Re: Is there not enough junk up there already ?
The payload had "SPACE JUNK" written on the side of it in big letters. Crafty beggers those ruskies.
439 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Apr 2007
I have received the following reply from MBNA on the matter...
Thank you for contacting us {Horridbloke}. I appreciate your concerns however rest assured that Contactless technology has been extensively tested to ensure the absolute security of your account. This is a new development in the card industry that lets you make a payment for retail purchases without entering a PIN or signing to authorise the transaction wherever you see the Contactless acceptance symbol. Paying with a Contactless card is just as secure as paying by Chip and PIN because it is based on the same secure technology as Chip and PIN, it only works when you hold the card up to the terminal (within 4 cm), so you can’t accidentally pay for someone else's shopping and occasionally you will be asked to make a normal Chip and PIN transaction instead of a Contactless one. There is nothing wrong with your card; this is a security check to limit fraud and would likely occur if you made multiple Contactless transactions within a short time period. For additional security when you are sent your Contactless card you must first make a Chip and PIN transaction. This is just to make sure it’s got to the right person and to enable it to work. In addition, you are still covered for any fraudulent activity on your card just as with Chip and PIN transactions, providing you let us know as soon as you notice any unrecognised transactions on your statement. All our cards now come with Contactless functionality and are perfectly secure. Contactless offers many benefits, but if you don’t want to use it in this way you don’t have to. We are unable to issue a card without Contactless functionality however you can continue to make your payments by Chip and PIN if you prefer. If you log on to the website. Click on the tab "Account Home" and you can select the tab "View all transactions" and you will be able to see any transactions in current activity if you wish to monitor your account. Many thanks.
I guess I'll carry on using the craft knife.
This works well but a shop assistant might get worried about the visibly mutilated card. The job can be done more discreetly by making a small nick with a craft knife, though this really needs an nfc-capable phone to confirm the card really has been snipped.
It's probably a good idea to make a test purchase afterward to verify the card's normal chip & pin function still works - have an alternative payment method just in case.
I made the mistake of wandering into one of their branches several years ago to try and buy an unlocked handset. The sales slug couldn't believe somebody could be so demented as to want such a thing and pulled in a second sales slug to help teach me the error of my ways and to show me the contract I actually wanted (never mind the fact I had asked for something specific that the shop allegedly had for sale). After a couple of minutes of obnoxious high-pressure sales pitch I thanked them for their time and walked out but I can see how some people fall for it.
Carphone Warehouse were angels by comparison, at least they would sell you an unlocked phone without arguing and the larger branches had powered-up models you could play with so that expensive purchase was less of a pig in a poke. I say "were" because, well, you know who owns them now...
"no home user really needs this kind of speed"...
I suppose it depends on ones definition of "need" but I recently bought and installed the new Wolfenstein game via Steam and that was a 40 or 50 gigabyte download - an inconceivable figure not so long ago. That wasn't too painful on our 40Mb connection but these things just keep getting bigger.
Weirdly enough we're on Virgin and I'm pretty sure our connection has been throttled to 40Mb - our peak download speeds were much faster when we got connected a year back.
The trying-on-outfits-virtually-via-pseudo-mirror idea featured in an episode of the short-lived Max Headroom US scifi "drama" from the late eighties. (If you missed it, the show was based on the original Twenty minutes into the future Channel 4 production and looks horribly dated nowdays.)
I suppose that counts as prior art should anyone try patenting the idea.
If all phones have a kill switch you won't have to buy another one, because the existing one won't be nicked. In addition your car window won't need replacing the one time you accidentally leave your phone on display in your car and you'll be saved a night in A&E when a bad person doesn't decide to take your phone off you by force.
I've had both those experiences - through matters other than phones - and don't recommend them.
... except when they don't.
I had a Samsung 840 pro fail utterly and without warning on me three months after purchase. Nothing I tried it with even recognised there was a storage device there.
(I was pleasantly surprised when the backup successfully restored and the replacement has been good so far.)
There were a number of android slabs boasting lenticular displays for sale at Bangkok's Pantip Plaza when I visited a couple of years ago. Those displays weren't great, but there's been time to improve that part of the equation and I can see Amazon using that with online 3d film or game delivery to draw more people into their ecosystem.
It's potentially useful when photographing fast-moving subjects such as martial arts bouts. My current digital compact takes the shot almost immediately when I press the button, however the display on the back of it lags by about half a second. It's therefore not possible to watch the bout through the display because by the time you see something happening the moment has passed. The current workaround is to not look at the display, keep things reasonably wide-angle and hope the camera is pointing in the right direction.
(In theory an SLR is better, however that can suffer from being TOO fast - I found I had to slow myself down to grab the perfect glove-in-face moment.)
I don't claim to be any sort of photography expert, but this transparency gimmick seems weirdly suited to this problem.
"Much of the widely-alleged benefit of offshoring sounds like a typical tunnel-vision fantasy of a stereotypical accountant."
Bingo. I while ago I worked at a UK software outfit that had been bought up by US dot-com lunatics. At one point there were several IT professionals from India visiting the officers on six-month stints and supposedly learning the ropes. The phrase "Don't worry, you're not training up your replacements" was uttered numerous times. A development office was opened in India, the folks there got access to our CM system and the fun really started.
I'm sure there are lots of educated, capable and very well motivated technical types in India, but the people we were asked to work with were about as good as a random UK-born chav would be if plonked into a development role and expected to produce with no pertinent training. Of course there were language problems to contend with as well. I had the impression the US overlords had travelled to India and hired the cheapest people they could find there.
This was all a bit ironic considering the cash the people stateside were burning on nice offices and perks, but given they didn't respect the engineering function I suppose it made sense.
Err, I don't think anyone is suggesting Stephen Fry is an idiot.
He's famous primarily for having a lovely voice and the veneer of cosy authority the BBC and advertisers go for. He's done very well on it and that level of success doesn't come without a good dollop of initiative and drive but why should anyone take any more notice of him than, say, Keith Chegwin?