* Posts by h4rm0ny

4605 posts • joined 26 Jul 2008

If Microsoft made laptops, it'd make this: HP Spectre x360

h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Pen?

It seems a waste that with this technology, how good hand-writing technology has become and how great it is for sketching out notes or annotating web-pages and PDFs, pens aren't being pushed as more of a standard thing. It should be a major differentiator for Microsoft over their competitors at Apple and Google, but they don't seem to capitalize.

That said, coming up with good stuff and then not doing much with it, is almost standard practice for Microsoft, unfortunately.

3
0
h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Re: For £1,099 you can have...

The difference between Macs and PCs, in hardware terms, is that Apple only sells premium laptops. With PCs there are Premium and Standard and Budget variations. Compare like for like. If Apple can successfully sell laptops in the premium range, there's clearly a market. And besides, Lenovo and Dell have been charging these sorts of prices for their high-end for years so presumably are doing fine.

Just because there are cheaper laptops out there, doesn't mean this is above market prices.

18
0

YOU! DEGRASSE! It's time to make Pluto a proper planet again, says NASA boffin

h4rm0ny
Silver badge

>> 1- Does not has independent orbit around the Sun it cut the orbit of Neptune.

Nowhere in the history of the use of the word planet has anyone ever said it's something that cannot overlap with another planets orbit. Until post-fact looking for reasons to add this to the definition, of course. In fact, your argument is equally an argument that Neptune is not a planet. So are neither of them planets by your definition? If not, why is it okay for one to be ruled out because it cuts another planet's orbit but not the other? But chiefly, this is a post-fact addition to the definition of planet by yourself.

>> 2- Pluto and Charon moving around the common center of gravity [...] also It is not fair

All planets with satellites are orbiting around a common centre of gravity. Is the Earth no longer a planet? Also, how is one unfair to a planet? Are its feelings hurt?

>> 3 Pluto is not completely spherically as revealed by NASA

Nor is the Earth. It is oblate. This is another post-fact criterion added by yourself.

>> 4- it has a different terrain in comparison with surface of other face

Again, I don't think the word planet has ever had uniformity of terrain as a criterion, until you needed to add things to the definition to separate out Pluto.

>>> 5- Pluto does not have enough gravity to clear its orbit

See 4.

>> 6- Pluto only is not a planet because it is a binary with Charon

You can't have a binary planet? If you had two Earth-sized planets orbiting each other and both orbiting a star, would they no longer be planets?

>> 7- Pluto rotation around itself the day is equal to a month on Pluto

See 4. Also, I'm reasonably confident that there are asteroids that the inverse would be true of - fast rotation much less than their month. Are you arguing that they are therefore considered for the position of planet? Of course not, so it's a double standard not relevant to this.

>> 8- Pluto's orbit has a great anomaly in the orbit in orbital inclination

And Uranus' axial tilt is nearly perpendicular to the rest of the planets which is far more of an anomaly. So what? Again, see answer to 4.

>> 9- Other satellites orbiting around Pluto and Charon does not around Pluto only or Charon only because the common center of gravity control orbits of these satellites.

Just number 2 again with different wording. All planet and satellite systems orbit a common centre of gravity. Is there some established point agreed in the definition of planet historically that defines how displaced the common centre can be from a body before it disqualifies that body from being called a planet? Not that I am aware of. See answers to 4 AND 6 this time.

>> 10

Snipped for legibility. This is again just a longer re-wording of 6.

4
0
h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Re: Nomen est omen

>>"The thing is, when it comes to science, precision matters. Science MUST be pedantic or mistakes linger."

Sure. But planet has next to no scientific meaning. When you're calculating the path of your spaceprobe, you factor in 1x10^6Kg mass to your slingshot calculations, not "1 planet".

Planet is a cultural term used by laypeople.

3
0
h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Re: American

I upvoted you just for "Team Planet". Beats the Hell out of "Team Downgrade Classification".

