Google was an obvious front for spies for as long as they were more than a search engine. This merely gives the rest of the world good formal pretext to treat them accordingly.
88 posts • joined 29 Jun 2008
Other than that, "OMG we lost a rigged election, it must be evil sorcery!"
But also, they use Wwhat? http://xkcd.com/463/
May be a campaign, indeed. When did these start?
Short version -
SJWAL Second Law: SJWs Always Double Down.
Long version -
"Digital Maoism", like any socialist movement, is very fragile. Any time things go wrong for them, it's an existential threat. The more their dam breaks apart, the more it's obvious it was made of papier-mache to begin with. There's desperation.
They can't wait it out quietly, because for the crybullies there's no middle ground - they either ride triumphant or will be flushed down the drain. So they crank it up. Like this:
Right now there's a moment of true unity (and revel in the knowledge that for a while they are safe from each other) in a rush to save the rotting corpse of Pink Terror (very paltry breed of Red Terror) - each does however much they dare: one sets a girl on fire, another swings a bicycle lock, Lena Dunham tier starts new witch-hunts, and Kieren McCarthy tier does not have status (inside or outside the pack) enough for this, so they advertise a case of successful disemployment as far and wide as possible.
Re: I vote to add the clearly bigoted Kieren McCarthy in San Francisco.
> Actually you can condemn people for holding objectionable, indefensible, hurtful and unpleasant beliefs. And you should.
But when people here did exactly this, you protest again.
Specifically, it looks like a lot of the readers consider yet another variation of "I did not read Pasternak, but condemn him!" presented in your article an "indefensible and unpleasant belief" and, accordingly, condemn you for it.
You are in process of receiving a reward specifically prescribed by your own belief, according to yourself.
So what's your problem? That the people here are too decent, fastidious or lazy to burn you at the stake - or to disemploy you and then shriek and throw poo at you when you're down?
> Google management is not the first (nor will it be the last) to blunder down this mine-infested rocky road. It’s a case of smart people making dumb decisions.
Since it's Google with all its... antics, that's more a case of beast biting its own leg. With any luck, it will immobilise itself and then chew itself to death.
Re: Diversity for Diversity's sake?
Which exactly parts of the memo do you consider the most "awful"?
Re: now we see the conservatives move on to Bing
Unfortunately, leaving the polyticks alone does not work - they do not reciprocate.
Very few witch-hunts try to go after someone with a megaphone, because most of those that do backfire.
Re: I vote to add the clearly bigoted Kieren McCarthy in San Francisco.
So now Google will have to redefine another word. Not the first time.
Re: Opinion Piece
It looks like something from a CNN columnist carbon-copied to a wrong mailbox.
Re: Misconceptions, misinterpretations, fallacites, and flat-out fabrications
Why would a commissar allow anything to come "directly from the horse's mouth" when a strawman will suffice?
If we're in a simulation, someone hit it with a hammer, please: Milky Way spews up to 100 MEELLLION black holes
A bug in stretching things until they fall apart for the sake of cargo cult (scientism). Not the first time.
Google diversity memo: Web giant repudiates staffer's screed for 'incorrect assumptions about gender'
Re: Dare I say
It sounds like you support BOFH's Unequal Opportunities Policy!
He used to add "No offence." however. And even explained why.
Is it the same Google that censors results and hides search suggestions to catch any dirt falling on the socialists, and occasionally does even more laughable things, like redefining words in the dictionary?
Re: Pokemon not gone yet?
The concern is moot, but the company's money still exist.
Follow the money, not the concern.
The tune is familiar, the lyrics are never-ending.
Every problem, indeed, can be solved with "Everything can magically work out with some more tax money" and "Everybody must support degenerate clones of Lysenko".
And if it somehow remains, this only means there's need for more other people's money and more cheerleading for quacks-of-the-season (or both at once: throwing more other people's money at quacks).
THE POOL IS CLOSED DUE TO AIDS AND STINGRAYS (who also have aids) desu desu desu
He's right and has very good points.
But game-the-system potential is enormous.
Which place is the next to be DoS'd with the weaponized herds of weaboo?
Note that the risk of just helping the surprise party hosts is minimal, because the target audience can be easily chosen via fine-tuning content - the players of "1810: The Reconstruction", "Ponies & Unicorns" and "More Than One Way To Skin A Cat" are very unlikely to be the same crowd.
Re: "Because you can"
Perhaps need to add "yet another proposition" to ballots at the last moment would appear less often if they were made with less haste and more thinking through to begin with?
Can "WE MUST HAVE A VOTE ON IT RIGHT NOW" possibly be an actual problem more often than an attempt to push something right now because in another week more facts may become public and the campaign will go belly up?
Re: It's total bollocks
This can happen in any solution.
Same old? http://xkcd.com/463/
> Anybody can cram an illegitimate idea into a web page and – so long as it's encoded as AMP content – it'll look like it's from a legit new organization endorsed by Google.
Oh, come on… "legit" or "endorsed by Google"? It helped two most odious cargo cults, after all (Hubbard's and Mann's).
Your continued presumption to speak for "everyone" is noted.
Unity always seemed to me to be a pile of widgets built for one and only purpose of making Mac fanboys go "SQUEE!". It had a scrollbar miniaturized AND auto-hiding. What's the point?
I switched to XUbuntu immediately after getting over attempts to figure out how that weird thing which replaced window panel in Unity can be actually useable.
Re: no bias nor inflamatory tone, move along
>sorry, but when the author uses terms like "President Snowflake"
That's just SJWAL rule #3: "SJWs always project". =)
And we all know who pushes this particular scam.
