> law-abiding Russian equivalent of the FBI
The FBI ... law-abiding?
Say, I have a nice bridge, you may be interested...
All power centers work the same.
15010 posts • joined 3 Jun 2008
> law-abiding Russian equivalent of the FBI
The FBI ... law-abiding?
Say, I have a nice bridge, you may be interested...
All power centers work the same.
Well, what do you think?
"Oh no it's that misbegotten son of you-know-who. Can you drop a hint to persons upstairs that he should stop this bullshit, maybe?"
I'm still working on my first USD 17m. When I arrive, I will need USD 25m for the same purchasing power.
But the following month (i.e. April 2011) the Feds – and Seleznev – suffered a serious setback. The Russian was seriously injured in a terrorist attack while holidaying in Morocco, and spent several months in a coma.
Weird coincidence, that. Who is controlling Moroccoan terrorists?
Attacks could be indiscriminate and could target foreigners. In April 2011, 17 people were killed and 25 injured in a large explosion caused by a bomb in Marrakech at the Argana Restaurant in Djema el-Fna Square.
Change the skillset? Too many people think
Too many people may think but it still takes committment and money. Plus, it's not only the language, but the whole system around: IDE, libraries, principles, architecture, O'Reilly Books.
Plus, quite a few developers cannot even properly write code in the language in which they are supposed to be the master, I have seen things you wouldn't believe.
The galactic enrichment will be great, I tell you. Why, quite a lot of stars have extragalactic-sounding names already.
up to one million light years away
That's smaller than the local group by quite a bit: Local Group
It basically includes the "dwarf galaxies" around The Galaxy, and yes these are regularly hoovered up for stray materials if not swallowed whole.
cooperative multithreading was similarly disparaged by purists
Well, those purists noticed that one deep-stack call or one long-running or even never-returning function would mess your system up badly. This low-budget approach was thus rightfully thrown into the river.
OS got processes and even threads which were scheduled by the CPU, so every code could play in its garden, safely. The world breathed in relief.
Now we are back where we started because someone made the decision to throw away task switching and replace it with the illusion of optimizing aways context switching overhead. Of course context switching overhead does not magically go away at all, you have just moved it from the OS to your runtime like a first-semester student.
As Vagg described, Node developed out of creator Ryan Dahl's observation that most programming is biased toward blocking-style code, where operations happen in a linear order. Node favors non-blocking, asynchronous programming, which turns out to be a much better way to deal with data that may or may not be immediately available when requested. Blocking code stops while it waits for data; non-blocking code can deal with other tasks.
Protip: "stops while it waits for data" means the CPU is given to other tasks in a thread/process-oriented way, "non-blocking code can deal with other tasks" means you have to do the context switch yourself and schlep the mess of the callback handler around too. Enjoy not using an OS for what it is meant for.
"Asynchronous programming is much more like we interact with the world," said Vagg.
Are these people just completely confused or are they actually so intelligent that they are just dumb again?
"Node.js is emerging as a universal development framework for digital transformation with a broad diversity of applications"
It's not unlike a bog then. I wonder how many billions went down the drain in this particularly horrible IT fad driven by Google and other more-money-than-sense outfits? The fact that "developers" are ready to use this language for a "diversity of applications" also speaks volumes about the commen sense levels in this "industry". It's like digging one's own grave in the swamp of technical debt.
There is not even a need to "hack the phones" as everything passes through switches tapped by TLAs.
This "transcribing" business sounds schizophrenic.
Reminds me of the antiwar protests of 2010 or so where "micro-drones" the size of dragonflys were spotted. No use explaining to the "seers" over the 'net that technology for this is about 20 years away or so, They were probably dragonflys if they existed at all.
I have this quote which I wanted to post:
"We reached the Onion Singularity years ago; kind of like the Turing Test, it’s when the average reader can no longer reliability differentiate between “serious journalism” and satire"
(This was written in cotext with Congratulations to the Red Cross for Beating Donald Trump at His Own Game: Racism, but it applies here.
In China, "draconian" means burning down cities to shut up revolting citizens of dubious ethnicity.