2
0
h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Re: American

British support of Pluto's Planethood right here. Don't be so xenophobic. At best, I think you're just suffering confirmation bias from the fact that this is more of a controversy in the USA. In most of Europe and Asia, most people still just think of it as a planet so of course you'll see less argument.

I don't care if an American discovered it. I don't discount Venus because a bunch of Sumarians or Mayans first documented it.

3
1
h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Re: Wishing and Hoping

And honestly, why shouldn't it be a planet. Planet isn't a term that has any precise scientific meaning? No space probes will crash because they expected 2 Planets worth of gravitational force to affect them and there was only 0.5 Planets of gravitational force. It's not a scientific term, it's a cultural one. You want to correct someone who calls a hyena a canine because it's not? Fine - there are precise meanings behind the term. But there's nothing that says "planet = Xkg in mass".

It's been a planet for most of its existence and it's really just a cadre of people who like correcting others that took it up as a crusade. Call it a planet, no-one will get confused. In fact, confusion and arguments will drop. And I say all this as someone who back in the day argued fiercely against metric KB and KiB inventions - they affected me as an engineer. But what the Hell is the scientific definition of "planet". It's just a layperson's term so let 'em have it.

5
1

Galloway and Greens challenge Brit spooks over dragnet snooping

h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Re: Galloway Rocks....

>>"The real issue as that I find Galloway to be odious, oily, smug and self-centred. A massive contrast to another leftwing politician, Tony Benn, who also stuck to his principles no matter what

So basically you think that he should leave the country because you don't like his manner whereas another politician you did so they can stay.

Got it.

1
0
h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Re: Galloway Rocks....

>>"Well I guess he must have something to inspire such an impassioned defence"

More that I just dislike cheap attacks and pretending to speak for the country.

Anyway, given I posted facts and your posts go "are you his mum", I think this is pretty much done. As another poster said, if sponsors of mass surveillance just try to tar opponents of it by association, your sort of mindset is exactly the one that tactic works on. What matters is that they're trying to get away with dragnet style surveillance, not that you get upset about George Galloway.

He has a very good track record of highlighting government wrongs. You should watch that link of him laying into the US case for war with Iraq. That got a lot of press and his arguing style is to back everything up with references as he goes, which is a lot better than most people's style of word play and veiled ad hominems, imho.

3
0
h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Re: Dear Mr. Galloway.

No. Are you his ex?

2
0
h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Re: Galloway Rocks....

>>"I don't believe he gives a toss about this subject, he just wants the publicity"

Any particular reason you would know the inner mind if George Galloway? He's been pretty badly beaten up twice by people for his criticisms of various powerful factions. He could have had a cushy and successful career in the Labour party but clashed with the whips repeatedly over points of principle and was eventually expelled from the Labour party for advocating that people refuse to go to war. This may come as a shock to you but you don't generally achieve political success by annoying the most powerful people in government. It actually tends to lead to political marginalization, severe curtailment if your political career and advancement. Oh, and character assassination. There has been a truly exceptional amount of that over the years in Galloway's case. Usually followed by people having to settle for libel, incidentally.

So given how often he has set back his political career by sticking to his principles or pursuing human rights (he was an early supporter if same-sex marriage and I seem to recall him getting flack for voting to normalize the age of consent for homosexuality with heterosexuality), or been hospitalized for criticism of Israeli policy or put up with some pretty vicious attempts to end his career with various libels, I'm going to return to my original question. How is it you know that despite all the cost sticking to his principles has brought him, that you know that what he's really motivated by is the pursuit of fame?

3
1
h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Re: Dear Mr. Galloway.

I rather enjoyed seeing him rip into the US Senate over Iraq. They basically tried to character assassinate this vocal critic by summoning him to answer charges of taking bribes from Iraq and it turned into one of the all the great political backfires of the decade. He pretty much tore down their case for the invasion of Iraq in meticulous detail and the lovely thing is, he backs everything up with references. Got a LOT of coverage of the flaws in the case for war. And possibly the only person I have ever seen successfully shoot down Fox News's Bill O'Reilly in his own show, no less.

