Re: Bears with Arms
I'm sure all of those pilots taking off from metropolitan airports every day live in fear of some fuckwit taking pot shots at the evil flying metal demons.
3549 posts • joined 22 Apr 2007
I'm sure all of those pilots taking off from metropolitan airports every day live in fear of some fuckwit taking pot shots at the evil flying metal demons.
Which is the first thing that will happen to UPS as soon as someone uses it to deliver a parcel load of semtex with a timed detonation mechanism, of course.
Or of course, that could be complete crap.
I would say in sparsely populated areas, they'd be more viable than sending a 20 or 40 foot wagon with a single 5kg parcel in it. More viable than the old Transit Van method as well, I would say.
Can you imagine the combined noise of all those 2 stroke engines buzzing overhead morning, noon and night?
For a start, there's no need for them to be two-stroke. Or methanol-fuelled. You can get some surprisingly quiet model aircraft engines in two or four-stroke with more than enough poke to drive a generator to generate electricity for the main brushless motors.
Quieter than the whacking great four-stroke diesels and reverse bleepers that announce Morning deliveries any other day, anyway. Or the screaming thousands-of-horsepower things that fly overhead every day around here, usually emblazoned with livery such as "Easyjet" or "Ryanair".
Or the copper chopper, which usually picks 4AM as its time to do nightly patrols.
You might need more ammo for that air rifle.
Can Lancashire join you? The people in power think London is a separate country.
In my experience, the people in Lancashire think that London is a separate country, and extends North as far as Birmingham.
Steam wouldn't exist without Steamworks, and even the KSP devs say that they are selling through Steam because for whatever reason, there's people who will ONLY buy games through Steam (despite the game being available more cheaply direct from their own website). They've stated the game will remain available through their website for the forseeable future, and as far as I'm aware, in a pitifully rare exception for games in general, they're not using Steamworks or any other DRM. Therefore, KSP will actually work without Steam running. Hell, you can just copy the game from your Steamapps folder, put it where you like and it will still run.
However, Steam would not exist without Steamworks, and you can "offline mode" me as much as you like. "Offline" mode isn't, and you know it. Unless of course I can install and run a Steamworks-hobbled game with no Internet connection whatsoever and without logging into Steam, and with a guarantee that nothing is going to phone home to anybody in order to decide if I get to continue having the use of a toy.
so all you're left with is a full screen start menu.
So all you're left with is the thing everyone's complaining about.
You mean those wonderful games that demand an Internet connection for single player? The ones with built in crapware that checks up on you but does approximately fuck all to actually stop unauthorised copies flooding into torrentville? The ones with half the game stuck behind a single-use download coupon or being tied to an account because apparently being able to sell your own stuff second hand is evil and needs to be stamped out?
I'll stick with games like Kerbal Space Program precisely because (a) they don't do that, and (b) they're awesome. 99.99% of the rest of the PC gaming market can fuck off. Especially the "AAA" titles, and anything that demands a Steam, Origin or Ubisoft account.
And it still costs less for me to go out and buy a 200mph model aircraft that will probably last longer than a games console and doesn't spy on me. And I can sell it, or its parts, after extensive use. Hell, I could splash it all over a tree and the surviving bits are still worth a nice heap of cash toward buying a new one.
Plenty of other toys out there that don't come with spyware.
But I fail to see what 20th century fascists have to do with Jaques Cousteau...
Just pointing out that even the biggest cock-ends may have done some things that might be considered useful. It doesn't stop them from being cock-ends. Or genocidal maniacs.
In other news, Isaac Newton was also interested in the Occult, and Alchemy. Yes, the whole lead-into-gold thing. So crazy batshit insane in many ways, which doesn't detract from his quite useful (if superceded in more recent decades) theories on motion and gravity.
And Hitler made the trains run on time. Oh, and is responsible for the roads that many Germans enjoy the use of to this day. Also Volkswagen. He was still a momumental penis. Or should I say "a festering sore on the anus of humanity"?
Can I have a Godwin award now?
I think they are slightly uncooler than bluetooth earpieces. Both cause me to want to take them off the wearer and stomp on them. Both of those devices rank up there with people on the phone in the bathroom; I make sure I flush the toilet repeatedly.
Well you sound like a fucking shitload of fun to be with.
Also what are you doing, sneaking into people's bathrooms to flush the bog while they are in there? Bit of a wierd fetish going on?
and like fiat currencies, they can create more.
I still want to see how the deflation that is going to happen, or rather is happening with BTC is any better than (moderate) inflation. Don't forget that debts rise in real terms as well as the value of the currency, in a deflationary situation.
See when I saw this in September, I thought that Motorola had bought up the Phonebloks project and turned it into this.
So it turns out the truth is more like "hey, that open source project might actually make some money, let's close it off with something similar but incompatible."
Did wonder why the parts look a little different, and somewhat less customisable. How can you rearrange and put various different bits on when those spiney bits restrict what sizes of block you use, and when the connectors are all in specific places?
