Re: because Microsoft do not call you.
And, not coincidentally, he lived on the Isle of Skye :)
6262 publicly visible posts • joined 18 Apr 2007
Another paypal user here - it's one place less that has a debit/credit card stored if I can purchase via a single on-line point (though it does, as pointed out above, make paypal an obvious target - so the card linked at paypal is deliberately restricted in its access to cash).
A couple of points:
- in the vast majority of cases, there is absolutely no need for a company to store *any* details about me, whether that be my name and address or my payment details. If there are legal requirements to log the purchase, then surely all that is needed is an encrypted record that the purchase has taken place.
- every company with whom I might deal on the internet seems to suffer from the delusion that I am now in a relationship with them. This is emphatically not the case. Each and every purchase is a single discrete event. I am quite happy to spend the couple of minutes that it takes to fill out the details each time, but it seems that my co-habitees on this planet are happy to take the risk of having their details stored willy-nilly throughout the world. (Admittedly, this would not have helped in a scraping case like this).
- STOP allowing random scripts to run. The majority are trackers in one form or another: you are under no obligation to allow yourself to be tracked. Others are potentially dangerous - particularly if they call other scripts - or annoying, in the case of every advert ever made. Allow only those scripts that *must* be run to run, e.g. payment services. As a courtesy detail, if a site presents an empty page unless its scripts are allowed, I consider that site broken by design and avoid using it.
is a navigation application.
There are no other circumstances in which the designer of an application knowing my location is of benefit to me, as opposed to something that can be monetised by the application provider.
Facebook is better with location. According to Facebook...
It powers features like check-ins and makes planning events easier. Perhaps if I used FB I would know what check-ins were - the only time I do those is at an airport (or more likely, before I leave for the airport). As for planning events... um, don't I know where I am?
It helps improve ads It makes them go away? I doubt it...
and keep you and the Facebook community safe. From whom? Are FB users being stalked by location-sensitive predators, or something?
Features like Find Wi-Fi You'd trust a random WiFi service with anything sensitive? And if so, how is this different from looking at the WiFi connections management details and picking one?
and Nearby Friends "Hello, group of friends - I'm in xxx. Anyone around?"
You are me and I claim my five pounds!
I will believe in car automation when I see one that can reliably drive from London to the outer Hebrides - including managing the ferries - in any weather, at any time of day, at any time if year. Fleshy meatbags can do that without any great effort...
Allowing the owner to perform basic maintenance without requiring a main dealer to tell the on board computer that the maintenance has been performed would be a good first start. I have a suspicion that the only reason we see so much of this crap - auto lights, auto wipers, lane following, controls for the radio five levels deep in menus (and my personal bete noir - touch screens completely lacking in haptic feedback) is there solely because software is cheap, and manufacturers have to have something to keep up with their competition. This kind of 'driver assistance' is a toy and should be treated as such - restrict it to constant speed cruise control (no, don't make it follow the white line or adjust its speed to the vehicle in front - *you* should be making decisions when you're the person in charge. And you should never, when behind the wheel of a car, not be in charge.)
I'd be quite happy if I could retrofit my 25 year old petrol drinker - I've got quite fond of it - with a battery pack and a motor of similar performance, at a sane price. That is, low thousands, not thirty or forty grand.
There is a reason lots of folks drive ten year old cars - and it tends to be that they either can't afford, or see no reason, to buy a new one. They're going to have to have a very strong reason to purchase a new electric vehicle, but inexpensive conversions make a lot of sense.
There are complaints that software is converting audio conversions of written text to, er, written text?
Isn't that how they started out in the first place? And is it in any way different from e.g. automated subtitles on broadcast TV or youtube and friends?
Maybe it's me, but the whole thing sounds like 'damn, I wish we'd thought of that'.
(Personally, I dislike 'audio books' but I would find this handy to help with a foreign language - one of the biggest difficulties I have is separating spoken words).