He also stands up for his principles. He's been badly beaten up twice by people with your attitude in the past couple of years. Once by a Zionist fanatic because of his criticisms of the Israeli government and I don't recall the other's reasons. But it seems to me he has a lot more courage and clear beliefs than a lot of MPs. He fought tooth and nail against the invasion of Iraq whilst most of the Labour and Tory politicians kowtowed to their political masters and only came out against the war much later when there was no political cost in doing so. Whilst Galloway is endlessly politically marginalized for positions that are actually pretty justifiable.

So no, you don't get to speak for "basically everyone in the country", in fact, as the pretty much equal downvotes to your post show.

8
2

All smartwatches are insecure, reveals unsurprising research

h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Re: Really?

>>"Now, I know the Band can easily pair with both Android and iOS, but surely in a security test, you'd pair it with its "native" OS as well. Wouldn't you HP?"

Well if they're truly testing the device itself, it shouldn't matter which they pair it with. For something multi-platform like the Microsoft Band, if it accepts weak encryption from Android it's still a flaw even if it defaults to something more secure with Windows Phone.

Incidentally, if that's a dig at WP's popularity, plenty of them here in Europe. Come on El Reg - you ought to be able to at least get a list of which ten devices were tested if you're going to post a headline like that.

1
1
h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Really?

Because there's not a single reference in the report to the Microsoft Band. In fact the report doesn't even list what devices they tested, it just says it samples ten smartwatches. So is it in there or not? It's certainly a smartwatch.

Perhaps El Reg could drop them a line and find out what devices HP actually tested and what the results were, rather than just throw up a far from proven headline about 100% of smartwatches. I mean are there four different Android watches in there? Should they really be treated as separate? Are there marked differences in the number of vulnerabilities? Did the iWatch fail six categories and a rival fail only one? Not all the categories are equal as the first poster on this article illustrates quite nicely. El Reg should AT LEAST get a list of which devices were assessed.

11
2

Were the FIRST AMERICANS really FIRST? MYSTERY of vanished 'Population Y'

h4rm0ny
Silver badge

>>"We spent a really long time trying to make this result go away and it just got stronger," says Professor David Reich of the Harvard Medical School.

That's a refreshing degree of candour. Would that scientists in certain other fields could be so upfront.

2
0

Microsoft launches Advanced Threat Analytics

h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Re: The key question is ..

>>The fact that they charge for it? :)

So to summarize the criticisms, Microsoft need to spend more money on fixing their problems and to stop charging for their products?

Got it.

0
0
h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Re: The key question is ..

I shall probably regret this, but what is it you think is broken in current Windows that would be fixed by more money?

1
0
h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Not really. Firstly, it's massive, massive overkill as such people are likely to have a very small user base and a single location for files. It's not much good trying to detect anomalous patterns of behaviour amongst your users and network if that's basically two people and a couple of laptops.

Secondly, even though this flags up data for review, you still need to be competent to make use of that. The average family are not going to know what to do with if some software flags up an alert that user account X suddenly has a new pattern of scanning and copying files from Y. A competent sysadmin would, but not your typical home users.

Though really the first one makes the second academic, anyway.

5
0

Facebook fails to block NY DA's fat warrants for profiles of suspected September 11 fraudsters

h4rm0ny
Silver badge

9/11

I doubt that its coincidence that the case they used to try and get this through has to do with 9/11. Trying to oppose something with 9/11 in the name in the USA is immediately three times as hard as it would be otherwise.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YOh-rpvjYg

2
2

GOOGLE GMAIL ATE MY LINUX: Gobbled email enrages Torvalds

h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Re: am I the only one wondering....

>>"Why didn't Linus just call up someone at google or perhaps even send an email, I am sure he knows *someone that could allow him to bypass the lack of customer service."

Possibly because Linus Torvalds, creator of Linux, has a community spirit and wants to raise things publicly and for the benefit of all, rather than some invisible and perhaps partial fix.

