* Posts by Erudite Luddite

6 posts • joined 13 Nov 2008

Ten classic electronic calculators from the 1970s and 1980s

Erudite Luddite

Re: All these comments...

Beat me to it! Although I recall the apposite numerical plural being 5318008

:)

Climate change made sea levels fall in 2010 and 2011

Erudite Luddite

Occam's razor...

... There is no global warming?

(Personally I still adhere to the phlogiston theory)

Three curbs data tariff excesses

Erudite Luddite
FAIL

I'm still waiting for 3 to reply my query as to why you can get unlimited internets for £15 a month on a SIM only deal (or for £25 by tethering a smartphone to your laptop on the One Plan) but a mere max of 15Gb per month when popping a 3 SIM into a MiFi or WiBE (when using mobile BB as a replacement for a slooow ADSL connection in the back of beyond).

Actually I can guess the answer, but I just like asking questions.

One last production run for TouchPad

Erudite Luddite

HTC Flyer is now down to £329

The WiFi version of the HTC Flyer is now down to £329 @ Carphone Warehouse (from a previously ridiculous £479).

http://www.carphonewarehouse.com/mobiles/mobile-phones/HTC-FLYER-WIFI/HANDSET

That's *starting* to get closer to a realistic purchase price...

eBay revenue shrinks for first time in history

Erudite Luddite
Thumb Down

Baffled

Have been interested in a variety of items (camera, lenses, notebooks) and been searching on eBay for a month now.

It baffles me why:

1) The majority of (alleged) "buyers" seem happy paying 80%+ of the NEW price for something secondhand from an unknown seller.

2) Some items go for way over 100% of the new price (e.g. HP 2133).

3) Anyone would want to bid against other bidders whose identity is hidden.

Madness!

eBay used to be a great place to buy 2nd hand. But no more. Might as well buy new, or secondhand from a proper retailer with a guarantee.

CRB database wrongly labels thousands as criminals

Erudite Luddite
Stop

A "good" error rate??

"That is an error rate of 0.085%, which is staggeringly good"

Um... Unless you happen to be one of the thousands affected? Statistics have no interest in the individual. I trust you never have to right a wrong on your credit and/or criminal record.

If (for the sake of argument using a random and made up number) DNA fingerprinting provides "accuracy" (actually a probablility of uniqueness) to a level of 1 in 30 million... then, to me, that means there's someone else in the UK who can be fingered for that crime (or vice versa).

"Where were YOU on the night of the fifth...?"

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019