But I'm not gonna get worked up about enforced surveillance of the Muslim Far West of the PRC. Actually, I let the NGOs take care of that.
Grin and bear it.
It's like the New Deal: A total catasrophe implemented by crazies bringing nothing but pain & destruction that everyone will laud as the best idea ever after some time.
And truth be told, I am starting to appreciate it as it simpklifies life a lot in certain cases. It is the right direction to take. Not sure whether it is the right way to take it.
Let's do this. Installing KDE spin now...
Hoorrorific if true.
But why is all that information even IN a single database?
And what happens now? Free credit monitoring??
more money than God
Everyone has more money than God.
Unfortunately that's the sort of "money" that is falling off the printing presses like dog turd.
If the West (or the "Western Elites") would stop their pretend-rich Keynesianism and would stop borrowing from the future (at "zero interest", hah!) it would quickly become clear that people are selling their house for cheap tat from Shenzen.
Anyone know wheter the person in charge of information management is a young and eager lion ready to prove his chops? (Not likely to be a she, right?)
If so it is likely that he will be told to stop having dumbass attacks soon.
Information management is best when applied sparingly. Become crass and people will be pushed to the tipping point and start to complain about it.
Yes, that struck me too.
Plus backchaining and forward chaining is now merging in LPS.
It's about time.
Yes, I know, a very primitive version of this existed in PLANNER in the 60's as Carl "I invented everything, but earlier" Hewitt keeps saying.
Also, "Blackboard Architectures". These are VERY 80s. Basically a device useful when you don't really know how to attack a problem and the solution is "throw specialized agents at it that shall communicate via a common database know as a blackboard". How exactly the inter-agent communication should be formalized was never really spelled out. I still have the Addison-Wesley Fat Book "Blackboard Systems", maybe I should have it scanned and put online. I would imagine that today problems would be more often solved by additional fat injections of appropriate mathematics in search and optimization so that one knows what one is computing and can even get performance stats.
I remember an article from 1996 in NewScientist:
(paywalled! and I have no longer a subscription!)
AFAIR, it was based on neural networks being rejigged at random to "generate creative ideas".
The "Creativity Machine®" is actually a registered trademark of Imagination Engines Inc. There are also patents and stuff: IEI's Patented Creativity Machine® Paradigm
IEI's Patented Creativity Machine® Paradigm
"The simple, elegant, and inevitable path to human level machine intelligence and beyond, the Creativity Machine Paradigm, US Patent 5,659,666 and all subsequent foreign and divisional filings."
It is a depressing thought that the "simple, elegant, and inevitable path to human level machine intelligence" can actually be patented.
This doesn't even pass the smell test. Any smell test.
Plus, there seem to be laws demanding that people protesting do so in declared "free speech zones" (directly behind the dumpster, down that alley). Apparently these are ok?
I hope this black robe donner gets corrected.
They are not laws, they are changes to the constitution, and, being in effect, articles of the Constitution.
Hassabis said: "Building systems capable of general artificial intelligence means developing algorithms that can learn from raw data and generalise this learning across a wide range of tasks.
I do think that reaching General Artificial Intelligence as opposed to task-targeted Artificial Intelligence (whoich immediately is relabeled "automation" once it hits the real world) is a rather extreme goal. Also, farther away than a few funding rounds.
Unless there really is hardware from the future in the vault...
Twitter General Counsel Vijaya Gadde said that lack of diversity is a vicious cycle and discourages women from advancing in their fields.
“They’re withdrawing from the process, because they’ll walk into the room and the interview panel is all men,” she said.
But what of they are culturally diverse men and members of the LGBT "community"? Would that help?
Probably not a problem.
Havens said the IEEE P7000 Standards aim to allow organizations to demonstrate that their products conform to a high level of ethics.
This excursion into nonfunctional requirements will lead to rampant "badgering" (from "Fairtrade AI" to "This city is ETHICAL AI managed"), irate mobs of dumbs proclaiming "Someone's Lives Matter", lawsuits by no-win no-fee attorneys, special patrolling by auditors / state outfits / profiting not-for-profit organizations, and from the religious corner and extremist political spectrum fatwas and other assorted declarations if not burning of factories or people.