Not much point in issuing take down notices for Usenet posts.
If only that were because of the decentralised nature of NNTP, and not because USENET died on its arse under a flood of spam a decade ago.
Mention USENET to most Internet users these days, they'll probably give you a blank stare and say something like "so it's a bit like Google Groups, then?"
Planning on making love atop a substation transformer?
Strapping electrodes to your bollocks?
A lightning rod to your gonads?
Is your other half into some kind of TENS fetish?
I'm wondering how conductive spermicidal lubricant is now, come to think of it.
Well that'll stop STDs, I'm sure.
(Edit: Dammit. Ninja'd.)
If you can let loose 640ml in one go, I believe there may be certain film producers interested in what you have to offer.
Dunno why they're that worried. Played right, the only way that's adjusting house prices is up.
I already have one. It's called Grub.
Doesn't make any of the software work outside of Windows though.
Well, so long as you don't mind Amazon peeking at everything you do and potentially stealing your idea.
Seems like my Amstrad PPC640's great great great great great great great grandson. And about as hefty.
Only Google would do something like this.
Or was I right when I said there's too much money in it and everyone's doing it?
No, just a lot of people that can see through transparent bullshit being peddled by the likes of Fairsearch.
Google are not some innocent flower, but you are not forced in the slightest way to use their search engine. Neither is anybody else. Don't you remember a few years ago, when people were cheering over Google downgrading listings from the very same "vertical search" companies that are now trying to force Google to put them back in the top ten?
You want their search engine to go back to the way it was 5, 6 years ago, where far too many search results pointed at search engines, which pointed to more search engines, which pointed to more search engines?
MS had no browser lock-in.
Not for want of trying. I'm sure ActiveX and DirectX filters are perfectly cross-platform though. The Halloween documents were just a collective bad dream, no?
Having to make two versions of every website.. one for IE, one for everyone else, I'm sure that was just an accident, too. Of course it wasn't an attempt to own the entire World Wide Web, even though Microsoft have effectively admitted that it was.
Oh and I still have no Plus account. I just don't comment on Youtube, nor rate or review Android apps any more. If Plus starts being even more "integrated", I'll be moving to Amazon's app store rather quickly. Or anybody else's app store come to think of it. Got that option with iThings? Ahh... no.
Plenty of things you can criticise Google for. I don't like the increasing false need for Google Facebook either. But, don't pretend that they are unique or that Apple and Microsoft aren't bastards that want to own you, and charge you heftily for the "privilege". Especially Microsoft, lobbying hard for the EU to spank Google over a search "monopoly" that's there because they are good at it, as opposed to the clearly abusive Microsoft monopoly that's only there because you have little choice in the matter if you want to be employable in IT, or want to run any kind of PC software that isn't niche. No, Apple is not the answer to that. Apple are the fire to Microsoft's frying pan.
So yes, please go ahead and criticise Google. I'll even agree with you on some things, but make sure those accusations get thrown straight at Microsoft and Apple too, because they are every bit as bad.
At least Apple and MS just want to sell you stuff. Google want to own you.
You really sure that's just Google?
Just firewall Google out of your network if you hate them that much. You'll be able to use the rest of the Internet just fine. Now, erm, try that with Microsoft Windows. Try running all the software that you need Windows to run (which is.. erm.. just about everything of note in the commercial market, and absolutely heaps of legacy software that isn't going to be changed any time soon). Bear in mind that Apple dearly want to be where Microsoft is (and Microsoft dearly want to be as cool in the public eye as Apple).
They all want to "own you", to use your own terminology. Google are just the ones that you have the biggest ability to avoid entirely.
But surely only Google does that kind of stuff?
Nope. Everyone does. Too much money in it not to. Some perhaps to an extent that makes "right up to the creepy line" Schmidt look quite wholesome. Hate to say "I told you so" but...
...actually, no I don't. Told you so.
Not fricken' goldfish.
Hey, I guess a laser-toting neon tetra could be pretty cool though.
it just looks like outsiders who know nothing about what is considered their local culture enforcing standards upon them
And what would giving people dolphin meat disguised as tuna sound like to you?
Is that like a PIN number?
Redundancy department of redundancy?
Ok, ok, I'm going.
Follow the money.
Isn't that what Bitcoin is designed to prevent?
...then maybe it'll find a niche. That's the obvious use for something coming from a place like Wolfram, and I've seen enough people complaining about Matlab.
After having to learn the basics of it for my degree, and after looking up licensing costs, I agree; Matlab is way overdue an alternative.
Alternatives are there yes but your comparison to OSs is dis-ingenious seeing as there have always been alternative OSs too.
As I pointed out, I would like to see you running all that lovely commercial software in something not Windows. Enjoy your pain. I'll be around later to sweep the hair up that you've torn out after enough battling with WINE to get a few percent of it sort-of half working.
Now, firewall Google's entire IP range out of your system. Observe that the rest of the Internet still works. Flawlessly.
since it was demonstrable.
