£60K & it's not even valid markup...
Run it through the W3C validator for a laugh.....or not considering we paid for it. Similar scenario to the Olympic logo.
2 publicly visible posts • joined 3 Jul 2008
A far more useful and cost effective exercise would be to raise the profile/fund OpenStreetMap to the point at which The Ordnance Survey had to get real about their licence fees and charges.
Would both directly & indirectly save punters millions as well as creating a far broader/innovative open playing field to stimulate further UK geo-related business - all very trendy & web2.0 etc.