Further afield, the IEEE missed the occasion to call these the "H9000 Standards".
Even air-gapped systems can fall prey to targeted attacks.
Well, you know, there are targeted attacks and then there are Targeted Attacks which demand a large investment up-front that even cybermobster are unlikely to deploy.
Well, it might be, but it will hopefully be hardcore germanic with a strong link to Russia and plugged directly into the New Silk Road.
And, you know. Not ethnomasochistic.
It's a law about companies on Earth dealing with mining in space, in particular property and taxation aspects.
This is just standard.
Unfortunately we are very far away from having viable space mining tech.
The way things are going, maybe infinitely away. Well, I have confidence the Chinese can pull something off eventually.
Replaced shortly before 16:58 by the sandy version.
Come on El Reg.
Yup, but not in the next 600 millions years.
It's actually a picture of Anti-Rakis, where everything is reversed, sand is water, the Harkonnen are the good guys and the Atreides are evil terrorists that need to be defuned/sanctioned.
A bit like in the newspapers.
This assumption is correct.
The problem is that there is correctly zero tech to do any sort of space mining whatsoever, and you will have to touchdown in China or the US or the Africa-reformatted-by-China, and thus pay "landing taxes"...
It also doesn't agree with Luxembourg's anti-nuclear stance. Chemical rocket space mining? I laugh. Now, if the next law allows plutonium reprocessing to begin in the industrial wastelands of its southern part, I will change my current sarcastic stance.
Interestingly, Peter Marquez served as director of space policy under presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama
Looks pretty junior. I don't know what he got paid for his efforts, pretty sure it must be a 7-number figure. It sounds like he has one of those close-to-State revolving door jobs that are amply rewarded for emitting Word documents.
Of course it was a Grey area.
And it will stay that way, goddammit.
"I have exposure to the most cutting edge AI and I think people should be really concerned about it,"
Stop talking to Eliza, dude.
Meanwhile actually content-holding discussion:
Ray Kurzweil, Rodney Brooks, and others weigh in on the future of artificial intelligence
Rodney Brooks (Chairman and CTO, Rethink Robotics) says (and that's a guy who REALLY sees cutting-edge AI):
"When will we have computers as capable as the brain?"
Rodney Brooks’s revised question: When will we have computers/robots recognizably as intelligent and as conscious as humans?
Not in our lifetimes, not even in Ray Kurzweil’s lifetime, and despite his fervent wishes, just like the rest of us, he will die within just a few decades. It will be well over 100 years before we see this level in our machines. Maybe many hundred years.
"As intelligent and as conscious as dogs?"
Maybe in 50 to 100 years. But they won’t have noses anywhere near as good as the real thing. They will be olfactorily challenged dogs.
"How will brainlike computers change the world?"
Since we won’t have intelligent computers like humans for well over 100 years, we cannot make any sensible projections about how they will change the world, as we don’t understand what the world will be like at all in 100 years. (For example, imagine reading Turing’s paper on computable numbers in 1936 and trying to project out how computers would change the world in just 70 or 80 years.) So an equivalent well-grounded question would have to be something simpler, like “How will computers/robots continue to change the world?” Answer: Within 20 years most baby boomers are going to have robotic devices in their homes, helping them maintain their independence as they age in place. This will include Ray Kurzweil, who will still not be immortal.
"Do you have any qualms about a future in which computers have human-level (or greater) intelligence?"
No qualms at all, as the world will have evolved so much in the next 100+ years that we cannot possibly imagine what it will be like, so there is no point in qualming. Qualming in the face of zero facts or understanding is a fun parlor game but generally not useful. And yes, this includes Nick Bostrom.
Yeah about that,
Self-loathing Murricans butthurt that Mexico lost its territory:
Mexico is now a victim ripe for reparations.
Hey, maybe the UK can get some pieces back, too?
I always though that WWII transformed Japan into crazy self-punishing animeland, but apparently this can be bettered.
> Naming your kid Jesus is not cool, think of going through school being called Jesus and the constant "Jesus" jokes as an adult.
