* Posts by Jock

4 posts • joined 25 Jun 2008

Google's boffins branded 'unacceptably ineffective' at tackling web piracy


Why cannot the banks instantly refund known Phishing scams, pretend 'Microsoft' security scams and coercion emails when people are suckered by these well known frauds?

Hacked climate Prof stands aside


They must be joking...


Hmmm. How to achieve this?

Let's ask Al and the Moonbat. Meanwhile, it is pretty chilly up here where the warming is 'supposed' to happen. At night. In the winter.

You, quite literally, couldn't make it up.

What's the cost of global warming?


alpha and omega

Thanks Evan. For the follow up as much as the article itself.

I am finding it increasing hard to stomach the alarmists. Pedantry would be the least of their sins. Hiding behind it would seem to be one of their best defenses.

Alarm is turning to fear. They cannot lead all of us to the slaughter so they are attempting to push.

I wish they could point to a weapons grade expose of CO2. I wish they could point to an engineer quality expose of CO2 atmospheric lifetime.

Instead they point to IPCC, rc, tamino and other blogs because anyone who creates dissonance is abruptly cast aside as retired, out of their field, previously proved second hand asbestos shouldn't be used to stuff children's toys, has a book out, worked for an oil company which now pays more to environmentalists than heretics, and other blathering tedious shite.

They have zero problem insisting that we should divert the major economies of the world to combat the phantom menace yet resist the infinitely cheaper option of debate.

They can all foxtrot oscar.

Veteran climate scientist says 'lock up the oil men'


Bring on the lawyers...

We actually need a court case over this. Let us sort out these lying scumbags once and for all. Get a set of the top criminal attorneys.

The charges?

Mislabelling, and the subsequent deliberate demonization of, CO2 as A) anything but the most vital part of the carbon cycle (without which none of us would be here to debate this loonies’ theories) and B) a "pollutant" that has been present in far, far greater concentrations than at present (and mankind would only benefit from getting even halfway toward those levels once more).

Withholding of taxpayer funded research methodology.

Falsification of taxpayer funded research results.

Misappropriation of taxpayer funded resources.

Obfuscation and deception.

Continuous, and malefic, extreme alarmism leading to "children having sleepless nights" worrying about mythological threats. There are many more of course.

Some questions:

Why is Hanson always described as a climate scientist? For that matter, why are any of the leading proponents of MMGW described as climate scientists?

James Hansen, B.A. Physics and Mathematics, M.S. Astronomy, Ph.D. Physics

Gavin Schmidt, Ph.D. Applied Mathematics

Michael Mann, Ph.D. Geology & Geophysics

Lonnie Thompson, Ph.D. Geological Sciences

Michael Oppenheimer, S.B. Chemistry, Ph.D. Chemical Physics

Steven Schneider, Ph.D. Mechanical Engineering and Plasma Physics

Alfred Gore, Duh. Refuses debate and questions

What’s this! The scientists crying shrilly that AGW is real and we must pay to stop it do not have degrees in climatology? Or even climate related sciences? Surely not?

Yet a publication like this [ http://www.tech-know.eu/uploads/AGW_hypothesis_disproved.pdf ] from Richard Courtney, a UN IPCC expert reviewer and a climate and atmospheric science consultant is ignored by the “free” press?

Why is NASA (historical)temperature data always being "reviewed" and "adjusted", mostly upward?

Why is NASA (current)temperature data nearly always double the other three standard datasets (Had/CRU, RSS and UAH)?

The world’s largest desert, Antarctica has the lowest level of water vapour on the planet, bar none. If CO2 caused warming it would have a proportionately greater effect in areas where there is little, or zero, water vapour[ http://brneurosci.org/co2.html ]surely we would have a large temperature anomaly right there? Continuously? Rather than record levels of ice?

If the oil companies, having spent soooo much money, have failed as miserably as the grant seekers and Malthusians to produce "evidence" about AGW is it not about time to drop the entire issue?

Why is the general population so dumb as to be unable to read between the lines and see the twin lie of peak oil/climate change for the spiteful, political tax exercise and control system that it most assuredly is.

The skull because hanson is toxic and working, or playing near it will damage your health.


Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019