I don't want to see ads for TV's when I've just bought one and I'm reading about motorbikes. Or ads for dildo's when on a political news site (well, OK, I can see the relationship there). Or ads for cars on newegg, or on ebay if I'm browsing the knitting wool section. unless I explicitly look for them.
Fixed that for me, and perhaps for you.
To change to Libre Office, if you haven't done already. Pascal is entirely correct, but I can't help thinking that people have been gradually eased into paying rental for things they would previously have owned over the last couple of decades or so. After all, you hardly notice all those leeches already drinking away at your blood; you'll surely not notice another.
@Jake - the 13A fuse in a UK fused appliance isn't to protect you from electrocution (as I'm sure you know) - it's to protect you from fire in the event of a short in the appliance heating the conductors in either the flex or the house wiring. The fuse is in the plug rather than in the appliance so that if it blows because of a live-earth short in the appliance the appliance housing can not become live (if metal and not double insulated, it must be attached to earth).
A 13A fuse is rated to carry 13A fuse *forever*. The rating is such that the fuse itself does not dissipate more than one watt at the rated current. The higher the current; the faster it blows but it will take 20A (not just 13A) for ever - see graph at https://www.pat-testing-training.net/articles/fuse-operation-characteristics.php
As Mr Eel says... definite differences between live yeast vs dried yeast vs my fifteen year old starter, but the difference between the three is - apart from the sourness of the sourdough starter caused by opportunistic bacteria - largely down to differences in texture caused by the time it takes to rise. The sourdoughs are much slower than carefully developed bakers' yeasts, and that affects the hydrolisation of the flour and the final texture and taste (you can see this by making bread with a tiny amount of yeast, so it needs three or four hours to multiply enough to rise).
But to be honest, I feel that while the yeast choice has a huge effect on bread texture, the flour choice has much more effect on the taste.
And I'd like some of his starter... but there are so many yeasts in the environment that you're pretty much guaranteed to end up, after a few cycles of feeding and baking, with a 'local' yeast/bacteria blend no matter what your original yeast was.
Though he does claim sterile media, I'm finding it hard to believe in a yeast that's estivated for four thousand years with no admixture of more recent yeasts.
Runny bread time ---->
Of course they do. They provide *hours* of punditry while the experts debate what the result would be if they could believe the exit polls, then the results next morning, then more hours of pundits explaining why the polls were wrong.
Paper ballots are *made* for 24 hour TV.
(Anyone would think the results would be different if you stopped up all night to watch, instead of just waiting for the morning news...)
That was my first thought: the Consumer Rights Act requires that goods be 'fit for purpose' and it's hard to argue that a thousand quids worth of computer that dies after a year meets that standard - particularly when there are plenty of examples of other similar tech lasting five or more years. It strikes me that it is not for the vendor to define how long it should last unless explicitly stated at the point of purchase; the expectation is that of the customer based on previous experience. A one year guarantee is *not* a warranty that the device is only expected to last that long - if it was, would you buy one?
Sales of Goods act only applied until 2015 and has been superseded by the CRA which is supposed to be better for the consumer (but IANAL).
"Two thousand million or so years ago, at the time of the Coalescence, when the First and Second Galaxies were passing through each other and when myriads of planets were coming into existence where only a handful had existed before, two races of beings were already old; so old that each had behind it many millions of years of recorded history." - E. E. Smith
You just can't use seatbelts on an automated bus.
Even though it is a transport device which not only can but is likely to make sudden stops, you can't use seatbelts.
Even though they'd stop people falling out of their seats in the case that a sudden stop occurs, you can't use 'em.
And why? Because they're decades old mature technology that actually works. Not cool at all.
There seems to be this curious idea that money spent on space is 'wasted', as if dollar bills are being bundled up and launched into orbit. It seems to be forgotten somehow that each and every dollar spent in the Apollo programme (and since) was spent right here on Earth, and most if not all of it in America.