I think that would be borderline anti-semitic.
I had to overtake it at 90mph+ with a "lead foot" praying that nothing else flies out of the top of the skip during the 15 or so seconds to do so
Captain Wedge Antilles, I presume?
Using a signed time_t allows you to use time_t for both datetime, and for a duration. This is useful in procedural languages like C, however most OO languages use a separate DateTime and Duration types.
That has nothing to do with OO vs. procedural.
It's just what you want your bit pattern to MEAN.
I suppose there is no ulterior motive and its motivations are as pure as driven snow?
I hope they will take up the Afghan "surge" next (laughably, 5000 dudes and dudettes to be shipped over to check whether the local IED industry is still top notch)
Referring to the extraordinary news that Donald Trump Jr had taken a meeting with a Russian government lawyer offering damaging information on his father's presidential rival – and then repeatedly lied about it
You see, dear author. You cannot accuse others of cynicism when you yourself are providing "facts" that just aren't, embiggened with fast-breathing partisanship.
> "extraordinary news"
A prior judgement. Is this news "extraordinary"? Really. I doubt it. But adding adjectives is a nice way of penetrating the filters of the target audience.
> a meeting with a Russian government lawyer
Shock! Ties to Russia! Well, let's cite RT (and why not, it's better than Vox and shit along that line)
Natalia Veselnitskaya was almost certainly not representing the Kremlin when she courted baby Trump. Rather she was lobbying on behalf of a client, mixed up in the Sergei Magnitsky case [a very politicised case that seems to be smokescreened by everybody involved]. To that end, the ex-UK tabloid hack Robert Goldstone exaggerated her usefulness to attract Donald Jr.’s attention. By Trump's own account, he quickly sussed this distorted pretext and pulled back. Plus, it’s worth mentioning how she’s also engaged plenty of Democrats as part of her campaign.
So, did she deliver on La Madame? As far as we are being told, she didn't.
> and then repeatedly lied about it
Should Mr. Trump Jr. have accepted the meeting? Heck no. Did he break "campaign finance laws"? Doubtful. Did he lie? It seems so, as he did not correctly disclose the content or the subject of the meeting. But let's be realistic: It frankly sounds like a set-up. Would you really tell world & dog that a russian lawyer has contacted you about oppo, when fingers are already being pointed at you with the accusation that your ties are less clean than they should be?
> £128m ($168m) in the red.
How is that even possible? Just melt the metal casings and recover most of the value.
Yeah, sounds convenient.
Maybe one wants to look into "services provided but not documented" for various State agencies.
This is a teaser for Half-Life 3, right?
If Tardigrades are Earth's most resilient species, who knows what else is out there?
Well, either nothing or more tardigrades?
You just need a centrally held map on how the hell you are supposed to look like and rebuild rthe organism around that. It would even fix the cancer problems.
Nature is too distributed.
How the holy hell do you run on ammonia?
It might be useful as reaction mass for space-going vehicles (like in 2001), but on Earth?
It's highly toxi and volatile, too.
Lafferty's "Interurban Queen" was a short story with a very Progressive Obamite/Hillarite Outlook:
“Lafferty depicts an America where electric interurban transport had won out over the automobile, which the group-centred interurbanites have outlawed. The picture he paints is of a friendly, idyllic land free of urban blight, agriculture and industry being blended into lovely, evenly-populated “quasiurbia”, unified by convenient public transport. But it is also a land where competition having yielded completely to cooperation, the individualist and the loner are not tolerated; and those who persist in driving bootleg cars are considered incorrigible menaces to society, whom it is the duty of all right-thinking citizens to shoot on sight in approved vigilante manner. What makes “Interurban Queen” so remarkable, though, is the incredible tonal balance with which Lafferty handles the two sides of this question: I cannot tell, even with inside knowledge of Lafferty's personal politics, where his sympathies lie — probably a historic first in s-f of this type.”
—Sheryl Smith, Riverside Quarterly Vol. 7 No. 2 (1982)
Come on, you know this was just a 'mercial to put Weka.io on the map.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017