>I mean, the data is out there, so how can ANYONE actually BELIEVE that CRAP???
Those who advertise it don't believe it themselves - except maybe "useful idiots" ("Do you want a cola with that?"). Which is why if you get all fired up, you are pretty much arguing with a TV screen.
Quoth interview of Patrick Moore, in the very Register (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/02/08/patrick_moore_greenpeace_dropout/):
> when I see the NGOs themselves in sackcloth and ashes, then I might put some truck by what they're saying.
> That was 12,000 NGOs – not counting the bureaucrats.
> There tens of thousands more bureaucrats. And there are four of five of these conferences a year.
> Yet here they are telling us we all must stop flying ...
That's fine. Siberia has more than enough of space for all the Climate Refugees™ who want to put the money where their mouths are and find the new home.
>I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade
> or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality
> the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most
> obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they
> lose once and for all their sense of probity.
> -Theodore Dalrymple
The promoters know well that the whole apocalyptic cult of the Hockey Schtick is a scam - or the biggest ones won't be frequent fliers.
Now, believing that everyone else is enough of an idiot that this scam will hold water even without witch-hunts and censorship - THAT's a desperate self-deception.
Indeed. Therefore what we see is likely to be yet another case of digging under something else entirely under pretence of an idolatrous scare.
Admittedly, it's not as big as "think of teh childern", "clean power", etc but the spirit can be the same on a smaller scale and while scamming a different crowd.
This bullshit is so old, it's completely fossilized.
"Surely THIS TIME one more stupid law will make an economical niche and problems that created it magically disappear" - watch Episode 99993.
So let me get this straight...
It's really cheaper to buy a bunch of lobbyist once than to introduce it as a corporate policy and have an admin competent enough to implement it?
Shortage of ashes? Samsung to the rescue!
Re: Lead by example
What will they do? USA is going to remain the Happy Hunting Ground for botnets no matter what.
In other words, the fattest server-side censorship provider on the whole internet points an accusing finger at two fattest client-side censorship providers in Australia.
While they are probably right about the prices, the author here have a curious way of picking the independent experts to heed.
Re: I get where they are coming from
It's only in the ancient Spectrum era you could get away with using a random cat.
To have servers healthy, or at least not bugging out for very long, you need to work a tambourine. Preferably with proper logos painted on it.
Funny. I would expect this from American uniderpsities, but a research center in Europe?
Where it rolls, indeed..
> In fact, at least one child was initially raised as a native speaker of Klingon."
Wait, whose head is screwed on in such a way that this looks like a good argument AGAINST the move? Oh, right - trekkies.
Or the education quality is bog-low in both cases, and it just becomes more noticeable?
So... "Duck Grinder" by Powerglove is just a minor artistic exaggeration?
I, for one, fed up with micro soft nonsense even at home long ago. But to have anything on air and get a pop up like this? The next time (on air) it would be something to the effect of "Bonus: installing Lubuntu for the beginners".
Re: The largest note is always 'too big', the 2nd largest is OK.
That's certainly n option.
It's not like anyone will abolish money and force all transaction via oligopoly of a few banks... it's just that the only money left legitimate are small coin practical only for kids to buy cola and train mugging skillz.
Re: Unlimited Overdraft
> On the other hand, if you're making your tenth, twentieth or thirtieth withdrawal of $10,000, which you know doesn't belong to you, and you can't pay back, surely at some point you're doing it with the intent of stealing it. The first time is a lucky accident, and a windfall. Can you still say that by the 20th?
This may be a good point assuming that the client in question is capable of keeping the tracks of money and things.
Do you really think it's a reasonable expectation given that she, well... apparently blew a note-worthy portion of these millions on fancy handbags of all things? She's a valley girl. :D
Thoughtcrime. She failed to tell her lords to stop pouring food in the trough, thus she clearly didn't feel "not entitled" to much.
Which is amusing, because quite obviously she managed to commit thoughtcrime via not thinking. Now that is a bad precedent they make, right here.
If its mission is basically "Spirit of Mawson 3.0", this name may be downright merciful.
But audience-wise... I just don't get it.
Sure, land-whales are traditionally considered more of Apple market, so not kissing up to them is not too great a surprise.
But for weeaboos X-box isn't the toy of choice either. So why did they think doing it Animu Style will be a great idea? Even fursuits would have more of a chance.
In other words, the usual: power creep.
Wasn't it much the same deal, only a bit louder, with "ritual murders" (in U$), "intellectual property" and "harassment"? There already are all laws needed and more, but somehow an astroturf campaign of obvious lunatics to make speshul exceptions was not waved away, but promoted.
In other words, the usual: power creep.
Maybe they would have extra clues if, say, someone supplied them with a photo of the tricky beast with the immediate surroundings.
When he is remembered doing something descendants of his International pets don't approve, not only he was born in Russia, but Besoshvilli is an ancient Russian surname.
> While Eurovision rules do not allow songs with "lyrics, speeches, gestures of a political or similar nature" - and indeed Georgia's 2009 entry We Don't Wanna Put In got into trouble
Therefore... uh... is there any possible conclusion other than "some biological objects are more equal than the others"?
> "This song is precisely what we are all suffering in Ukraine today."
So... did the strangers come to her house and kill her all, or did she simply ate her cake and then bemoan being robbed of it too? Please clarify.
Amusing, but only good for delivering a new sort of bird dropping all over those who won't do anything about it. As usual.
The butt of this joke are their birds.
Because electric shock is better at developing reflexes than food. How much a flash tube pumping circuit in cheap soap-box cameras does weigh?..