6 can't possibly live forever and I can't believe migration costs are going to go down in the future. I mean it's a web browser people, we aren't talking about a modern COBOL here... are we?
Oh, I just gotta know, where did they find 9 year old milk and was it raw whole milk, UHT pasteurized 2%, irradiated skim, what?
I can tell you with authority that change==bad with many people. My mother complains that she can't find anything because of the new start menu... in XP! Oh yes, she hates the fact that Win7 won't allow the "classic" view. As for the Mac, I had hopes that because she does both she wouldn't freak out about how "everything changed" in 10.5 but I was wrong. Now there isn't any way to move her forward without listening to how awful they both are. Some people just need to be pushed out of the nest and forced to deal.