Though equally plausible, when dealing with a corporation the size of Google, even Linus realises that public opinion is a useful weapon to wield.

14
1

Pray for AMD

h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Re: Low end parts

Good point. And these MacBooks sell well unlike their low-end corner-cutting counterparts. Whilst I got a factual detail wrong, you've actually proved the point I wanted to.

0
0
h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Re: Of course they'll break up

Some of AMD's debt isn't due until 2017 and the rest isn't due until 2020. So no, receivers aren't going to come bursting in the door tomorrow. AMD have time for Carrizo to be selling before then and they will have a very new architecture (Zen) released and in distribution as well. We should also see HBM bedded down as a standard by then in which AMD have the lead.

So whilst the plane has been nose-diving, the ground is still legally five years away and they have measures that could turn things around in that time.

6
0
h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Re: Low end parts

A lot of the time the customer doesn't even bet as far as buying it in the first place. Vendors always pair the AMD chips with shoddy hardware. So whilst the processor might be adequate to their needs the poor screen and shoddy plastic wont. So AMD get disqualified by association.

A high-end laptop or workstation isn't going to use AMD because the high-end Intel chips are more powerful and more efficient than AMD's best chips. But there's certainly room for AMD's offerings in better products than they get.

7
0
h4rm0ny
Silver badge
Mushroom

Re: What if

And I wonder what would have happened if Intel hadn't engaged in blatant anti-trust behaviour to sabotage AMD so badly back in the day. Intel were found guilty and forced to settle, but the settlement was a bargain for keeping their competitor from gaining ground. Even after that verdict they continue to engage in such practices, such as paying vendors to buy their chips over AMD's. (True - look it up).

38
3

Microsoft's Surface Hub mega-slab DELAYED 'cause you demanded it

h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Re: But will it

It's an x86 device so yes, it should run GNU/Linux.

1
0

Mathematician: sunspot could mean mini ice age from 2030

h4rm0ny
Silver badge
Thumb Up

Re: Old news

>>Exactly. Fitting a curve in the past is not guarantee of future.

Modded you up in the belief that this is subtle and cheeky satire. :)

0
0
h4rm0ny
Silver badge
Facepalm

>>"My problem lies in being sentenced to the British gulag known as North Wales for three years :)"

My problem lies in wading through 15+ posts dealing with your personal misery as the only English child in the village. Move on!

2
0
h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Re: This good be good news or bad news..... @CodeJunky

>>"However, is it still the case that there have been no deaths due to Fukushima? I can't clearly recall where, but I do remember reading about 1300 deaths, though did not at the time ascertain the source."

There have been no deaths attributable to radiation or other direct effects of Fukushima. There have, however, been a number of deaths due to the hysterical ways of responding to it. That's hysteria in the clinical sense, not the humorous one. For example, many aged people have become ill or passed away from stresses and emotional trauma brought on by being moved away from their homes, from loved ones, kept in evacuation centres, loss of livelihood and financial devastation from losing homes. There have been many cases of severe depression and trauma amongst people who have basically seen their entire community and life taken away from them as villages are emptied and the inhabitants scattered to the wind. I'm not sure about your figure, but statistically many people have suffered adverse health effects and mortality has increased amongst affected demographics. The great tragedy being that it's avoidable. Nearly all of the evacuated areas are fine to live in and even the areas really close are essentially just a "you have a very slightly increased risk of cancer, statistically speaking".

However, the Japanese government was and is terrified of being accused of not doing enough. You're familiar with the way someone will always show up to tear down a government with claims of how they could have done X and why didn't they do Y. They even upgraded the rating of the nuclear disaster to its highest level (despite not meeting the criteria at all) because someone accused them of not taking the disaster seriously enough by putting it lower than the maximum. Disastrous evacuations and traumatic break up of communities and families followed.

I'm not exactly sure of your numbers, but that is likely what you have seen referred to as "deaths due to Fukushima". The media loves its disaster porn.

8
1
h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Re: This good be good news or bad news.....

