Re: I'd be a bit concerend it I were Apple
LOL u mad?
14520 posts • joined 3 Jun 2008
LOL u mad?
Wir zeigen Ihnen, "noch eine Sache", Arschloch
This sounds double ominous in german. Was that really necessary?
Paul, is that you?
I remember that comic. There was a hitman cleaning out all the observatories to hide the fact that the world's gonna end in a month or so.
Yup, yup. Makes sense. Politicians would do ANYTHING to win the next election.
Doing business under fascism is always a tad difficult. You have to wiggle your arse and hustle...
Should have, could have.
I remember that idea was rejected because there was Hurd going nowhere fast, microkernels were starting to go out of fashion (sometimes someone dowloaded the Mach manual), and Linus wanted to have something situated in a known technical domain at useful levels of functionality fast. Hence, monolithic kernel.
It's the same as the difference between honest diplomacy and wargasm lies being pumped out by Judith Miller types, now being produced courtesy of AP.
Why is it called Blue Termite?
Is it a play on the Blue Ant company from the later William Gibson novels? (Pattern recognition and later novels)?
...duly published in Nature.
...they are being fined for not being precog enough?
"Yes, Mr. Anderson. It seems your department's work has not been up to the usual standards lately .... give money plox!"
Does their insurance cover that sort of event?
And do they screen animals like Cheney, Hillary and "Inspector Surge" Petraeus?
Hannah and her sweets have probably put paid to that
I WILL SAY. The person who formulated this as if he/she were hailing from the low-power bulb end of the Gaussian would have been sent for a ten-year stint of hard labor to Australia in more enlightened times!
Hannah has 6 orange sweets and some yellow sweets.
Overall, she has n sweets.
The probability of her taking 2 orange sweets is 1/3.
Prove that: n^2-n-90=0
NO BUT JUST NO. UNDERSPECIFIED; MISTAKES "CONCLUDING" FOR "PROVING"...
the Fracker companies have stolen away in the night, leaving cleanup to the state or town
I have read about this on AlterNet!
How can "the fracker companies" steal away? Don't they have a mailbox address? Maybe they are linked to the Bush family?
"My own personal computers, being highly secured and reliable, coupled with my knowledge of how to use them, would make me personally the equivillent of a nuclear power in a nuclear war."
This is basically the slightly more egocentric "Inna woods with AK-47 and Heintz Beans stash" equivalent of the US-centric zombocalypse.
who pretended Java was realtime
Learn2BasicComputerScience. I hope your not in the "industry" and posting from you stuudent account?
I don't think anyone pretended "Java" (the JVM) was realtime, though there ARE realtime reduced JVMs. Anyway, what has that to do with anything?
into chips with standards-based offerings
The one which RAMBUS gets the IEEE to standarize on whereupon PATENT SUBMARINES surface menacingly?
Man, I remember the article in "The Economist" about RAMBUS. Still have it probably on my HD. There were also a number of articles by El Reg's Andrew Orlowski back from 200, when he wrote about other things than crying artists.
Welcome to the Internet. The ride never ends here!
Hi Lenny, how's life behind the Great Firewall?
Lighten up and remember:
Bhopal Chernobyl Mayak that reality does not go away if one sits on it.
Most of the media would have been dragged away, yipee-ka-yay style, over Fukushima...
"Defence comes back to proper output encoding, and input validation."
Amen brother and"; DELETE FROM TABLE COMMENTS WHERE USER LIKE '%'
What did you expect? If you read between the lines and divide by the frequency of Foucault's Pendulum you will find that the Freemasons didn't ACTUALLY code fake malware in the Bermuda Triangle (because they are masons, not coders) but instead got them from relics found in a Mayan temple left by ancient astronauts, the location of which is shopped out on Google Maps.
We will now tune back to the discussion of several planes of Malaysian Airlines victims of P.U.T.I.N. and/or the hegemonistic faction of Reticulans.
I'm no mathematician, I've not calculated the number of possible collisions, or the size of the file.
There would not be many collisions. That's the point of a hash.
The number of file versions is not going to get particularly astronomical even if Microsoft is involved. For whitelisting, it sounds like a sure proposal.
Size of the file is irrelevant. Actually I would chunk it and hash the chunks.
But the important point is that these files have internal structure. DLLs are not big blob. Hash the various parts or have more interesting ways of checking. Pretty sure this must be done anway.
Yup, makes absolutely no sense for me either.
Google have also called out snakeoil vendors
Errmmm...... yeah. Oh well.
Rather certain some TLAs of "the West" (and possibly some of "the P.U.T.I.N.") would be happy with Kaspersky a smoking ruin. There would be less discoveries of weaponized software that one couldn't smooth-talk away by a short visit of Agent Smith.
In other news, why is General Odierno now talking up "a sustained war with Russia" on russian soil?
The Entrepreneurial State
Not that shit again. I'm using that book as
toilet paperrecycled it properly.
A state is ANYTHING but "entrepreneurial" BY ITS VERY NATURE OF THE PEOPLE WHO ARE MAKING UP THE DISCOMBOBULATED ORGANISATION.
It couldn't detect an opportunity if it bit it in the arse. Nepotism, colonization, vainglorious shit and the current thing à la mode are of course acceptable.
Yeah, it's "entrepreneurial" under the condition that infinite money can be allocated from the actually entrepreneurial side of the economy. And from time to time that side is killed off in a war or two.
She says big companies are unwilling to spend massive amounts of money in investment, but are happy to ride on the backs of government research and reap the rewards.
That dumb bitch should maybe check out how actual investment takes places.
R100 vs. R101
I can't find these EU forms? Where do I get them??