Open your web browser.
Type in "www.yahoo.com" (Or maybe bing.com, duckduckgo.com, ask.com or comparethemeerkat.com).
Now do the same thing, only with Google's entire IP range firewalled out of your network. Observe that the sites still work.
Now, try running most commercial PC software without the operating system made by one of the corporations that comprise the Fairsearch lobby. Yes, Microsoft are one of the entities trying to say that Google have an abusive monopoly, which to me is best described as "fucking rich".
Observe how the software will neither install nor run.
And now you know the difference between an abusive monopoly, and people choosing in large numbers to use a particular product or service.
Matey, I'd use a tablet to take photographs just to piss that guy off.
Maddox is funny when he's pissed off. Doesn't make him always right.
Quite right when comparing his phone to the original iPhone 1 when it came out, though.
Not Google and Apple. Just Apple.
Granted, you won't get the Play Store without a Google account. You can however, dump whatever APK you like on the device, including things like the Amazon app store (or anybody else's app store).
It's amusing in a way. Apple wish they were Microsoft, and Microsoft wish they were Apple.
and your cloud provider of choice to put the image on the tablet.
Bluetooth not working any more? This isn't an Apple device, you know.
"and has a powerful version that is entirely free."
So long as you're not developing for mobile. Or expect to run things multi-core. Or in 64 bit (except for Linux, apparently). Or want a more recent version of PhysX that actually uses hardware acceleration.
Then it costs £1500, and that only fixes the "developing for mobile" problem. Cheaper than some game toolkits to be sure, but hardly "free".
In English (and possibly Australian), it's "Bum Bag".
Except I have a stereo headset that has all the functions of an earpiece, but doesn't look like a twat-dongle. I guess it's public perception as well as looks.
Didn't people cast doubts on the original Sony Walkman because nobody would want to walk around with headphones on?
(Admittedly, I probably won't be buying Glass myself, but a related device... maybe.)
Not really. I don't see the masses of fuel transfer pipes and modified asparagus staging leading to a rocket that looks less like a rocket and more like a pancake.
Still want to see a real rocket use some asparagus staging though. If only for the geekgasm.
For everyone who can be bothererd to sign a petition, there are probably 20 people who feel the same way but couldn't be bothered to sign.
Though, I'm sure Google can ignore 1.6 million people as easily as they ignore 80,000. Maybe direct action is a better approach?
In other words: Troll the shit out of everything. Make them regret their decision. If they undo it, the few people that actually like G+ can get back to liking it and leave the rest of us alone. If not, well, I'm sure drowning in a sea of filth will be awesome.
Best part is, you really can do this from your armchair.
...I tell my domain name to redirect to Live Mail, or whatever the Borg are calling it this week.
Under a tenner for two years? More people should be doing this!
Back in the good old days, telling someone your name was considered rather normal.
On the Internet? Really?
What strange parallel universe do you come from?
Yes, but now that they're under your real name, maybe everyone will think twice before leaving imbecile YouTube comments. Less Internet pocket lint.
I really hope you're being sarcastic. That or you haven't been looking at any of the comments since the Google+ bullshit started. Really, the crap that the apologists are coming out with is totally disjointed from reality. Apparently forcing Google+ onto people to comment on a youtube video will somehow, magically remove the trolls and kooks?
Just had a quick look and I'm getting "comment fatlos", "reply1", "reply2", "no wone [sic] cares", "first post"... all from comments in the last day or two, on random videos. There are worse, and they are very, very easy to find, especially the ones that declare "FROM GOOGLE+". Oh, and Google+ names such as "Nigger_Gangrape", amongst other less pleasant monikers. Oh and hashtags. Fucking hashtags everywhere, now. If this is your idea of change for the better, you can keep it.
Incidentally, it only takes about a gigabyte or so to make a 24 hour long, 360kbps, 640x360@30fps video displaying the text "FUCK GOOGLE PLUS", along with a 64kbit audio stream of whatever the hell you want (let's say a trololololol loop). Easy enough to upload to your Youtube channel before buggering the fuck off to any other video site on the Web, alongside changing your channel name to "Fuck Google Plus". Think I'll be doing just that.
Nononono. Struts are for when it moves when it's not supposed to. If it doesn't move when it IS supposed to, the correct response is "moar boosters".
So... the problem with someone making a phone call on a plane is what? That you don't get to hear the other side of the conversation?
I could understand if this was some bell-end throwing out random techno like they've never heard of headphones, but are you expecting people to just sit in their seat and not say a word for 6, 9, 18 hours or however long they are sat there for?
Ah yes, hating mobile phone use is fashionable. Even as most of the commentards here (and possibly even Iain Thompson) likely have something more powerful than a 5 year old PC sat in their pocket and connected to the nearest phone tower.
I think the idea is that various agencies can tap as much megabit-key-encrypted info as they like. It'll do them no use without a few billion years of supercomputing time.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017