>>"Genius. It's not even compromise. Superb"

It's not some clever method of tricking AGW-skeptics into supporting anti-climate change measures. I AM a skeptic. And for example, I get very unhappy when I see extras tacked onto my electricity bill and am forced to subsidise wind farms which are hugely inefficient. (Solar and nuclear I'm in favour of, wind power is downright destructive).

I just happen to be an AGW-skeptic who would like to head off staggering rises in energy costs (which increasingly expensive to extract fossil fuels inevitably lead to), who detests regimes that stone women and would like to see London's vehicles emit water vapour rather than black filth.

3
0
h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Re: This good be good news or bad news.....

>>"Have you seen where a lot of the uranium comes from?"

Kazakhstan may mine Uranium, but there are also plenty of other sources globally where it can be mined very economically. For example, whilst Australians are frequent complainers about their government, I doubt even they would refer to their government as a despotic regime (mostly). And that's just Uranium. When you get onto Thorium reactors, fuel is so globally plentiful it's absurd.

You can get oil from places other than Qatar, Saudi, et al. But with oil, Western support of despotic regimes seems to have been intractable. Nuclear power, the fuel is so easily sourced that if we decide we don't like Kazakhstan's human rights, shifting to another provider is perfectly doable with only a modest financial impact. Maybe even none.

1
0
h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Re: This good be good news or bad news.....

AGW-skeptic right here, and you might be surprised to find that many of us are actually in favour of moving away from fossil fuels. Just not out of some (imo) terror of AGW. They are polluting and cause adverse health effects. They are finite, meaning we must start changing away from them. They are heavily produced in regions ruled by despotic regimes we should not be supporting.

All of these are good reasons to be moving away from fossil fuels. Though not to wind power which is a dreadful ideal, but to nuclear which is cleaner, has plentiful fuel and doesn't result in us protecting the Saudi royal family from those they oppress.

AGW doesn't come into it, as far as I'm concerned

78
6

Natural geothermal heat under Antarctic ice: 'Surprisingly high'

h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Why measure now?

I'm very puzzled as to why something like this would only be measured now rather than a long time ago.

Is there a reason why it's not been properly investigated earlier?

0
0

Osbo PRINTS first Tory budget in 19 years with his BARE HANDS

h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Re: It's like the sixth form common room

>>"The minimum wage is about to become £6.70 per hour. Coming out at £27,872, will leave very nearly £26k after taxes are applied. Multiply the gross by 3 for mortgage purposes and you get about £83k maximum safe borrowing limit.

If I'm reading you correctly you're basing your ideas on two people both working forty-hours a week every week of the year (2x40x52x £6.70 = £27,872). That unrealistic calculation alone should tell us what we need to know about your argument. It shows a very stunted understanding of both the current state of the jobs market and, indeed, how humans can tolerably live.

Furthermore, it takes no account whatsoever of living costs - firstly ignoring what repayments will be like and secondly the necessity to save for a deposit in the first place. Two people living off £26,000p/a and saving for a deposit? I'd enjoy seeing you try to live off £13k a year.

>>"That alone woul allow the purchase of a whole raft of protery types and locations throughout the land, except for central London."

Well you can get a small terraced house in Hartlepool for around £80,000, I'll grant you. So yes, if everyone is willing to move away from friends and family to whatever depressed area of the UK happens to have the lowest house prices, you might get on the ladder with something small. But we're still not at the point where someone on minimum wage can actually get here, as you're claiming. This is still above their level.

>>"Which is now taxed at a significantly higher rate than any and all previous goivernments desired to. How do you not see that as a good thing?"

Sure, it's a good thing, and I would not expect the government to ignore a pathway to get money out of anyone be they middle-class landlords or otherwise. But I don't see how it remotely addresses the fact that people wishing to buy face massive competition from wealthier people buying those same properties so that the former are forced to rent, instead.