I can't imagine who would NOT want to walk away from Verisign. Getting it in a contract that you MUST sure would be relaxing.
It is claimed Kaspersky engineers took harmless Windows operating system files, manipulated them to appear as though they contained malware, and uploaded them to VirusTotal. The aim was to deceive non-Kaspersky antivirus engines into treating those system files as dangerous
I fail to see how this is possible. If you "manipulate Windows operating system files", they no longer ARE Windows operating files. And how does this deceive other antivirus engines? Does one mark certain strings in those files and tell the other engines "if you see those strings, quarantine the file"? And they do it? In the age of polymorphic virus, no less?
If you start getting false positives on OS files, then you have a big problem, and it has nothing to do with someone poisoning your well. It's more along the lines of being lazy or not having the right conduit to Microsoft.
There is no technical reason or excuse for the end of domain names to be limited.
Please read the recent articles on El Reg about the moronocalypse.
Are you the wife of $DEAR_DEPARTED, rebel leader of the somalian insurgent group of upper mallfuck, with 40'000'000 (FORTY MILLION US DOLLAR) in an undisclosed storage box?
I'm hurredly off to reserve .moneygrab and blog about it in financial and IT publications. #moneygrab NOW!
The chance of the above happening are at Kim Dotcom levels.
"Mom, I want to UNDERSTAND this cryptography stuff!"
"Don't you rather want to become a laywer? Or get employed at GDS?"
Well, ok. So you are being chased by a hovering UFO making noises generally ascribed to FUCKING MONSTER INSECTS OF THE CARBONIFER, so what's a honest-to-God mammal not reading "IEEE Spectrum" and rather certain that he's not currently on the Presidential Kill List going to do?
Probably act nonchalant and tweet about it...
An important OOP feature is type casting that converts one object type to another. Type conversions play an important role in polymorphism. It allows a program to treat objects of one type as another so that the code can utilize certain general or specific features within the class hierarchy. Unlike other OOP languages—such as Java—that always verify the safety of a type conversion using runtime type information (RTTI), C++ offers two kinds of type conversions: static_cast, which verifies the correctness of conversion at compile time, and dynamic_cast, which verifies type safety at runtime using RTTI. static_cast is much more efficient because runtime type checking by dynamic_cast is an expensive operation (e.g., 90 times slower than static_cast on average). For this reason, many performance critical applications like web browsers, Chrome and Firefox in particular, prohibit dynamic_cast in their code and libraries, and strictly use static_cast. However, the performance benefit of static_cast comes with a security risk because information at compile time is by no means sufficient to fully verify the safety of type conversions. In particular, upcasting (casting a derived class to its parent class) is always safe, but downcasting (casting a parent class to one of its derived classes) may not be safe because the derived class may not be a subobject of a truly allocated object in downcasting. Unsafe downcasting is better known as bad-casting or type-confusion.
Yes, we are still in the Middle Ages of Coding, with barely adequate programming languages, EULAs, witches, "here be dragons" and mandragore sprinkled all over everywhere, and bad reflexes (performance >> security) are still prevalent. But we are slowly getting there.
Some kind of new STD?
> Nuke 'em!!!!
Very inwise, grasshopper.
The reason the average user won't swap to Linux is the difficulty of finding drivers for their peripherals.
As opposed to here where you get drivers you didn't want for peripherals you didn't know you had delivered DIRECTLY FROM THE BIOS.
Built into the firmware on the laptops' motherboard is a piece of code called the Lenovo Service Engine (LSE). If Windows 7 or 8 is installed, LSE is executed before Windows is launched.
Presumably, if Windows 10 is installed, YOU are executed before Windows is launched.
Efforts to search the premises and treat the injured are a priority
Should be "search for the premises"?
Doing the ethical thing == Doing the thing you can get away with
(Also "Slavish following the law, in particular bad law", depending on context)
Isn't the issue that he made freely available the tool to exploit the problem
I thought it was a feature?
Think of how much money the world could save on security if we just made it against terms and conditions, why did no one come up with this brilliant idea before Zuck?
I hate to tell you, but legislators perform this feat of high intelligence about every 48h.
You know, there are actually people who think that Obama ordered the pullout from Iraq.
You can sell anything these days. Karl Rove was absolutely right.
And he was seen driving off with a productivity juggernaut!
And the cause? The FSF, and OSS. Whilst Richard Stallman can not just exist; but live a lucrative and privileged lifestyle whilst commanding exorbitant fees on the international after-dinner speaker circuit; 97% of those contributing long hours in their evenings and weekends -- having completed a long and underpaid day job -- to OSS; are burning themselves out to produces the flawed and endlessly forked OSS products that allow Richard Stallman to live the high life.
Thank you fucking arsehole for dismissing work that may be done for fun and learning and not necessarily for profit (though some OSS work IS done for profit) and reducing it to the catchy "you are performing unpaid work for Stallman" meme. Congrats. You are the cancer.
If you want to understand what happens when creative works are distributed for free; ask a journalist; or a musician.
Journalists and musicians are not working for free (well, sometimes thy are, same thing really). They may be working in a branche that rewards mediocrity, works on bad model or in which it is hard to make a living but that is another problem entirely.
No-one forces you to use OSS of any quality level whatsoever. You are free to shell out maximum dollar for any software you like, for a quality level you can set. Only getting Windows from a company that has golden teeth of the X-Box kid but that disclaims reponsibility in an EULA? Tough. Then order bespoke. Not enough money? Sucks to be you.
Now Fuck Off And Die in an Orlowski thread.
Am I reading excerpts from "Stand on Zanzibar" again? Goddammit, John!!