At least they're up front
Other networks, such as 3, sell their plans as unlimited, but in the small print, their data limit is a paltry 500Mb.
3 dropped their limit from 1Gb to 500Mb and still sell it as unlimited. How is this legal?
86 publicly visible posts • joined 24 Jul 2008
If you have an unsecured signal, you're broadcasting to everyone.
No one is tapping into a line, you are shouting out your data to everyone within transmission radius. It's like Google has strolled past Speaker's Corner and is being punished for listening.
I'd be surprised if the author would just concentrate on the Evo's sales or no sales blip. It's pretty irrelevant given that the phone has sold out - I'm surprised they could even get that wrong. It's clearly not just IT guys that are buying Android phones.
How long is it until Android devices start sporting Apple's new screen? After all, it's not Apple's technology. But I haven't seen the new iPhone either, so I guess that means that any analysis is impossible.
No more of this FUD from MPEG LA. Google are encoding and delivering video with VP8 right now on Youtube, are you going to do something about it?
Because, quite frankly, the whispering campaign of FUDDY unmentionable submarine patents has been the most annoying itch, that we can now finally excise. It's time for MPEG LA to name those patents, for Google to challenge them, and for the open source community to work around them.
No more of this secret war bullshit. Let's get it into the open.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gizmondo#Smart_Adds
I don't know if that counts as prior art. But the concept of the use of location data to target advertising should not be patented, only specific implementations.
But then again, the USPTO are the biggest bunch of incompetent wasters around, who have about as much insight into technology as a dead rabbit.
We need fewer, and better patents to be filed. And fewer frivolous cover-alls. By increasing the cost of filing, you reduce the workload, and can allow more time to examine the patent.
How about having a system whereby some of the initial cost is paid back in reduced maintenance fees after an application is successful? That would deter against shotgun patent applications.
And whereas Joe the Plumber may tea party against increased taxes for the USPTO, corporations might not, especially if it means they don't have to waste as much money on defending from patent trolling.
The entire workings of open source projects are out in the open. If they infringe on patents, then the patent holders should be obliged to speak out and protect their inventions, in the same way trademark holders are forced to defend their marks which are otherwise lost. This will allow either the open source community to work around them, or for those patents to be challenged.
The situation as it is now, should never arise - that FUDdy patents loom over projects which are completely in the open is unacceptable. Microsoft should not be able to charge companies for using Linux, and yet keep those "infringing" patents secret, which only serves to promote their licensing carousel.
The US patent system needs serious reform, and this is only one small facet. The USPTO need to start hiring competent patent examiners for a start, so that fewer all encompassing obvious patents are granted. They need to seriously reexamine their criteria for granting software patents, in many cases, these are patents on ideas - not inventions.
And yet, every time patent reform comes up, the Union of Patent Examiners, speak out against it. They speak out against it, because it'd mean they'd actually have to do some work instead of rubberstampting everything, and hire some competent people who might not pay their union dues.
I totally agree zef, let's get this shit out into the open, so that the Open Source community can work around it, or fight.
What we're left with right now, are H264 licensors spreading FUD to protect their licensing revenues. Let's see what they actually have, so it can be addressed.
There should be protection for open source projects against submarine patents. In open source software, everything is available for anyone to see, there should be no excuse for the existence of submarine patents. In the same way that trademarks are ruled invalid if they are not defended, so should software patents against open source software.
The FTSE and NASDAQ are down 1% today, yet ARM is up 3.5%, for no other reason than this scurrilous bullshit. They really are taking everyone for muppets.
As has been pointed out already - this will not happen. Apple can't buy ARM because other tech giants with massive cash piles will take out blocking chunks of the company.
Microsoft, Google, and every other device manufacturer out there will buy up chunks the company if Apple were to attempt a purchase. The ARM board would be dead against an acquisition, I doubt they'd enjoy committing suicide for the sake of Apple dominance.
So it's impossible for Apple to acquire ARM, so they won't even try, regardless of the fit. So this rumour is bullshit, and yet their overbought stock is still up, on a down day. This idiot short termist gambling, based on unfounded speculation and rumour, is exactly what lead to the financial collapse.
Oh how we learn.
It's not going to happen. And it's not going to happen because Apple aren't the only tech giants around with significant cash piles.
Every other company - (Google, Microsoft, Nokia, Intel et al) would just gobble up enough chunks of ARM to block an acquisition. And you can be certain that the ARM board would be dead against committing suicide for the sake of Apple dominance.
This rumour is absolute bullshit.
The reason no one takes you seriously, is because you've taken the population of the earth, picked a random number, and then multiplied it together. It makes absolutely no sense.
You've also switched your original "end earth" argument to a pathetic strand regarding weapons research.
Do you remember the internet? It was created so a communications network could survive nuclear war, by making nuclear war more survivable, it upsets the MAD equation. I take it had you been around then, you'd be campaigning against that too.
Nuclear war possibility x Population of Earth = LEGAL HOLOCAUST
Luis Sancho is the guy who filed a lawsuit in Hawaii to stop the LHC being built, because he thinks it'll create a black hole which destroys us all.
He seems to have switched his line of argument to one against the dastardly military industrial complex.
Either way, he's a worthless crank.
http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings_manager06.html
As for Firefox addons, they already exist - Flashblock and AdblockPlus.
Flashblock makes Flash behave like it should (you have to click play for flash apps/video to run) - I wish browsers would do this by default. It stops your resources from getting raped, and cuts down on the seizure inducing advertisments.
The reason Wikipedia is so popular is because Google ranks everything in it at the top of all search results. The only way anyone is going to find out about knol is if they start fondling their Google-rithms to like it a lot more, this of course, will only take a matter of time.