>>"Only, it isn't. I've already shown you how any minimum wage couple can afford to buy a home almost anywhere in the UK"

You really haven't. You've completely assumed cost of living is low enough that your hypothetical couple who have managed to find consistent full time employment and work fifty-two weeks of the year can somehow save enough.

>>"Unrealistic expectations i what is at play here. Having rented nice fully specced homes in nicer areas, they simply don't want to start out at the bottom of the ladder liek the rest of us had to."

A couple don't live in a five-person house share, shacking up in a single bedroom because they're too snooty to settle for a modest house. You really have no idea and IF you started out at the bottom like the rest of us, you should have a better feel for how hard it is to get out in the modern day. But I suspect you did not.

4
1
h4rm0ny
Silver badge
Paris Hilton

Minimum wage for >= 25 year olds.

I don't understand this one. Presumably it pushes employers to hire under 25's as much as possible for unskilled / low-skilled jobs? This is ostensibly a positive for 25 year olds but as far as I can see what it actually does is put increased pressure on them by making it even harder to escape the unemployment trap. Have I misread this?

4
1
h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Re: It's like the sixth form common room

>>"they are most probably still living with mum and dad"

That would be because house prices today are beyond most people's reach and consequently any available properties are snapped up by well-off people who buy them to let out. Frequently borrowing to fund their buy-to-let which further exacerbates the problem. Thus you get buying a house unattainable for most under the age of thirty-five and if rent it takes up half or more of what you actually earn each month.

So there are lots of people "still living with mum and dad" through little choice, even when they work.

6
1
h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Re: If you're an IT Contractor

Can you explain, please? I missed this one.

0
1

Call that a mugshot? Aussie model/fugitive asks rozzers for more flattering pic

h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Re: Good God !!

I've never had any trouble understanding amanfrommars1. Indeed, I have always liked the way they talk in accurate and informationally complete terms rather than through the layer of underlying social assumptions one must accept in order to understand most people's posts here.

3
0
h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Re: I am more concerned...

They can end up being used in the national press when you are investigated / wanted for a crime.

2
0

We tried using Windows 10 for real work and ... oh, the horror

h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Re: Are you ready? Probably not.

I don't think a Service Pack will fix this. The issues I have with it are fundamental design choices. Search bar integrated into the taskbar, hybrid and very cluttered Start Menu, Cortana intended to be a core part of the experience yet unusable unless you grant Microsoft permission to rifle through your emails and txt messages for supplementary information, the hideous inconsistency of settings between programs and OS, the unnecessary windowing of the formerly clean Metro interface.

I am for the first time in a while seriously considering switching back to GNU/Linux for my primary desktop needs.

16
1

Kali Linux 2.0 to launch at DEFCON 23

h4rm0ny
Silver badge
Thumb Up

Nice.

Will be very keen to see what they have for us.

2
0

ONE MILLION new lines of code hit Linux Kernel

h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Re: One million new lines...

>>"It seems that at least four of you don't know sarcasm when it hits you in the face"

Actually, I just figured you were trolling.

0
0
h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Re: One MEEELION lines…

No. A major version increase would be based on new functionality / interface changes. Simple improvements to the codebase (or complex ones!) don't merit that.

0
5

150,000 angry Redditors demand Chairman Pao's head on a spike

h4rm0ny
Silver badge

And the Internet Hate Machine rolls on.

Once some people get their Righteous Cause on, nothing but absolute submission will appease. And often not even then. A great many people get their superiority from being able to point out the faults of others.

11
1

Wikipedia jumps aboard the bogus 'freedom of panorama' bandwagon

h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Re: Brilliant Campaign Strategy

Or who remember your last post on this. ;)

9
0
h4rm0ny
Silver badge

2 minutes 21, there is false information. Jimmy Wales states that people aren't worried about strangers looking them up and finding old and regrettable things about them, they're worried about friends and family finding it out, and that these people will already know it.

Both parts of this are incorrect. As a person, what would concern me IS that something I did over a decade ago is going to come up every time I meet a stranger, whether that is a job interview, a new acquaintance, a date, whatever. Secondly, we make new friends all the time (at least most of us do) so again, they may not know what we were arrested for twelve years ago or whatever.

The issue, in a nutshell, is that up until now, the damage to how people see you of something diminished over time. It was possible to move on, rebuild your life or get past that.

With the popular indexing of search engines, that changes. You go for a job interview, start dating someone, try to make a friend and suddenly, just through typing in your name, they know that you were raped six years ago, or were arrested for assault, or that your partner died in an accident, or you programmed in Visual Basic or anything. And these things never go away - no matter how long ago, they are the first thing anyone knows about you defining the impression before you even arrive for your interview or whatever.

Regardless of one's position on this, what Jimmy Wales claimed in that interview is untrue. People ARE concerned about strangers knowing all these details about them and it is NOT the case that everyone in your social circle will already know something.

And anyone claiming that knowledge of this kind doesn't impact your life through how people treat you, plainly is familiar with a different type of human being than the species I live amongst.

14
0

NHS IT failures mount as GP data system declared unfit for purpose

h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Re: Employ their own consultants

>>"Perhaps it's time that the NHS and the civil service in general employed their own IT consultants direct."

In my experience with this area, in-house actual work is the last thing that they will do. There will be plenty of in-house people producing paperwork and looking busy, but it will all be just liaising with the third party company(ies) and waffle.

There are two reason they wont touch actual work in-house. The first is that there is a fair bit of corruption at the upper levels and the aim of a lot of this is to funnel money to outside parties. Oh they will tell people, even themselves, that they're actually spending it for good, but they will still ultimately be funnelling money to their friends. A lot of the SPINE and Connecting for Health was done under Health Secretary Patricia Hewitt, formerly board member of Accenture. Who got tonnes of money for these contracts? Accenture.

There are a lot of rules and regulations about spending in government. But once you get it out into the third party, accountability goes down the drain, it's essentially a firewall against investigation.

Which leads to the second big reason which is one of accountability. No-one in upper reaches of the NHS or Department of Health ever risks having the blame for something land on their desk. They ALL have bits of paper that show it's actually not their fault. Doing work in-house, runs directly counter to that. And yes, that even includes specification which you thought was harmless but no - if there's a clear specification done in-house and it turns out to have been flawed and can be blamed for the ensuing disaster by the outside company, then whoever was head of the department or team writing that specification is going to be hung out to dry by the government as an easy scapegoat. So even writing the specification is outsourced where possible. They'll hire an expert consulting company to help draft and develop the specs.

The one thing you have to understand, if you really want to know why things like this happen, is that the ONE overriding concern of everyone involved on the government side of this, is THEY MUST NOT BE ABLE TO HOLD ME RESPONSIBLE.

And so, no-one is.

16
0
h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Negligence.

The people in charge of this debacle should be prosecuted under the law. I used to work in the NHS. I left because of the sheer degree of corruption at the top. The NHS is filled with people who pointed out flaws with this program and others right from the start and said exactly where it was going wrong. Unfortunately they are all at the middle to bottom of the power structure and never listened to.

I and my project team could deliver better versions of the software components of Careall this for a twelfth the cost. But what would be our chances of even getting to the tendering stage? I will tell you for a fact it is zero.

21
0

UK.gov spied on human rights warriors at Amnesty International

h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Re: Disgusting

This is sadly not new. Some years ago, they were shown to have infiltrated that bastion of terrorism, the Green Party. Now I think wind turbines are as stupid just like most other people who have heard of nuclear power, but spying on our political parties on behalf of the New Labour (this happened under Blair, iirc), is not democratic behaviour.

17
0

Microsoft in Blighty reveals its 78 THOUSAND POUND Surface 3 slabloid

h4rm0ny
Silver badge

They should have used AWS which as we all know has solved the problem of users typing in the wrong information

1
0
h4rm0ny
Silver badge

Well...

Microsoft have been trying to emulate Apple for a while now, seems they're just carrying on that tradition.

13
1

Forums

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2018